Social Innovation in Rural Development Policy: Strengthening Participation, Representation and Accountability
By: Gary Bosworth
, Ruth McAreavey and Matt Kennedy
, Ruth McAreavey and Matt Kennedy 
References
- Atterton, J., McMorran, R., Glass, J., Jones, S. & Meador, E. (2020). The role of the LEADER approach post-Brexit [Technical Report]. Aberdeen: Rural Policy Centre, Scotland’s Rural College.
- Bock, B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4), 552–573. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12119.
- Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
- Bosworth, G., Price, L., Annibal, I., Sellick, J., Carroll, T. & Shepherd, J. (2016). Empowering Local Action through neo-endogenous development: The case of LEADER in England. Sociologia Ruralis 56(3), 427–449. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12089.
- Bund, E., Gerhard, U., Hoelscher, M. & Mildenberger, G. (2015). A methodological framework for measuring social innovation. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 40(3), 48–78. DOI: 10.12759/hsr.40.2015.3.48-78.
- Castro-Arce, K. & Vanclay, F. (2020). Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 45–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010.
- Cejudo, E. & Navarro, F. (2020). Neoendogenous development in European rural areas. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
- Chatzichristos, G. & Perimenis, A. (2022). Evaluating the social added value of LEADER: Evidence from a marginalised rural region. Journal of Rural Studies, 94, 366–374. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.07.016.
- Dainienė, R. & Dagilienė, L. (2016). Measurement of social innovation at organisation’s level: theoretical issues. Economics and Business, 29(1), 96–103. DOI: 10.1515/eb-2016-0027.
- Dargan, L. & Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(3), 274–291. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x.
- Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J. & Maye, D. (2016). The Leader programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), 56–68. DOI: 10.1177/096977641490425.
- Esparcia, J. & Abbasi, F. (2020). Territorial governance and rural development: challenge or reality? In Cejudo, E., Navarro, F., eds., Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas: Results and Lessons (pp. 33–60). Cham: Springer.
- Finta, I. (2023). Comments on the European Court of Auditors’ Special Report on the Leader Programme. European Countryside, 15(2), 328–345. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2023-0018.
- Gonçalves, M. S., d’Angelo, M. J. & Rocha, R. G. (2022). Generating shared value: intersection between organisations that invest in social innovation. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(8), 1505–1519. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-05-2020-0201.
- Grieco, C., Michelini, L. & Iasevoli, G. (2015). Measuring value creation in social enterprises: A cluster analysis of social impact assessment models. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1173–1193. DOI: 10.1177/0899764014555986.
- Hall, M., Millo, Y. & Barman, E. (2015). Who and what really counts? Stakeholder prioritization and accounting for social value. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7), 907–934. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12146.
- Hämäläinen, P. & Németh, S. (2021). The Finnish way of CLLD: place-based or half-hearted implementation? European Planning Studies, 30(5), 879–898. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.198049.
- Hietschold, N., Voegtlin, C., Scherer, A. G. & Gehman, J. (2023). Pathways to social value and social change: An integrative review of the social entrepreneurship literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(3), 564–586. DOI: 10.1111/ijms.12321.
- Husu, H. M. & Kumpulainen, K. (2019). Promoting neoliberal ideology in Finnish rural community development: the creation of new moral actors. Local Government Studies, 45(6), 893–912. DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2019.1635015.
- Hwang, K. (2016). Cost-benefit analysis: its usage and critiques. Journal of Public Affairs, 16(1), 75–80. DOI: 10.1002/pa.1565.
- Kibler, E., Fink, M., Lang, R. & Muñoz, P. (2015). Place attachment and social legitimacy: Revisiting the sustainable entrepreneurship journey. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 3, 24–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2015.04.001.
- Konečný, O., Šilhan, Z., Chaloupková, M. & Svobodová, H. (2020). Area-based approaches are losing the essence of local targeting: LEADER/CLLD in the Czech Republic. European Planning Studies, 29(4), 619–636. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1764913.
- Konečný, O. (2019). The leader approach across the European Union: One method of rural development, many forms of implementation. European Countryside, 11(1), 1–16. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2019-0001.
- Kroeger, A. & Weber, C. (2014). Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 513–540. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2012.0344.
- Lashitew, A. A., Narayan, S., Rosca, E. & Bals, L. (2022). Creating social value for the ‘base of the pyramid’: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(2), 445–466. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-0471-2.
- McAreavey, R. (2009). Community Regeneration: An Elite or a ‘Real’ Community Space? International Planning Studies, Volume 14(3), 311–327. DOI: 10.1080/13563470903481627.
- McAreavey, R. (2022). Finding rural community resilience: Understanding the role of anchor institutions. Journal of Rural Studies, 96, 227–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.014.
- Mirosa, M., Mainvil, L., Horne, H. & Mangan-Walker, E. (2016). The social value of rescuing food, nourishing communities. British Food Journal, 118(12), 3044–3058. DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-04-2016-0149.
