Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period

European Countryside
Volume 10 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)
By:
Open Access
|Apr 2018

References

  1. [1] Augustyn, A. & Nemes, G. (2014). Catching up with the West? Europeanisation of rural policies in Hungary and Poland. Studies in Agricultural Economies 116, 114–121. DOI: 10.7896/j.1419.10.7896/j.1419
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Belliggiano, A. & De Rubertis, S. (2016). El farm tourism como oportunidad de desarrollo sostenible en las regiones del sur de Italia. Pampa 13, 11–30. DOI: 10.14409/pampa.v0i13.5900.10.14409/pampa.v0i13.5900
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Böcher, M. (2008). Regional governance and rural development in Germany: the implementation of LEADER+. Sociologia Ruralis 48(4), 372–388. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00468.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00468.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Bock, B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis 56 (4), 552–573. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12119.10.1111/soru.12119
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Bonfiglio, A., Camaioni, B., Coderoni, S., Esposti, R., Pagliacci, F. & Sotte, F. (2017). Are rural regions prioritizing knowledge transfer and innovation? Evidence from Rural Development Policy expenditure across the EU space. Journal of Rural Studies 53, 78–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.00510.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.005
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Bosworth, G., Annibal, I., Carroll, T., Price, L., Sellick, J. & Shepherd, J. (2016). Empowering local action through neo-endogenous development; the case of LEADER in England. Sociologia Ruralis 56(3), 427–449. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12089.10.1111/soru.12089
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Bruchmeier, K. (2000). LEADER in Germany and the discourse of autonomous regional development. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2), 219–227. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00144.10.1111/1467-9523.00144
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Copus, A., Skuras, A. & Tsegenidi, K. (2008). Innovation and peripherality: and empirical comparative study of SMEs in six European Union member countries. Economic Geography 84(1), 51–82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00391.x.10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00391.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Dargan, L. & Shucksmith, M., (2008). LEADER and innovation. Sociologia Ruralis 48(3), 274–291. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Dax, T. & Oedl-Wieser, T. (2016). Rural innovation activities as a means for changing development perspectives – An assessment of more than two decades of promoting LEADER initiatives across the European Union. Studies in Agricultural Economics 118, 30–37. DOI: 10.7896/j.1535.10.7896/j.1535
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J. & Maye, D. (2016). The LEADER programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development?. Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies 23(1), 56–68. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413490425.10.1177/0969776413490425
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] De Rubertis, S. (2013). Spazio e sviluppo nelle politiche per il Mezzogiorno. Il caso della programmazione integrata in Puglia. Bologna: Pàtron.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Esparcia, J. (2014). Innovative and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects. Journal of Rural Studies 34, 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.12.004.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.12.004
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Esparcia, J. & Escribano, J. (2012). La dimensión territorial en la programación comunitaria y el nuevo marco de políticas públicas: desarrollo rural territorial, reforma de la PAC y nuevo LEADER. Anales de Geografía 32(2), 227–252. DOI: 10.5209/rev_AGUC.2012.v32.n2.39719.10.5209/rev_AGUC.2012.v32.n2.39719
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Esparcia, J., Noguera, J. & Pitarch, M. (2000). LEADER en España: desarrollo rural, poder, legitimación, aprendizaje y nuevas estructuras. Documentos de Análisis Geográfico 37, 95–113.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Farrell, G. & Thirion, S. (2005). Social capital and rural development: from win-lose to winwin with the LEADER Initiative. In Schmied D., ed.,. Winning and losing. The changing geography of Europe’s rural areas (pp. 45–61), London: Ashgate.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Fhlatharta, A. M. N., & Farrell, M. (2017). Unravelling the strands of ‘patriarchy’in rural innovation: A study of female innovators and their contribution to rural Connemara. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 15–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.002.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.002
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Furmankiewicz, M., Thompson, N. & Zielinska, M. (2010). Area-based partnerships in rural Poland: the post-accession experience. Journal of Rural Studies 26, 52–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.001
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Gardner, G. (2011). Community action in rural Wales. In Milbourne, P., ed., Rural Wales in the twenty-first century: Society, economy and environment (pp. 89–106). Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Labianca, M. (2014). Inter-municipal cooperation: from cooperation through rules to cooperation through networks – empirical evidence from Puglia. Regional Studies Regional Science 1(1), 184–206. DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2014.952769.10.1080/21681376.2014.952769
