Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Development of Rural Peripheral Areas in Lithuania: The Challenges of Socio-Spatial Transition Cover

The Development of Rural Peripheral Areas in Lithuania: The Challenges of Socio-Spatial Transition

European Countryside
Volume 10 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)
By:
Open Access
|Oct 2018

References

  1. [1] Berzins, A. &amp; Zvidrins, P. (2011). Depopulation in the Baltic states. <em>Lithuanian Journal of Statistics</em> 50(1), 39–48.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.15388/LJS.2011.13931" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.15388/LJS.2011.13931</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Blowers, A. &amp; Leroy, P. (1994). Power, politics and environmental inequality: A theoretical and empirical analysis of the process of “peripheralisation”. <em>Environmental Politics</em> 3, 197–228. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019408414139." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/09644019408414139.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019408414139" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/09644019408414139</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Burbulytė-Tsiskarishvili, G. (2012). Measuring Peripherality and Accessibility for Lithuanian Regional Policy. <em>Regional Formation and Development Studies</em> 8(3), 25–35.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.15181/rfds.v7i2.2359" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.15181/rfds.v7i2.2359</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Bürk, T. (2013). Voices from the Margin: The Stigmatization Process as an Effect of Socio-Spatial Peripheralization in Small-Town Germany. In Fischer-Tahir, A. &amp; Naumann, M., eds., <em>Peripheralization. The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice</em> (pp. 168–185). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19018-1_8" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/978-3-531-19018-1_8</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Burneika, D. (2006). Peculiarities of economic relations between former Soviet countries – influence of different heritage. <em>Geopolitical Studies</em> 14, 409–420.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Burneika, D. (2012). Transformations in Lithuania – factors of change and regional patterns. In Gorzelak, G., Goh, C. C. &amp; Fazekas, K., eds., <em>Adaptability and Change: The Regional Dimensions in Central and Eastern Europe</em> (pp. 267–283). Drelow: Poligraf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Chevalier, P., Mačiulyté, L., Razafimaheva, L. &amp; Dedeire, M. (2017). The Leader Programme as a Model of Institutional Transfer: Learning From its Local Implementation in France and Lithuania. <em>European Countryside</em> 9(2), 317–341. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0020." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/euco-2017-0020.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0020" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/euco-2017-0020</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Copus, A. K. (2001). From Core-periphery to Polycentric Development: Concepts of Spatial and Aspatial Peripherality. <em>European Planning Studies</em> 9(4), 539–552. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/713666491." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/713666491.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/713666491" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/713666491</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Daugirdas, V., Burneika, D., Kriaučiūnas, E., Ribokas, G., Stanaitis, S. &amp; Uberevičiuné, R. (2013). <em>Lietuvos retai apgyventos teritorijos.</em> Vilnius: Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Daugirdas, V. &amp; Burneika, D. (2008). Peripherality and peripheral regions in Lithuania – borderland of EU. In Baubinas, R., ed., <em>Problem regions in Lithuania (sociogeographical aspect)</em> (pp. 6–12). Vilnius: Geografijos ir geologijos institutas.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Deleuze, G. (2004). <em>Desert islands and other texts.</em> Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Dringelis, L. (2013). Lietuvos miestai, miesteliai ir kaimai: jų urbanistinių ir demografinių pokyčių įtaka šalies kraštovaizdžio erdvinės struktūros savitumui <em>Juornal of architecture and urbanism</em> 37(4), 310–323. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2013.869884." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3846/20297955.2013.869884.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2013.869884" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3846/20297955.2013.869884</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Elcock, H. (2014). Multi-level governance and peripheral places: The North-East of England. <em>Local Economy</em> 29(4–5), 323–333. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094214541524." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/0269094214541524.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094214541524" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/0269094214541524</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Eriksson, M. (2008). (Re)Producing a “peripheral” region – Northern Sweden in the news. <em>Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography</em> 90, 369–388. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00299.x." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00299.x.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00299.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00299.x</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Gutiérrez, J. &amp; Urbano, P. (1996). Accessibility in the European Union: the impact of the Trans European road network. <em>Journal of Transport Geography</em> 4(1), 15–25. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1068/a301337." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1068/a301337.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1068/a301337" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1068/a301337</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Janc, K. (2006). Human and social capital in Poland – spatial diversity and relations. <em>Europa XXI</em> 14, 39–55.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Jeřábek, M. (2006). Research into peripheral areas in the Czech Republic – changes in the landscape and land use in the model regions. <em>Europa XXI</em> 15, 171–183.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Juska, A., Poviliunas A. &amp; Pozzuto, R. (2005). Resisting Marginalisation: The Rise of the Rural Community Movement in Lithuania. <em>Sociologia Ruralis</em> 45(1–2), 3–21. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00287.x." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00287.x.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00287.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00287.x</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Juškevičius, P. (2015). Lietuvos miestų sistemos raida ir jos ateities perspektyvos. <em>Acta Academiae Artium Vilensis</em> 76, 11–34.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Kavoliutė, F. (2014). Gyvenamųjų vietovių vardai – nematerialusis šalies kultūros paveldas [Place names – intangible cultural heritage]. <em>Geografijos metraštis</em> 47, 88–102.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Keeble, D. E. (1989). Core-periphery disparities, recession and new regional dynamisms in the European Community. <em>Geography</em> 74(1), 1–11.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/20436564.1989.12452161" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/20436564.1989.12452161</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Kinsey, B. S. (2006). Cleavage formation in Norway: The Contextual Dimension. <em>Scandinavian Political Studies</em> 29(3), 261–283. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00152.x." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00152.x.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00152.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00152.x</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Kondrotaitė, G. (2006). Socialinės rizikos šeimos Lietuvoje: atvejo studija. <em>Filosofija.Sociologija</em> 4, 55–60.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Kriaučiūnas, E., Krupickaité, D., Pociūté-Sereikiné, G. &amp; Ubarevičiuné, R. (2014). Lietuvos kaimo gyvenviečių funkcijų kaitos regioninės ypatybės. <em>Geografijos metraštis</em> 47, 70–87.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Kriaučiūnas, E. (2010). Some development patterns of Lithuanian rural territories in 1990– 2010. <em>Geopolitical Studies</em> 16, 199–212.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Kriaučiūnas, E. &amp; Daugirdas, V. (2013). Rečiausiai gyvenamų Lietuvos teritorijų gyvenviečių tinklo ypatumai <em>Geografijos metraštis</em> 46, 32–45.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Krugman, P. R. (2010). The New Economic Geography, Now Middle-aged. <em>Regional Studies</em> 45(1), 1–7. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.537127." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/00343404.2011.537127.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.537127" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/00343404.2011.537127</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Kühn, M. (2015). Peripheralization: Theoretical Concepts Explaining Socio-Spatial Inequalities. <em>European Planning Studies</em> 23(2), 367–378. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.862518." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/09654313.2013.862518.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.862518" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/09654313.2013.862518</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Kühn, M. &amp; Bernt, M. (2013). Peripheralization and power – Theoretical debates. In Fischer-Tahir, A. &amp; Naumann, M., eds., <em>Peripheralization</em> – <em>The making of spatial dependencies and social injustice</em> (pp. 302–317). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Lang, T. (2012). Shrinkage, Metropolisation and Peripheralisation in East Germany. <em>European Planning Studies</em> 20(10), 1747–1754. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.713336." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/09654313.2012.713336.</a><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.713336" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/09654313.2012.713336</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Lang, T. (2015). Socio-economic and political responses to regional polarisation and socio-spatial peripheralisation in Central and Eastern Europe: a research agenda. <em>Hungarian Geographical Bulletin</em> 64(3), 171–185. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.2." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.2.</a><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.2</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Mačiulytė, J. &amp; Bagočiūtė, A. (2008). Regional Developement Disparities and Regional Policy in Lithuania after Accession to the European Union. In Gaidoš, P., ed., <em>Regional Disparities in Central Europe</em> (pp. 87–97). Bratislava: Interlingua.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Maldžiūnas, V. (1970). <em>Teritorinių mikrorajonų centrų tinklas Lietuvos</em> TSR [PhD thesis]. Kaunas: Kauno politechnikos institutas.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Marada, M., Chromý, P., Jančák, V. &amp; Havlíček, T. (2006). Space polarization and peripheral regions in Czechia. <em>Europa XXI</em> 15, 29–34.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Miggelbrink, J. &amp; Meyer, F. (2015). Lost in Complexity? Researching the Role of Socio-Spatial Ascriptions in the Process of Peripheralization. In Lang, T., Henn, S., Ehrlich., K. &amp; Sgibnev, W., eds., <em>Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization</em> (pp. 62–79). Basingstoke: Palgrave.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137415080_4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1057/9781137415080_4</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Nagy, G. (2006). Economic potential of regions – modelling the spatial structure of Hungary in the period of transition. <em>Europa XXI</em> 14, 7–26.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Pocius, A. (2007). Changes in internal territorial Lithuanian resident mobility and influence of migration of labour market. <em>Survey of Lithuanian economy</em> 2, 24–32.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Pociūtė, G. (2014). Trends of imbalances of demographic and socioeconomic development in post-reform period in Lithuania. In Churski, P., ed., <em>The social and economic growth vs. the emergence of economic growth and stagnation areas</em> (pp. 129–150). Poznan: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Pociūtė-Sereikienė, G., Kriaučiūnas, E. &amp; Ubarevičienė, R. (2014). Peripheralisation trends in rural territories: the case of Lithuania. <em>Studies in Agricultural Economics</em> 116, 122–130. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1421." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.7896/j.1421.