Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How Does Quality of Life (QOL) Affect Attractiveness of Cities and Internal Migration in Turkey? Cover

How Does Quality of Life (QOL) Affect Attractiveness of Cities and Internal Migration in Turkey?

Economic Themes
Volume 61 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)
By:
Open Access
|Apr 2023

References

  1. Ahmadiani, M. & Ferreira, S. (2019). Environmental amenities and quality of life across the United States. Ecological economics, 164, 106341.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Amara, M. & Jemmali, H. (2018). Deciphering the relationship between internal migration and regional disparities in Tunisia. Social Indicators Research, 135(1), 313-331.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Amin, R. W., Rivera-Muñiz, B., & Guttmann, R. P. (2021). A spatial study of quality of life in the USA. SN Social Sciences, 1(5), 1-19.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical analysis, 27(2), 93-115.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Awasthi, S. (2021). ‘Hyper’-Urbanisation and migration: A security threat. Cities, 108, 102965.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Bauer, T. K., Rulff, C., & Tamminga, M. M. (2019). Berlin calling-Internal migration in Germany (No. 823). Ruhr Economic Papers.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Bayramoğlu, Z. & Bozdemir, M. (2019). Dış göçlerin mevsimlik tarım işçiliği üzerine etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 9(2), 1164-1176.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Bell, A., Fairbrother, M., & Jones, K. (2019). Fixed and Random effects models: making an informed choice. Quality & quantity, 53, 1051–1074.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Bryan, G. & Morten, M. (2019). The aggregate productivity effects of internal migration: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 127(5), 2229-2268.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Buch, T., Hamann, S., Niebuhr, A., & Rossen, A. (2014). What makes cities attractive? The determinants of urban labour migration in Germany. Urban Studies, 51(9), 1960-1978.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Carlino, G. A. & Saiz, A. (2019). Beautiful city: Leisure amenities and urban growth. Journal of Regional Science, 59(3), 369-408.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. De Nadai, M., Xu, Y., Letouzé, E., González, M. C., & Lepri, B. (2020). Socio-economic, built environment, and mobility conditions associated with crime: a study of multiple cities. Scientific reports, 10(1), 1-12.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Didenko, I., Volik, K., Vasylieva, T., Lyeonov, S., & Antoniuk, N. (2020). Migration, environment, and country safety: Analysis of touchpoints. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 202, p. 03028). EDP Sciences.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Dotti, N. F., Fratesi, U., Lenzi, C., & Percoco, M. (2013). Local labour markets and the interregional mobility of Italian university students. Spatial Economic Analysis, 8(4), 443-468.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Evandrou, M., Falkingham, J., & Green, M. (2010). Migration in later life: evidence from the British Household Panel Study. Population trends, 141(1), 77-94.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Ferguson, M., Ali, K., Olfert, M. R., & Partridge, M. (2007). Voting with their feet: Jobs versus amenities. Growth and Change, 38(1), 77-110.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Garretsen, H. & Marlet, G. (2017). Amenities and the attraction of Dutch cities. Regional Studies, 51(5), 724-736.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Hakim, A. R., Nachrowi, N. D., Handayani, D., & Wisana, I. D. G. K. (2022). Do Amenities and Economic Factors Affect Migration? Empirical Evidence from Indonesian Cities. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 13(1), 11-26.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 25(2), 73–76.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Higa, K., Nonaka, R., Tsurumi, T., & Managi, S. (2019). Migration and human capital: Evidence from Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 54, 101051.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Huggins, R., Prokop, D., & Thompson, P. (2020). Universities and open innovation: The determinants of network centrality. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(3), 718-757.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Karakayacı, Z. & Öz, A. A. (2020). Kentten Köye Göç Eğiliminin Sınıflandırma Ağacı Yöntemine Göre Analizi. Ziraat Mühendisliği, (369), 84-93.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Kirchberger, M. (2021). Measuring internal migration. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 91, 103714.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., & Wahlström, M. H. (2021). How to make cities the home of people– a ‘soul and body’analysis of urban attractiveness. Land use policy, 111, 104734.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Laajimi, R., & Le Gallo, J. (2022). Push and pull factors in Tunisian internal migration: The role of human capital. Growth and Change, 53(2), 771-799.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Lagakos, D. (2020). Urban-rural gaps in the developing world: Does internal migration offer opportunities?. Journal of Economic perspectives, 34(3), 174-92.