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Labianca, M., De Rubertis, S., Belliggiano, A. & Salento, A. (2016). Innovation in rural development in Puglia, Italy: critical issues and potentialities starting from empirical evidence. Studies in Agricultural Economics 118, 38–46. DOI: 10.7896/j.1531.10.7896/j.1531
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Lowe, P., Murdoch, J. & Ward, N. (1995). Beyond endogenous and exogenous models: networks in rural development. In van der Ploeg, J. D. and van Dijk, G. eds., Beyond modernization: the impact of endogenous rural development (pp. 87–105). Assen: Van Gorcum.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] MacCallum, D., Moulaert, F., Hillier, J. & Vicari, S. (2009). Social innovation and territorial development. Farnham: Ashgate.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Martínez, F., Sacristán, H. & Yagüe, J. L. (2015). Are local action groups, under LEADER approach, a good way to support resilience in rural areas?. Ager 18, 39–63. DOI: 10.4422/ager.2015.06.10.4422/ager.2015.06
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Midmore, P. (1998). Rural policy reform and local development programmes: appropriate evaluation procedures. Journal of Agricultural Economics 49(3), 409–426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01281.x.10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01281.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E. & González, S. (2005). Towards alternative models of local innovation. Urban Studies 11, 1969–1990. DOI: 10.1080/00420980500279893.10.1080/00420980500279893
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Moulaert, F. (2008). Social innovation: institutionally embedded, territorially (re)produced. In MacCallum, D., Moulaert, F. Hillier, J. & Vicari Haddock, S., eds., Social innovation and territorial development (pp. 11–23). Farnham: Ashgate.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Nardone, G., Sisto, R. & Lopolito, A. (2010). Social capital in the Leader Initiative: a methodological approach. Journal of Rural Studies 26, 63–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.001
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Navarro, F., Cejudo, E. & Maroto, J. (2014). Reflexiones en torno a la participación en el desarrollo rural. ¿Reparto social o reforzamiento del poder? LEADER y PRODER en el sur de España. Eure 40(121), 203–224. DOI: 10.4067/S0250-71612014000300010.10.4067/S0250-71612014000300010
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Navarro, F., Woods, M. & Cejudo, E. (2016). The LEADER Initiative has been a victim of its own success. The decline of the bottom-up approach in rural development programmes. The cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis 56(2), 270–288. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12079.10.1111/soru.12079
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? – Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis 52(1), 48–69. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Osti, G. (2000). Leader and partnerships: the case of Italy. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2), 172–180. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00139.10.1111/1467-9523.00139
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Ploeg, J. D. van der, Renting, H. & Brunori, G. (2000). Rural development: from practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4), 391–408. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00156.10.1111/1467-9523.00156
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Pollermann, K., Raue, P. & Schnaut, G. (2013). Rural development experiences in Germany: opportunities and obstacles in fostering Smart places through LEADER. Studies in Agricultural Economics 115, 111–117. DOI: 10.7896/j.1228.10.7896/j.1228
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Ray, C. (1998). New places and space for rural development in the European Union: an analysis of the UK LEADER II Programme [Working Paper 34]. Newcastle University.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Ray, C. (2006). Neo-endogenous rural development in the European Union. In Cloke, P., Marsden, T. & Mooney, P., eds., The Handbook of Rural Studies (pp. 278–291). London: Sage.10.4135/9781848608016.n19
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Schucksmith, M. (2000). Endogenous development, social capital and social inclusion: perspectives from LEADER in the UK. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2), 208–218. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00143.10.1111/1467-9523.00143
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Shortall, S. (2008). Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: exploring the differences. Journal of Rural Studies 24, 450–457. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] ENRD (2010). Extended report on preserving the innovative character of LEADER. Brussel: ENRD.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] European Union Rural Observatory (1997). Innovation and rural development, Observatory dossier nº 2. Brussels: AEIDL.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Howald, J. & Schwarz, M. (2010). Social Innovation: Concepts, research field and International trends, www.internationalmonitoring.com.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Ex-post evaluation of Leader+. Wien: Metis GmbH.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/European Communities (2005). Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Oslo: OECD.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2018-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 107 - 126
Submitted on: Apr 2, 2017
Accepted on: Dec 8, 2017
Published on: Apr 4, 2018
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
social innovation,
rural development,
LEADER approach,
rural areas,
marginal areas
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2018 Francisco Navarro, Marilena Labianca, Eugenio Cejudo, Stefano de Rubertis, Angelo Salento, Juan Carlos Maroto, Angelo Belliggiano, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 10 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)Next article