Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unleashing Innovation in Rural Areas: Insights from Quadruple Helix Case Studies Cover

Unleashing Innovation in Rural Areas: Insights from Quadruple Helix Case Studies

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Adams, R. M., Hurd, B. H., Lenhart, S. & Leary, N. (1998). Effects of global climate change on agriculture: an interpretative review. Climate Research, 11(1), 19–30.
  2. Afrakhteh, H. & Azizi, S. (2020). The role of science and technology parks in creating jobs for rural women (Case study: Sistan and Baluchestan Science and Technology Park). Woman in Development & Politics, 18(3), 407–429. DOI: 10.22059/jwdp.2020.306721.1007870.
  3. Ali, M. A. (2022). Smart city policy in developing countries: Case study of the new administrative capital in Egypt. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(S1), e2774. DOI: 10.1002/pa.2774.
  4. Allahar, H. & Sookram, R. (2019). A University Business School as an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Hub. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(11), 15–25. DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1280.
  5. Bhattacharjya, B. R., Bhaduri, S. & Kakoty, S. K. (2023). Co-creating community-led frugal innovation: An adapted Quadruple Helix? Technovation, 124, 102752. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102752.
  6. Bosworth, G. & Salemink, K. (2021). All hubs and no spokes? Exploring the potential of hubs to sustain rural and regional development. Local Economy, 36(7–8), 543–550. DOI: 10.1177/02690942221097027.
  7. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  8. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
  9. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. DOI: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597.
  10. Butt, S. A., Rava, K., Kangilaski, T., Pappel, I. & Draheim, D. (2021, 2021). Designing A Digital Collaborative Platform for the Silver Economy: Inception and Conceptualization, In 2021 Eighth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 47–54). DOI: 10.1109/ICEDEG52154.2021.9530937.
  11. Calzada, I. (2019). Local entrepreneurship through a multistakeholders' tourism living lab in the post-violence/peripheral era in the Basque Country. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 11(3), 451–466. DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12130.
  12. Carayannis, E. G. (2009). “Mode 3” and “quadruple helix”: toward a 21st century fracta. Intrnational Journal of Technological Management, 46, 201–234. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374.
  13. Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F. J., Meissner, D. & Stamati, D. (2018). The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. R&D Management, 48(1), 148–162. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12300.
  14. Carayannis, E. G. & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 212–239. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8.
  15. Casale Mashiah, D., Beeri, I., Vigoda-Gadot, E. & Hartman, A. (2023). Responsible research and innovation in Europe: empirical evidence from regional planning initiatives in Austria, Norway, and Spain. European Planning Studies, 31(9), 1949–1974. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2023.2170215.
  16. Cornish, F., Breton, N., Moreno-Tabarez, U., Delgado, J., Rua, M., de-Graft Aikins, A. & Hodgetts, D. (2023). Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3(1), 34. DOI: 10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1.
  17. Crescenzi, R. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2017). The Geography of Innovation in China and India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 1010–1027. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12554.
  18. Cromartie, J. (2017). Rural areas show overall population decline and shifting regional patterns of population change. In Amber Waves: The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America. Washington, DC., US Department of Agriculture.
  19. Crowley, F. & McCann, P. (2018). Firm innovation and productivity in Europe: Evidence from innovation-driven and transition-driven economies. Applied Economics, 50(11), 1203–1221. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2017.1355543.
  20. da Costa Mineiro, A. A., de Castro, C. C. & do Amaral, M. G. (2023). Who Are the Actors of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix? Multiple Cases in Consolidated Science and Technology Parks. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 4691–4709, DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01184-1.
  21. da Silva, I., Bricca, D., Andrea Micangeli, D., Davide Fioriti, D. & Paolo Cherubini, D. (2021). Triple helix as a strategic tool to fast-track climate change adaptation in rural Kenya: A case study of Marsabit County. In Leal Filho, W., Oguge, N., Ayal, D., Adeleke, L. & da Silva, I., eds., African Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation (pp. 1873–1895). Cham: Springer.
