Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Making Landscapes of (Be)Longing. Territorialization in the Context of the Eu Development Program Leader in North Rhine-Westphalia Cover

Making Landscapes of (Be)Longing. Territorialization in the Context of the Eu Development Program Leader in North Rhine-Westphalia

European Countryside
Volume 13 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)
By:   
Open Access
|Apr 2021
References

References

  1. [1] Abrams, Jesse B., Gosnell, H., Gill, N. J. & Klepeis, P. J. (2012). Re-creating the rural, reconstructing nature. An international literature review of the environmental implications of amenity migration. Conservation and Society 10(3), 270–284. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4923.101837.10.4103/0972-4923.101837
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Ahmed, S. (2004). Collective feelings: or, the impressions left by others. Theory Culture & Society 21(2), 25–42. DOI: 10.1177/0263276404042133.10.1177/0263276404042133
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Almstedt, A., Brouder, P., Karlsson, S. & Lundmark, L. (2014). Beyond post-productivism: from rural policy discourse to rural diversity. European Countryside 6(4), 297–306. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2014-0016.10.2478/euco-2014-0016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Antonsich, M., (2010). Searching for belonging: an analytical framework. Geography Compass 4(6), 644–659. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00317.x.10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00317.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Bender, B. (2001). Landscapes on-the-move. Journal of Social Archaeology 1(1), 75–89. DOI: 10.1177%2F146960530100100106.10.1177/146960530100100106
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Bieling, C., Plieninger, T. & Trommler, K. (2011). Cross the border – close the gap: resilience-based analysis of landscape change. European Countryside 3(2), 83–92. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-011-0005-0.10.2478/v10091-011-0005-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Berr, K. & Kühne, O. (2020). Und Das Ungeheure Bild Der Landschaft... The genesis of landscape understanding in the German-speaking regions. Wiesbaden: Springer.10.1007/978-3-658-27756-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Bohnsack, R., Meuser, M. & Geimer, A., eds. (2018). Hauptbegriffe Qualitativer Sozialforschung. München: UTB.10.36198/9783838587479
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Bridgewater, P., Rotherham, ID. (2019). A critical perspective on the concept of biocultural diversity and its emerging role in nature and heritage conservation. People and Nature 1, 291–304. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10040.10.1002/pan3.10040
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Bruns, D., Kühne, O., Schönwald, A. & Theile, S. (2015). Landscape culture – culturing landscapes: the differentiated construction of landscapes. Wiesbaden: Springer.10.1007/978-3-658-04284-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Cejudo, E., Toro, F. & Castillo, J. (2020). Agrarian heritage as an example of the sustainable and dynamic use of natural resources. LEADER projects in Andalusia 2007–2013. In Cejudo E. & Navarro, F., eds., Neodendogenous development in European rural areas. Results and lessons (pp. 251–282). Basel: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-33463-5_12
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Clarke, R. (2015). Beyond landscape designation: innovative funding, delivery and governance and the UK protected area system. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 26(2), 172–194. DOI: 10.1108/MEQ-07-2014-0106.10.1108/MEQ-07-2014-0106
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Cloke, P. (2013). Rural landscapes. In Johnson, N. C., Schein, R. H. & Winders, J., eds., The Wiley-Blackwell companion to cultural geography, Volume 11 (pp. 225–237). Chichester UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9781118384466.ch21
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Eriksson, O. (2018). What is biological cultural heritage and why should we care about it? An example from Swedish rural landscapes and forests. Nature Conservation 28, 1–32. DOI: 10.3897/natureconservation.28.25067.10.3897/natureconservation.28.25067
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Everts, J. (2015). Invasive life, communities of practice, and communities of fate. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 97(2), 195–208. DOI: 10.1111/geob.12074.10.1111/geob.12074
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Furmankiewicz, M., Thompson, N., Zielińska, M. (2010). Area-based partnership in rural Poland: the post-accession experience. Journal of Rural Studies 2, 52–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Gavin, M. C., McCarter, J., Mead, A., Berkes, F., Stepp, J. R., Peterson, D. & Tang, R. (2015). Defining biocultural approaches to conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30(3), 140–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.005.10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.00525622889
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Gelencsér, G., Vona, M. & Centeri, C. (2012). Loosing agricultural heritage in rural landscape – a case study in Koppány Valley Area, Hungary. European Countryside 4(2), 134–146. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-012-0019-2.10.2478/v10091-012-0019-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Halfacree, K. (2006). Rural space: constructing a three-fold Architecture. In Cloke, P., Marsden, T. & Mooney, P., eds., The handbook of rural studies (pp. 44–62). London: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781848608016.n4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Heatherington, T. (2012). Remodeling the fortress of conservation? Living landscapes and the new technologies of environmental governance. Anthropological Forum 22(2), 165–185. DOI: 10.1080/00664677.2012.694172.10.1080/00664677.2012.694172
