Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Value of Content-Based Deception Detection Methods Cover

Value of Content-Based Deception Detection Methods

Open Access
|Jun 2014

References

  1. Adams S.H. (1996), Statement analysis: What do suspects’ words really reveal? FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, October, 12-20.
  2. Akehurst L., Bull R., Vrij A., Koehnken G. (2004), Th e eff ects of training professional groups and lay persons to use Criteria - Based Content Analysis to detect deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 877-891.10.1002/acp.1057
  3. Akehurst L., Koehnken G., Hoefer E. (2001), Content credibility of accounts derived from live and video presentations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 65-83.10.1348/135532501168208
  4. Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1992). Deception detection and reality monitoring: A new answer to an old question? In F. Losel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and Law. International Perspectives (328-332). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  5. Arntzen F. (1989), Psychologia zeznań świadkow. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.
  6. Bembibre, J., & Higueras, L. (2011). Diff erential eff ectiveness of the cognitive interview in a simulation of testimony. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 473-489.10.1080/10683160903321540
  7. Blandon-Gitlin, I., Pezdek, K., Lindsay, S.D., & Hagan, L. (2008). Criteriabased content analysis of true and suggested accounts of events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 901-917.10.1002/acp.1504
  8. Bradford, D. (2006.) Detection of deception in the confessional context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New South Wales.
  9. Buck, J. A., Warren, A. R., Betman, S. I., & Brigham, J. C. (2002). Age diff erences in Criteria-Based Content Analysis scores in typical child sexual abuse interviews. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 267-283.10.1016/S0193-3973(02)00107-7
  10. Caso, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., & de Leo, G. (2006). Deceptive responses: Th e impact of verbal and nonverbal countermeasures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 99-111.10.1348/135532505X49936
  11. Craig, R. A., Scheibe, R., Raskin, D. C., Kircher, J. C. & Dodd, D. (1999). Interviewer questions and content analysis of children’s statements of sexual abuse. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 77-85.10.1207/s1532480xads0302_2
  12. Dando. C. J., Bull, R. (2011). Maximising opportunities to detect verbal deception: Training police offi cers to interview tactically. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Off ender Profi ling, 8, 189-202.10.1002/jip.145
  13. Davies, G. M., Westcott, H. L., and Horan, N. (2000), Th e impact of questioning style on the content of investigative interviews with suspected child abuse victims, Psychology, Crime and Law, 6, 81-97.10.1080/10683160008410834
  14. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.7412555795
  15. Dukała, K. Sporer, S., Polczyk, R. (in preparation). Can Cognitive Interview Impair Lie Detection Using CBCA Criteria in Elderly Witnesses Testimonies?
  16. Erdmann, K., Volbert, R., & Bohm, C. (2004). Children report suggested events even when interviewed in a non-suggestive manner: What are its implications for credibility assessment? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 561-589.10.1002/acp.1012
  17. Esplin, P. W., Boychuk, T., & Raskin, D. C. (1988, June). A fi eld study of criteria- based content analysis of children’s statement in sexual abuse cases. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Studies Institute on Credibility Assessment, Maratea, Italy.
  18. Fiedler, K., & Walka, I. (1993). Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20, 199-223.10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00321.x
  19. Fisher, R.P, & Geiselman, R.E. (1992). Memory enhancement techniques for investigative interviewing: Th e cognitive interview. Springfi eld, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Godert, H.W., Gamer, M., Rill, H.G., & Vossel, G. (2005) Statement validity assessment Inter-rater reliability of criteria-based content analysis in the mock-crime paradigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 225-245.
  20. Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., & Landstrom, S. (2006). Children recalling an event repeatedly: Eff ects on RM and CBCA scores. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 81-98.10.1348/135532505X49620
  21. Gruza, E. (2009). Psychologia sądowa dla prawnikow. Warszawa: Ofi cyna Wolters Kluwer business.
  22. Hernandez-Fernaud, E., & Alonso-Quecuty, M.L. (1997). Th e Cognitive Interview and lie detection: A new magnifying glass for Sherlock Holmes? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 55-68.10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199702)11:1<55::AID-ACP423>3.0.CO;2-G
  23. Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (1997). Th e relationships among interviewer utterance type, CBCA scores and the richness of children’s responses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2, 169-176.10.1111/j.2044-8333.1997.tb00341.x
  24. Johnson. M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67
  25. Kohnken, G. (1999, July). Statement Validity Assessment. Paper presented at the pre-conference programme of applied courses ‘Assessing credibility’ organised by the European Association of Psychology and Law. Dublin, Ireland.
  26. Kohnken, G. (2004). Statement validity analysis and the ‘detection of the truth. In P.A. Granhag, & L.A. Stro¨mwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (41-63). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Kohnken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E., & Ho¨fer, E. (1995). Th e cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adult’s statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 671-684.10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.671
  28. Lamers-Winkelman, F., & Buffi ng, F. (1996). Children’s testimony in the Netherlands: A study of statement validity analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 304-321.10.1177/0093854896023002004
  29. Landry, K., & Brigham, J. (1992). Th e eVect of training in Criteria-Based Content Analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 663-675.10.1007/BF01884022
  30. Marten, Z. (2012). Psychologia zeznań. Warszawa: Lexis Nexis. Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). Th e cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 16, 340-372.
  31. Otgaar, H., Candel, I., Memon, A., Almerigogna, J. (2010), Diff erentiating between children’s true and false memories using Reality Monitoring criteria’ Psychology, Crime and Law,16, 555-566.10.1080/10683160902926166
