Specialities in the Institutionalisation of Hungarian Leader Local Action Groups

Patkós, Csaba

Specialities in the Institutionalisation of Hungarian Leader Local Action Groups

European Countryside

Volume 10 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

By:

Csaba Patkós

Open Access

|Apr 2018

References

[1] Bedrac, M. & Cunder, T. (2010). “Leader” approach and local development strategies in Slovenia. In Fieldsend, A. ed. Rural Areas and Development (pp. 245–256). European Rural Development Network, Debrecen.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] Bogár, E. (2011). The LEADER program in Hungary and in Europe. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 12(3), 486–497. DOI: 10.5513/JCEA01/12.3.945.10.5513/JCEA01/12.3.945
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] Csurgó, B. & Kovách, I. (2015). The LEADER Programme in Hungary – Bottom-up Development with top-down control? In Granberg, L., Andersson, K. & Kovách, I., eds., Evaluating the European approach to rural development (pp 53–78). Farnham: Ashgate.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] Finta, I. et al. (2013). LEADER 2014–2020. Javaslatok a felkészüléshez. Budapest: Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] Furmaniewicz, M. & Macken-Walsh, Á. (2016). Government within governance? Polish rural development partnerships through the lens of functional representation. Journal of Rural Studies 46, 12–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.05.004.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.05.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] Gailing, L. (2012). Dimensions of the social construction of landscapes – Perspectives of new institutionalism. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences – Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. 66, 195–205.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] Gailing, L. & Leibenaht, M. (2015). The social construction of landscapes: two theoretical lenses and their empirical applications. Landscape Research 40(2), 123–138. DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2013.775233.10.1080/01426397.2013.775233
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] Fekete, G. É. (2001). Együtt — de hogyan? Innovációk a kistérségi fejlesztésekben. Miskolc-Pécs: Institute for Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] Kisiel, R. & Gierwiatowska, M. (2013). Functioning of the Polish LAG in the context of the LEADER initiative. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Oeconomia 12(3), 39–50.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[10] Kiss, M. (2016). Helyi termék mint továbblépés? A helyitermék-előállítás szerepe és típusai a hátrányos helyzetű térségekben. Erdélyi Társadalom 14(1), 9–30.10.17177/77171.27
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[11] Kovách, I. (2000). LEADER, a new social order, and the Central and East–European Countries. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2), 181–190. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00140.10.1111/1467-9523.00140
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[12] Kovács, K. & Váradi, M., eds. (2013). Hátrányban vidéken. Budapest: Argumentum.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[13] Kovács, T. (2012). Vidékfejlesztési politika. Budapest: Dialóg Campus.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[14] Krámos, D. (2015). The topography of possible Hungarian renewable energy regions and cities: a possible interpretation based on three models. International Journal of Regional Development 2(1), 1–16. DOI: 10.5296/ijrd.v2i1.7022.10.5296/ijrd.v2i1.7022
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[15] Krolopp, A., Marticsek, J., Petri, M., Szuda, Z. & Francia, R. (2005). “Egy európai eszme és hazai megvalósítása” LEADER – Közösségi kezdeményezés a vidék gazdasági fejlesztése érdekében. Budapest: CEEWEB.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[16] Kull, M. (2014). European integration and rural development: actors, institutions and power. Farnham: Ashgate.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[17] Kurka, B., Maier, G. & Sedlacek, S. (2007). Breaking the vicious cycle in peripheral rural regions: the case of “Waldviertler Wohlviertel” in Austria [Discussion Papers], Vienna University of Economics and Business.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[18] Lukesch, R. (2007). The LAG-Handbook. A guide through the stunning world of local action groups. Brussel: LEADER+ Observatory Contact Point.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[19] Maurel, M. (2008). Local development stakeholders and the European model: learning the LEADER approach in the new member states. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 44(3), 511–529.10.13060/00380288.2008.44.3.04
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[20] Maurel, M. (2016). Building local development on territorial identity: lessons from implementing the LEADER public action model in Central Europe. In Regions in Europe. Administrative structures and territorial identity issues (not paged), Paris: L’Harmettan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[21] Paasi, A. (1986). The institutionalisation of regions: a theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity. Fennia 164(1), 105–146. DOI: 10.11143/9052.10.11143/9052