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1421" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.7896/j.1421</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Rokkan, S. &amp; Urwin, D. W. (1982). Introduction: Centres and peripheries in Western Europe. In Rokkan, S. &amp; Urwin, D. W., ed., <em>The Politics of territorial identity: Studies in European regionalism</em> (pp. 1–17). London: SAGE Publications.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Rupas, V. &amp; Vaitekūnas, S. (1980). <em>Lietuvos kaimo gyventojai ir gyvenvietės</em> [Lithuanian rural population and settlements]. Vilnius: Mintis.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Šešelgis, K. (1975). <em>Rajoninio planavimo ir urbanistikos pagrindai</em>. Vilnius: Mintis.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Šešelgis, K. (1996). Teritoriju planavimo raida Lietuvoje. <em>Urbanistika ir Architektūra</em> 21(1), 4– 19.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Spiekermann, K. &amp; Wegener, M. (1996). Trans-European Networks and Unequal Accessibility in Europe. <em>European Journal of Regional Development</em> 4, 35–42.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Spoor, M. (2013). Multidimensional Social Exclusion and the ‘Rural-Urban Divide’ in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. <em>Sociologia Ruralis</em> 53(2), 139–157. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12008." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/soru.12008.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12008" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/soru.12008</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] Swain, N. (2016). Eastern European Rurality in Neo-Liberal, European Union World. <em>Sociologia Ruralis</em> 56 (4), 574–596. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12131." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/soru.12131.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12131" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/soru.12131</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] Ubarevičienė, R. &amp; van Ham, M. (2017). Population decline in Lithuania: who lives in declining regions and who leaves? <em>Regional Studies, Regional Science,</em> 4(1), 57–79. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2017.131312." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/21681376.2017.131312.</a><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2017.1313127" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/21681376.2017.1313127</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] Vaishar, A. (2006). Regional periphery: What does it mean? <em>Europa XXI</em> 15, 7–12.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] Vaitekūnas, S. (1989). <em>Gyvenviečių geografija.</em> Vilnius: Vilniaus Universitetas.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. [50] Vaitekūnas, S. (2006). <em>Lietuvos gyventojai: Per du tūkstantmečius.</em> Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. [51] Van Berkel, D. B. &amp; Verburg, P. H. (2011). Sensitising rural policy: Assessing spatial variation in rural development options for Europe. <em>Land Use Policy</em> 28(3), 447–459. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.09.002." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.09.002.</a><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.09.002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.09.002</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. [52] Vanagas, J., Kriśjane, Z., Noorkoiv, R. &amp; Staniunas, E. (2002). Planning urban systems in Soviet times and in the era of transition: the case of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. <em>Geographia Polonica</em> 75(2), 75–100.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. [53] Willett, J. (2010). <em>Why is Cornwall So Poor? Narrative, Perception and Identity</em> [PhD thesis]. Exeter: University of Exeter.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. [54] Census 1989 (1991). <em>Lithuanian 1989 population census data.</em> Vilnius: Statistics Lithuania.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. [55] European Commission (2017). Commission Staff Working Document. Country Report Lithuania 2017. SWD (2017) 80 final. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2017-european-semester-country-reports_en">https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2017-european-semester-country-reports_en</ext-link> Accessed 22 February 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. [56] LR Vyriausybės nutarimas (2003). <em>Dėl probleminių teritorijų išskyrimo kriterijų</em> [LR Government decision “Due to the criterion to distinguish problem territories”]. Act. No. 35–1483.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. [57] LR Vyriausybės nutarimas (2007). <em>Dėl probleminių teritorijų</em> [LR Government decision “Due to problem territories”]. Act. No. 15–555.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. [58] Lyman, R. (2016). Like Trump, Europe‘s Populist Win Big With Rural Voters. <em>The New York Times</em> December 6. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/06/world/europe/europe-poland-populism-rural-voters.html?_r=2">https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/06/world/europe/europe-poland-populism-rural-voters.html?_r=2</ext-link> Accessed 7 December 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. [59] Raagmaa, G. (2003). Centre-periphery model explaning the regional development of informational and transitional society. Conference abstract. 43<sup>rd</sup> Congress of the European regional science association (ERSA) in Jyväskylä, Finland, 27–30 August 2003. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.jyu.fi/ersa2003/cdrom/abstracts/a503.html">http://www.jyu.fi/ersa2003/cdrom/abstracts/a503.html</ext-link> Accessed 15 January 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. [60] Statistics Lithuania (2017). <em>Database of indicators</em>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://osp.stat.gov.lt/en/statistiniu-rodikliu-analize1?epoch=ML">http://osp.stat.gov.lt/en/statistiniu-rodikliu-analize1?epoch=ML</ext-link> Accessed 12 December 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2018-0028 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 498 - 515
Submitted on: Nov 16, 2017
Accepted on: Feb 27, 2018
Published on: Oct 16, 2018
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
peripheral areas,
rural settlements,
socio-spatial transition,
territorial regrouping,
adaptation,
migration,
Lithuania
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2018 Gintarė Pociūtė-Sereikienė, Edis Kriaučiūnas, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 10 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)Next article