References
- Aharoni, Zvi (1998), On Life and Death: The Tale of a Lucky Man, Minerva Press, p. 99.
- Horvath, F., Blair, J., Buckley, J. (2007), The Behavioural Analysis Interview: Clarifying the Practice, Theory and Understanding of Its Use and Effectiveness, International Journal of Police Science and Management, (10), pp. 101–158.10.1350/ijps.2008.10.1.101
- Illinois Law Regarding the Licensing of Polygraph and Regulating the Practice of the Polygraph, 224 (ILCS 4301), 8/23/63.
- Jensen, M., Bessarabova, E., Adame, B., Burgoon, J., Slowik, S. (2011), Deceptive Language by Innocent and Guilty Criminal Suspects, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, (30), pp. 357–375.10.1177/0261927X11416201
- Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 (2004).
- National Academy of Science, The Polygraph and Lie Detection, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003.
- Office of Technological Assistance, Scientific Validity of Polygraph Testing, NTIS Order #PB84-181411, November, 1983.
- Peters, R. (2012), Reid Method: Developing Probable Lie Comparison Questions, Journal of the American Polygraph Association, Vol. 41, No. 2.
- Reid, J., Inbau, F. (1953), Lie Detection and Criminal Interrogation, Williams and Wilkins.
- Reid, J., Inbau, F. (1966), Truth and Deception: The Polygraph (“Lie Detector”) Technique, Williams and Wilkins.10.2307/1140568
- Reid, J., Inbau, F. (1967), Criminal Interrogation and Confession, Williams and Wilkins.10.2307/1140860
- Reid, J., Inbau, F. (1977), Truth and Deception: The Polygraph (“Lie Detector”) Technique, Williams and Wilkins, Second Edition, pp. 118–127.
- Slowik, S. (2016), Interrogation, International Encyclopedia of Communications, Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic220
- Slowik, S., Horvath, F. (2019), Chicago: Where Polygraph Became a Science, European Polygraph, Vol. 13, No. 1 (47).10.2478/ep-2019-0001
- Stansbury v. California, 522 U.S. 318 (1994).