A Territorial Perspective On Eu´S Leader Approach In Denmark: The Added Value Of Community-Led Local Development Of Rural And Coastal Areas In A Multi-Level Governance Settings

Annette Aagaard Thuessen; Niels Christian Nielsen

doi:10.2478/euco-2014-0017

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

A Territorial Perspective On Eu´S Leader Approach In Denmark: The Added Value Of Community-Led Local Development Of Rural And Coastal Areas In A Multi-Level Governance Settings

European Countryside

Volume 6 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)

By: Annette Aagaard Thuessen and Niels Christian Nielsen

Open Access

|Dec 2014

Abstract

This paper investigates the added value of the territorial governance approach LEADER in the multi-level governance setting of rural and coastal development. Using focus group interviews in five Danish rural and fisheries local action groups (LAGs) from the 2007-2013 programming period, the paper demonstrates that pursuing the LEADER method at the LAG level enhances rural development in the form of leverage, democratisation and bottom-up decision making that none of the other levels in the multi-level governance setup of LEADER would be able to provide. However, some of the method’s seven concepts are not fully used. Maintaining a focus on all of the method’s concepts could allow for even greater rural development.

References

[1] Brennan, M. A., Flint, C. G. & Luloff, A. E. (2008). Bringing together local culture and rural development: Findings from Ireland, Pennsylvania and Alaska. Sociologia Ruralis, 49(1), 97-112. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00471.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00471.x
Search in Google Scholar
[2] Bryden, J. & Munro, G. (2000). New approaches to economic development in peripheral rural regions. Scottish Geographical Journal, 116(2), 111-124.DOI: 10.1080/00369220018737085.10.1080/00369220018737085
Search in Google Scholar
[3] CEC (2001). Communication from the Commission of 25 July 2001 "European governance - A white paper", Official Journal C 287 of 12.10.2001. (available at: http://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=URISERV:l10109&rid=1) (accessed on 17th September 2014).
Search in Google Scholar
[4] CEC (2005). Council Regulation No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).
Search in Google Scholar
[5] CEC (2006a). The LEADER Approach - A basic guide. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Search in Google Scholar
[6] CEC (2006b). Commission Regulation No 1974/2006 of 15 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).
Search in Google Scholar
[7] CEC (2012). Community-led local development. Fact Sheet. (available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/conferences/od2012/doc/community_en.pdf) (accessed on 14th February 2013).
Search in Google Scholar
[8] Cioloṣ, D. (2011). Video message from Commissioner Dacian Cioloş. Leader as a driver for Rural Europe: workshop for new LAGs 19-20 January 2011. Brussels, Charlemagne. (available at: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/myenrd/app_templates/filedownload.cfm?id=B98FA8C4-0BFA-F171-F402-8E0272A1E1CB) (accessed on 14th March 2013).
Search in Google Scholar
[9] Clemmensen, N. (1987). Associationer og foreningsdannelse i Danmark 1780-1880: Periodisering og forskningsoversigt. Bergen: Alvheim & Eide.
Search in Google Scholar
[10] Dargan, L. and Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and Innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 48 (3), 274-291. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x
Search in Google Scholar
[11] Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J. & Maye, D. (2013). The Leader programme 2007-2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies, on-line. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413490425.10.1177/0969776413490425
Search in Google Scholar
[12] DGARD (2006). Handbook on common monitoring and evaluation framework, Rural Development 2007-2013, Guidance document. Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development. (available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/eval/guidance/document_en.pdf (accessed on 14th March 2013).
Search in Google Scholar
[13] ECA (2001). Annual Report concerning the financial year 2000 (2001/C 359/01), European Court of Auditors, Official Journal of the European Communities (15.12.2001), pp. 187-194.
Search in Google Scholar
[14] ECA (2010). Implementation of the LEADER approach for rural development. Special Report No 5. European Court of Auditors. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Search in Google Scholar
[15] Edmunds, H. (1999) The focus group research handbook. Chicago: NTC Business Books.10.1108/bl.1999.12.3.46.1
Search in Google Scholar
[16] EENRD (2010). Working paper on Capturing impacts of Leader and of measures to improve Quality of Life in rural areas. (available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/eval/wp-leader_en.pdf (accessed on 13 th March 2013).
Search in Google Scholar
[17] ENRD (2010a). Leader subcommittee Focus Group on the Implementation of the bottomup approach - Extended Report. (available at: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/myenrd/app_templates/filedownload.cfm?id=B66F1BB9-BE4C-5C73-E1F3-B9FE448D0A18 (accessed on 14th March 2013).
Search in Google Scholar
[18] ENRD (2010b). Leader subcommittee focus group on Preserving the innovative/experimental character of Leader - Extended Report on Preserving the Innovative Character of Leader. (available at: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/app_templates/filedownload.cfm?id=7CC8B99E-925C-7C33-CE76-1814EDEAD8A3 (accessed on: 14th March 2013).
