Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impacts of International Immigrants’ Capitals on Neo-Endogenous Rural Development in the French and Spanish Pyrenees Cover

Impacts of International Immigrants’ Capitals on Neo-Endogenous Rural Development in the French and Spanish Pyrenees

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Bartoš, M., Kušová, D. & Těšitel, J. (2009). Motivation and lifestyle of the Czech amenity migrants. European Countryside 1(3), 164–179. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-009-0014-4.
  2. Bayona-i-Carrasco, J. & Gil-Alonso, F. (2013). Is foreign immigration the solution to rural depopulation? The case of Catalonia (1996–2009). Sociologia Ruralis 53(1), 26–51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00577.x.
  3. Belliggiano, A., Sturla, A., Vassallo, M. & Viganò, L. (2020). Neo-endogenous rural development in favor of organic farming: Two case studies from Italian fragile areas. European Countryside 12(1), 1–29. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2020-0001.
  4. Benson, M. & O’Reilly, K. (2016). From lifestyle migration to lifestyle in migration. Migration Studies 4(1), 20–37. DOI: 10.1093/migration/mnv015.
  5. Berthomière, W. & Imbert, C. (2020). The Ariège ‘refuge’: Advantage and diversity of a host topography. Journal of Alpine Research / Revue de Géographie Alpine 108(2), 1–15. DOI: 10.4000/rga.6947.
  6. Bosworth, G. & Atterton, J. (2012). Entrepreneurial in-migration and neoendogenous rural development. Rural Sociology 77(2), 254–279. DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00079.x.
  7. Bosworth, G., Rizzo, F., Marquardt, D., Strijker, D., Haartsen, T. & Thuesen, A. A. (2016). Identifying social innovations in European local rural development initiatives. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 29(4), 442–461. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2016.1176555.
  8. Boyle, P. & Halfacree, K. (1998). Migration into rural areas: Theories and issues. London: John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Camagni, R. (2008). Regional competitiveness: Towards a concept of territorial capital. In Capello, R., Camagni, R., Chizzolini, B. & Fratesi, U., eds., Modelling regional scenarios for the enlarged Europe: European competitiveness and global strategies (pp. 33–48). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
  10. Carson, D. A. & Carson, D. B. (2018). International lifestyle immigrants and their contributions to rural tourism innovation. Journal of Rural Studies 64(8), 230–240. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.004.
  11. Carson, D. A., Carson, D. B. & Eimermann, M. (2018). International winter tourism entrepreneurs in northern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 18(2), 183–198. DOI: 10.1080/15022250.2017.1339503.
  12. Corrado, A., Castro, C. & Perrotta, D. (2017). Migration and agriculture. Mobility and changes in the Mediterranean area. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
  13. De Filippis, F., Giua, M., Salvatici, L. & Pineiro, C. (2022). The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope? Food Policy 112, 102371. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102371.
  14. Eimermann, M. (2016). Two sides of the same coin: Dutch rural tourism entrepreneurs and countryside capital in Sweden. Rural Society 25(1), 55–73. DOI: 10.1080/10371656.2016.1152033.
  15. Eimermann, M. & Kordel, S. (2018). International lifestyle migrant entrepreneurs in two new immigration destinations. Journal of Rural Studies 64(8), 241–252. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.04.007.
  16. Esparcia, J. (2000). The LEADER programme and the rise of rural development in Spain. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2), 200–207. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00142.
  17. Faist, T. (2000). The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.2307/2675522.
  18. Farkas, T. (2021). The role of the social capital in rural development: Case study analysis of village research camps in Romania and Hungary. European Countryside 13(3), 584–598. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2021-0033.
  19. Fuà, G. (1988). Small-scale industry in rural areas: The Italian experience. In Arrow, K. J., ed., The balance between industry and agriculture in economic development (pp. 259–283). London: Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-10271-6_14.
  20. Garofoli, G. (1992). Endogenous development and Southern Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  21. Gkartzios, M. & Lowe, P. (2019). Revisiting neo-endogenous rural development. In Scott, M., Gallent, N. & Gkartzios, M., eds., The Routledge companion to rural planning (pp. 159–169). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315102375-17.
  22. Gretter, A., Machold, I., Membretti, A. & Dax, T. (2017). Pathways of immigration in the Alps and Carpathians: Social innovation and the creation of a welcoming culture. Mountain Research and Development 37(4), 396–405. DOI: 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-17-00031.1.