  22. Devarakonda, S. (2016). Hub and spoke model: making rural healthcare in India affordable, available and accessible. Rural and Remote Health, 16(1), 3476.
  23. Devine-Wright, H. & Davies, A. R. (2023). What role for citizens? Evolving engagement in quadruple helix smart district initiatives. Urban Planning, 8(2), 70–80. DOI: 10.17645/up..v8i2.6351.
  24. Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Global environmental change, 23(1), 61–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.08.003.
  25. Dotti, N. F., Fratesi, U. & Oberst, C. (2024). Regional economic theories as drivers of the EU Cohesion Policy. In Dotti, N.F., Musiałkowska, I., De Gregorio Hurtado, S. & Wałczyk, J., eds., EU Cohesion Policy (pp. 30–46). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: 10.4337/9781802209402.
  26. Eder, J. & Trippl, M. (2019). Innovation in the periphery: Compensation and exploitation strategies. Growth and Change, 50(4), 1511–1531. DOI: 10.1111/grow.12328.
  27. Esteves, A. M., Genus, A., Henfrey, T., Penha-Lopes, G. & East, M. (2021). Sustainable entrepreneurship and the Sustainable Development Goals: Community-led initiatives, the social solidarity economy and commons ecologies. Business strategy and the environment, 30(3), 1423–1435. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2706.
  28. Fabbri, E. (2016). Strategic planning and foresight: the case of Smart Specialisation Strategy in Tuscany. Foresight (Cambridge), 18(5), 491–508. DOI: 10.1108/FS-06-2015-0036.
  29. Foray, D. (2014). Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
  30. García-Terán, J., & Skoglund, A. (2019a). A Processual Approach for the Quadruple Helix Model: the Case of a Regional Project in Uppsala. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(3), 1272–1296. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-018-0521-5.
  31. Goetz, S. J. & Han, Y. (2020). Latent innovation in local economies. Research Policy, 49(2), 103909. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103909.
  32. Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M. & Martin, B. R. (2008). Creative Knowledge Environments. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 196–210. DOI: 10.1080/10400410802060018.
  33. Hervás-Oliver, J.-L., Parrilli, M. D., Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Sempere-Ripoll, F. (2021). The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU. Research Policy, 50(9), 104316. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104316.
  34. Höglund, L. & Linton, G. (2018). Smart specialization in regional innovation systems: a quadruple helix perspective. R & D Management, 48(1), 60–72. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12306.
  35. Irungu, R. W., Liu, Z., Liu, X. & Wanjiru, A. W. (2023). Role of networks of rural innovation in advancing the sustainable development goals: a quadruple helix case study. Sustainability, 15(17), 13221. DOI: 10.3390/su151713221.
  36. Irvine, J., Stewart, L., Karacsonyi, Z., Szabó, T., Kolehmainen, J., Alarinta, J. & Norberg, A. (2014). Innovation Strategy Development For Remote, Rural And Less Favoured Regions. In Practitioners Proceedings 2014 University-Industry Interaction Conference: Challenges and Solutions for Fostering Entrepreneurial Universities and Collaborative Innovation (pp. 51–70). Amsterdam: University Industry Innovation Network.
  37. Kindon, S., Pain, R. & Kesby, M. (2007). Participatory action research: Origins, approaches and methods. In Kindon, S., Pain, R. & Kesby, M., eds., Participatory action research approaches and methods (pp. 35–44). Abingdon: Routledge.
  38. Kolehmainen, J., Irvine, J., Stewart, L., Karacsonyi, Z., Szabó, T., Alarinta, J. & Norberg, A. (2016). Quadruple Helix, Innovation and the Knowledge-Based Development: Lessons from Remote, Rural and Less-Favoured Regions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 23–42. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-015-0289-9.
  39. Kraus, S., Breier, M. & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16, 1023–1042. DOI: 10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4.
  40. Kriz, A., Bankins, S. & Molloy, C. (2018). Readying a region: temporally exploring the development of an Australian regional quadruple helix. R&D Management, 48(1), 25–43. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12294.
