References
- Alison, L. J., Alison, E., Shortland, N., & Surmon-Bohr, F. (2020). ORBIT: The science of rapport-based interviewing for law enforcement, security, and military. Oxford University Press.
- Anderson, B. J. (2011). Recognizing character: A new perspective on character evidence. Yale LJ, 121, 1912.
- Blinkhorn, V. (2023). Witness testimony. In Forensic Psychology, Crime and Policing (pp. 324–329). Policy Press.
- Bull, R., & Dando, C. J. (2010). Detecting verbal deception: Strategy versus tactics. Paper presented at the Annual American Psychology and Law Society, 18th–20th March 2010, Vancouver, Canada.
- Canter, D. V., & Alison, L. J. (Eds.). (1999). Profiling in policy and practice, networks (pp. 157–188). Offender Profiling Series Vol II. Aldershot.
- Cassell, P. G., & Hayman, B. S. (1996). Police interrogation in the 1990s: An empirical study of the effects of Miranda. University of California Law Review, 43, 839–931.
- Clemens, F., Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., Vrij, A., Landstrom, S., Hjelmsater, E. R. A., & Hartwig, M. (2010). Skulking around the dinosaur: Eliciting cues to children’s deception via strategic disclosure of evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(7), 925–940. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1597
- Clemens, F. (2013). Detecting lies about past and future actions: The Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) technique and suspects’ strategies (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Clemens, F., Granhag, P. A., & Stromwall, L. A. (2013). Counter‐interrogation strategies when anticipating questions on intentions. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 10(1), 125–138.
- Clemens, F., & Grolig, T. (2019). Innocent of the crime under investigation: Suspects’ counter-interrogation strategies and statement-evidence inconsistency in strategic vs. non-strategic interviews. Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(10), 945–962.
- Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Memon, A., Woods, D., & Michlik, P. M. (2006). Strategies of impression management among deceivers and truth-tellers: How liars attempt to convince. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 24(2), 31–38.
- Deeb, H., Vrij, A., Hope, L., Mann, S., Granhag, P. A., & Stromwall, L. A. (2018). Police officers’ perceptions of statement inconsistency. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(5), 644–665.
- Feather, N. T. (1999). Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 86–107.
- Fisher, R. P., Vrij, A., & Leins, D. A. (2012). Does testimonial inconsistency indicate memory inaccuracy and deception? Beliefs, empirical research, and theory. In Applied issues in investigative interviewing, eyewitness memory, and credibility assessment (pp. 173–189). New York, NY: Springer New York.
- Ford, J. D., Grasso, D. J., Elhai, J. D., & Courtois, C. A. (2015). Posttraumatic stress disorder: Scientific and professional dimensions. Academic press.
- Galinsky, A. D., Maddux, W. W., Gilin, D., & White, J. B. (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations. Psychological science, 19(4), 378–384.
- Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332–346.
- Granhag, P.A. (November 18–19, 2010). The Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) technique: A scientific perspective. High Value Detainee Interrogation Group (HIG; FBI). HIG Research Symposium: Interrogation in the European Union, Washington, DC.
- Granhag, P. A., Andersson, L. O., Stromwall, L. A., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Imprisoned knowledge: Criminal’s beliefs about deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 103–119.
- Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(3), 189–200.
- Granhag, P. A., Clemens, F., & Stromwall, L. A. (2009). The usual and the unusual suspects: Level of suspicion and counter‐interrogation tactics. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 6(2), 129–137.
- Granhag, P.A., 2010. The strategic use of evidence (SUE) technique: a scientific perspective. Presented at the High Value Detainee Interrogation Group (FBI) Research Symposium: Interrogation in the European Union, Washington, DC.
- Granhag, P. A. (2010, November). The Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) technique: A scientific perspective. In Washington, DC, USA: High Value Detainee Interrogation Group (HIG, FBI). HIG Research Symposium: Interrogation in the European Union.
- Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., Willen, R. M., & Hartwig, M. (2013). Eliciting cues to deception by tactical disclosure of evidence: The first test of the Evidence Framing Matrix. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18(2), 341–355.
- Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2015). The strategic use of evidence technique: A conceptual overview. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Detecting deception: Current challenges and cognitive approaches (pp. 231–251). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Granhag, P. A., Kleinman, S., & Oleszkiewicz, S. (2016). The Scharff technique: On how to effectively elicit intelligence from human sources. International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, 29(1), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/08850607.2015.1083341
- Hafer, C. L., & Begue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167.
- Hartwig, M. (2005). Interrogating to detect deception and truth: Effects of strategic use of evidence.
- Hartwig, M., & Granhag, P. A. (2023). Strategic use of evidence: A review of the technique and its principles. In G. E. Oxburgh, T. Myklebust, M. Fallon, & M. Hartwig (Eds.), Interviewing and interrogation: A review of research and practice since World War II (pp. 299–318). Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118510001.ch10.