  23. Hedlund, M., Carson, D. A., Eimermann, M. & Lundmark, L. (2017). Repopulating and revitalising rural Sweden? Re-examining immigration as a solution to rural decline. The Geographical Journal 183(4), 400–413. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12227.
  24. Hoey, B. (2005). From pi to pie: Moral narratives of noneconomic migration and starting over in the postindustrial Midwest. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 34(5), 586–624. DOI: 10.1177/0891241605279016.
  25. Iversen, I. & Jacobsen, J. K. S. (2017). Migrant tourism entrepreneurship in rural Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 16(4), 484–499. DOI: 10.1080/15022250.2015.1113887.
  26. Jørgensen, A., Fallow, M. A. & Nielsen, R. S. (2021). ‘Just ask Eric’: On the importance of governance efficacy, territorial ties and heterogenous networks for rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 61(2), 303–332. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12328.
  27. Kanas, A., van Tubergen, F. & van der Lippe, T. (2009). Immigrant self-employment testing hypotheses about the role of origin- and host-country: Human capital and bonding and bridging social capital. Work and Occupations 36(3), 181–208. DOI: 10.1177/0730888409340128.
  28. Kluvankova, T., Nijnik, M., Spacek, M., Sarkki, S., Perlik, M., Lukesch, R., Melnykovych, M., Valero, D. & Brnkalakova, S. (2021). Social innovation for sustainability transformation and its diverging development paths in marginalised rural areas. Sociologia Ruralis 61(2), 344–371. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12337.
  29. Labrianidis, L. & Sykas, T. (2013). Social construction of community and immigration networks in rural areas: Towards a dynamic view of their importance to Balkan immigrants. Sociologia Ruralis 53(1), 1–25. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12000.
  30. Little, J. (2012). Transformational tourism, nature and wellbeing: New perspectives on fitness and the body. Sociologia Ruralis 52(3), 257–271. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00566.x.
  31. MacKinnon, D., Kempton, L., O’Brien, P., Ormerod, E., Pike, A. & Tomaney, J. (2022). Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society 15(1), 39–56. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsab034.
  32. Marango, S., Bosworth, G. & Curry, N. (2021). Applying neo-endogenous development theory to delivering sustainable local nature conservation. Sociologia Ruralis 61(1), 116–140. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12315.
  33. Mattsson, K. T. & Cassel, S. H. (2019). Immigrant entrepreneurs and potentials for path creating tourism development in rural Sweden. Tourism Planning & Development 17(4), 384–403. DOI: 10.1080/21568316.2019.1607543.
  34. Méloux, S. & Péalaprat, C. (2021). Portrait de l’espace rural dans les départements d’Occitanie. INSEE Dossier 12.
  35. Mendoza, C. (2023). International immigration and entrepreneurship in rural areas of the Spanish Pyrenees. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 72(2), 119–131. DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.72.2.2.
  36. Mendoza, C., Morén-Alegret, R. & McAreavey, R. (2020). (Lifestyle) immigrant entrepreneurs in Spanish small villages: Rethinking international immigration in rural Alt Empordà, Catalonia. Belgeo 1(2020), 1–19. DOI: 10.4000/belgeo.44107.
  37. Morén-Alegret, R., Milazzo, J., Romagosa, F. & Kallis, G. (2021). ‘Cosmovillagers’ as sustainable rural development actors in mountain hamlets? European Countryside 13(2), 267–296. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2021-0018.
  38. Müller, D. K. & Jansson, B. (2007). The difficult business of making pleasure peripheries prosperous. In Müller, D. & Jansson, B., eds., Tourism in peripheries: Perspectives from the far North and South (pp. 3–18). London: CABI Digital Library. DOI: 10.1079/9781845931773.0003.
  39. Munkejord, M. C. (2006). Challenging discourses on rurality: Women and men in-migrants’ constructions of the good life in a rural town in northern Norway. Sociologia Ruralis 46(3), 241–257. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00415.x.
  40. Munkejord, M. C. (2017). ‘I work with my heart’: Experiences of migrant care workers in a northern, rural context. Population Ageing 10, 229–246. DOI: 10.1007/s12062-016-9157-z.
  41. Nori, M. (2021). Integrating immigrant workforce in European pastoralism: reality, policy and practices. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics 76(1), 49–58. DOI: 10.36253/rea12825.
