Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Well-Being and Participation: Views on Policy Measures in Sparsely Populated Rural Municipalities in Finland Cover

Well-Being and Participation: Views on Policy Measures in Sparsely Populated Rural Municipalities in Finland

Open Access
|Jun 2018

References

  1. [1] Abbott, P. & Sapsford, R. (2005). Living on the margins. Policy Studies 26(1), 29-46. DOI: 10.1080/01442870500041660.10.1080/01442870500041660
  2. [2] Alastalo, M. & Åkerman, M. (2017). Asiantuntijahaastattelun analyysi: Faktojen jäljillä. In Ruusuvuori, J., Nikander, P. & Hyvärinen, M., eds., Haastattelun analyysi (pp. 372-392). Tampere: Vastapaino.
  3. [3] Allardt, E. (1993). Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In Nussbaum, M. & Amartya, S., ed., The quality of life (pp. 88-94). Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198287976.003.0008
  4. [4] Atkinson, S., Fuller, S. & Painter, J. (2012). Wellbeing and Place. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.
  5. [5] Bock, B. B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation: a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis 56(4), 552-573. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12119.10.1111/soru.12119
  6. [6] Copus, A. K., Courtney, P., Dax, T., Meredith, D., Noguera. J., Shucksmith, M. & Talbot, H. (2011). EDORA: European development opportunities for rural areas, Applied Research 2013/1/2 [final report]. Luxembourg: EPSON & UHI Millennium Institute.
  7. [7] Bowling, A. & Windsor, J. (2001). Towards the good life: a population survey of dimensions of quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies 2(1), 55-82. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011564713657.10.1023/A:1011564713657
  8. [8] Erikson, R. (1993). Descriptions of inequality: The Swedish approach to welfare research. In Nussbaum, M. & Amartya, S., eds., The quality of life (pp. 67-83). Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198287976.003.0006
  9. [9] Evers, A. (2009). Civicness and civility: their meanings for social services. Voluntas 20: 239-259. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-009-9088-x.10.1007/s11266-009-9088-x
  10. [10] Evers, A. & Guillemard, A.-M. (2012). Reconfiguring welfare and reshaping citizenship. In Evers, A. & Guillemard, A.-M., eds., Social policy and citizenship: The changing landscape (pp. 359-388). New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199754045.003.0071
  11. [11] Farrington, J. & Farrington, C. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualization. Journal of Transport Geography 13, 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.002.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.002
  12. [12] Halonen, M., Kotilainen, J., Tykkyläinen, M. & Vatanen, E. (2015). Industry life cycles of a resource town in Finland: the case of Lieksa. European Countryside 7(1), 16-41. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2015-0002.10.1515/euco-2015-0002
  13. [13] Hayward, C., Simpson, L. & Wood, L. (2004). Still left out in the cold: problematising participatory research and development. Sociologia Ruralis 44(1), 95-108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00264.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00264.x
  14. [14] Helminen, V., Nurmio, K., Rehunen, A., Ristimäki, M., Oinonen, K., Tiitu, M., Kotavaara, O., Antikainen, H. & Rusanen, J. (2014). Kaupunki-maaseutu-alueluokitus: Paikkatietoihin perustuvan alueluokituksen muodostamisperiaatteet. Helsinki: The Finnsh Environmental Institute.
  15. [15] Hirvilammi, T. (2015). Kestävän hyvinvoinnin jäljillä: Ekologisten kysymysten integroiminen hyvinvointitutkimukseen [Doctoral thesis]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
  16. [16] Juhila, K., Raitakari, S. & Löfstrand, C. H. (2017). Responsibilities and current welfare discourses. In Juhila, K., Raitakari, S. & Hall, C., eds., Responsibilisation at the margins of welfare services (pp. 35-56). London, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315681757
  17. [17] Kainulainen, S. & Rintala, T. (2003). Maaseutukuntien mosaiikki - menestyjiä ja häviäjiä. Maaseudun Uusi Aika 2, 26-35.
  18. [18] Kilpeläinen, A. & Seppänen, M. (2014). Information technology and everyday life in ageing rural villages. Journal of Rural Studies 33, 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.10.005.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.10.005
  19. [19] Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousands Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
  20. [20] Küntzel, S. (2012). The local dimension of active inclusion policy. Journal of European Social Policy 22(1), 3-16. DOI: 10.1177/0958928711425270.10.1177/0958928711425270
  21. [21] Marsden, T. (1998). New rural territories: regulating the differentiated rural spaces. Journal of Rural Studies 14(1), 107-117. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00041-7.10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00041-7
  22. [22] Matthies, A.-L., Kattilakoski, M. & Rantamäki, N. (2011). Citizens participation and community orientation - indicators of social sustainability of rural welfare services. Nordic Social Work Research 1(2), 125-139. DOI: 10.1080/2156857X.2011.613575.10.1080/2156857X.2011.613575
  23. [23] Matthies, A.-L. (2014). How participation, marginalization and welfare are connected. In Matthies, A.-L. & Uggerhøj, L., eds., Participation, marginalization and welfare services: Concepts, politics and practices across European countries (pp. 3-18). Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.
  24. [24] Mewes, J. & Mau, S. (2013). Globalization, socio-economic status and welfare chauvinism: European perspectives on attitudes toward the exclusion of immigrants. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 54(3), 228-245. DOI: 0.1177/0020715213494395.10.1177/0020715213494395
  25. [25] Morse, J. M. & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: principles and procedures. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