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Heidner, S. (2018). Recultivation of Drieschlandschaft at Barmen through extensive agricultural use. Ecological, socioeconomic and landscape conservation effects on natural and cultural regions. Aachen: RWTH.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Henkel, G. (2012). Das Dorf. Landleben in Deutschland− gestern und heute. Darmstadt: WBG (Wiss. Buchges.).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment. London & New York: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Ingold, T. (2018). One world anthropology. HAU- Journal of Ethnographic Theory 8(1–2), 158–171. DOI: 10.1086/698315.10.1086/698315
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Ipsen, D. (2006). Ort und Landschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Jansson, M., Vogel, N., Fors, H. & Randrup, T. B. (2019). The governance of landscape management: new approaches to urban open space development. Landscape Research 44(8), 952–965. DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199.10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Jones, M. & Olwig, K. R. (2008). Nordic landscapes. Region and belonging on the northern edge of Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Kidd, S. (2013). Landscape planning: reflections on the past, directions for the future. In Howard, P., Thompson, I., Waterton, E. & Atha, M., eds., The Routledge companion to landscape studies (pp. 384–400). London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203096925-41
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Kusters, K., Buck, L., de Graaf, M., Minang, P., van Oosten, C. & Zagt, R. (2018). Participatory planning, monitoring and evaluation of multi-stakeholder platforms in integrated landscape initiatives. Environmental Management 62(1), 170–181. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0847-y.10.1007/s00267-017-0847-y599912228324144
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Kamvasinou, K. & Stringer, B. (2019). The politics of rurality. Landscape Research 44(7), 783–786. DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2019.1641260.10.1080/01426397.2019.1641260
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Konečný, O., Binek, J., Svobodová, H. (2020). The Rise and Limits of Local Governance: LEADER/Community-Led Local Development in the Czech Republic. In: Nunes Silva C., ed., Contemporary Trends in Local Governance. Local and Urban Governance (pp. 173–193). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-52516-3_9.10.1007/978-3-030-52516-3_9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Kulmer, A. (2012). Historical assets and related landscape. Towards a new cultural heritage policy for rural areas in Europe. Zoll+ 21, 92–95.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Kühne, O. (2019). Landscape theories: a brief introduction. Wiesbaden: Springer.10.1007/978-3-658-25491-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical inquiry, 30(2), 225–248. DOI: 10.1086/421123.10.1086/421123
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Lindholm, K.-J. & Ekblom, A. (2019). A framework for exploring and managing biocultural heritage. Anthropocene 25, 100195–100205. DOI: 10.1016/j.ancene.2019.100195.10.1016/j.ancene.2019.100195
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Lowe, P., Phillipson, J., Proctor, A. & Gkartzios, M. (2019). Expertise in rural development: a conceptual and empirical analysis. World Development 116, 28–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.12.005.10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.12.005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Marango, S., Bosworth, G. & Curry, N. (2020). Applying neo-endogenous development theory to delivering sustainable local nature conservation. Sociologia Ruralis. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12315.10.1111/soru.12315
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Massey, D. (2006). Landscape as a provocation: reflections on moving mountains. Journal of Material Culture 11(1–2), 33–48. DOI: 10.1177/1359183506062991.10.1177/1359183506062991
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Mee, K. & Wright, S. (2009). Geographies of belonging. Why belonging? Why geography? Environment and Planning A-Economy and Space 41(4), 772–779. DOI: 10.1068/a41364.10.1068/a41364
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Müller, O. (2021). Der Driesch – Die (Re)Konstruktion einer historischen Kulturlandschaft. Territoralisierungspraktiken im Kontext des LEADER-Prgogramms. In: Fenske, M., Peselmann, A. & Best, D., eds., Ländliches vielfach! Leben und Wirtschaften in erweiterten sozialen Entitäten. Bielfeld: Transcript.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Müller, O., Sutter, O. & Wohlgemuth, S. (2020). Learning to LEADER. Ritualised performances of ‘participation’ in local arenas of participatory rural governance. Sociologia Ruralis 60(1), 222–242. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12287.10.1111/soru.12287
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Olwig, K. R. (2008). Performing on the landscape versus doing landscape: perambulatory practice, sight and the sense of belonging. In Ingold, T. & Vergunst, J., eds., Ways of walking: ethnography and practice on foot (pp. 81–91). London: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Olwig, K. R. (2013). Globalism and the enclosure of the landscape commons. In Rotherham, I. D., ed., Cultural severance and the environment – The ending of traditional and customary practice on commons and landscapes managed in common (pp. 31–46). Dordrecht: Springer.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Pollermann, K., Raue, P. and G. Schnaut (2014). Opportunities for a participative approach in rural development: findings from LEADER in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and the requirements for community led local development. Landbauforsch 64(3/4), 127–138.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Pollermann, K., Aubert, F., Berriet-Solliec, M., Laidin, C., Lépicier, D., Pham, H., Raue, P. & Schnaut, G. (2020). Leader as a European Policy for Rural Development in a Multilevel Governance Framework: A Comparison of the Implementation in France, Germany and Italy. European Countryside 12(2), 156–178. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2020-0009.10.2478/euco-2020-0009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] Printsmann, A., Kruse, A. & Roth, M. (2012). Introduction for living in agricultural landscapes: practice, heritage and identity. European Countryside 4(2), 89–100. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-012-0016-5.10.2478/v10091-012-0016-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] Probyn, E. (1996). Outside belongings. London: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] Ray, C. (2001). Culture economies: a perspective on local rural development in Europe. Newcastle upon Tyne: Centre for Rural Economy.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] Rose, M. (2002). Landscape and labyrinths. Geoforum 33(4), 455–467. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7185(02)00030-1.10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00030-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. [50] Rotherham, I. D. (2015). Bio-cultural heritage and biodiversity: emerging paradigms in conservation and planning. Biodiversity and Conservation 24, 3405–3429. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-015-1006-5.10.1007/s10531-015-1006-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. [51] Schein, R. H. (2009). Belonging through land/scape. Environment and Planning A, 41(4), 811–826. DOI: 10.1068/a41125.10.1068/a41125
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. [52] Selman, P. (2006). Planning at the landscape scale. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203696903
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. [53] Stemmer, B., Philipper, S., Moczek, N. & Röttger, J. (2019). Die Sicht von Landschaftsexperten und Laien auf ausgewählte Kulturlandschaften in Deutschland– Entwicklung eines Antizipativ-Iterativen Geo-Indikatoren-Landschaftspräferenzmodells (AIGILaP). In Berr, K. & Jenal, C., eds., Landschaftskonflikte (pp. 507–534). Wiesbaden: Springer.10.1007/978-3-658-22325-0_29
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. [54] Taylor, K., Clair, A. S. & Mitchell, N. J. (2014). Conserving cultural landscapes: challenges and new directions (Vol. 7). New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315813226
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. [55] Trudeau, D. (2006). Politics of belonging in the construction of landscapes: place-making, boundary-drawing and exclusion. Cultural Geographies 13(3), 421–443. DOI: 10.1191/1474474006eu366oa.10.1191/1474474006eu366oa
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. [56] Tsing, A. (2017). The buck, the bull, and the dream of the stag: some unexpected weeds of the Anthropocene. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society 42(1), 3–21.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. [57] Waterton, E. (2018). More-than-representational landscapes. In Howard, P., Thompson, I., Waterton, E. & Atha, M., eds., The Routledge companion to landscape studies (pp. 91–101). London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315195063-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. [58] Welz, G. (2015). European products: making and unmaking heritage in Cyprus. Oxford: Berghahn.10.2307/j.ctv6jmwb9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. [59] Whatmore, S. J. (2009). Mapping knowledge controversies: science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise. Progress in Human Geography, 33(5), 587–598. DOI: 10.1177/0309132509339841.10.1177/0309132509339841
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. [60] Woods, M. (2007). Engaging the global countryside: globalization, hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place. Progress in Human geography 31(4), 485–507. DOI: 10.1177/0309132507079503.10.1177/0309132507079503
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. [61] Wright, S. (2020). ‘Belonging’. In Kobayashi, A. ed., International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 294–299). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. [62] Wylie, J. (2005). A single day's walking: narrating self and landscape on the South West Coast Path. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(2), 234–247.10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00163.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  63. [63] Yuval Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: intersectional contestations. London: SAGE.10.4135/9781446251041
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  64. [64] CoE: Council of Europe (2000). European Landscape Convention. European Treaty Series 176. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Last accessed on 23.07.2020, https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/176.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  65. [65] HFR: Höhere Forstbehörde Rheinland (1986). Waldflächenentwicklung im Rheinland 1820–1980. Bonn: HFR.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  66. [66] LANUV: Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Nordrhein-Westfalen (2013). DE-5003-301 Kellenberg und Rur zwischen Flossdorf und Broich. Last accessed on 23.07.2020, http://natura2000-meldedok.naturschutzinformationen.nrw.de/natura2000-meldedok/web/babel/media/zdok/DE-5003-301.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  67. [67] Local Development Strategy (LDS): Schichtwechsel. Regionale Entwicklungsstratgie: LEADER-Bewerbung für die Förderperiode 2014-2020, last accessed on 23.03.17, https://www.inde-rur.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/200616-res-weboptimiert.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  68. [68] LWL & LVR: Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe & Landschaftsverband Rheinland (2007). Kulturlandschaftlicher Fachbeitrag zur Landesplanung in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Last accessed on 23.07.2020, http://www.lwl.org/302a-download/PDF/kulturlandschaft/Teil1.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2021-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 21
Submitted on: Aug 25, 2020
Accepted on: Dec 13, 2020
Published on: Apr 3, 2021
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Rural development,
LEADER,
Participatory landscape governance,
bio-cultural heritage,
territorial identity
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2021 Oliver Müller, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 13 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)
Next article