Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What Do Polygraphers–Practitioners Expect from Science? Cover

What Do Polygraphers–Practitioners Expect from Science?

By: Jan Widacki  
Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. Langleben D.D, Loughead J.W., Bilker W.B., Ruparel K., Childress A.R. (2005), Telling truth from lie individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 26,4, 262–272.
  2. Philips M.C., Vendemia J.M.C. (2008), Individual Differences in Comparison Question Anxiety. European Polygraph 2 (3–4), 5–6.
  3. Vendemia J.M.C. (1999), Neural mechanisms of deception and response congruity to general knowledge information and autobiographical information in visual two-stimulus paradigms with motor response. Department of Defence, Polygraph Institute, DoD PI 99-P-0010.
  4. Vendemia J.M.C. (2014), fMRI as a Method of Detection of Deception. A Review of Experience. European Polygraph 8, 1 (27), 5–21.10.2478/ep-2014-0001
  5. Widacki J. (2007), From forensic psychophysiology to forensic neurophysiology. European Polygraph 2, 93–103.
  6. Widacki J., ed. (2018), Kierunki rozwoju instrumentalnej i nieinstrumentalnej detekcji kłamstwa. Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, Kraków 2018.
  7. Widacki J. (2021), History of Polygraph Examination, Polskie Towarzystwo Kryminalistyczne, Warszawa 2021.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ep-2022-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2380-0550 | Journal ISSN: 1898-5238
Language: English
Page range: 65 - 72
Published on: Oct 21, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Jan Widacki, published by Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.