References
- [1] Anderson, J. & Van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review 93(1), 170–192. DOI: 10.1257/000282803321455214.
- [2] Barkley, A. (1990). The determinants of the migration of labor out of agriculture in the United States, 1940–85. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(3), 567–573. DOI: 10.2307/1243025.
- [3] Berg-Andersson, B. & Kotilainen, M. (2016). Pakotteiden vaikutus Suomen vientiin Venäjälle [Brief No. 45]. Helsinki: The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
- [4] Berlinschi, R., Swinnen, J. & Van Herck, K. (2014). Trapped in agriculture? Credit constraints, investments in education and agricultural employment. European Journal of Development Research 26(4), 490–508. DOI: 10.1057/ejdr.2014.30.
- [5] Bilgic, A., King, S., Lusby, A. & Schreiner, D. F. (2002). Estimates of U.S. Regional Commodity Trade Elasticities of Substitution. The Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 32(2), 79–98. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.132238.
- [6] Boulanger, P., Dudu, H., Ferrari, E. & Philippidis, G. (2016). Russian roulette at the trade table: A specific factors CGE analysis of an agri-food import ban. Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(2), 272–291. DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12156.
- [7] Cruz, L., Ramos, P. N., Barata, E. & Sargento, A. L. (2017). Assessing an agri-food develoment strategy: a bi-regional input-output model with resource-constrained sectors. European Review of Agricultural Economics 44(5), 860–882. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbw028.
- [8] Drabenstott, M. (2003). A new era for rural policy. Economic Review, Fourth Quarter. Kansas: Center for the Study of Rural America, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, USA.
- [9] Garrone, M., Emmers, D., Olper, A. & Swinnen, J. (2019). Jobs and agricultural policy: Impacts of the common agricultural policy on EU agricultural employment. Food Policy 87, No. 101744. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101744.
- [10] Harrigan, F. & McGregor, P. G. (1989). Neoclassical and Keynesian Perspectives on the Regional Macro-Economy: A Computable General Equilibrium Approach. Journal of Regional Science 29(4), 555–573. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1989.tb01244.x.
- [11] Horridge, M. (2011). The TERM model and its database [General Paper No. G-219]. Melbourne: Monash University.
- [12] Hyytiä, N. (2014). Farm diversification and regional investments: efficient instruments for the CAP rural development targets in rural regions in Finland? European Review of Agricultural Economics 41(2), 255–277. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbt022.
- [13] Julia-Wise, R., Cooke, S. C. & Holland, D. (2002). A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of a Property Tax Limitation Initiative in Idaho. Land Economics 78(2), 207–227. DOI: 10.2307/3147269.
- [14] Khachaturyan, M. & Peterson, E. W. F. (2017). The Russian Food and Agricultural Import Ban. Cornhusker Economics No. 756. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
- [15] Kilkenny, M. & Partridge, M. D. (2009). Export Sectors and Rural Development. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91(4), 910–929. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01320.x.
- [16] Kutlina-Dimitrova, Z. (2015). The economic impact of the Russian import ban: a CGE analysis. DG TRADE Chief Economist Note 3.
- [17] Liefert, W. M. & Liefert, O. (2015). Russia’s Economic Crisis and its Agricultural and Food Economy. Choices 30(1), 1–6.
- [18] Lofgren, H., Harris, R. L. & Robinson, S. (2002). Standard Computable General Equilibrium Model in GAMS. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
- [19] Niemi, J. & Väre, M., eds., (2018). Agriculture and food sector in Finland 2018. Helsinki: Natural Resources Institute Finland.
- [20] Martinho, V. (2015). Agricultural economics in the context of Portuguese Rural Development. In Martinho, V., ed., The Agricultural Economics of the 21st Century (pp. 121–136). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- [21] Mattas, K. & Loizou, E. (2017). The CAP as a job stabiliser. EuroChoices 16(3), 23–26. DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12170.
- [22] Midmore, P., Partridge, M. D., Olfert, M. R. & Ali, K. (2010). The evaluation of Rural Development Policy: Macro and Micro Perspectives. Euro Choices 9(1), 24–29. DOI: 10.1111/J.1746-692X.2010.00155.X.
- [23] Olper, A., Raimondi, V., Cavicchioli, D. & Vigani, M. (2014). Do CAP payments reduce farm labour migration? A panel data analysis across EU regions. European Review of Agricultural Economics 41(5), 843–873. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbu002.
- [24] Partridge, M. D. & Rickman, D. S. (1998). Regional Computable General modelling: A Survey and Critical Appraisal. Regional Science Review 21(3), 205–248. DOI: 10.1177/016001769802100301.
- [25] Petrick, M. & Zier, P. (2012). Common agricultural policy effects on dynamic labour use in agriculture. Food Policy 37(6), 671–678. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.07.004.
- [26] Richardson, H. W. (1976). Regional Economics, Location Theory, Urban Structure and Regional Change. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
- [27] Rizov, M., Davidova, S. & Bailey, A. (2018). Employment effect of CAP payments in the UK non-farm economy. European Review of Agricultural Economics 45(5), 723–748. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jby008.
- [28] Robinson, S., Cattaneo, A. & El-Said, M. (2000). Updating and estimating a Social Accounting Matrix using cross entropy method [TMD discussion papers 59]. Washington DC: International Food Policy Institute.
- [29] Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Gill, N. (2006). How does trade affect regional disparities? World Development 34(7), 1201–1222. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.12.003.
- [30] Round, J. (2003). Social Accounting Matrices and SAM-Based Multiplier Analysis. In: Tool Kit; Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (pp. 1–14). Washington, DC: World Bank.
- [31] Smutka, L., Spicka, J., Ishchukova, N. & Selby, R. (2016). Agrarian import ban and its impacts on the Russian and European Union agrarian trade performance. Agricultural Economics –Czech 62(11), 493–506. DOI: 10.17221/294/2015-AGRICECON.
