Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of Fuzzy AHP in Priority Based Selection of Financial Indices: A Perspective for Investors Cover

Application of Fuzzy AHP in Priority Based Selection of Financial Indices: A Perspective for Investors

Open Access
|Mar 2024

References

  1. Ala, A., Simic, V., Pamucar, D., & Jana, C. (2023). A Novel Neutrosophic-Based Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer for Ensuring the Security and Resilience of Sustainable Energy: A Case Study of Belgium. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104709
  2. Bajec, P., & Tuljak-Suban, D. (2019). A framework for detecting the proper multi-criteria decision-making method taking into account the characteristics of third-party logistics, the requirements of managers, and the type of input data. In Application of Decision Science in Business and Management. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.87222
  3. Baskaran, V., Madasamy, M., Kumar, S. P., & Sahana, S. V. (2023). Modeling the land suitability for agricultural utility in a semi-arid region of Tirunelveli district, South India using multi-criteria and geospatial approach. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01706-5
  4. Bobar, Z., Božanić, D., Đurić-Atanasievski, K., Pamučar, D.: (2020). Ranking and Assessment of the Efficiency of Social Media using the Fuzzy AHP-Z Number Model - Fuzzy MABAC, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 17(3), 43-70. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.17.3.2020.3.3
  5. Božanić, D. I., Pamučar, D. S., & Karović, S. M. (2016). Hibridni model fuzzy AHP–MABAC za rangiranje potencijalnih lokacija za izradu maskirnih vezova. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 64(3), 705-729. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg64-9261
  6. Božanić, D., Pamučar, D., & Bojanić, D. (2015). Modification of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method using fuzzy logic: Fuzzy AHP approach as a support to the decision making process concerning engagement of the group for additional hindering. Serbian Journal of Management, 10(2), 151-171. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm10-7223
  7. Bozanic, D., Tešić, D., Komazec, N., Marinković, D., & Puška, A. (2023). Interval fuzzy AHP method in risk assessment. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 4(1), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.31181/rme040122082023b
  8. Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems, 17(3), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
  9. Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European journal of operational research, 95(3), 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
  10. Chen, H., Huang, A. B., Peng, B., & Liu, Y. M. (2023). Evaluation of Post-Earthquake Geological Environment Carrying Capacity Based on AHP-GIS Coupled Analysis Method. Acadlore TTransactions on Geosciences, 2(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.56578/atg020102
  11. Dabić-Miletić, S., & Raković, K. (2023). Ranking of autonomous alternatives for the realization of intralogistics activities in sustainable warehouse systems using the TOPSIS method. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 1(1), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems1120234m
  12. Fattoruso, G., Barbati, M., Ishizaka, A. and Squillante, M. (2022). A hybrid AHPSort II and multi-objective portfolio selection method to support quality control in the automotive industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2033140
  13. Fattoruso, G., Scognamiglio, S. and Violi, A. (2022). A New Dynamic and Perspective Parsimonious AHP Model for Improving Industrial Frameworks. Mathematics, 10(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10173138
  14. Gallizo, J. L., Jiménez, F., & Salvador, M. (2002). Adjusting financial ratios: a Bayesian analysis of the Spanish manufacturing sector. Omega, 30(3), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00026-9
  15. Ghorui, N., Ghosh, A., Mondal, S. P., Kumari, S., Jana, S., & Das, A. (2021). Evaluation of performance for School Teacher Recruitment using MCDM techniques with Interval Data. Multicultural Education, 7(5). http://ijdri.com/me/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/45.pdf
  16. Ghosh, A. (2021). Analyzing Efficiency of Indian Life Insurance Companies using DEA and SEM. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(12), 3897-3919. https://turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/8178
  17. Ghosh, A., Jana, S. (2017). Best Indian Information Technology company based on Financial Ratios analysis using VIKOR method. Arthvati-Journal of Economics, 3 (7), 89-100. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=5H7fhGEAAAAJ&citation_for_view=5H7fhGEAAAAJ:Y0pCki6q_DkC
  18. Ghunaim, H., & Dichter, J. (2019). Applying the FAHP to improve the performance evaluation reliability of software defect classifiers. IEEE Access, 7, 62794-62804. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2915964
