Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The Major Relationships in the Economic Growth of the Rural Space

European Countryside
Volume 14 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)
By:
Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. [1] Aboelnaga, S., Tóth, T. & Neszmélyi, Gy. I. (2019). Land use management along urban development axis as one of urban regeneration principles. Engineering for Rural Development, 18, pp. 944–953. DOI: 10.22616/ERDev2019.18.N382.10.22616/ERDev2019.18.N382
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Aiginger, K. (1995). Creating a Dynamically Competitive Economy: Defining Competitiveness of a Nation and a Case Study. In Devine, P. J., Katsoulacos, Y. S. & Sugden, R., eds., Competitiveness, Subsidiarity and Industrial Policy (pp. 129–149). London: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Aljoufie, M., Zuidgeest, M., Brussel, M. & Maarseveen, M. (2011). Urban growth and transport: Understanding the spatial temporal relationship. In Pratelli, A. & Brebbia, C. A., eds., Urban transport XVII: urban transport and the environment in the 21st century (pp. 315–328). Southampton: WIT Press.10.2495/UT110271
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Barrado-Timón, D. A. (2016). Tourist destination and territorial competitiveness: a closer look from geography to territorial competitiveness and the role of the territory as a competitive factor. Esic Market Economics and Business Journal 47(2), 233–252, DOI: 10.7200/esicm.153.0472.2.10.7200/esicm.153.0472.2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Béresné, M. B. & Darabos, É. (2017). Versenyképesség régen és ma, avagy merre tovább Magyarország? Acta Wekerleensis 1(2), 1–15.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Buday-Sántha, A. (2009). Környezetgazdálkodás. Pécs-Budapest: Dialog-Campus Kiadó.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Camagni, R. & Capello, R. (2013). Regional competitiveness and territorial capital: A conceptual approach and empirical evidence from the European Union. Regional Studies, 47(9), 1383–1402. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2012.681640.10.1080/00343404.2012.681640
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Camagni, R. (2004). Uncertainty, social capital and community governance: The city as a milieu. In Capello, R. & Nijkamp, P., eds., Urban dynamics and growth (pp. 121–152). Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/S0573-8555(04)66005-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Camagni, R. (2008). Regional competitiveness. Towards a concept of territorial capital. In Capello, R., Camagni, R., Chizzolini, B. & Fratesi, U., eds., Modelling regional scenarios for the enlarged Europe (pp. 33–46). Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-74737-6_3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Camagni, R. (2009). Territorial capital and regional development. In Capello, R. & Nijkamp, P., eds., Handbook of regional growth and development theories (pp. 118–132). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Camagni, R., ed. (1991). Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. London: Belhaven Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Camagni, R. & Capello, R. (2002). Milieux innovateurs and collective learning: From concepts to measurment. In Acs, Z., De Groot, H. & Nijkamp, P., eds., The emergence of the knowledge economy: A regional perspective (pp. 15–45). Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-24823-1_2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Capello, R. (2007). Regional economics. Abingdon: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Creelman, L., Pešinová, V., Cohen, Y. & Winer, A. M. (1994). Intermedia transfer factors for modeling the enviromental impact of air pollution from industrial sources. Journal of Hazardous Materials 37, 15–25. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3894(94)85029-1.10.1016/0304-3894(94)85029-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] De Falco, S. E. (2012). A model for the analysis of territorial competitiveness. In Morvillo, A., ed., Advances in Tourism Studies. In memory of Clara Stefania Petrillo (pp. 39–57). New York: McGraw-Hill. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4313.9287.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Duggan, C. & Peeren, E. (2020). Making up the British countryside: A posthuman critique of Country Life’s narratives of rural resilience and conservation. Journal of Rural Studies 80, 350–359. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.011.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Enyedi, Gy. (2003). Városi világ – városfejlődés a globalizáció korában [PhD thesis]. Pécs: University of Pécs.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Fleischer, T., Futó, P. & Pessl, G. (2001). A területfejlesztési politika és a hazai területi folyamatok alakulása a rendszerváltás óta [unpublished paper]. Budapest: World Economy Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Flink, A. & Schnierer, K. (2009). Az önkéntesség szerepe a településfejlesztésben [unpublished conference paper]. 29th national scientific student conference. Budapest: National Scientific Student Council.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Frantál, B., Martinat, S., Halfacree, K. & Walker, G. (2013). New Rural Spaces: Towards Renewable Energies, Multifunctional Farming, and Sustainable Tourism. Ostrava: Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Geonics.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Garrod, B., Wornell, R. & Youell, R. (2006). Re-conceptualising rural resources as countryside capital: The case of rural tourism. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(1), 117–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.08.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.08.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Bodor, A. & Grünhut, Z. (2014). Dilemmák a területi tőke modelljének alkalmazhatóságáról. A társadalmi tőke problémája Camagni elméletében. Tér és Társadalom 28(3), 3–17. DOI: 10.17649/TET.28.3.2602.10.17649/TET.28.3.2602
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Komorowski, Ł., Mróz, A. & Stanny, M. (2021). The Spatial Pattern of the Absorption of Cohesion Policy Funds in Polish Rural Areas. Land 10(1), 26. DOI: 10.3390/land 10010026.10.3390/land
