Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Hundred Years of Polygraphy: Some Primary Changes and Related Issues Cover

A Hundred Years of Polygraphy: Some Primary Changes and Related Issues

By: Frank Horvath  
Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. Alder, K. (2007), The Lie Detectors: The History of an American Obsession, Free Press.
  2. Barland G.H. (1972), An experimental study of field techniques in lie – detection, Dept. of Psychology, University of Utah.
  3. Bunn G.C. (2012), The Truth Machine: A Social History of the Lie Detector, Baltimore: The Jones Hopkins University Press.
  4. Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1998 (EPPA, 1998).
  5. Grubin D. (2016), Polygraph testing of sex offenders, in: D.R. Laws & W. O’Donohue (eds.), Treatment of sex off enders: Strengths and weaknesses in assessment and intervention, New York, NY Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-25868-3_6
  6. Horvath, (2019), Chicago: Birthplace of Modern Polygraphy, European Polygraph, Vol. 13, No. 2 (48).10.2478/ep-2019-0005
  7. Horvath, F. & Reid, J. (1971), The Reliability of Polygraph Examiner Diagnosis of Truth and Deception, Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 62, 2, pp. 276–281.10.2307/1141892
  8. Horvath, F. (2008), Is the Lie Detector an American Obsession? Response to K. Alder, European Polygraph, 1, 3, pp. 5–19.
  9. Reid J.E. (1947), A revised questioning technique in lie – detection tests, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 37, 542.10.2307/1138979
  10. Keeler, L. (1930), A Method For Detecting Deception, American Journal of Police Science, 1, 48.10.2307/1147254
  11. Keeler, L. (1933), Scientific Methods for Criminal Detection with the Polygraph, Kansas Bar Association, 2, pp. 22–31.
  12. Larson J.A. (1932), Lying and its detection, Peterson Smith, Montclair N.Y., 1932.
  13. Marston W. (1938), New facto about shaving revealed by lie-detector, “Th e Saturday Evening Post” 1938, October 8.
  14. National Research Council (2003), The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  15. Reid, J. & Inbau, F. (1977), Truth and Deception: The Polygraph (“Lie Detector”) Technique. Second edition. Baltimore, The Williams and Wilkins Company.
  16. Starks, (2019), President’s Message, American Polygraph Association Magazine, 52 (5) pp. 22–23.
  17. Starks, (2020), President’s Message, American Polygraph Association Magazine, 53, (1) pp. 13–14.
  18. Office of Technology Assessment (1983). Scientific Validity of Polygraph Testing: A Research Review and Evaluation – A Technical Memorandum (Rep. No. OTA-TM-H-15), Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ep-2020-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2380-0550 | Journal ISSN: 1898-5238
Language: English
Page range: 30 - 43
Published on: Jul 24, 2020
Published by: Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Frank Horvath, published by Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.