Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How can “gender planning” contribute to tackle the challenges of demographic change? Cover

How can “gender planning” contribute to tackle the challenges of demographic change?

European Countryside
Volume 6 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)
By: Heidrun Wankiewicz  
Open Access
|Feb 2014

References

  1. [1] Aufhauser, E. (2005). Unternehmerinnen & Unternehmen in der Innovationsregion Süd Ost. [Project Ginnova]. Universität Wien.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Burgess, G. (2008). Planning and the Gender Equality Duty- why does gender matter? In: People, Place and Policy Online 2(3), 112-121.10.3351/ppp.0002.0003.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Buchinger, B., Huber, P., Lutz, H., Mayrhuber, C. & Schratzenstaller, M. (2010). Salzburger Leitbild für Chancengleichheit von Frauen und Männern. Wien: Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] De Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkely: University of Califonia Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] CEC (2010). Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union C 83, 391-403.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] CEC (2006a). Council Decision of 6 October 2006 on Community strategic guidelines on cohesion. Official Journal of the European Union L291, 11-32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Cortolezis, H. (2010). Steht Regionalentwicklung drauf, muss Gender Mainstreaming rein.Raum vol. 77, 26-29.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Damyanovic, D. (2007). Landschaftsplanung als Qualitätssicherung zur Umsetzung der Strategie des Gender Mainstreaming. Theoretische und methodische Konzepte eines gendergerechten Planungsprozesses als Bestandteil des Örtlichen Entwicklungskonzeptes dargestellt an der Fallstudie Tröplach/Stadtgemeinde Hermargor/Pressegger See (Kärnten). Wien: Guthmann-Peterson.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Demochange (2013). Der demographische Wandel. Herausforderungen für Raumplanung und Regionalentwicklung. Land Salzburg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Demochange (2011a). Demographic Change in Model Regions Pongau-Pinzgau-Lungau. [Short Regional Report]. Land Salzburg/Universität Salzburg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Demochange (2011b). Porträt der Salzburger Modellregion Pongau-Pinzgau-Lungau. Land Salzburg/Universität Salzburg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Dollinger, F., Spitzer, W., Prinz, T. & Wankiewicz, H. (2010). Raumplanung als Alltagsmanagement für ALLE? Herausforderungen des demographischen Wandels - Werkstattbericht Demochange. In Schrenk, M., Popovich, V. V., Zeile, P, eds.: Real Corp Proceedings (pp. 599-608). Wien.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Egerö, B. (2012). Four decades of Swedish cohousing - what chances of a real take-off? In Proceedings of the conference‚ Self-managed co-housing: born out of needs or new form of life? (pp. 66-80): Tours: CNRS.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Fainstein, S. (2009). Spatial Justice and Planning. Journal on Spatial Justice and Planning 1(1), 58-77.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Fainstein, S. & Servon, L. (2005). Gender and planning: A Reader. Piscataway (NJ): Rutgers University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Greed, C. (1994). Women and Planning. London: Taylor and Francis.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Magel, H., et al. (2011), Warum Frauen nicht arbeiten können und Männer das Geld verdienen. München: Grontmij.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Häberli, R., Lüscher, C., Praplan Chastonay, B. & Wyss, C. (1991). Boden-Kultur.Vorschläge für eine haushälterische Nutzung des Bodens in der Schweiz. Zurich: Verlag der Fachvereine.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies.London. UBC Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Horelli, L. (2013). Gender Sensitive E-Planning for Sustaining Everyday Life. In Sanchez de Madariaga, I. & Roberts, M., eds, Fair Shared Cities. The Impact of Gender Planning in Europe (pp. 231-248). Farnham: Ashgate.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Horelli, L., (2010). Sustaining Everyday Life through Psychological Presence, Time, and Space. In: Karlsson, K. & Ellegård, K., eds., Proceedings of the Sustaining Everyday Life Conference. Issue 38. Linköping University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Horelli, L. (2009). Gender-Sensitive Community Informatics for Sustaining Everyday Life.Paper presented for the Madrid EURA-Conference on “City futures in a Globalised World” - Madrid 04.-06.06.2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Hudson, C. & Rönnblom, M. (2008). The Woman-Made City - Feminist Utopia or Practical Possibility? In Denèfle S., ed., Utopies féministes et expérimentations urbaines (pp. 73-90).PU Rennes.10.4000/books.pur.1536
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Kail, E. & Irschek, E. (2010). Fair shared city: Gender Mainstreaming planning strategy in Vienna In Gender and Urban policies, strategies for gender mainstreaming and local governance (pp. 43-66). City of Seoul.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] Karlsson, K. & Ellegård, K., eds. (2009). Proceedings of the Sustaining Everyday Life Conference. Issue 38. Linköping University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Labit, A. (2012). Self-managed cohousing within the context of an ageing population: some experiences in France, Germany and Sweden. In Proceedings of the conference ‚Selfmanaged co-housing: born out of needs or new form of life?’ (pp. 66-80): Tours: CNRS.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] Land Salzburg (2009). Sachprogramm. Standortentwicklung für Wohnen und Arbeiten im Salzburger Zentralraum. Land Salzburg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] Land Salzburg and Partners, eds. (2007a). GenderAlp! Spatial development for women and men. [Final publication]. Salzburg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] Land Salzburg, ed. (2007b). Living and working in Salzburg for women and men.Requirement oriented spatial planning. GenderAlp! best practice documentation. Retrieved from http://www.genderalp.com/IMG/pdf/82_Salzburg_planning_May_07-pr-eng.pdf, accessed: 5/10/2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] Land Niederösterreich, ed., (2007). GenderAlp! Equality in in Lower Austrian Business parks. [Short report: Results and Recommendations]. St. Pölten: Land Niederösterreich..