  32. Porter, S., Yuille, J. C., & Lehman, D. R. (1999). Th e nature of real, implanted, and Fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: Implications for the recovered memory debate. Law and Human Behavior, 2, 517-537.10.1023/A:1022344128649
  33. Raskin, D. C. & Esplin, P. W. (1991b). Statement validity assessment: Interview procedures and content analysis of children’s statements of sexual abuse. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 265-291.
  34. Roberts, K., P. & Lamb, M. E. (2010). Reality-monitoring characteristics in confi rmed and doubtful allegations of child sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1049-1079.10.1002/acp.1600
  35. Ruby, C. L., & Brigham, J. C. (1997). Th e usefulness of the Criteria-Based Content Analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 705-737.10.1037/1076-8971.3.4.705
  36. Ruby, C.L. & Brigham, J.C. (1998). Can criteria-based content analysis distinguish between true and false statements of African-American speakers? Law and Human Behaviour, 22, 369-388.10.1023/A:1025766825429
  37. Santtila, P., Roppola, H., & Niemi, P. (1999). Assessing the truthfulness of witness statements made by children (aged 7-8, 10-11, and 13-14) employing scales derived from Johnson and Raye’s model of Reality Monitoring. Expert Evidence, 6, 273-289.10.1023/A:1008930821076
  38. Santtila, P., Roppola, H., Runtti, M., & Niemi, P. (2000). Assessment of child witness statements using Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA): Th e eff ects of age, verbal ability, and interviewer’s emotional style. Psychology, Crime & Law, 6, 159-179.10.1080/10683160008409802
  39. Saykaly, Ch. (2009), Eff ects of Multiple Interview on Children’s Verbal Expressive Behaviour of True and Fabricated Events. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
  40. Schelleman-Off ermans, K. and Merckelbach, H. (2010), Fantasy proneness as a confounder of verbal lie detection tools. J. Investig. Psych. Off ender Profi l., 7, 247-260.
  41. Short, J. L. and Bodner, G. E. (2011), Diff erentiating accounts of actual, suggested and fabricated childhood events using the judgment of memory characteristics questionnaire. Appied. Cogniive. Psychology, 25: 775-781.
  42. Sporer S.L., Sharman S.J. (2006), Should I Believe this? Reality Monitoring of Accounts of Self - Experienced and Invented Recent and Distant Autobiographical Events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 837-854.10.1002/acp.1234
  43. Sporer, S. (1997). Th e less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373-397.10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199710)11:5<373::AID-ACP461>3.0.CO;2-0
  44. Sporer, S. L. & Breuer, M. M. (2005). Validity of the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales-Short Training Version-German (ARJS-STV-G). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, TBA, San Antonio.
  45. Sporer, S. L. & Bursh, S. E. (2003). Training to Detect Deception by Verbal Means: Learning to Discriminate or Change in Response Bias? Unpublished Manuscript, University of Giessen, Germany.
  46. Sporer, S.L. (2004). Reality monitoring and the detection of deception. In P.A. Granhag & L. Stromwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (64-102). Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  47. Sporer, S.L., & Kupper, B. (1995). Realita¨tsu¨berwachung und die Beurteilung des Wahrheitsgehaltes von Erza¨hlungen: Eine experimentelle Studie [Reality monitoring and the judgment of the truthfulness of accounts: An experimental study]. Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, 26, 173-193.
  48. Steller, M. and Kohnken, G. (1989) “Criteria-Based Statement Analysis”, in Raskin, D.C. (ed.), Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence. New York: Springer-Verlag, 217-245.
  49. Steller, M., & Ko¨hnken, G. (1989). Statement analysis: Credibility assessment of children’s testimonies in sexual abuse cases. In D.C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (217-245). New York, NY: Springer.
  50. Steller, M., & Wellershaus, P. (1996). Information enhancement and credibility assessment of child statements: the impact of the cognitive interview technique on criteria-based content analysis. In G.Davies, S.Lloyd Bostock, M.McMurran, & C.Wilson (Eds.),Psychology, law and criminal justice: International developments in research and practice (118-126). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  51. Stromwall, L. A. & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Children’s Repeated Lies and Truths: Eff ects on Adults’ Judgments and Reality Monitoring Scores. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 345-356.10.1375/pplt.12.2.345
  52. Stromwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Children’s repeated lies and truths: Eff ects on adults judgements and reality monitoring scores. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 345-356.10.1375/pplt.12.2.345
  53. Tye, M. C., Amato, S. L., Honts, C. R., Devitt, M. K., & Peters, D. (1999).Th e willigness of children to lie and the assessment of credibility in an ecologically relevant laboratory setting. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 92-109.10.1207/s1532480xads0302_4
  54. Vrij A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: Wiley.
  55. Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A qualitative review of the fi rst 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 11, 3-41.10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3
  56. Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004). Let me inform you how to tell aconvincing story: CBCA and reality monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching, and deception. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 113-126.10.1037/h0087222
  57. Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., Bull, R. (2002). Will the truth come out? Th e eff ect of deception, age, status, coaching and social skills on CBCA scores. Law and Human Behaviour, 26, 261-283.10.1023/A:1015313120905
  58. Vrij, A., Kneller, W., & Mann, S. (2000). Th e eff ect of informing liars about Criteria- Based Content Analysis on their ability to deceive CBCA-raters. Legal and Criminological Psychology 5, 57-70.10.1348/135532500167976
  59. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S., & Fischer, R. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behaviour, 31, 499-518.10.1007/s10979-006-9066-417211691
  60. Wojciechowski, B. (2012). Ocena wiarygodności zeznań świadkow dorosłych przy zastosowaniu psychologicznych i prawniczych kryteriow treściowych. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Silesia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ep-2014-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2380-0550 | Journal ISSN: 1898-5238
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 44
Published on: Jun 21, 2014
Published by: Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2014 Karolina Dukała, Romuald Polczyk, published by Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.