- Hartwig, M., & Voss, J. A. (2017). Lie detection guide: Theory and practice for investment professionals. Career Resources.
- Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works. Law and human behavior, 30(5), 603.
- Hartwig, M., Anders Granhag, P., & Stromwall, L. A. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(2), 213–227.
- Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., & Doering, N. (2010). Impression and information management: On the strategic self-regulation of innocent and guilty suspects. The Open Criminology Journal, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.2174/1874917801003010010
- Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L., Wolf, A. G., Vrij, A., & Hjelmsater, E. R. A. (2011). Detecting deception in suspects: Verbal cues as a function of interview strategy. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(7), 643–656. http://doi:10.1080/10683160903446982
- Hartwig, M., Granhag, P.A. (2023). “Strategic Use of Evidence: A Review of the Technique and Its Principles”, in Gavin E. Oxburgh, Trond Myklebust, Mark Fallon and Maria Hartwig (editors), Interviewing and Interrogation: A Review of Research and Practice Since World War II, Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, Brussels.
- Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., and Luke, T. J. (2014). “Strategic use of evidence during investigative interviews: the state of the science,” in Credibility Assessment: Scientific Research an Applications, eds D. C. Raskin, C. R. Honts, and J. C. Kircher (Oxford: Academic Press), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394433-7.00001-4
- Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., & Doering, N. (2010). Impression and information management: On the strategic self-regulation of innocent and guilty suspects. The Open Criminology Journal, 3(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874917801003010010
- Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30(5), 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9053-9
- Heller, K. J. (2006). The cognitive psychology of circumstantial evidence. Michigan Law Review, 241–305.
- Hilgendorf, E. L., & Irving, B. (1981). A decision-making model of confessions. In Psychology in legal contexts: Applications and limitations (pp. 67–84). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
- Hindi, I., Mordi, H., Tener, D., & Katz, C. (2022). How does religiosity affect the richness of child forensic testimonies? Comparing the narratives of sexual abuse victims from three Jewish groups in Israel. Children and youth services review, 137, 106488.
- Justice, B. P., Bhatt, S., Brandon, S. E., & Kleinman, S. M. (2010). Army field manual 2-22.3: Interrogation methods: A science-based review. Washington, DC (Draft, September).
- Kassin, S. M., & Norwick, R. J. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 211–221.
- Lacy, J. W., & Stark, C. E. (2013). The neuroscience of memory: implications for the courtroom. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(9), 649–658.
- Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. New York, NY: Plenum.
- Luke, T. J. (2021). A meta-analytic review of experimental tests of the interrogation technique of Hanns Joachim Scharff. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 360–373. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yxpja
- Luke, T. J., & Granhag, P. A. (2021, September 7). The Shift-of-Strategy (SoS) approach: A laboratory test. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MFUS8
- Luke, T. J., & Granhag, P. A. (2022). The Shift-of-Strategy (SoS) approach: Using evidence strategically to influence suspects’ counter-interrogation strategies. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–26. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2030738
- Luke, T. J., Hartwig, M., Brimbal, L., Chan, G., Jordan, S., Joseph, E., Osborne, J., & Granhag, P. A. (2013). Interviewing to elicit cues to deception: Improving strategic use of evidence with general-to-specific framing of evidence. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 28(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-012-9113-7
- Luke, T. J., Hartwig, M., Brimbal, L., & Granhag, P. A. (2017). Building a case: The role of empirically based interviewing techniques in case construction. In H. Otgaar, & M. Howe (Eds.), Finding the truth in the courtroom: Dealing with deception, lies and, memories (pp. 187–208). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190612016.003.0009
- Luke, T. J., Dawson, E., Hartwig, M., & Granhag, P. A. (2014). How awareness of possible evidence induces forthcoming counter‐interrogation strategies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 876–882.
- Luke, T. J., Hartwig, M., Joseph, E., Brimbal, L., Chan, G., Dawson, E., Jordan, S., Donovan, P., & Granhag, P. A. (2016). Training in the Strategic Use of Evidence technique: Improving deception detection accuracy of American law enforcement officers. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 31, 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9187-0
- Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2015). New approaches in deception detection II. Active interviewing strategies and contextual information. Papeles del Psiclogo, 36(2), 96–108.
- May, L., Granhag, P. A., & Tekin, S. (2017). Interviewing suspects in denial: On how different evidence disclosure modes affect the elicitation of new critical information. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1154.
- McDougall, A. J., & Bull, R. (2015). Detecting truth in suspect interviews: The effect of use of evidence (early and gradual) and time delay on Criteria-Based Content Analysis, Reality Monitoring and inconsistency within suspect statements. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(6), 514–530.
- Murillas, G. G. M. (2022). Crime Scene Reconstruction. Manual of Crime Scene Investigation, 15–48.