- Moreno, F., Flores, J., Díaz-Puente, J-M. & Bettoni, M. (2024). Contribution of Leader Community Initiative to People’s Quality of Life: A Case of Thirty Years Application in Rural Spain. European Countryside, 16(2), 183–203. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2024-0011.
- Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. & Hamdouch, A. (2014). The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Moulaert, F. & Nussbaumer, J. (2005). The Social Region: Beyond the Territorial Dynamics of the Learning Economy. European Urban and Regional Studies 12(1), 45–64. DOI: 10.1177/0969776405048500.
- Mulgan, G. (2010). Measuring Social Value. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(3), 38–43. DOI: 10.48558/NQT0-DD24.
- Müller, O., Sutter, O. & Wohlgemuth, S. (2020). Learning to LEADER. Ritualised performances of ‘participation’ in local arenas of participatory rural governance. Sociologia Ruralis, 60(1), 222–242. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12287.
- Mulloth, B. & Rumi, S. (2022). Challenges to measuring social value creation through social impact assessments: the case of RVA Works. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(4), 528–549. DOI: 10.1108/JSBED-06-2021-0219.
- Neumeier, S. (2017). Social innovation in rural development: identifying the key factors of success. The Geographical Journal, 183(1), 34–46. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12180.
- O’Hagan, A., MacRae, C., Hill O’Connor, C. & Teedon, P. (2020). Participatory budgeting, community engagement and impact on public services in Scotland, Public Money & Management, 40(6), 446–456. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1678250.
- Olmedo, L. & O’Shaughnessy, M. (2023). A Substantive View of Social Enterprises as Neo-endogenous Rural Development Actors. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 34(2), 209–221. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-021-00442-7.
- Pappalardo, G., Sisto, R. & Pecorino, B. (2018). Is the partnership governance able to promote endogenous rural development? A preliminary assessment under the Adaptive Co-management approach. European Countryside, 10(4), 543–565. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2018-0031.
- Pel, B., Haxeltine, A., Avelino, F., Dumitru, A., Kemp, R., Bauler, T., Kunze, I., Dorland, J., Wittmayer, J. & Jørgensen, M. S. (2020). Towards a theory of transformative social innovation: A relational framework and 12 propositions. Research Policy, 49(8), 104080. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104080.
- Perez, J. E. (2000). The LEADER Programme and the rise of rural development in Spain. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2), 201–207. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00142.
- Pollerman, K. (2014). Processes of cooperation in rural areas: obstacles, driving forces, and options for encouragement. In Kasabov, E., ed., Rural Cooperation in Europe: In Search of the ‘Relational Rurals’ (pp. 210–227). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Ray, C. (2006). Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU. In Cloke, P., Marsden, T. & Mooney, P., Handbook of Rural Studies (pp. 278–291). London: Sage.
- Scott, K., Rowe, F. & Pollock, V. (2018). Creating the good life? A wellbeing perspective on cultural value in rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 173–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.001.
- Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C. & Röcke, A. (2008). Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and Challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32(1), 164–178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x.
- Skerratt, S. & Steiner, A. (2013). Working with communities-of-place: Complexities of empowerment. Local Economy, 28(3), 320–338. DOI: 10.1177/0269094212474241.
- Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006. DOI: 10.1080/00420980500279869.
- Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S. & Aarts, N. (2010). How participation creates citizens: participatory governance as performative practice. Ecology and Society, 15(4). DOI: 10.5751/ES-03701-150426.
- Vercher, N., Barlagne, C., Hewitt, R., Nijnik, M. & Esparcia, J. (2021). Whose narrative is it anyway? Narratives of social innovation in rural areas–A comparative analysis of community-led initiatives in Scotland and Spain. Sociologia Ruralis, 61(1), 163–189. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12321.
- Furmankiewicz, M. & Janc, K. (2011). Partnership governance in the new UE member states. The impact of place-based intervention on the social and economic activity of local communities in Poland. Presented at the Institute for European Integration Research workshop 29–30 Nov 2011. Accessed 31st October 2024 at: https://www.sciencespo.fr/coesionet/sites/default/files/Furrmankiewicz%20%20Janc%20-%20Partnership%20governance%20in%20Poland.pdf.
- Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2005). “The Bristol Accord: Conclusions of ministerial informal on sustainable communities in Europe”, London: Her Majesty’s Government.
- Social Value Engine (no date) Case study: Tyne & Esk. Accessed 13th April 2025 at: https://socialvalueengine.com/case-study-tyne-esk-social-value/.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2025-0021 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Language: English
Page range: 412 - 430
Submitted on: Feb 3, 2025
Accepted on: May 31, 2025
Published on: Oct 7, 2025
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2025 Gary Bosworth, Ruth McAreavey, Matt Kennedy, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.