  41. Lew, Y. K., Khan, Z. & Cozzio, S. (2018). Gravitating toward the quadruple helix: international connections for the enhancement of a regional innovation system in Northeast Italy. R & D Management, 48(1), 44–59. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12227.
  42. Lew, Y. K. & Park, J.-Y. (2021). The evolution of N-helix of the regional innovation system: Implications for sustainability. Sustainable Development, 29(2), 453–464. DOI: 10.1002/sd.2143.
  43. Li, Y., Westlund, H. & Liu, Y. (2019). Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 135–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003.
  44. Lindberg, M., Danilda, I. & Torstensson, B.-M. (2012). Women Resource Centres – A Creative Knowledge Environment of Quadruple Helix. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 36–52. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-011-0053-8.
  45. Mahroum, S., Atterton, J., Ward, N., Williams, A. M., Naylor, R., Hindle, R. & Rowe, F. (2007). Rural innovation. London: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts.
  46. Makkonen, T. & Kahila, P. (2021). Vitality policy as a tool for rural development in peripheral Finland. Growth and Change, 52(2), 706–726. DOI: 10.1111/grow.12364.
  47. Malhi, G. S., Kaur, M. & Kaushik, P. (2021). Impact of climate change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: A review. Sustainability, 13(3), 1318. DOI: 10.3390/su13031318.
  48. Malva, J. O., Amado, A., Rodrigues, A., Mota-Pinto, A., Cardoso, A. F., Teixeira, A. M., Todo-Bom, A., Devesa, A., Ambrósio, A. F. & Cunha, A. L. (2018). The quadruple helix-based innovation model of Reference Sites for Active and Healthy Aging in Europe: The Ageing@ Coimbra case study. Frontiers in Medicine, 5, 132, DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00132.
  49. Martínez, M., Katte, K., De Andrés, A. M., Ribera, A., Arnal, L., Carné, J., Rodríguez, P., Carrion, C., Alenyà, G., Vilaró, J., Serrano, J., Fuertes, O., Fornt, A. & Inzitari, M. (2023). Barcelona Aging coLLaboratory (BALL): an open-innovation ecosystem to co-create and test innovative solutions for older people in real-life settings. International Journal of Integrated Care, 23(S1), 612. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.ICIC23236.
  50. Merrell, I., Phillipson, J., Gorton, M. & Cowie, P. (2022). Enterprise hubs as a mechanism for local economic development in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 93, 81–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.05.016.
  51. Nicolopoulou, K., Karataş-Özkan, M., Vas, C. & Nouman, M. (2017). An incubation perspective on social innovation: the London Hub – a social incubator. R&D Management, 47(3), 368–384. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12179.
  52. Nordberg, K. (2015). Enabling Regional Growth in Peripheral Non-University Regions – The Impact of a Quadruple Helix Intermediate Organisation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(2), 334–356. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-015-0241-z.
  53. Nordberg, K., Mariussen, Å. & Virkkala, S. (2020). Community-driven social innovation and quadruple helix coordination in rural development. Case study on LEADER group Aktion Österbotten. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 157–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.001.
  54. Our Common Agenda Policy Brief 11 (2023). New York, NY: United Nations.
  55. Page, M., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., Mulrow, C., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E., Brennan, S., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M., Li, T., Loder, E., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S. & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71). DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
  56. Reidolf, M. & Graffenberger, M. (2019). How local resources shape innovation and path development in rural regions. Insights from rural Estonia. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 15(3), 131–162. DOI: 10.7341/20191535.
  57. Rodríguez-Soler, R., Uribe-Toril, J. & De Pablo Valenciano, J. (2020). Worldwide trends in the scientific production on rural depopulation, a bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix R-tool. Land Use Policy, 97, 104787. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104787.
  58. Rosyadi, S., Sabiq, A., Ahmad, A. A. & Yamin, M. (2021). The Cross-Sector Collaboration for Development Policy of Rural Creative Economy: The Case of Bengkoang Creative Hub. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 8(1), 10–21. DOI: 10.18196/jgpp.811339.