- Neequaye, D. A., & Luke, T. J. (2018). Management of disclosure-costs in intelligence interviews. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240635
- Nieuwkamp, R., & Mergaerts, L. (2022). Alibi assessment and believability across different legal systems and cultural contexts. In Alibis and corroborators: Psychological, criminological, and legal perspectives (pp. 75–86). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Oleszkiewicz, S., Granhag, P. A., & Cancino Montecinos, S. (2014). The Scharff-technique: Eliciting intelligence from human sources. Law and human behavior, 38(5), 478.
- Oleszkiewicz, S., & Watson, S. J. (2021). A meta‐analytic review of the timing for disclosing evidence when interviewing suspects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 342–359.
- Polman, S. (2021). The Influence of Evidence Disclosure Timing and Strength on Statement-Evidence Inconsistencies, Within-Statement Inconsistencies and Information Disclosure by Mock Suspects (Master’s thesis, University of Twente).
- Savitsky, K., & Gilovich, T. (2003). The illusion of transparency and the alleviation of speech anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39618–625.
- Shepherd, E & Griffiths, A (2013). Investigative Interviewing: The Conversation Management Approach. OUP Oxford.
- Soufan, A. H. (2011). The black banners: The inside story of 9/11 and the war against Al-Qaeda. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
- Srivatsav, M. (2019). Determinants of Guilty Suspects’ Behavior in Investigative Interviews: Evidence-Disclosure Tactics and Question Content.
- Srivatsav, M., Luke, T. J., Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L., & Vrij, A. (2019). What to Reveal and what to Conceal? An Empirical Examination of Guilty Suspects’ Strategies. Unpublished manuscript.
- Strömwall, L.A., Hartwig, M., & Granhag, P.A. (2006). To act truthfully: Nonverbal behaviour and strategies during a police interrogation. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 207–219.
- Suchotzki, K. (2018). Challenges for the application of reaction time-based deception detection methods. In J. P. Rosenfeld (Ed.), Detecting concealed information and deception: Recent developments (pp. 243–268). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812729-2.00011-2
- Tekin, S. (2016). Eliciting admissions from suspects in criminal investigations. Student thesis: Doctoral Thesis.
- Tekin, S. (2022). Interviewing suspects with the Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) technique. In The Future of Forensic Psychology: Core Topics and Emerging Trends (pp. 105–113). Routledge.
- Tekin, S., Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., Mac Giolla, E., Vrij, A., & Hartwig, M. (2015). Interviewing strategically to elicit admissions from guilty suspects. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000131
- Tekin, S. (2016). Eliciting admissions from suspects in criminal investigations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Available at https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/44452/4/gupea_2077_44452_4.pdf.
- Tekin, S., Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., and Vrij, A. (2016). How to make perpetrators in denial disclose more information about their crimes. Psychol. Crime Law 22, 561–580. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2016.1168425
- Verigin, B. L., Meijer, E. H., Bogaard, G., & Vrij, A. (2019). Lie prevalence, lie characteristics and strategies of self-reported good liars. PloS one, 14(12), e0225566.
- Verigin, B. L., Meijer, E. H., Vrij, A., & Zauzig, L. (2020). The interaction of truthful and deceptive information. Psychology, Crime & Law, 26(4), 367–383.
- Vorauer, J. D., & Claude, S.-D. (1998). Perceived versus actual transparency of goals in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 371–385.
- Vredeveldt, A., van Koppen, P. J., & Granhag, P. A. (2014). The inconsistent suspect: A systematic review of different types of consistency in truth tellers and liars. Investigative interviewing, 183–207.
- Vredeveldt, A., van Koppen, P. J., & Granhag, P. A. (2014). The inconsistent suspect: A systematic review of different types of consistency in truth tellers and liars. In R. Bull (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 183–207). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9642-7_10
- Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and its implications for professional practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
- Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2011). Outsmarting the liars: Toward a cognitive lie detection approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410391245
- Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2016). Which lie detection tools are ready for use in the criminal justice system? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(3), 302–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.06.014
- Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2006). Interviewing to detect deception. Offenders’ memories of violent crimes, 279–304.
- Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(2), 110–117.
- Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Ashkenazi, T., Ganis, G., Leal, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2022). Verbal lie detection: its past, present and future. Brain Sciences, 12(12), 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121644
- Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Leal, S., Fisher, R. P., Kleinman, S. M., & Ashkenazi, T. (2023). The Present and Future of Verbal Lie Detection. In D. DeMatteo & K. C. Scherr (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Psychology and Law (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.33
- Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2015). Interviewing suspects: Examining the association between skills, questioning, evidence disclosure, and interview outcomes. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(7), 661–680
- Walton, D., & Reed, C. (2008). Evaluating corroborative evidence. Argumentation, 22, 531–553.