Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Intellectual property rights in regional trade agreements: balancing economic and political interests in the EU and RCEP Cover

Intellectual property rights in regional trade agreements: balancing economic and political interests in the EU and RCEP

By: Garima Sangwan  
Open Access
|Nov 2024

References

  1. Alikhan, S., Mashelkar, R. (eds.) (2009). Intellectual property and competitive strategies in 21st century. Wolters Kluwer.
  2. Driving Innovation. (n.d.). The dynamic knowledge economy: Shifting industries and technologies. Retrieved from: drivinginnovation.ie.edu
  3. European Commission. (2020). Intellectual Property Rights in the European Union. Retrieved from: http://europa.eu
  4. Kang, S-J. (2020). Convergence and Divergence in Intellectual Property-Related Provisions in EU-Asia- Pacific Trade Partnership Agreements. In: A. Berramdane, M. Trochu, Economic Power Partnerships in Asia-Pacific (p. 797-818). London: Sweet & Maxwell.
  5. Krizic, I., Serrano, O. (2017). Exporting intellectual property rights to emerging countries: EU and US approaches compared. European Foreign Affairs Review, 22(Special), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.54648/EERR2017020
  6. Maskus, K. E., Reichman, J. H. (2004). The globalization of private knowledge goods and the privatization of global public goods. Journal of International Economic Law, 7(2), 279-320. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/7.2.279
  7. Ministry of Trade and Industry Singapore (2022). RCEP Intellectual Property Rights Chapter 11. Retrieved from: http://www.mti.gov.sg
  8. Motta, M. (2004). Competition policy: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804038
  9. Phoebe, C. (2023). The Role of RCEP in Harmonizing IP Rights in Asia-Pacific. Asian Law Journal.
  10. Reichman, J. H. (2009). Intellectual property in the twenty-first century: will the developing countries lead or follow? Houston Law Review, 46(4), 1115-1185.
  11. Sell, S. K. (2003). Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491665
  12. The World Bank. (2023). Merchandise trade (% of GDP) [Data file]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TG.VAL.TOTL.GD.ZS. Accessed: July 24, 2024.
  13. The World Bank. (n.d.). High-technology exports (% of manufactured exports) [Data]. World Development Indicators. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS
  14. UNCTAD Report (2007). Stringent Intellectual Property Projection Hampers Technological Progress in the World’s Progress in the World’s Poorest Countries. Geneva, Switzerland, 9 July 2007.
  15. World Intellectual Property Organization (1967). Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization. Available from: https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/283854#P50_1504] (Accessed on July 26, 2024).
  16. Wu, Y. (2022). How the RCEP has benefited China: Initial findings from 2022. China Briefing. Available from: https://www.china-briefing.com/news/how-has-the-rcep-benefitted-china-findings-from-the-initial-months-of-operation-2022/
  17. Yu, P. K. (2017). The RCEP and Intellectual Property Norm-Setting in the Asia-Pacific. Current alliances in international intellectual property lawmaking: the emergence and impact of mega-regionals, Pedro Roffe and Xavier Seuba, eds., CEIPI and ICTSD, 89-107.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2024-0024 | Journal eISSN: 2451-182X | Journal ISSN: 2083-3725
Language: English
Page range: 446 - 462
Submitted on: Aug 1, 2024
Accepted on: Sep 1, 2024
Published on: Nov 5, 2024
Published by: John Paul II University of Applied Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Garima Sangwan, published by John Paul II University of Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.