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[22] Paasi, A. (1991). Deconstructing regions: notes on the scales of spatial life, Environment and Planning A 23, 239–256. DOI: 10.1068/a230239.10.1068/a230239
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[23] Paasi, A. (1996). Territories, boundaries and consciousness: the changing geographies of the Finnish-Russian Border. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[24] Raagmaa, G. (2015). Territorial governance and core-periphery relations: the implications of European Policy concepts for Central and Eastern Europe. In: Lang, T., Henn, S., Sgibnev, W. & Ehrlich, K., eds., Understanding geographies of polarization and peripheralization. New geographies of Europe (pp. 287–308). London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137415080_16
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[25] Ruszkai, Cs. &. Kovács, T. (2013). The Community Initiative LEADER I and the implementation and results of the Hungarian Pilot LEADER programme in rural development. Bulletin of Geography. Socio–economic Series 19, 87–97. DOI: 10.2478/bog-2013-0006.10.2478/bog-2013-0006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[26] Salchner, G. (2014). Setting up effective management in rural development. In Keszthelyi, A., ed., Proceedings of FIKUSZ 2014 (pp. 261–272). Budapest: Óbuda University.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[27] Semian, M., Chromý, P. & Kučera, Z. (2016). Name as a regional brand: The case of Local Action Groups in Czechia. Journal of Language and Politics, 15(6), 768–789. DOI: 10.1075/jlp.15.6.06sem.10.1075/jlp.15.6.06sem
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[28] Šifta, M. & Chromý, P. (2017). The importance of symbols in the region formation process. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 71(2), 98–113. DOI: 10.1080/00291951.2017.1317285.10.1080/00291951.2017.1317285
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[29] Svobodová, H. (2015). Do the Czech Local Action Groups Respect the LEADER Method? Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 63(5), 1769–1777. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563051769.10.11118/actaun201563051769
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[30] Tácsik, B. (2009). Ipoly-menti Palócok Helyi Közösség genezise. Különös tekintettel a Belső – Cserhát vidékre és a LEADER megközelítés szerepére [MA thesis]. Eger: Eszterházy Károly Főiskola.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[31] Thuesen, A. A. (2009). Is LEADER Elitist or Inclusive? Composition of Danish LAG Boards in the 2007–2013 Rural Development and Fisheries Programmes, Sociologia Ruralis, 50(1), 31–45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00500.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00500.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[32] AEID (1994). LEADER Directory of the 217 Local Action Groups. LEADER Coordinating Unit. 470 p.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[33] Brosei, P. (2011). The principles of the Leader approach: lessons learned and future potential for local rural development. European Economic and Social Committee Public Hearing “Leader as a tool for local development” 20 June 2011 [unpublished presentation]. Retrieved from http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/leader-2062011---mr-brosei.pdf (Last access: 7 March 2017)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[34] Brosei, P. (2012). Multi-level governance in LEADER and lessons learned from the implementation. Open Days 2012, 11 October, European Commission DG AGRI Unit “Consistency of rural development“ [unpublished presentation]. Retrieved from http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/enrd-static/fms/pdf/54EB3377-0A21-52D3-2350-EAC29951DBC1.pdf (Last access 3 Sept 2014).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[35] Fekete, G. É. (2014). Helyi termékek a helyi gazdaságfejlesztésben. Presentation at VII. Magyar Földrajzi Konferencia, Miskolc-Lillafüred 2014.09.02.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[36] Lechner Nonprofit Kft. (2015). Nemzeti LEADER Kézikönyv. LEADER Helyi Fejlesztési Stratégia Tervezési Útmutató 2014–2020. Miniszterelnökség Agrár-Vidékfejlesztési Programokért Felelős Helyettes Államtitkárság.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[37] Nemes, G. (2005). Az előcsatlakozási programok (SAPARD, PHARE, ISPA) tapasztalatai. AVOP LEADER+ készségek elsajátítása tananyag, PROMEI-Faluműhely Alapítvány-SZRVA-ZRVA, 2005 9.1. fejezet (pp. 316–336) http://www.promei.hu/index.php?m=1134&id=1066.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[38] ÚMVP (2013). A helyi akciócsoportok munkaszervezeteinek elérhetősége. http://umvp.eu/?q=node/645LEADER_HACS_elérhetőségek_2012_11_ho_IH_orszagos.xls (20 September 2014).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[39] 1312/2016. (VI. 13.) Korm. határozat a központi hivatalok és a költségvetési szervi formában működő minisztériumi háttérintézmények felülvizsgálatával kapcsolatos intézkedésekről.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article