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Lyu, H., Dong, Z., Roobavannan, M., Kandasamy, J., & Pande, S. (2019). Rural unemployment pushes migrants to urban areas in Jiangsu Province, China. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1-12.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Nilsson, B. & Ramadan, R. (2020). Migration and inequalities around the Mediterranean Sea (No. 788). LIS Working Paper Series.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Özdemir, D. (2018). Türkiye’de bölgelerarası iç göç hareketlerinin belirleyicileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(3), 1337-1349.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Özer İ. Kentleşme, Kentlileşme Ve Kentsel Değişme. Ekin Kitabevi, 2004.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Peters, M. E. & Shin, A. J. (2022). Inequality and immigration policy. Studies in Comparative International Development, 1-28.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Pierewan, A. C. & Tampubolon, G. (2014). Spatial dependence multilevel model of well-being across regions in Europe. Applied Geography, 47, 168-176.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Piras, R. (2017). A long-run analysis of push and pull factors of internal migration in Italy. Estimation of a gravity model with human capital using homogeneous and heterogeneous approaches. Papers in regional Science, 96(3), 571-602.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Rodríguez-Vignoli, J. & Rowe, F. (2018). How is internal migration reshaping metropolitan populations in Latin America? A new method and new evidence. Population Studies, 72(2), 253-273.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Rowe, F., Corcoran, J., & Bell, M. (2017). The returns to migration and human capital accumulation pathways: non-metropolitan youth in the school-to-work transition. The Annals of Regional Science, 59(3), 819-845.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Rowe, F., Bell, M., Bernard, A., Charles-Edwards, E., & Ueffing, P. (2019). Impact of internal migration on population redistribution in Europe: Urbanisation, counterurbanisation or spatial equilibrium?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03795.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Shi, T., Zhu, W., & Fu, S. (2021). Quality of life in Chinese cities. China Economic Review, 69, 101682.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Snijders, T. A. & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. sage.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Stockdale, A. & Haartsen, T. (2018). Editorial introduction: Putting rural stayers in the spotlight. Population, Space and Place, 24(4), e2124.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Şen, B. & Altın, C. (2018). MEVSİMLİK GÖÇ VE YOKSULLUK İLİŞKİSİ: MEVSİMLİK TARIM İŞÇİLERİ ÖRNEĞİ. Motif Akademi Halkbilimi Dergisi, 11(23), 174-192.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Teke-Lloyd, F. A., Türk, U., & Özgür Dönmez, R. (2022). Social mobility and pro-government mobilization: the case of July 15th pro-government mobilization in Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 22(2), 281-304.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Tiebout, C.M. (1956), A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures, Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Türk, U. & Östh, J. (2019). How much does geography contribute? Measuring inequality of opportunities using a bespoke neighbourhood approach. Journal of Geographical Systems, 21(2), 295-318.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Yang, Z., Cai, J., Qi, W., Liu, S., & Deng, Y. (2017). The influence of income, lifestyle, and green spaces on interregional migration: Policy implications for China. Population, Space and Place, 23(2), e1996.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Yılmaz, V. (2019). İç Göçün Nedenleri ve Değerlendirilmesi: Bitlis İli Örneği. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 11(18), 1709-1735.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Yu, Z., Zhang, H., Tao, Z., & Liang, J. (2019). Amenities, economic opportunities and patterns of migration at the city level in China. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 28(1), 3-27.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Xing, C. & Zhang, J. (2017). The preference for larger cities in China: Evidence from rural-urban migrants. China Economic Review, 43, 72-90.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Zhao, L., Liu, S., & Zhang, W. (2018). New trends in internal migration in China: Profiles of the New-generation migrants. China & World Economy, 26(1), 18-41.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Zheng, L. (2016). What city amenities matter in attracting smart people?. Papers in Regional Science, 95(2), 309-327.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2023-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2217-3668 | Journal ISSN: 0353-8648
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 85 - 103
Submitted on: Feb 2, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 8, 2023
Published on: Apr 15, 2023
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
internal migration,
quality of life,
attractiveness,
mobility,
amenities,
multilevel model,
LISA
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other,
Business management,
Business management, other

© 2023 İsmet Selçuk Özer, Umut Türk, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 61 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)Next article