References
- Acharya, A. (2017). The myth of ASEAN centrality?. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 39(2), 273-279.
- Ayman Falak, M. (2021). ASEAN’s Free Trade Agreements: An Overview. ASEAN Briefing. https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/aseans-free-trade-agreements-an-overview/ (accessed on December 31, 2023).
- Bergmann, M., Haddad, B. (2021). Europe Needs to Step Up on Defense. Brussels Should Borrow and Spend More on Security. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/europe/europe-needs-step-defense (accessed March, 5, 2024).
- Börzel, T., Risse, T. (2000). When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change. European Integration Papers (EIoP), 4(15).
- Buchan, P., Rimland, B. (2020). Defining the Diamond. The Past, Present, and Future of the Quadrilateral Dialogue. Center of Strategic and International Studies (CIS). https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/200312
- Caballero-Anthony, M. (2022). The ASEAN way and the changing security environment: navigating challenges to informality and centrality. International Politics, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-022-00400-0
- Camroux, D., (2018). The European Union and Asean: Two to Tango? Notre Europe. Thinking of a united Europe. Penser l’ unité européenne. Studies and Research 65. https://institutdelors.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/eu-aseancamrouxnejune08.pdf
- Congressional Research Service, IN FOCUS, updated October 17, 2022 (accessed on December 31, 2023). https://crsreports.congress.gov
- Council of the European Union (2008). Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on thefunctioning of the European Union, 6655/08 28.
- Crivelli, P., Inama, S., Pearson, M. (2023). An Assessment of Rules of Origin in RCEP and ASEAN+1 Free Trade Agreements. ASEAN Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/916421/rules-origin-rcep-asean1-free-trade-agreements.pdf
- Emmers, R. (2017). ASEAN minus X: Should This Formula Be Extended? (RSIS Commentaries, No. 199). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsispublication/cms/co17199-asean-minus-x-should-this-formula-be-extended/ (accessed on 28 Feb2024)
- European Commission (2023). European Union, Trade in goods with ASEAN. Directorate General for Trade. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/isdb_results/factsheets/region/details_asean-association-of-south-eastasian-nations_en.pdf (accessed on December 31, 2023)
- European Parliament (2023). Trade negotiations between the EU and ASEAN member states. Briefing. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2023/754629/EPRS_BRI(2023) (accessed on December 31, 2023).
- European Parliament (2022). ASEAN: The EU’s strategic partner in Asia. Briefing. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/698807/EPRS_BRI(2021)698807_EN.pdf (accessed on January 21, 2024).
- Ferchen, M., Kuik, Ch.-Ch. (2022). EU-ASEAN Trade investment and Connectivity Cooperation. In: L. Bomassi (ed). Reimaging EU-ASEAN Relations: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 31-38). Carnegie Europe.
- Gilson, J. (2020). EU-ASEAN relations in the 2020s: pragmatic inter-regionalism? International Economics and Economic Policy, 17(3), 727-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-020-00474-2
- Grare, F., Yeo, H. L. (2023). Europe’s Security Posture in the Indo-Pacific and the View from Asia. In: L. Bomassi (ed). Reimaging EU-ASEAN Relations: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 15-21). Carnegie Europe.
- He, K. (2014). A Strategic Functional Theory of Institutions and Rethinking Asian Regionalism: When Do Institutions Matter?. Asian Survey, 54(6), 1184-1208. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2014.54.6.1184
- Heydarian, J. R. (2020). At strategic crossroads: Asean Centrality Amid Sino-American Rivalry in the Indo- Pacific Foreign Policy. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/at-a-strategic-crossroads-aseancentrality-amid-sino-american-rivalry-in-the-indo-pacific/ (accessed December 31, 2023).
- Kausikan, B. (2023). Navigating the New Age of Great-Powe Competition/Statecraft in the Shadow of the US-Chinese Rivalry. Foreign Affairs.
- https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/china-great-power-competition-russia-guide (accessed December 31, 2023).
- Khandekar, G. Mapping EU-ASEAN Relations. AGORA Asia-Europe. FRIDE, A European Think Tank for Global Action. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/177603/Mapping%20EU-ASEAN%20relations.pdf
- Kuik, Ch.-Ch. (2022). Shades of Grey: Riskification and Hedging in the Indo-Pacific, Pacific Review, 36(6), 1181-1214. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2110608
- Kimura, F., Urata, S. Thangavelu, S, Narjoko, D. (2022). The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Challenges and Opportunities for ASEAN and East Asia. In: F. Kimura, S. Urata, S. M. Thangavelu, D. Narjoko (eds.), Dynamism of East Asia and RCEP: The Framework for Regional Integration (pp.1-11). Jakarta: ERIA.
- Krohn, F. (2009). What kind of power? The EU as an International Actor. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=f4a5029aa9c91bdf3d36b1d92dc867d1874db8b4 (accessed on February, 4, 2024).
- Lucarelli, S., Fioramonti, L. (2010). The EU in the eyes of others, why bother? In: S. Lucarelli, L. Fioramonti (eds.), External Perceptions of the European Union as a Global Actor. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203866917
- Mahbubani, K. (2023). Asia’s Third Way. How Asean Survives and Thrives Amid Great-Power Competition. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/southeast-asia/asias-third-way-asean-amid-greatpower-competition (accessed on March, 4, 2024).
- Manners, I. (2002). Normative Power Europe: A contradiction in terms?. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235-258. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203866917
- NATO (2022). Regional Perspectives Report on the Indo-Pacific. Strategic Foresight Analysis. https://www.act.nato.int/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/regional-perspectives-2022-07-v2-1.pdf (accessed on February, 24, 2024).
- Nuremberg Declaration on an EU-ASEAN Enhanced Partnership. 2007. Presidency of the European Union. Allemagne. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/PRES_07_54 (accessed January, 28, 2024).
- Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (2020). https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/rcep-chapter-20.pdf (accessed on February 28, 2024).
- Qin, Y., Nordin, A.H.M. (2019). Relationality and rationality in Confucian and Western traditions of thought. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32, pp. 601-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1641470
- Rüland, J. (2001). ASEAN and the European Union: A Bumpy Interregional Relationship. Discussion Paper, C 95. https://aei.pitt.edu/197/1/dp_c95_rueland.pdf (accessed on February 28, 2024).
- Stubbs, R. (2008). The ASEAN alternative? Ideas, Institutions and the challenge to „global” governance. The Pacific Review, 21(4), 451-468.. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740802294713
- Stubbs, R. (2019). ASEAN skeptics versus ASEAN proponents: evaluating regional institutions. The Pacific Review, 32(6), 923-950. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1611627 (accessed” https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1611627
- UNCTAD (2022). Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/6032/ (accessed February 16, 2024).
- Visoka, G., Doyle, J. (2016). New – Functional Peace: The European Union Way of Resolving Conflicts. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(4), 862-877. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12342
- Xuechen, I.C. (2018). The role of ASEAN’s identities in reshaping the ASEAN–EU relationship. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 40(2), 222-246. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs40-2c
- Yoshimatsu, H. (2023). Meanings, norms, and social constitution: revisiting ASEAN centrality in East Asian regionalism. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 409-423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109923000257