Search in Google Scholar
[19] ENRD (2010c). LEADER Sub-committee focus group on Implementation of the measure "Cooperation", Report to the Leader subcommittee of 20 May 2010. (available at: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/app_templates/filedownload.cfm?id=BEE357F9-BDB7-6912-A6AE-581D81990191 (accessed on 14th March 2013).
Search in Google Scholar
[20] ENRD (2011). LEADER Transnational Cooperation Guide. (available at: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/app_templates/filedownload.cfm?id=2A9A7348-B2CD-A9FB-620D-67CE880700D6 (accessed on 18th March 2013).
Search in Google Scholar
[21] Furmankiewicz, M. (2012). LEADER+ Territorial Governance in Poland: Successes and Failures as a Rational Choice Effect. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 103(3), 261-275. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00680.x. 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00680.x
Search in Google Scholar
[22] Galamba, M-L. L. (2011). De lokale aktionsgrupper som arnested for samarbejdsdrevet innovation i landdistrikterne? In: Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J., eds. Samarbejdsdrevet innovation i den offentlige sektor, Djøf/Jurist- og Økonomforbundet, pp. 339-362.
Search in Google Scholar
[23] Googins, B. K. & Rochlin, S. A. (2000). Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 127-144. DOI: 10.1111/0045-3609.00068.10.1111/0045-3609.00068
Search in Google Scholar
[24] Halkier, B. (2009). Fokusgrupper. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
Search in Google Scholar
[25] Hardis, J. (2003). Social multipartite partnerships - When practice does not fit rhetoric. In: Morsing, M. & Thyssen, C., Eds. Corporate Values and Responsibility: The Case of Denmark (pp. 199-210). Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
Search in Google Scholar
[26] Hardis, J. (2004). Sociale partnerskaber - et socialkonstruktivistisk casestudie af partnerskabsaktørers virkelighedsopfattelse mellem identitet og legitimitet. PhD serie, nr. 2004-6. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
Search in Google Scholar
[27] Healey, P., de Magalhaes, C. & Madanipour, A. (1999). Institutional capacity-building, Urban Planning and urban regeneration projects. Futura 18(3), 117-137.
Search in Google Scholar
[28] High, C. & Nemes, G. (2007). Social Learning in LEADER: Exogenous, Endogenous and Hybrid Evaluation in Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 47(2), 103-119. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00430.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00430.x
Search in Google Scholar
[29] Hooghe, L. & Marks, M. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233-243. DOI: 10.1017.S0003055403000649.
Search in Google Scholar
[30] Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. (2004). Doing things collaboratively: Realizing the Advantage or Succombing to Inertia? Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 190-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.01.006.10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.01.006
Search in Google Scholar
[31] Kull, M. (2009). EU Multi-level Governance in the Making - The Community Initiative LEADER+ in Finland and Germany. Paper presented at the EUSA Eleventh Biennal International Conference, Los Angeles, April 23-25, 2009.
Search in Google Scholar
[32] Lošták, M. & Hudečková, H. (2010). Preliminary impacts of the LEADER+ approach in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics, 56(6), 249-265.
Search in Google Scholar
[33] Lowndes, V. & Sullivan, H. (2004). Like a Horse and Carriage or a Fish on a Bicycle: How Well do Local Partnerships and Public Participation go Together? Local Government Studies, 30(1), 51-73. DOI: 10.1080/0300393042000230920.10.1080/0300393042000230920
Search in Google Scholar
[34] Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2004). Contrasting Visions of Multi-level Governance. In: Bache, I. & Flinders, M., eds. Multi-level Governance (pp.15-23), Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar
[35] Marquardt, D. (2011). Rural Networks in the Funding Period 2007-2013: A Critical Review of the EU Policy Instrument. Discussion Paper No. 133. Halle an der Saale: Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe.
Search in Google Scholar
[36] Marquardt, D. (2013). “Networking” and “New modes of governance” in EU Rural Development Policies - Challenges of implementation in Romania. Institut für Agrar- und Ernährungswissenschaften der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät III der Martin-Luther- Universität Halle-Wittenberg.
Search in Google Scholar
[37] MBBL (2013). De lokale aktionsgrupper - introduktion og status for perioden 2007-2012. København: Ministeriet for By, Bolig og Landdistrikter.
Search in Google Scholar
[38] MFAF (2007a). Bekendtgørelse om oprettelse og drift af lokale aktionsgrupper under landdistriktsprogrammet for perioden 2007-2013, BEK nr. 490 af 30/05/2007.
Search in Google Scholar
[39] MFAF (2007b). Bekendtgørelse om oprettelse og drift af lokale aktionsgrupper under fiskeriudviklingsprogrammet for perioden 2007-2013, BEK nr. 740 af 27/06/2007.
Search in Google Scholar
[40] MFAF (2010). Midtvejsevaluering af det danske landdistriktsprogram. Delrapport vedrørende Netværkscentret og Leader - Lokale Aktions grupper. Orbicon/Epinion.
Search in Google Scholar
[41] Nardone, G., Sisto, R. & Lopolito, A. (2010). Social Capital in the LEADER Initiative: a methodological approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(1), 63-72. DOI: org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.001
