Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Economic Transformation in the Digital Age: The Nexus Between Learning and Innovation Cover

Economic Transformation in the Digital Age: The Nexus Between Learning and Innovation

ECONOMICS
Volume 13 (2025): Issue 3 (September 2025)
By: J C Pavithra and  V Mohana Sundari  
Open Access
|Sep 2025

References

  1. Adavbiele, Justina. (2014). The Impact of Skill Acquisition Programme on the Socio-Economic Status of Youths in Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Economics and Public Sector Management, 2(1). https://internationalpolicybrief.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Journal-Economics15.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Adilova, N., Sultanbek, M., Sarzhanov, D., Sładkowski, A., & Zhanseitov, A. (2025). Digital Solution for Effective Management of Remote Work: The Case of Kazakhstan Railway. Economics - innovative and economics research journal, 13(1), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2025-0011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Ahmed, H. (2020). Role of digital economy in realization of inclusive growth. Academic Journal, 32(12), 281. https://doi.org/10.33001/m010420201269
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Aji, T. P., & Napitupulu, T. A. (2005). Effect of Gamification on E-Learning to Support Learning Achievement and Learning Motivation, 12. https://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol96No12/4Vol96No12.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Ayas, K. (1996). Design for learning and innovation. Long Range Planning, 29(6), 898–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-6301(97)82828-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Barikzai, S., S, V. B., & Perdana, A. (2024). Challenges and strategies in e-learning adoption in emerging economies: A scoping review. Cogent Education, 11(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2400415
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Bassanini, A., Scarpetta, S., & Visco, I. (2000). Knowledge, Technology And Economic Growth: Recent Evidence From OECD Countries. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.246375
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807644
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. In In Routledge eBooks (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Driskell, David. (2022). Impact of New Technologies on Economy and Society: A literature Review. Journal of Cyber Security Technology and Management, 4(3), 17–25. https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/115764/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1992-98610-000
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Faustmann, G., Kirchner, K., Lemke, C., & Monett, D. (2019). Which Factors Make Digital Learning Platforms Successful? INTED Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.1651
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Fergusson, L. (2022). Learning by... Knowledge and skills acquisition through work-based learning and research. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 14(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwam-12-2021-0065
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Francis, D. V., & Weller, C. E. (2022). Economic Inequality, the Digital Divide, and Remote Learning During COVID-19. The Review of Black Political Economy, 49(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/00346446211017797
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Furinto, A., Tamara, D., Yenni, N., & Rahman, N. J. (2023). Financial and digital literacy effects on digital investment decision mediated by perceived socio-economic status. E3S Web of Conferences, 426, 02076. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602076
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Gameil, A. A., & Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2023). Using Digital Learning Platforms to Enhance the Instructional Design Competencies and Learning Engagement of Preservice Teachers. Education Sciences, 13(4), 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040334
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Ganguli, I., Haidar, J. I., Khwaja, A. I., Stemper, S., & Zafar, B. (2024). Economic shocks and skill acquisition: Evidence from a national online learning platform at the onset of COVID-19. Labour Economics, 90, 102575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102575
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Gary S. Becker. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. In University of Chicago Press (3rd ed.). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Ghailani, M., Bouhdidi, J. E., & Fennan, A. (2014). Towards an Adaptive e-Learning Solution based on Ontologies and Competencies Approach. International Journal of Computer Applications, 98(21), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.5120/17311-7796
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis. In Cengage Learning (8th ed.). https://www.cengageasia.com/TitleDetails/isbn/9781473756540
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. In Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Hair, J. F., Page, M., & Brunsveld, N. (2019). Essentials of business research methods. In In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203374
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Hamdan Al-Abbadi, L., Alshawabkeh, R., Alkhazali, Z., Al-Aqrabawi, R., & Abu Rumman, A. (2024). Business Intelligence and Strategic Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Through: (Green Technology Innovation and Green Knowledge Management). Economics - innovative and economics research journal, 13(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2025-0013
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. He, J., Lin, K. Y., & Dai, Y. (2022). A Data-Driven Innovation Model of Big Data Digital Learning and Its Empirical Study. Information Dynamics and Applications, 1(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.56578/ida010105
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. and Sinkovics, R.R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 20, 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Jan A.G.M. van Dijk. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Khanal, S., & Pokhrel, S. R. (2024). Analysis, Modeling and Design of Personalized Digital Learning Environment. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2405.10476
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Kock, N. & ScriptWarp Systems. (2024). WarpPLS User Manual: Version 8.0. ScriptWarp Systems. https://scriptwarp.com/warppls/UserManual_v_8_0.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Kolodner, J. L. (2002). Learning by Design: Iterations of Design Challenges for Better Learning of Science Skills. Cognitive Studies, 10(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.11225/jcss.9.338
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Kuzmak O., & Kuzmak, O. (2023). Social Responsibility of Business Towards Sustainable Development: Case of Ukraine. Collection of papers new economy, 1, 126-148. https://doi.org/10.61432/CPNE0101126k
