References
- Barbara Streisand Vs. Kenneth Adelman Et. Al., Case no. SC077257, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
- CHIPIDZA, W., JIE, Y. “Does Flagging Potus’s Tweets Lead to Fewer or More Retweets? Preliminary Evidence from Machine Learning Models.” [online]. Available at: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/69hkb/.
- Fuchsmann v Germany, App no. 71233/13, the European Court for Human Rights. The European Court of Human Rights.
- Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González, C131/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:317.
- Google Transparency report. Request for removal of content under EU privacy rules [online]. Available at:
- Google trends [online]. Available at: https://trends.google.as/trends/explore?q=costeja%20gonz%C3%A1lez&date=all
- HAMUĽÁK, O., KOCHARYAN, H., KERIKMÄE, T. The Contemporary Issues of Post-Mortem Personal Data Protection in the EU after GDPR entering into Force. Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law, 2020, vol. 11, pp. 225–238. ISSn 1805-0565.
- HERN, A. Lords Describe Right to be Forgotten as „unworkable, unreaseonable, and wrong.“ [online]. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/30/lords-right-to-be-forgotten-ruling-unworkable
- JEFFREY, R. The Web Means the End of Forgetting. [online]. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/magazine/25privacy-t2.html
- JONES, M. L. Ctrl + z the right to be forgotten. new York: new York University Press, 2016. 267 pp.
- KIERAN, M. Media ethics: A philosophical approach. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 1999. 184 pp.
- KOCHARYAN, H., VARDANYAN, L., HAMUĽÁK, O., KERIKMÄE, T. Critical Views on the Right to be Forgotten after the Entry into Force of the GDPR: Is it Able to Effectively Ensure our Privacy? International and Comparative Law Review. 2021, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 96–115, DOI: 10.2478/iclr-2021-0015
- Krone Verlag Gmbh & Co. KG v. Austria. Case no. 34315/96.
- LEE, E. „Recognizing Rights in Real Time: The Role of Google in the EU Right to be Forgotten.“ UC Davis Law Review. 2015, vol. 49, no. 3, p. 1017–1096.
- MAYER-SCHÖNBERGER, V. Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in The Digital Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011. 249 pp.
- MYERS, C. Digital Immortality vs. „The Right to be Forgotten“: A Comparison of U.S. and E.U. Laws Concerning Social Media Privacy. Romanian Journal of Communication & Public Relations. 2014, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 47–60.
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance).
- Request form for removal of personal data [online]. Available at:
- SCRIVENS, Ryan and coll. Detecting Extremists Online: Examining Online Posting Behaviors of Violent and Non-Violent Right-Wing Extremists [online]. Available at:
- Similiarweb.com [online]. Available at: https://www.similarweb.com/
- Transparency Report [online]. Available at: https://transparencyreport.google.com/eu-privacy/overview
- XUE, M. The Right to be Forgotten in the Media: A Data-Driven Study. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. 2016, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 1–14.