References
- Alder, K. (2007). The Lie Detectors: The History of an American Obsession, Free Press, New York, 19–20.
- Furedy, J.J., Davis, C., & Gurevich, M. (1988). Differentiation of deception as a psychological process: a psychophysiological approach. Psychophysiology, 25, 683–688.10.1111/j.1469-8986.1988.tb01908.x3241855
- Horvath, F. & Reid, J. (1971). The Reliability of Polygraph Examiner Diagnosis of Truth and Deception, Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 62, 2, 276–281.10.2307/1141892
- Horvath, F. & Reid, J. (1972). The Polygraph Silent Answer Test, Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 63, 2, 285–293.10.2307/1142312
- Horvath, F. (1973). Verbal and nonverbal clues to truth and deception during polygraph examinations. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 1, 2, 138–152.
- Horvath, F. (2007). A Review and Critique of Alder’s: The Lie Detectors: The History of an American Obsession—What Polygraph Examiners Should Know, Polygraph, 36, 4, 211–220.
- Horvath, F. (2008). Review of: Alder, The Lie Detectors – The History of an American Obsession, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53, 3, 760–761.10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00731.x
- Horvath, F. (2008a). Is the Lie Detector an American Obsession? Response to K. Alder, European Polygraph, 1, 3, 5–19.
- Horvath, F. (2011). The Reid Technique: Understanding Global Analysis-An Overview of Method and Empirical Findings, American Polygraph Association Annual Seminar, Austin, TX, Sept. 15.
- Horvath, F. & Palmatier, J. (2008). The Effect of Two Types of Control Questions and Two Question Formats on the Outcomes of Polygraph Examinations, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53, 4, 1–11.10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00775.x
- Horvath, F. & Peters, R. (2013). The Reid Polygraph Technique, American Polygraph Association Annual Seminar, Orlando, FL, Sept. 12.
- Inbau, F., Reid, J., Buckley, J. & Jayne, B. (2001). Criminal Interrogation and Confessions, 4th Edition, Gaithersburg, MD, Aspen, 2001.
- Jones, E, Sigall, H. (1971). The Bogus Pipeline: A New Paradigm for Measuring Affect and Attitude, Psychological Bulletin, 76, 5, 349–364.10.1037/h0031617
- Keeler, L. (1930). A Method For Detecting Deception, American Journal of Police Science, 1, 48.
- Keeler, L. (1933). Scientific Methods for Criminal Detection with the Polygraph, Kansas Bar Association, 2, 22–31.
- National Research Council. (2003). The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Office of Technology Assessment (1983). Scientific Validity of Polygraph Testing: A Research Review and Evaluation – A Technical Memorandum (Rep. No. OTA-TM-H-15), Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment.
- Reid, J. (1945). Simulated Blood Pressure Responses in Lie-Detector Tests and a Method for Their Detection, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 36, 3, 201–214.
- Reid, J. (1947). A Revised Questioning Technique in Lie-Detection Tests, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 37, 6, 542–547.
- Reid, J. & and Arther, R. (1953). Behavior Symptoms of Lie-Detector Subjects, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology and Police Science, 44, 104–110.
- Reid, J. & Inbau, F. (1977). Truth and Deception: The Polygraph (“Lie Detector”) Technique, Williams and Wilkins Company, Baltimore.
- Roese, N. & Jamieson, D. (1993). Twenty Years of Bogus Pipeline Research: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 114, 363–375.
- Senese, L. (1976). Accuracy of the Polygraph Technique with and Without Card Test Stimulation. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 4, 3, 274–277.
- Slowik, S. (1982). Global Evaluation: An Inductive Approach to Case Resolution, Polygraph, 11, 3, 215–224.
- Trovillo, P. (1939). A History of Lie Detection, American Journal of Police Science, 29, 6, 848–881.
- Trovillo, P. (1940). A History of Lie Detection, (Part II), American Journal of Police Science, 30, 1, 104–119.