References
- Collins, N. (2019), The Utility of the Polygraph with Mentally Disordered Offenders. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Birmingham.
- Cook, R., Barkley, W., & Anderson, P.B. (2014), The sexual history polygraph examination and its influences on recidivism. Journal of Social Change, 5, 1–10.
- Counter Terrorism and Sentencing Bill (2019–21), Gov.uk. Home Office, National Archives Website.
- Craig, L. (2019), Book Review of “The Use of the Polygraph in Assessing, Treating and Supervising Sexual Offenders” [by D.T. Wilcox ed.]. Forensic Update, 104, 59–60.
- Domestic Violence Bill (2020), Gov.uk, Home Office, National Archives Website.
- Elliott, E., & Vollm, B. (2016), The Utility of Post-Conviction Polygraph Testing Among Sexual Offenders. Sexual Abuse, 30(4), 367–392.
- Emerick, R.L., & Dutton, W.A. (1993), The effect of polygraphy on the self-report of adolescent sex offenders: Implications for risk assessment. Annals of Sex Research, 6 (2), 83–103.10.1007/BF00849301
- English, K., Jones, L., Patrick, D., & Pasini-Hill, D. (2003), Sexual offender containment: Use of the post-conviction polygraph. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 411–427.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07322.x
- Gannon, T.A., Wood, J.L., Pina, A., Tyler, N., Barnoux, M.F.L., & Vasquez, E.A. (2014), An evaluation of mandatory polygraph testing for sexual offenders in the United Kingdom. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 26 (2), 178–203.10.1177/107906321348683623698742
- Gannon, T.A., Wood, J.L., Pina, A., Vasquez, E.A., & Fraser, I. (2012), The evaluation of the mandatory polygraph pilot (Ministry of Justice Research Series). Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/filel217436/evaluation-of-mandatory-polygraph-pilot.pdf
- Grubin, D. (2006), Polygraph pilot report: Final report. London: Home Office.
- Grubin, D. (2010), A trial of voluntary polygraphy testing in 10 English probation areas. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 22 (3), 266–278.10.1177/107906321036901220713747
- Grubin, D., & Madsen, L. (2006), Accuracy and utility of post-conviction polygraph testing of sex offenders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 479–483.10.1192/bjp.bp.105.00895316648536
- Heil, P., Ahlmeyer, S., & Simons, D. (2003), Crossover sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 15 (4), 221–236.10.1177/10790632030150040114571530
- Heil, P., & English, K. (2009), Sex offender polygraph testing in the United States: Trends and controversies. in: D.T. Wilcox (ed.), The use of the polygraph in assessing, treating, and supervising sex offenders: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 181–216). New York, NY: Wiley.10.1002/9780470743232.ch10
- Kokish, R., Levenson, J.S., & Blasingame, G.D. (2005), Post-conviction sex offender polygraph examination: Client reported perceptions of utility and accuracy. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 17 (2), 211–221.10.1177/10790632050170021015974426
- Konopasek, J.E. & Nelson, R. (2015), Sex history disclosure and sex offender recidivism. Polygraph, 44 (2), 56–70.
- McGrath, R.J., Cumming, G.F., & Burchard, B.L. (2003), Current practices and trends in sexual abuse management: The Safer Society 2002 Nationwide Survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
- McGrath, R.J., Cumming, G.F., Hoke, S.E., & BonnMiller, M.O. (2007), Outcomes in a community sex offender treatment program: A comparison between polygraphed and matched non-polygraphed offenders. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 19 (4), 381–393.10.1177/10790632070190040417914673
- National Research Council (2003), The polygraph and Lie Detections Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence of the Polygraph. Washington DC: National Academy
- Nelson, R., Blalock, B., & Handler, M. (2011), Criterion validity of the Empirical Scoring System and the Objective Scoring System, Version 3 with the USAF Modified General Question Technique. Polygraph, 40 (3), 172–179.
- Offender Management Act (2007), Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, Office of Public Sector Information.
- Spruin, E., Wood, J.L., Gannon, T.A., & Tyler, N. (2018), Sexual offender’s experiences of polygraph testing: a thematic study in three probation trusts. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 24 (1), 12–24.10.1080/13552600.2017.1378025
- Thornton, D. (2010), Scoring guide for Risk Matrix 2000.10/svc. Unpublished document.
- Wilcox, D.T. (2000), Application of the clinical polygraph examination to the assessment, treatment and monitoring of sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 5, 134–152.10.1080/13552600008413304
- Wilcox, D.T. (ed.) (2009), The Use of the Polygraph in Assessing, Treating, and Supervising Sex Offenders: A Practitioner’s Guide. Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9780470743232
- Wilcox, D.T. (2013), Ethical practice in the use of the polygraph in working with sex offenders. in: K. Harrison & B. Rainey (eds.), Legal and ethical aspects of sex offender treatment and management (pp. 388–405). Chichester, West Sussex; Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9781118314876.ch23
- Wilcox, D.T., & Donathy, M.L. (2008), The utility of the polygraph with sex offenders in England. Conférence Permanente Européenne de la Probation. Available from: http://www.cep-probation.org/news/65/46/the-utility-of-the-polygraph-with-sex-offenders-in-england
- Wilcox, D.T., & Sosnowski, D.E. (2005), Polygraph examination of British sexual offenders: A pilot study on sexual history disclosure testing. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11 (1), 3–23.10.1080/13552600410001667797
- Wilcox, D.T., Sosnowski, D.E., Warberg, B., & Beech, A.R. (2005), Sexual history disclosure using the polygraph in a sample of British sex offenders. Polygraph, 34, 171–183.
- Wood, J.L., Alleyne, E., O’Ciardha, C., & Gannon, T.A. (2020), An Evaluation of Polygraph Testing by Police to Manage Individuals Convicted or Suspected of Sexual Offending. University of Kent (KAR, id 81207).