Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Governance and Development Policy Dimensions of the Success of Rural Proofing Cover

The Governance and Development Policy Dimensions of the Success of Rural Proofing

European Countryside
Volume 17 (2025): Issue 3 (September 2025)
By:
Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Atterton, J. (2008). <em>Rural proofing in England: A formal commitment in need of review</em> [discussion paper]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Atterton, J., Korcekova, V. et al. (2022). <em>A framework of rural proofing actions: Final output 2022</em>. Milanówek: European Network for Rural Development.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bryce, B. (2024). <em>Rural proofing: Lessons from OECD countries and potential application to health</em> [OECD Regional Development Papers, No. 73]. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1787/4011899a-en." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1787/4011899a-en.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Cameron of Dillington, E. (2015). <em>Independent rural proofing: Implementation Review</em>. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Estèbe, P., Desjardins, X. &amp; Hodent, C. (2024). <em>Rural areas and rural policy in Europe. Comparative approach to five countries: Germany, Spain, Estonia, Ireland and Poland. Summary.</em> Paris: Agence Nationale de la Cohésion des Territoires.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Finta, I. &amp; Horeczki, R. (2023). Characteristics of rural development programmes in peripheral regions. <em>Tér és Társadalom</em> 37(3), 53–76. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.37.3.3504." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.17649/TET.37.3.3504.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Finta, I. (2022). Development trends and implementation of the overall development policy principles of the European Union in Hungary. <em>Új Magyar Közigazgatás</em> 15(2), 1–19.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Greer, A. (2023). Countryside Issues: A Creeping Crisis. <em>Parliamentary Affairs</em> 56(3), 523–542. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/parlij/gsg104." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/parlij/gsg104.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Jones, P. (2022). Rural proofing – an elusive concept? <em>Town and Country Planning.</em> pp. 345–349.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Lowe, P. &amp; Ward, N. (2007). Sustainable rural economies: Some lessons from the English experience. <em>Sustainable Development</em>, 15(5), 307–317. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.348." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/sd.348.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. McGlynn, D., ed. (2017). <em>Rural Connections. Focus on Rural Proofing.</em> Luxembourg: Publication Office of the EU.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Murdoch, J., Lowe, P., Ward, N., Marsden, T. (2003). The differentiated countryside. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Nieto, A., Alonso, C. (2017). 25 Years of the Leader Initiative as European Rural Development Policy: The Case of Extremadura (SW Spain). <em>European Countryside</em> 9(2), 302–316. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0019." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/euco-2017-0019.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Nordberg, K. (2021). Distributed Rural Proofing – an essential tool for the future of rural development? <em>Sociologia Ruralis</em> 61(1), 141–162. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12316." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/soru.12316.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Pazos-Vidal, S. (2019). <em>Subsidiarity and EU multilevel governance: Actors, networks and agendas</em>. London, New York: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Pemberton, S. &amp; Goodwin, M. (2010). Rethinking the changing structures of rural local government– state power, rural politics and local political strategies? <em>Journal of Rural Studies</em> 26(3), 272–283. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.12.005." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.12.005.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Pollermann, K., Aubert, F., Berriet-Solliec, M., Laidin, C., Lépicier, D., Vu Pham, H., Raue, P., Schnaut, G. (2020). Leader as a European Policy for Rural Development in a Multilevel Governance Framework: A Comparison of the Implementation in France, Germany and Italy. <em>European Countryside</em> 12(2), 156–178. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2020-0009." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/euco-2020-0009.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Rewhorn, S. A. (2019). <em>A critical review of rural proofing in England</em> [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Chester.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Sherry, E. &amp; Shortall, S. (2019). Methodological fallacies and perceptions of rural disparity: How rural proofing addresses real versus abstract needs. <em>Journal of Rural Studies</em> 68, 336–343. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.005." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.005.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Shortall, S. &amp; Alston, M. (2016). To rural proof or not to rural proof: a comparative analysis. <em>Politics &amp; Policy</em> 44(1), 35–55. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12144." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/polp.12144.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Shorthall, S. &amp; Sherry, E. (2017). <em>Briefing paper one: Preliminary recommendations to assist with the development of a guidance framework and monitoring framework for rural proofing related to the Rural Needs Act</em>. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Centre for Rural Economy, Newcastle University.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Shortall, S. &amp; Sherry, E. (2018). <em>Rural proofing in Northern Ireland</em>. An overview and recommendations on guidance, implementation and governance. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Centre for Rural Economy, Newcastle University.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Shortall, S. &amp; Brown, D. L. (2019). Guest editorial for special issue on rural inequalities: Thinking about rural inequalities as a crossnational research project. <em>Journal of Rural Studies</em> 68, 213–218. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.001." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.001.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Shucksmith, M. (2018). Re-imagining the rural: From rural idyll to Good Countryside, <em>Journal of Rural Studies</em> 59, 163–172. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.019." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.019.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Thuesen, A. &amp; Nielsen, N. (2014). A Territorial Perspective On EUś Leader Approach In Denmark: The Added Value Of Community-Led Local Development Of Rural And Coastal Areas In A Multi-Level Governance Settings. <em>European Countryside</em> 6(4), 307–326. DOI: DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2014-0017." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/euco-2014-0017.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Woods, M. (2011). <em>Rural</em> (2<sup>nd</sup> ed.). Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844304." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4324/9780203844304.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Atterton, J. (2022). <em>Analytical overview of rural proofing approaches and lessons learned</em>. ENRD Thematic Group Rural Proofing – Background document. European Network for Rural Development. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://ec.europa.eu/enrd/sites/default/files/tg-rp_background_paper-rural_proofing-jane_atterton_220127.pdf.pdf">https://ec.europa.eu/enrd/sites/default/files/tg-rp_background_paper-rural_proofing-jane_atterton_220127.pdf.pdf</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. ÁROP 1.1.22.-2012-2012-0001 (2013). „<em>The modernisation of local public services for competitiveness</em>”. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://arop.rkk.hu/">https://arop.rkk.hu/</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. CE (Council of the European Union) (2025). Special Committee on Agriculture: Implementing the rural proofing principle.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. CoR (European Committee of the Regions) (2022). Rural proofing – a foresight framework for resilient rural communities <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://ldnet.eu/rural-proofing-a-foresight-framework-for-resilient-rural-communities/">https://ldnet.eu/rural-proofing-a-foresight-framework-for-resilient-rural-communities/</ext-link> (Accessed date 03/03/25).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2008). <em>Rural challenges, local solutions: Building on the Rural Delivery Pathfinders in England</em>. A report by Defra on behalf of the Rural Delivery Pathfinders, (London).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2022). <em>Rural proofing: Practical guidance to consider the outcomes of policies in rural areas</em>. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6388a51bd3bf7f32848cbc3d/rural-proofing-guidance.pdf">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6388a51bd3bf7f32848cbc3d/rural-proofing-guidance.pdf</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2024). <em>Delivering rural opportunity: third report on rural proofing.</em> Policy Paper. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-rural-opportunity/delivering-rural-opportunity-third-report-on-rural-proofing">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-rural-opportunity/delivering-rural-opportunity-third-report-on-rural-proofing</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. ENRD Thematic Group (TG) on Rural Proofing (2022). <em>Rural proofing actions at different levels.</em> Key considerations. Outcomes of the 2nd Thematic Group meeting: 19/05/2022. European Network for Rural Development. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://ec.europa.eu/enrd/sites/default/files/2nd_enrd_tg_rural_proofing_summaryboard_0.pdf">https://ec.europa.eu/enrd/sites/default/files/2nd_enrd_tg_rural_proofing_summaryboard_0.pdf</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. European Economic and Social Committee (2014). <em>Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Community Led Local Development (CLLD) as a tool of Cohesion Policy 2014–20 for local, rural, urban and peri-urban development (exploratory opinion at the request of the Greek Council presidency</em>) (2015/C 230/01). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2015.230.01.0001.01.ENG">https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2015.230.01.0001.01.ENG</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Gardiner, B. (2019). <em>Select Committee on the rural economy</em>. Corrected oral evidence: Rural Economy: Tuesday 22 January 2019 11.30 am [minutes of meeting]. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/rural-economy-committee/ruraleconomy/oral/95525.html">https://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/rural-economy-committee/ruraleconomy/oral/95525.html</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Gaugitsch, R., Messinger, I., Neugebauer, W., Schuh, B. and Toptsidou, M. <em>et al.</em> (2022) <em>Rural proofing – a foresight framework for resilient rural communities</em>. (Brussels: European Committee of the Regions). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://ldnet.eu/wp-content/uploads/bsk-pdf-manager/2022/06/Rural-Proofing_CoR_coter_nat_rural.pdf">https://ldnet.eu/wp-content/uploads/bsk-pdf-manager/2022/06/Rural-Proofing_CoR_coter_nat_rural.pdf</ext-link>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. GRANULAR (2024). D 5.1 Guidelines for the rural proofing of transition policies in Europe. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.ruralgranular.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GRANULAR_D5.1_Guidelines_for_the_Rural_Proofing_of_Transition_Policies_in_Europe.pdf">https://www.ruralgranular.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GRANULAR_D5.1_Guidelines_for_the_Rural_Proofing_of_Transition_Policies_in_Europe.pdf</ext-link>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Hall, H. and Gibson, R. (2016). <em>Rural proofing in Canada: An examination of the rural secretariat and rural lens</em>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://ruraldev.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/RuralProofinginCanada-HallGibson.pdf">https://ruraldev.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/RuralProofinginCanada-HallGibson.pdf</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. House of Lords (2019). <em>Time for a strategy for the rural economy</em>. House of Lords Paper 330, Select Committee on the Rural Economy. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldrurecon/330/330.pdf">https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldrurecon/330/330.pdf</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Jackson, S. and Clarke, R. (2003). <em>Proofing rural lifelong learning</em>. Project Report. (London: Birkbeck College, University of London). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/9582/1/2003_JacksonClarke_ProofingRuralLLL-TEXT.pdf">https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/9582/1/2003_JacksonClarke_ProofingRuralLLL-TEXT.pdf</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. KÖFOP-2.1.2-VEKOP-15 (2019). “Public Service Reform Underlying Good Governance” Finta, I. (2019) Dimensions of self-government ability at the municipal level. (Budapest: Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://nkerepo.uninke.hu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/14691/Finta_Az_onkormanyzasi_kepesseg_dimenzioi.pdf;jsessionid=4AFC28AB8376EFFE3CFFF855354BAED8?sequence=1">https://nkerepo.uninke.hu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/14691/Finta_Az_onkormanyzasi_kepesseg_dimenzioi.pdf;jsessionid=4AFC28AB8376EFFE3CFFF855354BAED8?sequence=1</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Kommun Forbundet (2016). Landsbygdspolitik och landsbygdssäkring – i Finland, Norge, Storbritannien och Kanada. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.kommunforbundet.fi/ekonomi-ochlivskraft/livskraft/landsbygdspolitiken-och-landsbygdsutveckling">https://www.kommunforbundet.fi/ekonomi-ochlivskraft/livskraft/landsbygdspolitiken-och-landsbygdsutveckling</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023 (2023). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/55/enacted">https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/55/enacted</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Mantino, F., Forcina, B., Vironen, H., Fonseca L. and Kahila, P. (2023). <em>Review of rural proofing instruments and experiences in European and non-European countries</em> [A deliverable of the RUSTIK project]. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://rustik-he.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/D1.3-Report-on-rural-proofing-1.pdf">https://rustik-he.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/D1.3-Report-on-rural-proofing-1.pdf</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. OECD (2011). <em>OECD rural policy reviews: England, United Kingdom 2011</em>. OECD Rural Policy Reviews. (Paris: OECD Publishing). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264094444-en" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264094444-en</a>">https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264094444-en</ext-link>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. OECD (2014). <em>Innovation and modernising the rural economy</em>. OECD Rural Policy Reviews. (Paris: OECD Publishing). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264205390-en" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264205390-en</a>">https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264205390-en</ext-link>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. OECD (2020). Section 4: ‘Implementing the rural well-being policy framework: Guidelines and the institutional picture of OECD countries’. In: <em>Rural Well-being: Geography of Opportunities.</em> (Paris: OECD Publishing) pp. 139–177. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9f760bc0-en.pdf?expires=1724338769&amp;id=id&amp;accname=guest&amp;checksum=DBE7F17789650D00F7F125149B323CE0">https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9f760bc0-en.pdf?expires=1724338769&amp;id=id&amp;accname=guest&amp;checksum=DBE7F17789650D00F7F125149B323CE0</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Parnell, W. and Lynch, C. (2022). <em>Proposals for an effective rural proofing model for Ireland</em>. Department of Rural and Community Development. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.gov.ie/en/collection/06a3d-rural-proofing-proposals-for-a-rural-proofing-model-for-ireland/">https://www.gov.ie/en/collection/06a3d-rural-proofing-proposals-for-a-rural-proofing-model-for-ireland/</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Pazos-Vidal, S. (2022). ‘<em>Rural proofing in Spain’</em>. Presentation to the First Meeting of the European Network for Rural Development’s Thematic Group on Rural Proofing, Jan. 2022. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/tg1-rp_conclusions_of_the_g100_rural_proofing_initiative_from_spain_pazos-vidal.pdf">https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/tg1-rp_conclusions_of_the_g100_rural_proofing_initiative_from_spain_pazos-vidal.pdf</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Prime Minister’s Office (2023). <em>Finnish Council of regulatory ompact analysis, Annual review 2022.</em> (Helsinki). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/164804/VNK_2023_6.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y">https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/164804/VNK_2023_6.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of The European Parliament and of The Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32021R1060">https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32021R1060</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Rural Vision (2024). Rural Proofing. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://rural-vision.europa.eu/action-plan/cross-cutting/rural-proofing_en">https://rural-vision.europa.eu/action-plan/cross-cutting/rural-proofing_en</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Woods, M., Heley, J. and Goodwin-Hawkins, B. (2018). <em>The ROBUST conceptual framework</em>: A Guide for Practitioners (ROBUST Deliverable 1.5). (Prifysgol Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth University). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://research.aber.ac.uk/en/publications/the-robust-conceptual-framework-a-guide-for-practitioners-robust-">https://research.aber.ac.uk/en/publications/the-robust-conceptual-framework-a-guide-for-practitioners-robust-</ext-link> (Accessed date 05/06/24).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2025-0027 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 535 - 553
Submitted on: Apr 15, 2024
Accepted on: Apr 15, 2025
Published on: Oct 7, 2025
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
governance methods,
administrative cycle,
EU development policy,
territorial sensitivity,
coordination
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2025 István Finta, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 17 (2025): Issue 3 (September 2025)