- [32] Thomson, K., Berkhout, P. & Constantinou, A. (2011). Balancing between structural and rural policy. In Oskam, A., Meester, G. & Silvis, H., eds., EU policy for agriculture, food and rural areas (pp. 385–400). Wageningen Academic Publishers.
- [33] Thurlow, J. (2004). A Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model for South Africa: Extending the Static IFPRI Model [Working Paper 1]. Pretoria: Trade and Industrial Policy Strategies.
- [34] Törmä, H. & Lehtonen, H. (2009). Macroeconomic and welfare effects of the CAP reform and further decoupling of agricultural support in Finland: A CGE modelling approach. – Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C – Food Economics 6(2), 73–87. DOI: 10.1080/16507540903474673.
- [35] Törmä, H. & Rutherford, T. (1992). A General Equilibrium Assessment of Finland’s Grand Tax Reform [Reports No 15, Department of Economics and Management]. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
- [36] Vaittinen, R. (2004). Trade Policies and Integration: Evaluations with CGE-Models. Helsinki School of Economics.
- [37] Wysokinski, M. & Baran, J. (2014). The Russian Embargo: Tribulations of Dairy and Meat Exports from Poland and Other EU Member Countries. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, 10(1), 135–147.
- [38] Wing, I. S. (2004). Computable General Equilibrium models and their use in economy-wide policy analysis: Everything you ever wanted to know (but were afraid to ask) [technical note 6]. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
- [39] Bank of Finland 2017. Upswing strengthens, supported by exports – in 2019 GDP will finally exceed the level of 2008. Press release No 15. Available at: https://www.suomenpankki.fi/en/media-and-publications/releases/2017/upswing-strengthens-supported-by-exports-in-2019-GDP-will-finally-exceed-the-level-of-2008/.
- [40] European Union 2018. How the EU budget is spend. Referred to 21.9.2018. Available at: https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/money/expenditure_en.
- [41] European Commission 2013. Overview of CAP Reform 2014–2020. Agricultural Policy Perspectives Brief, No 5. DG Agriculture and Rural Development, Unit for Agricultural Policy Analysis and Perspectives. Brussels: European Commission.
- [42] European Commission 2017. The Future of Food and Farming, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2017)713. Brussels: European Commission.
- [43] European Commission 2019. Agricultural policy post-2020. Simplification and modernisation. European Commission.
- [44] European Parliament 2014. The Russian Embargo: Impact on the Economic and Employment Situation in the EU. Employment and Social Affairs, Briefing. Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy. Brussels: European Parliament.
- [45] European Parliament 2016. Research for AGRI Committee – The role of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy in creating rural jobs. DG for Internal Policies. Policy Department B structural and Cohesion Policies. Brussels: European Parliament.
- [46] ETLA (Elinkeinoelämän tutkimuslaitos) 2016. Suhdanne Vuosikirja 2016:2. [The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy. ETLA Forecast Year 2016:2] Helsinki: ETLA.
- [47] Finnish Customs 2016. Tavaroiden ulkomaankauppa maakunnittain vuonna 2015, Kauppa 2016. [International trade in goods by Finnish regions in 2015, Trade 2016.] Finnish Customs.
- [48] Finnish Customs 2018. Suomen ja Venäjän välinen kauppa. [Finnish-Russian trade]. Finnish Customs.
- [49] Finnish Customs. Kauppa Suomi-EU-28, 2008–2016. [Trade between Finland and the EU 2008-2016].
- [50] Finnish Customs. Kauppa Suomi-kaikki maat 2009–2016. [Trade between Finland and all foreign countries].
- [51] Finnish Customs. Tullissa kannetut valtion tulot. [Government taxes and levies].
- [52] LUKE Natural Resources Institute Finland. Maatalouden rakennekehitysennuste, Taloustohtori 20.6.2017. [Forecast of the structural development of agriculture, Statistics database].
- [53] LUKE Natural Resources Institute Finland. Maatilojen lukumäärä alueittain 1995–2012. [Number of farms by regions in 1995–2012].
- [54] OECD. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The observatory of economic complexity. Data visualization tool for international trade data. Finland: Product trade. Available at: https://oec.world/en/profile/country/fin/.
- [55] Regional Council of North Karelia. Työpaikat kunnittain, Pohjois-Karjala 1991–2013. [Work places by municipalities in North Karelia in 1991–2013].
- [56] Regional Council of North Karelia. Työllinen työvoima 31.12.2014. [Employed].
- [57] Regional Council of North Karelia and Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment. Työttömien osuus työvoimasta keskimäärin (%) [Approximate share of unemployed of labour force].
- [58] Regional Council of South Ostrobothnia. Etelä-Pohjanmaan hyvinvoinnin tilastopaketti 2016. [Statistics of wellbeing in South Ostrobothnia in 2016].
- [59] Statistics Finland. Official Statistics. Available at: http://tilastokeskus.fi/til//index_en.html.
- [60] Statistics Finland. StatFin database. Available at: http://pxnet2.stat.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/.
- [61] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Income Elasticities Finland 1996. Economic Research Service.
- [62] VATT, Institute for Economic Research (Finnish Government) 2015. Regional input-Output tables of 2008, unpublished data.
- [63] WTO (World Trade Organization). Russian Federation: Tariffs and imports: Summary and duty ranges / Tariffs and imports by product groups / Exports to major trading partners and duties faced.
- [64] WTO (World Trade Organization). European Union: Tariffs and imports: Summary and duty ranges / Tariffs and imports by product groups / Exports to major trading partners and duties faced.
- [65] Standard Industrial Classification TOL 2008. Classification of commodities: CPA 2008.