Search in Google Scholar
[42] Neumeier, S. (2011). Why do Social Innovations in Rural Development Matter and Should They be Considered More Seriously in Rural Development Research? - Proposal for a Stronger Focus on Social Innovations in Rural Development Research. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(1), 48-59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x
Search in Google Scholar
[43] OECD (2006). The new rural paradigm: Policies and Governance. Paris: OECD Rural Policy Reviews.10.1787/9789264023918-en
Search in Google Scholar
[44] Perez, J. E. (2000). The LEADER Programme and the Rise of Rural Development in Spain. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 200-207. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00142.10.1111/1467-9523.00142
Search in Google Scholar
[45] Provan, K. G., Veazie, M. A., Staten, L. K. & Teufel-Shone, N. I. (2005). The Use of Network Analysis to Strengthen Community Partnerships. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 603-613. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00487.x.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00487.x
Search in Google Scholar
[46] Ray, C. (2001). Transnational Co-operation between Rural Areas: Elements of a Political Economy of EU Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 41(3), 279-295. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00183.10.1111/1467-9523.00183
Search in Google Scholar
[47] Ray, C. (1998). Culture, intellectual property and territorial rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 38(1), 3-20. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00060.10.1111/1467-9523.00060
Search in Google Scholar
[48] Scott, M. (2002). Delivering Integrated Rural Development: Insights from Northern Ireland. European Planning Studies, 10(8), pp. 1013-1025. DOI: 10.1080/0965431022000031284.10.1080/0965431022000031284
Search in Google Scholar
[49] Scott, M. (2004). Building institutional capacity in rural Northern Ireland: the role of the partnership governance in the LEADER II programme. Journal of Rural Studies, 20(1), 49-59. DOI: org/10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00042-1.10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00042-1
Search in Google Scholar
[50] Shucksmith, M. (2000). Endogenous development, social capital and social inclusion: perspectives from LEADER in the UK. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 208-218. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00143.10.1111/1467-9523.00143
Search in Google Scholar
[51] Shucksmith, M. (2010). Disintegrated rural development? Neo-endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place-Shaping in Diffused Power Contexts. Sociologia Ruralis, 50(1), 1-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00497.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00497.x
Search in Google Scholar
[52] Svendsen, G. T. & Svendsen, G. L. H. (2004). The Creation and Destruction of Social Capital: Entrepreneurship, Co-operative Movements and Institutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Search in Google Scholar
[53] Svendsen, G. T. & Svendsen, G. L. H. (2006). Social Capital - En Introduktion. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Search in Google Scholar
[54] Sørensen, E., (2006). Metagovernance: the changing role of politicians in processes of democraticgovernance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 98-114. DOI:10.1080/03003930.2012.755463.10.1080/03003930.2012.755463
Search in Google Scholar
[55] Teilmann, K. (2012). Measuring social capital accumulation in rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 28(4), 458-465. DOI: org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.10.002.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.10.002
Search in Google Scholar
[56] Terluin, I. J. (2003). Differences in economic development in rural regions of advanced countries: an overview and critical analysis of theory. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(3), 327-344. DOI: org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00071-2.10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00071-2
Search in Google Scholar
[57] Thuesen, A. A. (2010). Is LEADER Elitist or Inclusive? Composition of Danish LAG Boards in the 2007 - 2013 Rural Development and Fisheries Programmes. Sociologia Ruralis, 50(1), 31-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00500.x. 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00500.x
Search in Google Scholar
[58] Vidal, R. V. V. (2009). Community facilitation of problem structuring and decision making processes: Experiences from the EU LEADER+ programme. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(3), 803-810. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.055. 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.055
Search in Google Scholar

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2014-0017 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 307 - 326

Submitted on: May 20, 2014

Accepted on: Sep 26, 2014

Published on: Dec 30, 2014

Published by: Mendel University in Brno

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

Keywords:

Rural and coastal development,

territorial governance,

community-led local development (CLLD),

local action groups (LAGs and FLAGs),

LEADER,

multi-level governance (MLG)

Related subjects:

Life sciences,

Ecology,

Life sciences, other

© 2014 Annette Aagaard Thuessen, Niels Christian Nielsen, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 6 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)