Have a personal or library account? Click to login
State of Perception and Knowledge of Bioeconomy in Selected European Universities Cover

State of Perception and Knowledge of Bioeconomy in Selected European Universities

European Countryside
Volume 15 (2023): Issue 4 (December 2023)
By: Michał Niewiadomski,  Juan C. Santamarta Cerezal,  Vojtěch Tamáš and  Fernanda dos Santos Pereira  
Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Atkociuniene, V. & Balkibayeva, A. (2019). The role of cooperation for the needs of bioeconomy development. Research for Rural Development, 2, 87–94. DOI: 10.22616/rrd.25.2019.054.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Stone, C. J. & Olsen, R. A. (2017). Classification and Regression Trees, New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.1201/9781315139470.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bugge, M. M., Hansen, T. & Klitkou, A. (2016). What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 8(7), 5–19. DOI: 10.3390/su8070691.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Devaney, L. & Henchion, M. (2018). Consensus, caveats and conditions: International learnings for bioeconomy development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1400–1411. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.047.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Dudek, G. (2014). Prognozowanie krótkoterminowe obciążeń systemów elektroenergetycznych z wykorzystaniem rozmytych drzew regresyjnych. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, 90(4), 108–109. DOI: 10.12915/pe.2014.04.24.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Drejerska, N. (2017). Employment in vs. education for the bioeconomy. In Raupeliené, A., ed., International scientific conference Rural Development 2017, (pp. 992–998). Akademija: Aleksandras Stulginskis University. DOI: 10.15544/RD.2017.245.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Golowko, N., Marquardt, K., Budz, S. & Foerster-Metz, U. S. (2019). German students' perception of bioeconomy – an exploratory study. Amfiteatru Economic, 21(50), 138–151. DOI: 10.24818/EA/2019/50/138.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Haarich, S., ed. (2017). Bioeconomy development in EU regions [final report]. Luxembourg: Publication Office of EU.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Kozak, J. & Juszczuk, P. (2016). Algorytmy do konstruowania drzew decyzyjnych w przewidywaniu skuteczności kampanii telemarketingowej banku. Studia Informatica Pomerania 39(1), 50–51. DOI: 10.18276/si.2016.39-05.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Masiero, M., Secco, L., Pettenella, D., Da Re, R., Bernö, H., Carreira, A., Dobrovolsky, A., Gertlieova, B., Giurca, A., Holmgren, S., Mark-Herbert, C., Navrátilová, L., Pülzl, H., Ranacher, L., Salvalaggio, A., Sergent, A., Sopanen, J., Stelzer, C., Stetter, T., Valsta, L., Výbošťok, J. & Wallin, I. (2020). Bioeconomy perception by future stakeholders: Hearing from European forestry students. Ambio, 49, 1925–1942. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01376-y.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Morgan, J. N. & Sonquist, J. A. (1963). Problems in the Analysis of Survey Data, and a Proposal. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(302), 426–433. DOI: 10.2307/2283276.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Purkus, A., Hagemann, N., Bedtke, N. & Gawel, E. (2018). Towards a sustainable innovation system for the German wood-based bioeconomy: Implications for policy design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3955–3968. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.146.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Salamaga, M. (2015). Próba identyfikacji muzycznych profili melomanów z wykorzystaniem drzew klasyfikacyjnych i regresyjnych. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 385, 229–238. DOI: 10.15611/pn.2015.385.25.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Staffas, L., Gustavsson, M. & McCormick, K. (2013). Strategies and policies for the bioeconomy and bio-based economy: An analysis of official national approaches. Sustainability, 5(6), 2751–2769. DOI: 10.3390/su5062751.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Stewart, R. & Niero, M. (2018). Circular economy in corporate sustainability strategies: A review of corporate sustainability reports in the fast-moving consumer goods sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 1005–1022. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2048.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Timofeev, R. (2004). Classification and Regression Trees (CART) Theory and Applications [Master thesis]. Berlin: Humboldt University.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Turlakova, T. (2021). Bioeconomy as an innovative approach to rural development in the context of Common Agricultural Policy in EU. SHS Web of Conferences, 120, 01008. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/202112001008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Vivien, F.-D., Nieddu, M., Befort, N., Debref, R. & Giampietro, M. (2019). The hijacking of the bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 159, 189–197. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Výbošťok, J., Navrátilová, L., Dobšinská, Z., Dúbravská, B., Giertliová, B., Aláč, P., Suja, M. & Šálka, J. (2022). Bioeconomy perception by students of different study programs–study from Slovakia. Central European Forestry Journal, 68(2), 91–100. DOI: 10.2478/forj-2021-0025.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. BIO HUB CZ (2022). Bioekonomika ve strategických dokumentech v čr. http://www.biohub.cz/images/doc/Bioekonomika_na_nrodn_rovni__CZ_final.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. BIOREF (2023). Portugal em boa posição para liderar a transição para a bioeconomia na Europa. https://www.bioref-colab.pt/pt/news-pt/portugal-bioeconomia.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze (2022). Platform for Bioeconomy of the Czechia. https://bioeconomy.czu.cz/cs/r-14276-o-nas.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Congressional Research Service (2022). The Bioeconomy: A Primer. CRS Report. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46881.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Direção Geral do Ensino Superior (2023). https://www.dges.gov.pt/pt/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. European Comission (2022b). Data-Modelling platform of resource economics. https://datam.jrc.ec.europa.eu/datam/mashup/BIOECONOMICS/index.html.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment: updated bioeconomy strategy (2018), Luxembourg: Publications Office. DOI: 10.2777/792130.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. European Commission (2018). A new bioeconomy strategy for a sustainable Europe. Press release. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_6067.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. European Commission (2019). Jobs and Wealth in the European Union Bioeconomy (Biomass producing and converting sectors). https://datam.jrc.ec.europa.eu/datam/mashup/BIOECONOMICS/index.html.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. European Commission (2022). Knowledge Centre for Bioeconomy, Poland, Czechia, https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/bioeconomy/country/poland_en.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. European Network for Rural Development (2019). European rural bioeconomy: policy and tools. https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/publications/european-rural-bioeconomy-policy-and-tools_en.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Gobierno de España (2020). España Circular 2030. Estrategia Española de Economia Circular. https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/calidad-y-evaluacion-ambiental/temas/economia-circular/espanacircular2030_def1_tcm30-509532_mod_tcm30-509532.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (2015). Estrategia española de Bioeconomía Horizonte 2030. https://www.mapa.gob.es/ca/desarrollo-rural/temas/innovacion-medio-rural/estrategiaenbioeconomia23_12_15_tcm34-560119.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Ministerstvo zemědělství České republiky (2019). Koncepce biohospodářství v České Republice z pohledu resortu Ministerstva Zemědělství na léta 2019–2024. https://bioeconomy.czu.cz/dl/92129?lang=cs.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Presidência do Conselho de Ministros (2021). Resolução do Conselho de Ministros n.º 183/2021. Diário da República, 1.ª serie, N.º 250. https://files.dre.pt/1s/2021/12/25000/0001000131.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2023-0032 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 598 - 615
Submitted on: Mar 30, 2023
|
Accepted on: Aug 8, 2023
|
Published on: Dec 14, 2023
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
bioeconomy perception,
bioeconomy knowledge,
sustainable economy,
circular economy
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2023 Michał Niewiadomski, Juan C. Santamarta Cerezal, Vojtěch Tamáš, Fernanda dos Santos Pereira, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 15 (2023): Issue 4 (December 2023)Next article