  42. Olmedo, L., van Twuijver, M. & O’Shaughnessy, M. (2023). Rurality as context for innovative responses to social challenges: The role of rural social enterprises. Journal of Rural Studies 99(1), 272–283. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.020.
  43. Paine, D., Spehn, E. M., Prescott, G. W., Geschke, J., Snethlage, M. A. & Fischer, M. (2020). Mountain biodiversity is central to sustainable development in mountains and beyond. One Earth 3, 530–533. DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.10.013.
  44. Papadopoulos, A. G., Fratsea, L. M. & Mavrommatis, G. (2018). Governing migrant labour in an intensive agricultural area in Greece. Journal of Rural Studies 64, 200–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.03.013.
  45. Pôle Emploi Occitanie (2021). Diagnostic territorial. Département des Pyrénées orientales. Toulouse: Pôle Emploi Occitanie.
  46. Portes, A., Haller, W. J. &. Guarnizo, L. E. (2002). Transnational entrepreneurs: An alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation. American Sociological Review 4(1), 278–298. DOI: 10.2307/3088896.
  47. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster. DOI: 10.1145/358916.361990.
  48. Ray, C. (2006). Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU. In Cloke, P., Marsden, T. & Mooney, P., eds., Handbook of Rural Studies (pp. 278–291). London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781848608016.n19.
  49. Ray, C. (1999). Endogenous development in the era of reflexive modernity. Journal of Rural Studies 15(3), 257–267. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00072-2.
  50. Romagosa, F., Mendoza, C., Mojica, L. & Morén-Alegret, R. (2020). Inmigración internacional y turismo en espacios rurales: El caso de los “micropueblos” en Cataluña. Cuadernos de Turismo 46, 319–347. DOI: 10.6018/turismo.451861.
  51. Rye, J. F. & Scott, S. (2018). International labour migration and food production in rural Europe: a review of the evidence. Sociologia Ruralis 58(4), 928–952. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12208.
  52. Sanders, J. M. & Nee, V. (1996). Immigrant self-employment: The family as social capital and the value of human capital. American Sociological Review 61(2), 231–249. DOI: 10.2307/2096333.
  53. Solé, A. (2013). Estrangers a la muntanya [unpublished PhD thesis]. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
  54. Sommer, E. & Gamper. M. (2018). Transnational entrepreneurial activities: A qualitative network study of self-employed migrants from the former Soviet Union in Germany. Social Networks 53, 136–147. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.04.007.
  55. Stam, E. (2010). Entrepreneurship, evolution and geography. In Boschma, R. & Martin, R., eds., The Handbook of Evolutionary Geography (pp. 139–161). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  56. Stathopoulou, S., Psaltopoulos, D. & Skuras, D. (2004). Rural entrepreneurship in Europe A research framework and agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 10(6), 404–425. DOI: 10.1108/13552550410564725.
  57. Svendsen, G. L. H. (2013). Public libraries as breeding grounds for bonding, bridging and institutional social capital: The case of branch libraries in rural Denmark. Sociologia Ruralis 53(1), 52–73. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12002.
  58. Van der Ploeg, J. D. & Long, A. (1994). Endogenous development: Practices and perspectives. In Van der Ploeg, J. D. & A. Long, A., eds., Born from within: Practice and perspectives of endogenous rural development (pp. 1–17). Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.
  59. Vázquez-Barquero, A. (2007). Endogenous development: Analytical and policy issues. In Scott, A. J. & Garofoli, G., eds., Development on the ground: Clusters, networks and regions in emerging economies (pp. 23–44). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
  60. Vázquez-Barquero, A. & Rodríguez-Cohard, J. C. (2016). Endogenous development and institutions: Challenges for local development initiatives. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34(6), 1135–1153. DOI: 10.1177/0263774X15624924.
  61. Wiesinger, G. (2007). L’importance du capital social dans le développement rural, les réseaux et les prises de décision dans les zones rurales. Journal of Alpine Research / Revue de Géographie Alpine 95(4), 1–14. DOI: 10.4000/rga.350.
  62. Willett, J. & Lang, T. (2018). Peripheralisation: A politics of place, affect, perception and representation. Sociologia Ruralis 58(2), 258–275. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12161.
Language: English
Page range: 352 - 368
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2024
Accepted on: Mar 15, 2025
Published on: Oct 7, 2025
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Cristóbal Mendoza, William Berthomière, Ricard Morén-Alegret, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.