  59. Rowan, N. J. & Casey, O. (2021). Empower Eco multiactor HUB: A triple helix ‘academia-industry-authority’approach to creating and sharing potentially disruptive tools for addressing novel and emerging new Green Deal opportunities under a United Nations Sustainable Development Goals framework. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 21, 100254. DOI: 10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100254.
  60. Schmidt, P. G., Díaz-Puente, J. M. & Bettoni, M. (2022). How rurality influences interactive innovation processes: lessons learnt from 15 case studies in 12 countries. European Planning Studies, 30(12), 2595–2617. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2022.2043832.
  61. Schütz, F., Heidingsfelder, M. L. & Schraudner, M. (2019). Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation, 5(2), 128–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.002.
  62. Shrivastava, P. & Kennelly, J. J. (2013). Sustainability and place-based enterprise. Organization & Environment, 26(1), 83–101. DOI: 10.1177/1086026612475068.
  63. Steiner, A., Calò, F. & Shucksmith, M. (2023). Rurality and social innovation processes and outcomes: A realist evaluation of rural social enterprise activities. Journal of Rural Studies, 99, 284–292. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.006.
  64. Szarka, N., García Laverde, L., Thrän, D., Kiyko, O., Ilkiv, M., Moravčíková, D., Cudlínová, E., Lapka, M., Hatvani, N., Koós, Á., Luks, A. & Martín Jimenez, I. (2023). Stakeholder Engagement in the Co-Design of Regional Bioeconomy Strategies. Sustainability 15(8), 6967. DOI: 10.3390/su15086967.
  65. Thomas, A. & Paul, J. (2019). Knowledge transfer and innovation through university-industry partnership: an integrated theoretical view. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(4), 436–448. DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2018.1552485.
  66. Tomasi, S., Szávics, P., Aleffi, C., Ferrara, C., Márton, A., Urbančíková, N., dos Santos, P., Ribeiro, A., Cavicchi, A. & Hudec, O. (2022). Drivers and challenges of RIS3-related university engagement: Insights from five European regions. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(1), 12567. DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12567.
  67. Van Der Valk, T. & Gijsbers, G. (2010). The use of social network analysis in innovation studies: Mapping actors and technologies. Innovation, 12(1), 5–17. DOI: 10.5172/impp.12.1.5.
  68. van Ginkel, K. C. H., Botzen, W. J. W., Haasnoot, M., Bachner, G., Steininger, K. W., Hinkel, J., Watkiss, P., Boere, E., Jeuken, A., de Murieta, E. S. & Bosello, F. (2020). Climate change induced socio-economic tipping points: review and stakeholder consultation for policy relevant research. Environmental Research Letters, 15(2), 023001. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6395.
  69. Van Horne, C. & Dutot, V. (2017). Challenges in technology transfer: an actor perspective in a quadruple helix environment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 285–301. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-016-9503-6.
  70. Walker, G. & Devine-Wright, P. (2008). Community renewable energy: What should it mean? Energy Policy, 36(2), 497–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019.
  71. Wigger, A. (2023). The New EU Industrial Policy and Deepening Structural Asymmetries: Smart Specialisation Not So Smart. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(1), 20–37. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13366.
  72. Wiggins, S. & Proctor, S. (2001). How special are rural areas? The economic implications of location for rural development. Development Policy Review, 19(4), 427–436. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7679.00142.
  73. Wiltshier, P. & Edwards, M. (2014). Managing knowledge transfer partnership for a rural community: the outcomes at Wirksworth, UK. Kybernetes, 43(3/4), 629–651. DOI: 10.1108/K-07-2013-0128.
  74. Yoda, N. & Kuwashima, K. (2023). Regional Innovation Led by the Fourth Helix: a Case of Sake Development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01582-5.
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 135
Submitted on: Jun 10, 2024
Accepted on: Nov 29, 2024
Published on: Jun 30, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Melissa Spiers, Julieanna Powell-Turner, Kennedy Mutua, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.