Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Uncovering the Interplay Between Social Welfare Preferences and Society 5.0 Achievement: Implications for Sustainable Development Cover

Uncovering the Interplay Between Social Welfare Preferences and Society 5.0 Achievement: Implications for Sustainable Development

Open Access
|Apr 2024

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., Swami, A. (1993). Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In: Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, 207-216. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/170036.170072
  2. Akerlof, G.A., Kranton, R.E. (2010). Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being. Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7rqsp
  3. Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., Glaeser, E.L. (2004). Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: A world of difference. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199267669.001.0001
  4. Althabhawi, N., Zainol, Z., Bagheri, P. (2022). Society 5.0: A New Challenge to Legal Norms. Sriwijaya Law Review 6(1), 41-54. http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/1415
  5. Artyukhov, A., Volk, I., Surowiec, A., Skrzypek-Ahmed, S., Bliumska-Danko, K., Dluhopolskyi, O., Shablystyi, V. (2022). Quality of Education and Science in the Context of Sustainable Development Goals – from Millennium Goals to Agenda 2030: Factors of Innovation Activity and Socio-economic Impact. Sustainability, 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811468
  6. Atkinson, A., Cox, D. (1977). Robust regression via discriminant analysis. Biometrika, 64, 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOMET/64.1.15
  7. Bartholomew, D.J. (2010). Analysis and Interpretation of Multivariate Data. International Encyclopedia of Education, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01303-8
  8. Bolton, G.E., Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 91(1), 166-193. https://www.jstor.org/stable/117286
  9. Borgen, F.H., Seling, M.1. (1978). Uses of discriminant analysis following MANOVA: Multivariate statistics for multivariate purposes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 689-697. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.63.6.689
  10. Charness, G., Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The quarterly journal of economics, 117(3), 817-869. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132490
  11. Council of Science, Technology and Innovation (2016). Fifth Science and Technology Basic Plan. Government of Japan, Tokyo. https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/kihonkeikaku/5basicplan_en.pdf
  12. Deguchi, A., Hirai, C., Matsuoka, H., Nakano, T., Oshima, K., Tai, M., Tani, S. (2020). What is Society 5.0? Society, 5, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2989-4_9
  13. Dluhopolskyi, O., Zhukovska, A. (2023). Inclusive development as an instrument to overcome economic inequality and discrimination. ECONOMICS - Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 11(1), 11-27. https://sciendo.com/issue/EOIK/11/1
  14. Dreber, A., Fudenberg, D., Rand, D.G. (2014). Who cooperates in repeated games: The role of altruism, inequity aversion, and demographics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 98, 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.12.007
  15. EVS/WVS (2022). European Values Study and World Values Survey: Joint EVS/WVS 2017-2022 Data-set (Joint EVS/WVS). JD Systems Institute & WVSA. Dataset Version 4.0.0. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.21
  16. Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2586885
  17. Funk, C.L., Garcia-Monet, P.A. (1997). The relationship between personal and national concerns in public perceptions about the economy. Political Research Quarterly, 50(2), 317-342. https://doi.org/10.2307/448960
  18. Gaertner, W., Schokkaert, E. (2012). Empirical social choice: questionnaire-experimental studies on distributive justice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139012867
  19. Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano J., M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin, B. Puranen (eds.). (2022). World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-Pooled Datafile Version 5.0. Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp
  20. Hong, H., Ding, J., Yao, Y. (2015). Individual social welfare preferences: An experimental study. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.05.002
  21. Huang, S., Wang, B., Li, X., Zheng, P., Mourtzis, D., Wang, L. (2022). Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0 – Comparison, complementation, and co-evolution. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 64, 424-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.010
  22. Jolliffe, I. (2002). Principal component analysis. Wiley Online Library. http://cda.psych.uiuc.edu/statistical_learning_course/Jolliffe%20I.%20Principal%20Component%20Analysis%20(2ed.,%20Springer,%202002)(518s)_MVsa_.pdf
  23. Kennard, A., Schnakenberg, K. (2021). Global Climate Policy and Collective Action: A Comment, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/8fyvs
  24. Knechel, W.R., Mintchik, N. (2022). Do Personal Beliefs and Values Affect an Individual’s “Fraud Tolerance”? Evidence from the World Values Survey. Journal of Business Ethics, 177(2), 463-489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04704-0
  25. Krost, K., Porter, D.J., Lane, S.T., Wojton, H.M. (2019). Impact of Conditions which Affect Exploratory Factor Analysis. Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) document. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep22720
  26. Megee, M. (1965). On Economic Growth and the Factor Analysis Method. Southern Economic Journal, 31(3), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/1055557
  27. Okulich-Kazarin, V., Artyukhov, A., Skowron, Ł., Artyukhova, N., Dluhopolskyi, O., Cwynar, W. (2024). Sustainability of higher education: a study of student opinions about the possibility of replacing teachers with AI technologies. Sustainability, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010055
  28. Okun, A. (2015). Equality and efficiency: The big tradeoff. Brookings Institution Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctt13wztjk
  29. Potočan, V., Mulej, M., Nedelko, Z. (2020). Society 5.0: balancing of Industry 4.0, economic advancement and social problems. Kybernetes, 50, 794-811. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-12-2019-0858
  30. Rojas, C., Peñafiel, G., Buitrago, D., Romero, C. (2021). Society 5.0: A Japanese Concept for a Super-intelligent Society. Sustainability, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13126567
  31. Sachs, J., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., Woelm, F. (2022). Sustainable Development Report. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009210058
  32. Sharp, L. (2020). Society 5.0: A Brave New World, 2-3. https://doi.org/10.21820/23987073.2020.2.4
  33. Social Progress Imperative (2022). Social Progress Index Executive Summary. https://www.socialprogress.org/static/8a62f3f612c8d40b09b3103a70bdacab/2022%20Social%20Progress%20Index%20Executive%20Summary_4.pdf
  34. Society 5.0: A People-centric Super-smart Society. Society 5.0 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2989-4
  35. Tasch, W., Houser, D. (2018). Social Preferences and Social Curiosity. CESifo Working Paper Series, 7132, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3211794
  36. Traub, S., Seidl, C., Schmidt, U. (2009). An experimental study on individual choice, social welfare, and social preferences. European Economic Review, 53(4), 385-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.04.002
  37. Treibich, R. (2014). Welfare egalitarianism with other-regarding preferences. Social Choice and Welfare, 52, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2540511
  38. Witten, I.H., Frank, E. (2000). Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java implementations. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. https://pzs.dstu.dp.ua/DataMining/bibl/Morgan.Kaufmann.Data.Mining.Practical.Machine.Learning.Tools.and.Techniques.Second.Edition.Jun.20.pdf
  39. Zatonatska, T., Liashenko, O., Fareniuk, Y., Skowron, Ł., Wołowiec, T., Dluhopolskyi, O. (2023). The impact of migration on forecasting budget expenditures on education: the sustainability context. Sustainability, 15(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115473
  40. Zengin, Y., Naktiyok, S., Kaygın, E., Kavak, O., Topçuoğlu, E. (2021). An investigation upon Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 within the context of sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052682
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2024-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2303-5013 | Journal ISSN: 2303-5005
Language: English
Page range: 175 - 197
Submitted on: Jan 8, 2024
|
Accepted on: Apr 5, 2024
|
Published on: Apr 8, 2024
Published by: Oikos Institut d.o.o.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2024 Oksana Liashenko, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi, published by Oikos Institut d.o.o.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.