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Hersperger, A. M., Burgi, M., Wende, W., Bacău, S. & Grădinaru, S. R. (2020). Does landscape play a role in strategic spatial planning of European urban regions? Landscape and Urban Planning 194, 103702. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103702.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103702
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Horlings, L. G. & Marsden, T. K. (2012). Exploring the ‘New Rural Paradigm’ in Europe: Eco-economic strategies as a counterforce to the global competitiveness agenda. European Urban and Regional Studies 21(1), 4–20. DOI: 10.1177/0969776412441934.10.1177/0969776412441934
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Jóna, Gy. & Tóth, T. (2017). Spatial effects and externalities of the rivals’ network in Hungary. Journal of Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, 5(3), 189–208.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Keskitalo, E. C. H., Lidestav, G., Westin, K. & Lindgren, U. (2020). Understanding the multiple dynamics of the countryside – Examples from forest cases in Northern Europe. Journal of Rural Studies 78, 59–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.023.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.023
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Kovács, T. (2003). Vidékfejlesztési politika. Budapest/Pécs: Dialóg Campus Kiadó.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Lengyel, I. & Rechnitzer, J. (2004). Regionális gazdaságtan. Budapest/Pécs: Dialog Campus Kiadó.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Łuczka, W., Kalinowski, S. & Shmygol, N. (2021). Organic Farming Support Policy in a Sustainable Development Context: A Polish Case Study. Energies 14, 4208. DOI: 10.3390/en14144208.10.3390/en14144208
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Marsden, T. (1998). New Rural Territories: Regulating the Differentiated Rural Spaces. Journal of Rural Studies, 14(1), 107–117. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00041-7.10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00041-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Page, S. & Hardyman, R. (1996). Place Marketing and Town Centre Management. Cities, 13, 153–164. DOI: 10.1016/0264-2751(96)00002-9.10.1016/0264-2751(96)00002-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Papp, Zs. & Raffay, Á. (2011). Factors influencing the tourism competitiveness of former socialist countries. Human Geographies 5(2), 21–30. DOI: 10.5719/hgeo.2011.52.21.10.5719/hgeo.2011.52.21
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Paniagua, A. (2017). Spatial and individual resistance(s) in depopulated and remote rural areas. Space and Polity 21(3), 303–317. DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2017.1355874.10.1080/13562576.2017.1355874
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Porter, M. E. (1993). Versenystratégia. Budapest: Akadémia Kiadó.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Porter, M. E. (1999). Microeconomic Competitiveness: Findings from the 1999 Executive Survey. In The Global Competitiveness Report. Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Ray, C. (1998). Culture, Intellectual Property and Territorial Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 38(1), 3–20. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00060.10.1111/1467-9523.00060
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Ray, C. (1999). Endogenous Development in the Era of Reflexive Modernity. Journal of Rural Studies, 15(3), 257–267. DOI: 10.1016/SO743-0167(98)00072-2.10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00072-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Ray, C. (2001). Culture economies: a perspective on local rural development in Europe. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Rechnitzer, J. (1998). Területi stratégiák. Budapest/Pécs: Dialog Campus.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Roberts, P. (1993). Managing the strategic planning of regions: Lessons from a European perspective. Regional Studies, 27(8), 759–768. DOI: 10.1080/00343409312331347945.10.1080/00343409312331347945
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Rosner, A. & Wesołowska, M. (2020). Deagrarianisation of the Economic Structure and the Evolution of Rural Settlement Patterns in Poland. Land 2020. 9(12), 523. DOI: 10.3390/land9120523.10.3390/land9120523
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Samuelson, P. & Nordhaus, W. (1995). Economics. 15th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Štastná, M., Vaishar, A. & Stonawská K. (2015). Integrated transport system of the South-Moravian Region and its impact on rural development. Transport and Environment. 36, 53–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.012.10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Vaishar, A. & Pavlů, A. (2018). Outmigration intentions of secondary school students from a rural micro-region in the Czech periphery: a case study of the Bystřice nad Pernštejnem area in the Vysočina region. Acta Uniersitatis Carolinae Geographica 53 (1), 49–57. DOI: 10.14712/23361980.2018.5.10.14712/23361980.2018.5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] Vaishar, A., Šťastná, M., Zapletalová, J. & Nováková, E. (2020). Is the European countryside depopulating? Case study Moravia. Journal of Rural Studies 80, 567–577. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.044.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.044
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] Venhorst, V., van Dijk, J. & van Wissen, L. (2010). Do the best graduates leave the peripheral areas of the Netherlands? Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 101(5), 521–537. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00629.x.10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00629.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] OECD (2020). https://data.oecd.org/gdp/gross-domestic-product-gdp.htm, retrieved on 2 March 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2022-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 67 - 86
Submitted on: Jun 1, 2020
Accepted on: Oct 21, 2021
Published on: Apr 10, 2022
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
space economy,
economic development strategies,
gradual growth,
factors of social wellbeing,
sectoral relationships,
rural development,
new rurality
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2022 József Káposzta, Henrietta Nagy, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 14 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)Next article