References
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge – Medford: Polity Press.
- Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge – Medford: Polity Press.
- Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
- Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE.
- Donovan, J. & Adams, C. J. (ed.) (2007). The feminist care tradition in animal ethics: a reader. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Eide, H. & Wiese, K. W. (2023). Oltre Terra. Oslo: The National Museum of Art, Architecture and Design and Köln: Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther und Franz König.
- Ferrando, F. (2011). Towards a Posthumanist Methodology: A Statement. Frame. Journal of Literary Studies, 25, 9–18.
- Fosstenløkken, S. M., Kubberød, E. & Viciunaite, V. (2023). Entrepreneurial networks in localized embedding practices: A case study from the Norwegian micro wool industry. Small Enterprise Research, 30(2), 214–238. DOI: 10.1080/13215906.2022.2164607.
- Gibson-Graham, J. K., et al. (2013). Take Back the Economy: An Ethical Guide for Transforming Our Communities. University of Minnesota Press.
- Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
- Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham – London: Duke University Press.
- Haraway, D. J. (2008). When Species Meet. Minneapolis – London: University of Minnesota Press.
- Horák, F. et al. (2012). Chováme ovce. Praha: Nakladatelství Brázda.
- Horák, F. et al. (2011). České ovčáctví: minulost, současnost, výhledy. Brno: Svaz chovatelů ovcí a koz v ČR.
- Jirman, M. (2023). Chov ovcí z pohledu schwarzenberského hospodářství. In Lenderová, M., ed., Zvířata a jejich lidé (pp. 390–409). Praha: Nakladatelství Karolinum.
- Klepp, I. G. et al. (2019). KRUS final report: Enhancing local value chains in Norway. Oslo: Oslo Metropolitan University.
- Klepp, I. G. & Tobiasson, T. S. (2022). Local, slow and sustainable fashion: wool as a fabric for change. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Konvalinová, K. (2024). V rozšířeném poli. Poznámky k umění, zemědělství a venkovu. Sešit pro umění, teorii a příbuzné zóny / Notebook for Art, Theory and Related Zones, No. 36.
- Konvalinová, K. & Levitnerová, J. (2024). Dreaming of Rusting Sheep. In Borisionok, A. & Erdödi, K., eds., Matter of Art Biennale 2024. Prague: tranzit.cz.
- Lather, P. & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633. DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788752.
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393. DOI: 10.1007/BF01059830.
- Lennon, A. (2017). Natural Regional Resilience. Determining the Sustainable Value of a Local Wool Industry through Actor-Network Theory [Master’s thesis]. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
- Mertová, P. & Ryšková, M. (2014). Kulturní dědictví brněnského vlnařského průmyslu. Ostrava: NPÚ, ÚOP v Ostravě.
- Neergaard, H. & Ulhøi, J. P., eds. (2007). Handbook of qualitative research methods in entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury park, CA: Sage.
- Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. New York: Rinehart & Company.
- Porcher, J. (2014). The Work of Animals: A Challenge for Social Sciences. Humanimalia, 6(1), 1–9.
- Postrelová, V. (2024). Předivo civilizace. Jak textil utvářel svět. Brno: Host.
- Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.
- Timmermans, S. & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory Construction in Qualitative Research from Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis. Sociological Theory, 30. 167–186. DOI: 10.1177/0735275112457914.
- Tučková, K. et al. (2014). Fabrika. Příběh textilních baronů z moravského Manchesteru. Brno: Moravská galerie.
- Vičiūnaitė, V. (2020). Moving towards sustainability: Business models and entrepreneurship in the Norwegian wool industry [PhD thesis]. Ås: Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
- Winter, M. (2003). Embeddedness, the new food economy and defensive localism. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 23–32. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00053-0.
- Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.
- Timmermans, S. & Tavory, I. (2022). Data Analysis in Qualitative Research: A Pragmatic Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.