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Lowry, P. B., & Gaskin, J. (2014). Partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for Building and Testing Behavioral Causal Theory: When to Choose It and How to Use It. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2014.2312452
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Ludwig von Bertalanffy, John W. Sutherland. (1974). General Systems Theory: Foundations, Developments, Applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC - 4(6), 592–592. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1974.4309376
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. M. Ababneh, M., A. Ababneh, M., Hamouda, A., & N. AlHarbi, A. (2019, April 5). Learning by Design Using MATLAB. Proceedings of The International Conference on Research in Education. The International Conference on Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.33422/icreconf.2019.04.221
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Mabhele, M., & Van Belle, J. (2019). A Conceptual Model for Institutional Adoption of Learning Technologies in Higher Education. Kalpa Publications in Computing, 12, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.29007/9bks
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Macklem, L. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the knowledge economy: Can old models both promote and protect. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2757228
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Massimiliano Nuccio & Sofia Mogno. (2023). Knowledge, Skills, and Competences (KSC) in the Knowledge-Based Economy. In In Contributions to management science, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26867-0_1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Njeri, M., & Taym, A. (2024). Analysing the power of socioeconomic status on access to technology-enhanced learning in secondary schools. Research Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(4), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.62583/rseltl.v2i4.55
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Oroni, C. Z., & Xianping, F. (2023). Modelling the mediation role of digital learning platforms on social media capability and students’ academic performance. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12360-w
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2015). Continued progress: Promising evidence on personalized learning. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1365.html
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Prince F. Ellis, Kevin D. Kuznia. (2014). Corporate eLearning impact on employees. Global Journal of Business Research, 8(4), 1–16.Prof. (UEP), PhD, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Department of Business Activity and Economic Policy, Poland, & Ziomek, A. (2021). Developing digital skills in Economy 4.0. UR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 20(3), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.15584/johass.2021.3.9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Rohs, M., & Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Sarstedt, M. (2019). Revisiting Hair Et al.’s Multivariate Data Analysis: 40 Years Later. In Springer eBooks, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06031-2_15
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Singh, H. P., & Alshammari, K. (2021). Impacts of Digital Technology-Enabled Personalized and Adaptive Learning on student Learning Performance: A TOE Framework for Saudi Arabia. In International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 12–13(13), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14456/ITJEMAST.2021.262
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Susilana, R., Dewi, L., Setiawan, B., Alias, N., DeWitt, D., Hazar, S., & Zulnaidi, H. (2024). Need Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills Acquisition through Adaptive Learning Model: Indonesian Perspective on Freedom of Learning Curriculum. AL-ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(3), 3487–3500. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.4720
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Szántó, N., Monek, G. D., & Fischer, S. (2024). Development of an Immersive, Digital Twin-Supported Smart Reconfigurable Educational Platform for Manufacturing Training: A Proof of Concept. Journal of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, 3(4), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.56578/jemse030402
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Vlasenko, T. (2023). Dimensions of The Analysis of the Organizational Culture of Multinational Companies. Collection of papers new economy, 1, 110-125. https://doi.org/10.61432/CPNE0101110v
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Wang, X., Wang, Y., & Ye, Y. (2023). Subjective socioeconomic status predicts e-learning engagement in college students: The mediating role of perceived social support and self-efficacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(2), 1119–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00725-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/MaxWeberEconomyAndSociety/page/n5/mode/2up
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. Westland, J. C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modelin. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(6), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. White, G. (2020). Adaptive Learning Technology Relationship with Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 19, 113–130. https://doi.org/10.28945/4526
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. World Economic Forum. (2021). Upskilling for shared prosperity: The future of jobs and skills. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. Zhang, J. (2009). Technology-supported learning innovation in cultural contexts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9137-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. Zhang, Z. G., Ren, Q. B., Zhao, W. C., Li, M. C., Liu, L. P., & Lyu, Y. G. (2024). An Intelligent Recording Method for Field Geological Survey Data in Hydraulic Engineering Based on Speech Recognition. Journal of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, 2(4), 220-237. https://doi.org/10.56578/jche020403
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2025-0061 | Journal eISSN: 2303-5013 | Journal ISSN: 2303-5005
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 167 - 193
Submitted on: Mar 19, 2025
Accepted on: Aug 22, 2025
Published on: Sep 2, 2025
Published by: Oikos Institut d.o.o.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Keywords:
Adaptive learning technologies,
digital learning platforms,
learning design innovation,
skill acquisition,
economic impact and socioeconomic status
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Economic theory, systems and structures,
Microeconomics,
Macroeconomics,
Public finance and fiscal theory

© 2025 J C Pavithra, V Mohana Sundari, published by Oikos Institut d.o.o.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 13 (2025): Issue 3 (September 2025)Next article