Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Theory of Weighted Involvement in Thematic Village Activities Cover

Theory of Weighted Involvement in Thematic Village Activities

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Adamowicz, M. & Zwolinska–Ligaj, M. (2020). The “Smart Village” as a way to achieve sustainable development in rural areas of Poland. Sustainability, 12(16), 2–28. DOI: 10.3390/su12166503.
  2. Bernacka, R. E., Mazurek-Kusiak, A., Korcz, N. & Kobyłka, A. (2023). Nonconformism, Social Identity, and Self-efficacy of Women Leaders of Thematic Villages. Educational Research Review, 42, 291–296. DOI: 10.12775/PBE.2023.024.
  3. Corbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  4. Cristina, H. M. (2020). Community Empowerment Program to Increase Community Income in Sitimulyo Village, Piyungan District, Yogyakarta. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 21, 128–134. DOI: 10.23917/humaniora.v21i2.9222.
  5. Danano, K. A. (2020). Challenges facing community participation in participatory forest management in Southwestern Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 10, 659–670. DOI: 10.18488/journal.ajard.2020.102.659.670.
  6. Dawuni, P., Mabe, F. N. & Tahidu, O. D. (2021). Effects of village savings and loan association on agricultural value productivity in Northern Region of Ghana. Agricultural Finance Review, 81, 657–674. DOI: 10.1108/AFR-02-2020-0024.
  7. Desnamita, D., Imran, S. P. & Mbulu, Y. (2019). Community participation in the creativity of thematic village tourism development. Journal of Tourism Destination and Attraction, 8, 11–22. DOI: 10.35814/tourism.v8i1.1407.
  8. Hazin, M., Yani, M. T., Rosyanafi, R. J., Rahmawati, R. W. D., Ladiqi, S. & Nurcholiq, M. (2024). Policy Model of Thematic Village Development Based Pentahelix in Realizing Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal of Religion, 5, 153–163. DOI: 10.61707/abaqen23.
  9. Hertwig, R., Pleskac, T. J. & Pachur, T. (2019). Taming uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  10. Idziak, W., Majewski, J. & Zmyślony, P. (2015). Community participation in sustainable rural tourism experience creation: a long-term appraisal and lessons from a thematic villages project in Poland. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23, 1341–1362. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2015.1019513.
  11. Imaniah, I., Purwanto, E. & Shahreza, M. (2023). Bojong Renged Village Government Development Communication Strategy in Empowering Entrepreneurship through Thematic Village Program. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan (Padang), 12. 216–232. DOI: 10.22202/mamangan.v12i2.7531.
  12. Johnston, K. A. & Lane, A. B. (2018). Building relational capital: The contribution of episodic and relational community engagement. Public Relations Review, 44, 633–644. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.006.
  13. Johnston, K. A. & Taylor, M. (2018). The Handbook of Communication Engagement. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  14. Johnston, K. A., Taylor, M. & Ryan, B. (2024). Evaluation of community engagement for resilience outcomes: A pre-engagement approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 110, 104613. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104613.
  15. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. DOI: 10.2307/1914185.
  16. Kloczko-Gajewska, A. (2013). General Characteristics of Thematic Villages in Poland. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 2, 60–63. DOI: 10.2478/vjbsd-2013-0012.
  17. Loewenstein, G. & Chater, N. (2017). Putting nudges in perspective. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 26–53. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2016.7.
  18. Lopez–Sanz, J. M., Penelas–Leguia, A., Gutierrez–Rodriguez, P. & Cuesta–Valino, P. (2021). Sustainable Development and Rural Tourism in Depopulated Areas. Land, 1, 985, 1–22. DOI: 10.3390/land10090985.
  19. Mazzetti, G., Guglielmi, D. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2022). Same Involvement, Different Reasons: How Personality Factors and Organizations Contribute to Heavy Work Investment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 8550. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17228550.
  20. Niswaty, R., Dewi, M., Darwis, M., Arhas, S. H. & Saleh, S. (2020). Community Participation in Development in Baringeng Village, Lilirilau District, Soppeng Regency. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 10, 389–397. DOI: 10.26858/jiap.v10i2.16736.
  21. Prasetyo, A. S., Sumekar, W., Kurniasari, D. A. & Musabikin, A. (2020). Aktivitas dan Tingkat Partisipasi Anggota dalam Usahatani Ternak Sapi Perah di Kelompok Tani Ternak Rejeki Lumintu Gunungpati, Kota Semarang. Jurnal Agrinika: Jurnal Agroteknologi Dan Agribisnis, 4, 186–196. DOI: 10.30737/agrinika.v4i2.1053.
  22. Prasetyo, A. & Firdauzi, A. (2023). Determinants of Farmer’s Participation in Implementing Community Empowerment: A Case Study of Thematic Village in Indonesia. Habitat, 34, 178–189. DOI: 10.21776/ub.habitat.2023.034.2.16.
  23. Putri, D. H. & Pawestri, T. A. (2018). Analysis of Genius Loci Concept Implementation on The Go Green Glintung Thematic Kampong in Malang City. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Creative Media, Design and Technology, 98–102. Dordrecht: Atlantis Press. DOI: 10.2991/reka–18.2018.21.
  24. Reindrawati, D. Y. (2023). Challenges of community participation in tourism planning in developing countries. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2164240. DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2022.2164240.
  25. Simon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. DOI: 10.2307/1884852.
  26. Sodik, J., Purwiyanta, P. & Wijayanti, D. L. (2021). Village Economic Potential for The Implementation of Learning Building Village. Economy and Business Series, 1, 179–184. DOI: 10.31098/bmss.v1i3.317.
  27. Stojanova, S., Lentini, G., Niederer, P., Egger. T., Cvar, N. & Stojmenova Duh, E. (2021). Smart Villages Policies: Past, Present and Future: Review. Sustainability. 13, 1663. DOI: 10.3390/su13041663.
  28. Subiyakto, B., Jumriani, J., Abbas, E. W., Muhaimin, M. & Rusmaniah, R. (2023). Community Economic Empowerment Through the Existence of Thematic Village. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 4, 1–10. DOI: 10.205927/iis.v4i1.6368.
  29. Suliyati, T. & Yuliati, D. (2021). Thematic Kampung in Semarang: Between Hope and Struggle to Maintain It. The 6th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology, and Information System. 37. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202131702026.
  30. Susanti, D., Dwihantoro, P. & Sukmasetya, P. (2020). Participatory Communication in the Development of Rural Tourism. Temanggung Papringan Market, 459, 86–88. DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.200818.020.
  31. Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1577–1600. DOI: 10.1257/aer.106.7.1577.
  32. Tobiasz-Lis, P., Wojcik, M., Dmochowska-Dudek, K. & Jeziorska-Biel, P. (2019). Thematic village as the new anchor for local development: a lesson from Masłomęcz, Poland. Europa Regional, 26, 29–42.
  33. Ulva, D. L., Hermanto, Y. A. L. & Susilo, G. (2020). Environmental Graphic Design (EGD) to Strengthen the Image of Sanan Village as a Thematic Village in Malang. International Conference on Art, Design, Education and Cultural Studies (pp. 111–115). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
  34. Vilkė, R. & Gedminaitė-Raudonė, Ž. (2019). Unique initiatives for future rural development: culture-uncommon thematic villages in Lithuania. Rural Areas and Development, 16, 96–110. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.309064.
  35. Wondirad, A. & Ewnetu, B. (2019). Community participation in tourism development as a tool to foster sustainable land and resource use practices in a national park milieu. Land Use Policy, 88, 104155. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104155.
  36. Yuliastuti, N., Esariti, L., Humaira Syaeful, H. & Putri Pressilia, A. (2023). The Concept of Thematic Village as A Driver of Sustainable Settlement in Semarang City. E3S Web of Conferences, 3064, 448–457. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202344803064.
  37. Yuliati, D., Suliyati, T., Handayani, T. & Subekti, S. (2019). Thematic Village Development for Creative Economy Improvement of Semarang City Residents. In Ottow, B., Chen, S-Ch. & Thianto, Y., eds., Proceedings of the First International Conference on Culture, Literature, Language Maintenance and Shift (pp. 147–151). Bratislava: European Alliance for Innovation. DOI: 10.4108/eai.13-8-2019.2290183.
Language: English
Page range: 391 - 411
Submitted on: Dec 18, 2024
Accepted on: Apr 24, 2025
Published on: Oct 7, 2025
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Ingrida Kazlauskienė, Vilma Atkočiūnienė, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.