Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Results of Polygraph Examinations: Direct or Circumstantial Evidence? Cover

Results of Polygraph Examinations: Direct or Circumstantial Evidence?

European Polygraph
Volume 8 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)
By:   
Open Access
|Aug 2014
References

References

  1. Abrams S., Polygraph validity and reliability: a review, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1973, 18, 4, pp. 313-326.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Cieślak M., zagadnienia dowodowe w procesie karnym, t. I Wyd. Prawnicze, Warszawa 1955, p. 82 and ff .
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Gaberle A., Dowody w sądowym procesie karnym, Ofi cyna a Wolters Kluwer business, Krakow 2007, p. 44 and ff .
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Inman K., Rudin N., Principles and practice of criminalistics. Th e profession of forensic science, CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington D.C., 2001, pp. 101-102. 110, 158.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Ingram J.L., Criminal evidence, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston, Heidelberg, London, New York, Oxford, Paris, San Diego, San Francisco, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo 2012, pp. 98-104. Innovations in evidence and proof. Integrating theory, research and teaching, P. Roberts, M. Redmayne (eds.), Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, 2009, pp. 219 and ff .
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Kiely T. F., Forensic evidence: science and the criminal law, CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington D.C. 2001, pp. 38-39, 169, 173, 277.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Nelken J., Dowod poszlakowy w procesie karnym, Wydawnictwo Prawnicze, Warszawa 1970, pp. 89 and ff . Report APA, Polygraph, special issue, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Widacki J., Wartość diagnostyczna badania poligrafi cznego i jej znaczenie kryminalistyczne, Wyd. UJ, Krakow 1977.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Widacki J., Horvath F., An experimental investigation of the relative validity and utility of the polygraph technique and three other common methods of criminal identification, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1978, 23,3, pp. 596-601.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Ziembiński Z. Logika praktyczna , PWN Warszawa 1984, pp. 170-173.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ep-2014-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2380-0550 (formerly 1898-5238) | Journal ISSN: 1898-5238
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 67
Published on: Aug 15, 2014
Published by: Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
polygraph in court,
evidence,
polygraph as evidence
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Psychiatry, psychotherapy

© 2014 Jan Widacki, published by Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 8 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)
Next article