References
- Adda, J. & Cooper, R. (2000). Balladurette and Juppette: A discrete analysis of scrapping subsidies. Journal of Political Economy 108(4), 778–806. DOI: 10.1086/316096.
- Adorno, V., Bernini, C. & Pellegrini, G. (2007). The impact of capital subsidies: New estimations under continuous treatment. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 66(1), 67–92.
- Andersson, A., Höjgård, S. & Rabinowicz, E. (2017). Evaluation of results and adaptation of EU Rural Development Programmes. Land Use Policy 67, 298–314. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.002.
- Austin, P. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effect of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research 46(3), 399–424. DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786.
- Bernini, C. & Pellegrini, G. (2011). How are growth and productivity in private firms affected by public subsidy? Evidence from a regional policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics 41(3), 253–265. DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.01.005.
- Bronzini, R. & Blasio, G. (2006). Evaluating the impact of investment incentives: The case of Italy’s Law 488/1992. Journal of Urban Economics 60(2), 327–349. DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2006.03.005.
- Cerqua, A. & Pellegrini, G. (2014). Do subsidies to private capital boost firms’ growth? A multiple regression discontinuity approach. Journal of Public Economics 109, 114–126. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.11.005.
- Dalziel, M. (2018). Why are there (almost) no randomized controlled trial-based evaluations of business support programmes. Palgrave Communications 4(12), 1–9. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-018-0069-9.
- Gabe, T. & Kraybill, D. (2002). The effects of state economic development incentives on employment growth of establishments. Journal of Regional Science 42(4), 703–730. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9787.00278.
- Greene, W. (2002). Econometric Analysis. New York: Prentice Hall.
- Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1), 153–161. DOI: 10.2307/1912352.
- Heckman, J., Ichimura, H. & Todd, P. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies 64(4), 605–654. DOI: 10.2307/2971733.
- Helminen, V., Nurmio, K. & Vesanen, S. (2020). Kaupunki-maaseutu-alueluokitus 2018. Paikkatietopohjaisen alueluokituksen päivitys. Helsinki: Suomen ympäristökeskus.
- Khandker, S., Koolwal, G. & Samad, H. (2010). Handbook on Impact Evaluation. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
- Klette, T., Møen, J. & Griliches, Z. (2000). Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconomic evaluation studies. Research Policy 29, 471–495. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00086-4.
- Lee, J. W. (1996). Government intervention and productivity growth. Journal of Economic Growth 1(3), 391–414. DOI: 10.1007/BF00141045.
- Lehtonen, O. (2015). Space-time dependence in regional development: the geospatial approach to understanding the development processes in small-scale areas of Finland. Joensuu: Juvenes Print.
- Lillemets, J., Fertö, I. & Viira, A-H. (2022). The socioeconomic impacts of the CAP: Systematic literature review. Land Use Policy 114, 1–17. DOI: 10.1016/2021.105968.
- Michalek, J., Ciaian, P. & Kancs, D. (2016). Investment crowding out: Firm-level evidence from northern Germany. Regional Studies 50(9), 1579–1594. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1044957.
- Michalek. J., Ciaian, P. & Marcantonio, F. (2020). Regional impacts of the EU Rural Development Programme: Poland’s food processing sector. Regional Studies 54(10), 1389–1401. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1708306.
- Morgan, S. & Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactual and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Petrick, M. & Zier, P. (2011). Regional employment impacts of Common Agricultural Policy measures in Eastern Germany: a difference-in-differences approach. Agricultural Economics 42(2), 183–193. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00509.x.
- Pietarinen, M. (2012). Yritystukiselvitys. Helsinki; Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö.
- Porro, G. & Salis, V. (2018). Do local subsidies to firms create jobs? Counterfactual evaluation of an Italian regional experience. Papers in Regional Science 97(4), 1039–1056. DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12317.
- Pyykkönen, P., Kytölä, L., Kuhmonen, I., Ponnikas, J., Keränen, R. & Arovuori, K. (2016). Manner-Suomen kehittämisohjelman 2007–2013 jälkiarviointi. Helsinki: MMM.
- Rosenbaum, P. & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1), 41–55. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
- Sekhon, J. (2011). Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: the Matching package for R. Journal of Statistical Software 42(7), 1–52. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v042.i07.
- Toomet, O. & Henningsen, A. (2008). Sample Selection Models in R: Package sampleSelection. Journal of Statistical Software 27(7), 1–23. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v027.i07.
- Asvapp (2012). Counterfactual impact evaluation of cohesion policy: impact and cost-effectiveness of investment subsidies in Italy. Final Report to the DG Regional Policy of the European Commission. Turin: Mimeo.
- European Commission (2013). Overview of CAP reform 2014–2020 (Agricultural Policy Perspectives Brief No. 5*). Brussels: European Commission.
- Ministry of agriculture and forestry (2007). Rural development program for mainland Finland 2007–2013. Helsinki: MMM.
- Statistics Finland (2020). Finland in figures. Available online: https://www.tilastokeskus.fi/tup/suoluk/index.html (accessed on 1 July 2020).
- Statistics Finland (2018). Business Register. Available online: https://www.stat.fi/tup/yritysrekisteri/index.html (accessed on 1 July 2020).
- TEM (2017). Virkamiesselvitys yritystuista ja niiden vaikutuksista. Yritykset 22/2017. Helsinki; Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö.