References
- [1] Alanen, I. (1999). Agricultural policy and the struggle over the destiny of collective farms in Estonia. Sociologia Ruralis, 39 (3): 431–458. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00117.10.1111/1467-9523.00117
- [2] Alanen, I. (2004). The transformation of agricultural systems in the Baltic countries – A critique of the World Bank’s concept. In Alanen, I., ed., Mapping the rural problem in the Baltic countryside. Transition processes in the rural areas of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (pp. 5–57). Aldershot: Ashgate.10.4324/9781351153287-2
- [3] Annist, A. (2011). Otsides kogukonda sotsialismijärgses keskuskülas. Arenguantropoloogiline uurimus. Tallinn: Tallinn University Press.
- [4] Argent, N. (2019). Rural geography III: Marketing, mobilities, measurement and metanarratives. Progress in Human Geography 43(4), 758–766. DOI: 10.1177/0309132518778220.10.1177/0309132518778220
- [5] Barrett, G. (2015). Deconstructing community. Sociologia Ruralis 55, 182–204. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12057.10.1111/soru.12057
- [6] Bauman, Z. (2001). Community. Seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- [7] Bell, M. M., Lloyd, S. E. & Vatovec, C. (2010). Activating the countryside: Rural power, the power of the rural and the making of rural politics. Sociologia Ruralis 50(3), 205–224. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00512.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00512.x
- [8] Blackshaw, T. (2010). Key concepts in community studies. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446279076
- [9] Bock, B. B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; A turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis 56(4), 552–573. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12119.10.1111/soru.12119
- [10] Bossuet, L. (2006). Peri-rural populations in search of territory. Sociologia Ruralis 46(3), 214–228. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00410.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00410.x
- [11] Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
- [12] Cohen, S. A., Duncan, T. & Thulemark, M. (2015). Lifestyle mobilities: The crossroads of travel, leisure and migration. Mobilities 10(1), 155–172. DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2013.826481.10.1080/17450101.2013.826481
- [13] Coulter, R., van Ham, M. & Findlay, A. M. (2016). Re-thinking residential mobility: Linking lives through time and space. Progress in Human Geography 40(3), 352–374. DOI: 10.1177/0309132515575417.10.1177/0309132515575417489345727330243
- [14] Creamer, E., Allen, E. & Haggett, C. (2019). ‘Incomers’ leading ‘community-led’ sustainability initiatives: A contradiction in terms? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37(5), 946–964. DOI: 10.1177/0263774X18802476.10.1177/0263774X18802476
- [15] Cresswell, T. (2010). Mobilities I: Catching up. Progress in Human Geography 35(4), 550–558. DOI: 10.1177/0309132510383348.10.1177/0309132510383348
- [16] Cresswell, T. (2012). Mobilities II: Still. Progress in Human Geography 36(5), 645–653. DOI: 10.1177/0309132511423349.10.1177/0309132511423349
- [17] Cresswell, T. (2014). Mobilities III: Moving on. Progress in Human Geography 38(5), 712–721. DOI: 10.1177/0309132514530316.10.1177/0309132514530316
- [18] Delbosc, A. & Currie, G. (2011). The spatial context of transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being. Journal of Transport Geography 19(6), 1130–1137. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.04.005.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.04.005
- [19] Edensor, T. (2006). Performing rurality. In Cloke, P. Marsden, T. & Mooney, P. eds., Handbook of Rural Studies (pp. 484–95). London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781848608016.n35.10.4135/9781848608016.n35
- [20] Edensor, T. (2007). Mundane mobilities, performances and spaces of tourism. Social & Cultural Geography 8(2), 199–215. DOI: 10.1080/14649360701360089.10.1080/14649360701360089
- [21] Ellingsen, W. (2017). Rural second homes: a narrative of de-centralisation. Sociologia Ruralis 57(2), 229–244. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12130.10.1111/soru.12130
- [22] Fallov, M. A., Jørgensen, A. & Knudsen, L. B. (2013). Mobile Forms of Belonging. Mobilities 8(4), 467–486. DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2013.769722.10.1080/17450101.2013.769722
- [23] Frello, B. (2008). Towards a discursive analytics of movement: On the making and unmaking of movement as an object of knowledge. Mobilities 3(1), 25–50. DOI: 10.1080/17450100701797299.10.1080/17450100701797299
- [24] Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
- [25] Gieling, J., Vermeij, L. & Haartsen, T. (2017). Beyond the local-newcomer divide: Village attachment in the era of mobilities. Journal of Rural Studies 55, 237–247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.015.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.015
- [26] Gieling, J., Haartsen, T., Vermeij, L. & Strijker, D. (2019). Out of love for the village? How general and selective forms of attachment to the village explain volunteering in Dutch community life. Journal of Rural Studies 71, 181–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.06.008.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.06.008
- [27] Goodwin-Hawkins, B. (2015). Mobilities and the English village: Moving beyond fixity in rural West Yorkshire. Sociologia Ruralis 55(2), 167–181. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12043.10.1111/soru.12043
- [28] Granberg, L. (2004). From agriculture to tourism: constructing new relations between rural nature and culture in Lithuania and Finland. In Alanen, I., ed., Mapping the rural problem in the Baltic countryside. Transition processes in the rural areas of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (pp. 159–178). Aldershot: Ashgate.10.4324/9781351153287-6
- [29] Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.10.1086/225469
- [30] Halfacree, K. (2012). Heterolocal identities? Counter-urbanisation, second homes, and rural consumption in the era of mobilities. Population, Space and Place 18(2), 209–224. Doi: 10.1002/psp.665.10.1002/psp.665
- [31] Halfacree, K. H. & Rivera, M. J. (2012). Moving to the countryside… and staying: Lives beyond representations. Sociologia Ruralis 52(1), 92–114. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00556.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00556.x
- [32] Hampton, K. & Wellman, B. (2001). Long distance community in the network society: Contact and support beyond netville. American Behavioral Scientist 45(3), 476–495. DOI: 10.1177/00027640121957303.10.1177/00027640121957303
- [33] Hidle, K., Ellingsen, W. & Cruickshank, J. (2010). Political conceptions of second home mobility. Sociologia Ruralis 50(2), 139–155. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00508.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00508.x
- [34] Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9), 1277–1288. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687.10.1177/104973230527668716204405
- [35] Hunt, R. (2019). Neglected rural geography: Exploring the quiet politics of ‘out-dwelling’. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37(2), 219–236. DOI: 10.1177/2399654418784944.10.1177/2399654418784944
- [36] Irwin, M. D. (2016). The concept of community as theoretical ground: Contention and compatibility across levels of analysis and standpoints of social processes. In Abrutyn, S., ed., Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory (pp. 247–268). Memphis: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-32250-6_13
- [37] Jetzkowitz, J., Schneider, J. & Jetzkowitz, S. B. (2007). Suburbanisation, mobility and the ‘good life in the country’: A lifestyle approach to the sociology of urban sprawl in Germany. Sociologia Ruralis 47(2), 148–171. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00431.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00431.x
- [38] Juska, A., Poviliunas, A., Ziliukaite, R. & Geguziene, V. (2008). Rural intelligentsia and path dependency in post-socialist civic organising: The Case of Lithuania. Sociologia Ruralis 48(2), 93–117. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00454.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00454.x
- [39] Kasemets, K., Rammo, A. & Palang, H. (2019). Turning a landscape into a suburban community and the realization of a sense of place. Cities 88 37−47. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.012.10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.012
- [40] Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M. M. & Joye, D. (2004). Motility: Mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28(4), 745–756. DOI: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00549.x.10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00549.x
- [41] Kay, R. (2012). Managing everyday (in)securities: Normative values, emotional security and symbolic recognition in the lives of Russian rural elders. Journal of Rural Studies 28(2), 63–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.01.018.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.01.018
- [42] Kurg, A. (2019). Werewolves on Cattle Street: Estonian collective farms and postmodern architecture. In Kulic, V., ed., Second World postmodernisms: Architecture and society under late socialism (pp. 111−127). London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350014459.0013
- [43] Maclaren, A. S. (2017). Affective Lives of Rural Ageing. Sociologia Ruralis 58(1), 213–234. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12196.10.1111/soru.12196
- [44] Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage.
- [45] Meador, J. E. (2019). Reaching rural: Identifying implicit social networks in community development programmes. Journal of Rural Studies 68, 285–295. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.006.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.006
- [46] Mettenberger, T. & Küpper, P. (2019). Potential and impediments to senior citizens’ volunteering to maintain basic services in shrinking regions. Sociologia Ruralis 59(4), 739–762. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12254.10.1111/soru.12254
- [47] Milbourne, P. & Kitchen, L. (2014). Rural mobilities: Connecting movement and fixity in rural places. Journal of Rural Studies 34, 326–336. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.004.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.004
- [48] Mormont, M. (1990). Who is rural? Or, how to be rural: Towards a sociology of the rural. In Mardsen, T., Lowe, P. & Whatmore, E., eds., Rural restructuring: Global processes and their responses. London: David Fulton.
- [49] Navarro, F. A., Woods, M. & Cejudo, E. (2015). The LEADER Initiative has been a victim of its own success. The decline of the bottom-up approach in rural development programmes. The cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis 56(2), 270–288. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12079.10.1111/soru.12079
- [50] Nugin, R. (2018). Mobile lives, immobile representations: Why mobility is not part of rural representation. Transfers 8 (2), 87−112. DOI: 10.3167/TRANS.2018.080206.10.3167/TRANS.2018.080206
- [51] Nugin, R. & Palang, H. (2020). Borderscapes in landscape: Identity meets ideology. Theory & Psychology. DOI: 10.1177/0959354320948131.10.1177/0959354320948131
- [52] Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.10.1145/358916.361990
- [53] Raagmaa, G. & Stead, D. (2014). Spatial planning in the Baltic states: Impacts of European policies. European Planning Studies 22(4), 671–679. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772730.10.1080/09654313.2013.772730
- [54] Roche, M. (2002). Rural geography: searching rural geographies. Progress in Human Geography 26(6), 823–829. DOI: 10.1191/0309132502ph406oa.10.1191/0309132502ph406oa
- [55] Rodman, M. C. (1992). Empowering Place: Multilocality and Multivocality. American Anthropologist 94(3), 640–656. DOI: 10.1525/aa.1992.94.3.02a00060.10.1525/aa.1992.94.3.02a00060
- [56] Ruutsoo, R. (2004). Rural Communities in the Baltic States and Post-Communist Transition. In: Alanen, I., ed., Mapping the rural problem in the Baltic countryside. Transition processes in the rural areas of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (pp. 59–107). Aldershot: Ashgate.10.4324/9781351153287-3
- [57] Savage, M., Bagnall, G. & Longhurst, B. (2005). Globalization and belonging. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446216880
- [58] Savage, M., Allen, C., Atkinson, R., Burrows, R., Méndez, M.-L. & Watt, P. (2010). Focus article. The politics of elective belonging housing. Theory and Society 27(2), 115–161. DOI: 10.1080/14036090903434975.10.1080/14036090903434975
- [59] Sepp, V. & Noorkõiv, R. (2018). Haldusreformi kesksete kriteeriumite valik: kuidas tuli 5000 ja 11 000 elaniku nõue. In Valner, S., ed., Haldusreform 2017. Artiklikogumik (pp. 123–160). Tallinn: Print Best.
- [60] Sheller, M. & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 38(2), 207–226. DOI: 10.1068/a37268.10.1068/a37268
- [61] Shucksmith, M. (2018). Re-imaging the rural: From rural idyll to Good Countryside. Journal of Rural Studies 59, 163–172. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.019.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.019
- [62] Tomaney, J. (2015). Region and place II: Belonging. Progress in Human Geography 39(4), 507–516. DOI: 10.1177/0309132514539210.10.1177/0309132514539210
- [63] Woods, M. (2010). Performing rurality and practising rural geography. Progress in Human Geography 34(6), 835–846. DOI: 10.1177/0309132509357356.10.1177/0309132509357356
- [64] Woods, M. (2011). Rural. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203844304
- [65] Tamm, M. & Nergi, A. M. (2018). Tallinn autostub. Eesti Ekspress 29(42) Available online at http://longread.delfi.ee/artiklid/tallinnasse-voorib-iga-paev-juurde-50-000-autot-linn-jaabneile-kitsaks?id=83978754. Accessed Dec 2020.