  26. [26] Osti, G. (2010). Mobility demands and participation in remote rural areas. Sociologia Ruralis 50(3), 296-310. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00517.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00517.x
  27. [27] Rantamäki, N. & Kattilakoski, M. (2016). Local welfare systems in rural Finland as a representation of sustainable development. In Matthies, A-L. & Närhi, K., eds., The ecosocial transition of societies: The contribution of social work and social policy (pp. 174-189). London: Routledge.
  28. [28] Reimer, B. (2004). Social exclusion in a comparative context. Sociologia Ruralis 44(1), 76-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00263.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00263.x
  29. [29] Room, G. (1995). Beyond the threshold: The measurement and analysis of social exclusion. Bristol: The Policy Press.10.51952/9781447366577
  30. [30] Room, G. (1999). Social exclusion, solidarity and the challenge of globalization. International Journal of Social Welfare 8(3), 166-174. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2397.00080.10.1111/1468-2397.00080
  31. [31] Rubin, H. & Rubin, I. (2012). The qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. London: SAGE Publications.
  32. [32] Saari, J. (2011). Hyvinvoinnin kentät. In Saari, J., ed., Hyvinvointi: Suomalaisen yhteiskunnan perusta. Helsinki: Gaudeamus Helsinki University Press.
  33. [33] Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In Nussbaum, M. & Amartya, S., eds., The quality of life (pp. 30-53). Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198287976.003.0003
  34. [34] Shorthall, S. (2004). Exclusion zones: inadequate resources and civic rights in rural areas. Sociologia Ruralis 44(1), 40-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00260.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00260.x
  35. [35] Shortall, S. (2008). Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: exploring the differences. Journal of Rural Studies 24, 450-457. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001
  36. [36] Shucksmith, M. (2004). Young people and social exclusion in rural areas. Rural Studies 44(1), 43-59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00261.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00261.x
  37. [37] Shucksmith, M., Cameron, S., Merridew, T. & Pichler, F. (2009). Urban-rural differences in quality of life across the European Union. Regional Studies 43(10), 1275-1289. DOI: 10.1080/00343400802378750.10.1080/00343400802378750
  38. [38] Siisiäinen, M. (2014). Four Faces of Participation. In Matthies, A.-L. & Uggerhøj, L., eds., Participation, marginalization and welfare services: Concepts, politics and practices across European countries (pp. 29-46). Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.
  39. [39] Tuuva-Hongisto, S., Pöysä, V. & Armila, P. (2016). Syrjäkylien nuoret- unohdetut kuntalaiset? Helsinki: Kunnallisalan kehittämissäätiön, Tutkimusjulkaisu-sarjan julkaisu 99.
  40. [40] Vaarama, M., Moisio, P. & Karvonen, S. (2010). Hyvinvointipolitiikka 2010-luvulla. Vaarama, M., Moisio, P. & Karvonen, S. eds., Suomalaisten hyvinvointi 2010 (pp. 278-286). Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare.
  41. [41] Veenhoven, R. (2000a). The Four Qualities of Life. Journal of Happiness Studies 1(1), 1-39. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010072010360.10.1023/A:1010072010360
  42. [42] Veenhoven, R. (2000b). Well‐being in the welfare state: level not higher, distribution not more equitable. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 2(1), 91-125. DOI: 10.1080/13876980008412637.10.1080/13876980008412637
  43. [43] Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research 58, 33-45. DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47513-8_3.10.1007/0-306-47513-8_3
  44. [44] Walsh, K., O’Shea, E., Scharf, T. & Shucksmith, M. (2014). Exploring the impact of informal practices on social exclusion and age-friendliness for older people in rural communities. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 24(1), 37-49. DOI: 10.1002/casp.2176.10.1002/casp.2176
  45. [45] Willis, J. W., Muktha, J. & Nilakanta, R. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: interpretive and critical approaches. Thousands Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
  46. [46] Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  47. [47] Basic Education Act 628/1998.
  48. [48] Health Care Act 1326/2010.
  49. [49] Local Government Act 410/2015.
  50. [50] Ministry of Finance (2015) Kuntien itsehallinnolliset tehtävät ja niiden laajuus. Valtiovarainministeriön julkaisuja 40/2015.
  51. [51] Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (2017). Promoting participation <http://stm.fi/en/promoting-participation> Accessed 8.8.2017.
  52. [52] Rural Policy Programme 2014-2020. Mahdollisuuksien maaseutu. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja, Alueiden kehittäminen 9/2014.
  53. [53] Siun sote (2016). Treaty of federation of North Karelia municipalities.
  54. [54] Social Welfare Act 1301/2014.
  55. [55] SYKE, Finnish Environment Institute (2014). Urban-rural classification. <http://www.ymparisto.fi> Published 18.3.2014.
  56. [56] Statistics Finland (2017). Key figures on population by region in 1990 to 2016. Demographic dependency ratio 2016. <http://pxnet2.stat.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/StatFin__vrm__vaerak/048_vaerak_tau_203.px/?rxid=b4fcd82d-96bd-40a1-a8c9-194a2ef2040e> Updated 22.9.2017.
  57. [57] The Strategic Programme of Prime Minister Juha Sipilä’s Government (2015). Finland, a land of solutions. Government Publications 12/2015.
  58. [58] THL, Sotkanet (2017a). Unemployed people, as % of labour force, Regions, 2016. <https://www.sotkanet.fi/sotkanet/en/haku?g=470> accessed 10.8.2017.
  59. [59] THL, Sotkanet (2017b). THL’s morbidity index, age standardised, Regions, 2014. <https://www.sotkanet.fi/sotkanet/en/haku?g=291> accessed 10.6.2017.
Language: English
Page range: 300 - 320
Published on: Jun 29, 2018
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Maija Halonen, Mari Kattilakoski, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.