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. [31] Larsson, A. (2006). From equal opportunities to gender awareness in spatial planning.Town Planning Review 77(5), 509-530.10.3828/tpr.77.5.2
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. [32] Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of Space. Oxford. Blackwell.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. [33] Löw, M. (2001). Raumsoziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. [34] Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. [35] Oedl-Wieser, T., Gmeiner, P. & Machold, I. (2012). Politische Mitbestimmung von Frauen in ländlichen Regionen Österreichs, Fact Sheet Nr. 3, Wien: Bundesanstalt für Bergbauernfragen.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. [36] Roberts, M. (2013). Introduction: Concepts, Themes and Issues in a Gendered Approach to Planning. In Sanchez de Madariaga, I. & Roberts, M., eds, Fair Shared Cities.The Impact of Gender Planning in Europe (pp. 1-20). Farnham: Ashgate.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. [37] Roberts, M. (2006). A place for citizenship? Women, Urban Design and Neighbourhood planning. In Buckingham, S. & Lievesley, G., eds., In the Hands of Women: Paradigms of Citizenship (pp. 95-126). Manchester University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. [38] RTPI (Royal Town Planning Institute 2007). Gender and Spatial Planning. RTPI Good practice note 7. Online retrieved from http://www.rtpi.org.uk/knowledge/publications/goodpractice-notes/gpn-7-gender-and-spatial-planning/ - accessed 26/10/2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. [39] SEMIGRA_a (2013). Selected Migration and Ubalanced Sex Ratio in Rural Regions.ESPON Targeted Analysis 2013/2/15. [Final Report] V. 30/06/12. Leipzig: Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. [40] SEMIGRA_b (2013). Case Study Report Sachsen-Anhalt. [Annex 2 A / Version 28 June 2012]. Leipzig: Leibniz Institut für Regional Geography.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. [41] Soja, E. W. (2009). The city and spatial justice. Journal on Spatial Justice and Planning. 1(1), 31-38.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. [42] Statistik Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (2012). Der demografische Wandel in Mecklenburg- Vorpommern - Veränderung der Altersstruktur, demografische Alterung und Schrumpfung von 1982 bis 2007 Retrieved from: http://www.statistikmv.de/cms2/STAM_prod/STAM/_downloads/Bevoelkerung/2-Altersstruktur.pdf, accessed: 12/01/2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. [43] Theorizing and Practizing Gender Sensitive Planning in European Discourse (2013).Leibniz Universität Hannover.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. [44] Tummers, L. (2013). Spatial planning at work: a gendered perspective form the Netherlands. In Sanchez de Madariaga, I. & Roberts, M., eds, Fair Shared Cities.The Impact of Gender Planning in Europe (pp. 131-154). Farnham: Ashgate.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. [45] Tummers, L. (2010). To the heart of planning: is the hardware of spatial planning open to feminist alternatives? In Ernst W., ed., Geschlecht und Innovation. Gender Mainstreaming im Techno-Wissenschaftsbetrieb. Internationale Genderforschung in Niedersachsen (pp.117-136). Berlin: LIT-Verlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. [46] Tummers, L. & Wankiewicz, H. (2009). Beyond the ‘women friendly-city’. Paper presented for the AESOP YA-conference “Planning as rear view mirror or Crystal Ball? - Diversities of Planning Cultures, Traditions Identities” in Vienna 12.02.2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. [47] Wankiewicz, H. (2013). European regional development programmes for cities and regions: Driving forces for gender planning? In Sanchez de Madariaga, I. & Roberts, M., eds, Fair Shared Cities. The Impact of Gender Planning in Europe (pp. 131-154). Farnham: Ashgate.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. [48] Wankiewicz, H., (2009). Are we really planning for people’s needs? Regions Magazine 274 (Suppl. 1,: 9-11). Doi: 10.1080/13673882.2009.1053.10.1080/13673882.2009.1053
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. [49] Wankiewicz, H., & Schrenk, M., (2004). Raumanalyse Salzburger Zentralraum. Retrieved from http://planwind.at/publikationen/sp_zentralraum-endbericht.pdf. Accessed: 25/10/2012
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. [50] Wotha, B. (2000). Gender Planning und Verwaltungshandeln. Umsetzung von Genderbelangen in räumliche Planung - unter Berücksichtigung von Verwaltungsmodernisierung und neuerer Tendenzen im Planungsbereich. Kiel: Kieler Arbeitspapiere zur Landeskunde und Raumordnung.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. [51] Zibell, B. (2006). Gender practice and criteria in Spatial Planning. GenderAlp! Salzburg Project. Short Version. Salzburg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. [52] ZBG Zweckverband Großraum Braunschweig/ Universität Hannover (eds., 2005). Good Practices. Praxisbeispiele zum Thema Wohnen und Versorgung’ (Good practices in housing and supply). Braunschweig.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. DEMOCHANGE project - (en, it, slo, ge) www.demochange.org DEMOCHANGE Salzburg (ge) www.demochange.at GDUS - European Network on Gender and diversity und urban sustainability GDUS (2012) http://www.rali.boku.ac.at/gdus.html GenderAlp! Spatial development for women and men project: http://www.genderalp.at/ QUING - Quality in Gender+ Equality Policies - The Quing project: www.quing.eu SEMIGRA - http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_TargetedAnalyses/semigra.html
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2014-0006 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 68 - 87
Published on: Feb 18, 2014
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
planning for the everyday,
gendered distribution of work,
spatial living conditions of women and men in rural areas,
spatial impacts of demographic change,
supportive infrastructures,
participation
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2014 Heidrun Wankiewicz, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous articleVolume 6 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)