References
- Ahl, H., Berglund, K., Pettersson, K. & Tillmar, M. (2023). Women's contributions to rural development: implications for entrepreneurship policy, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research (ahead-of-print). DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-11-2022-0973.
- Androniceanu, A. & Georgescu, I. (2023). Public Administration Digitalization and Government Effectiveness in the EU Countries. Central European Public Administratin Review, 21(7), 7–30. DOI: 10.17573/cepar.2023.1.01.
- Arroyo, L. (2020). Implications of Digital Inclusion: Digitalization in Terms of Time Use from a Gender Perspective, Social Inclusion 8(2), 180–189. DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i2.2546.
- Carbajal, J., Bailey-Wallace, K., Sharma, B. B., Bice-Wigington, T., Cordova, W., Scott, S. & Cordeiro Dutra, A. de F. (2019). Women Ascending to Leadership Positions in Rural Non-profit Organizations, Contemporary Rural Social Work Journal 11(1), 14. DOI: 10.61611/2165-4611.1176.
- Chapman, R. & Slaymaker, T. (2002). ICTs and Rural Development: Review of the Literature, Current Interventions and Opportunities for Action [Working Paper 192]. London: Overseas Development Institute.
- De Pablo Valenciano, J., Milán-García, J., Uribe-Toril, J. & Guerrero-Villalba, M. A. (2021). Rural Development from a Gender Perspective: The Case of Women Farmers in Southern Spain. Land 10(75). DOI: 10.3390/land10010075.
- Elena-Bucea, A., Cruz-Jesus, F., Oliveira, O. & Coelho, P. S. (2021). Assessing the Role of Age, Education, Gender and Income on the Digital Divide: Evidence for the European Union, Information Systems Frontiers 23(4), 1007–1021. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-020-10012-9.
- Feurich, M., Kourilova, J., Pelucha, M. & Kasabov, E. (2023). Bridging the urban-rural digital divide: taxonomy of the best practice and critical reflection of the EU countries' approach. European Planning Studies 9(3), 483–505. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2023.2186167.
- Fischl, C., Lindelöf, N., Lindgren, H. & Nilsson, I. (2020). Older adults' perceptions of contexts surrounding their social participation in a digitalized society – an exploration in rural communities in Northern Sweden. European Journal of Ageing, 17(3), 281–290. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-020-00558-7.
- Grifin. G., ed. (2022). Gender Inequalities in tech-driven Research and Innovation. Living the Contradiction. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
- Hájek, O. & Vytrhlíková, B. (2021). Czech Education System and experience with COVID-19. International Journal of Public Administration, Management and Economic Development, 6(1), 39–48.
- Hufad, A., Purnomo, Sutarnic, N. & Rahmat, A. (2019). Digital Literacy of Women as the Cadres of Community Empowerment in Rural Areas. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 9 (7), 276–288.
- Kostelecká, Y., Komárková, T. & Novotná, V. (2021). Remote home-based education as a new phenomenon in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic – the experience of Czech families. Journal of Pedagogy 12(1), 141–164. DOI: 10.2478/jped-2021-0007.
- Kramar, I., Marynenko, N., Mischuk, O., Bukhta, V. & Sherstiuk, R. (2020). Economic dimension of digitization in rural areas. Engineering for Rural Development (pp. 806–812). Jelgava: Latvia University of Life Sciences. DOI: 10.22616/ERDev2020.19.TF188.
- Krieger-Boden, Ch. & Sorgner, A. (2018). Labor market opportunities for women in the digital age. Economics 12, 1–8. DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-28.
- Larsson, A. & Viitaoja, Y. (2019). Identifying the digital gender divide: How digitalization may affect the future working conditions for women. In Larsson, A. & Teigland, R., eds., The digital transformation of labor (pp. 235–253). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429317866.
- Olsson, A. K. & Bernhard, I. (2021). Keeping up the pace of digitalization in small businesses–Women entrepreneurs' knowledge and use of social media. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(2), 378–396. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-10-2019-0615.
- Paraschiv, D. M., Titan, E., Ioana, M. D., Crina- Dana, I., Mihai, M. & Serban, O. (2022). The change in e-commerce in the context of the Coronavirus pandemic. Management & Marketing 17(2), 220–233. DOI: 10.2478/mmcks-2022-0012.
- Pelucha, M. & Kasabov, E., eds., (2020). Rural Development in the Digital Age: Exploring Neo-Productivist EU Rural Policy. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429340987.
- Perifanou, M. A. & Economides, A. A. (2020). Gender Digital Divide in Europe. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology 10(4), (7–14). DOI: 10.30845/ijbht.v10n4p2.
- Pisár, P., Priščáková, S., Špaček, D. & Nemec, J. (2022). Digitization as a tool of e-government in selected public services of the state: international comparison of Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Administratie si Management Public 39, 111–132. DOI: 10.24818/amp/2022.39-07.
- Philip, L. J. & Williams, F. (2019). Remote rural home based businesses and digital inequalities: Understanding needs and expectations in a digitally underserved community. Journal of Rural Studies 68, 306–318. DOI: 10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2018.09.011.
- Rajahonka, M. & Villman, K. (2019). Women Managers and Entrepreneurs and Digitalization: On the Verge of a New Era or a Nervous Breakdown. Technology Innovation Management Review 9(6), 14–24. DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1246.
- Salemink, K., Strijker, D. & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies 54, 360–371. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001.
- Stratigea, A. (2011). ICTs for rural development: potential applications and barriers involved. Networks and Communication Studies NETCOM 25(3–4), 179–204.
- Svatosova, V. (2022). Changes in Online Shopping Behavior in the Czech Republic During the COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Competitiveness 14(1), 155–175. DOI: 10.7441/joc.2022.01.09.
- Vaishar, A. & Šťastná, M. (2019). Smart village and sustainability. Southern Moravia case study. European Countryside 11(4), 651–660. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2019-0036.
- Valokivi, H., Carlo, S., Kvist, E. & Outila, M. (2023). Digital ageing in Europe: a comparative analysis of Italian, Finnish and Swedish national policies on eHealth. Ageing and Society 43(4), 835–856. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X2100094.
- Vidickienė, D. (2017). Attractiveness of rural areas for young, educated women in post-industrial society. Eastern European Countryside 23(1), 171–190. DOI: 10.1515/eec-2017-0008.
- Young, M., Soza-Parra, J. & Circella, G. (2022). The increase in online shopping during COVID-19: Who is responsible, will it last, and what does it mean for cities? Regional Science Policy & Practice 14(1), 162–179. DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12514.
- Zerrer, N. & Sept, A. (2020). Smart Villagers as Actors of Digital Social Innovation in Rural Areas. Urban Planning (Cogitatio, Lisbon) 5(4), 78–88. DOI: 10.17645/up.v5i4.3183.
- OECD (2017). Going Digital: The Future of Work for Women". Policy Brief on The Future of Work. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD (2020). School education during Covid-19. Were teachers and students ready? Czech Republic. Available online at https://www.oecd.org/education/Czech-Republic-coronavirus-education-country-note.pdf.
- Weichetova, L. & Skarlandtova, E. M. (2020). Internet (věcí) v českých domácnostech. Powerpoint presentation. Czech Statistical Office. Available in Czech language – 25. listopadu 2020, ČSÚ Praha. Available at: https://ct24.ceskatelevize.cz/sites/default/files/2518488-csu_tk_internet_veci_prezentace.pdf.