  19. Hadžikadunić, A., Stević, Ž., Badi, I., & Roso, V. (2023). Evaluating the Logistics Performance Index of European Union Countries: An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach Utilizing the Bonferroni Operator. International Journal of Knowledge and Innovation Studies, 1(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.56578/ijkis010104
  20. Hangshenas, S., Özçelik, Y., Mikaeil, R., & Moghaddam, S. (2017). Ranking and Assesment of tunneling projects risks using fuzzy MCDM (Case Study: Toyserkan Doolayi Tunnel). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316276762_Ranking_and_Assessment_of_Tunneling_Projects_Risks_Using_Fuzzy_MCDM_Case_Study_Toyserkan_Doolayi_Tunnel
  21. Hsieh, H. N., Chen, J. F., & Do, Q. H. (2015). Applying TRIZ and fuzzy AHP based on lean production to develop an innovative design of a new shape for machine tools. Information, 6(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.3390/info6010089
  22. Jana, C. (2021). Multiple attribute group decision-making method based on extended bipolar fuzzy MABAC approach. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 40(6), 227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01606-3
  23. Jana, C., Dobrodolac, M., Simic, V., Pal, M., Sarkar, B., & Stević, Ž. (2023). Evaluation of sustainable strategies for urban parcel delivery: Linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy Choquet integral approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106811
  24. Jana, C., Mohamadghasemi, A., Pal, M., & Martinez, L. (2023). An improvement to the interval type-2 fuzzy VIKOR method. Knowledge-Based Systems, 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111055
  25. Jana, C., Simic, V., Pal, M., Sarkar, B., & Pamucar, D. (2024). Hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method with a bipolar fuzzy approach and its applications to economic condition analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107837
  26. Jana, S., Basu, S (2021). Ranking of Top 20 Pharmaceutical Companies in India using TOPSIS. Empirical Economics Letters, ISSN 1681 8997, Special Issue 3.
  27. Jana, S., Maji, B., Sarkar, A. (2019). Linear Programming Approach for Portfolio Review. Parishodh Journal, 8(XI), 692-702. https://www.academia.edu/84206671/Linear_Programming_Approach_for_Portfolio_Review
  28. Johnson, H., Isaksson, L., & Fiedler, M. (2006, April). SF Wu. A decision system for adequate authentication. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Networking, International Conference on Systems and International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies (ICNICONSMCL’06), Washington, DC, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNICONSMCL.2006.9
  29. Khan, A. A., Mashat, D. S., & Dong, K. (2024). Evaluating Sustainable Urban Development Strategies through Spherical CRITIC-WASPAS Analysis. Journal of Urban Development and Management, 3(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.56578/judm030101
  30. Krstic, M., Tadic, S., & Agnusdei, L. (2023). Evaluating governance models in intermodal terminal operations: A hybrid grey MCDM approach. Journal of Intelligent Management Decision, 2(4), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.56578/jimd020403
  31. Kumar, R. D., &Nagarajan, V. (2021). Implementation and performance measure of fuzzy AHP for resource allocation in 5G. Fluctuation and Noise Letters, 20(02), 2150020. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219477521500206
  32. Kung, J. Y., Chuang, T. N., &Ky, C. M. (2011, June). A fuzzy MCDM method to select the best company based on financial report analysis. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011) (pp. 2013-2017). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.2011.6007679
  33. Laitinen, E. K. (2006). Financial statement data in assessing the future potential of a technology firm: The case of Nokia. International Review of Financial Analysis, 15(3), 256-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2005.03.001
  34. Low, C., & Hsueh Chen, Y. (2012). Criteria for the evaluation of a cloud-based hospital information system outsourcing provider. Journal of medical systems, 36, 3543-3553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-012-9829-z
  35. Modibbo, U. M., Hassan, M., Ahmed, A. and Ali, I. (2022). Multi-criteria decision analysis for pharmaceutical supplier selection problem using fuzzyTOPSIS.” Management Decision 60 (3), 806-836. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2020-1335
  36. Nandi, S., Granata, G., Jana, S., Ghorui, N., Mondal, S. P., &Bhaumik, M. (2023). Evaluation of the treatment options for COVID-19 patients using generalized hesitant fuzzy-multi criteria decision making techniques. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101614
  37. Nazzal, D., Mustafa, D., Halabi, E., Gnimat, S., & Gayada, S. (2019). Evaluation of types, stages and treatment of breast cancer among Palestinian women. Palestinian Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal (Pal. Med. Pharm. J.), 5(1), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.59049/2790-0231.1029
  38. Öcal, M. E., Oral, E. L., Erdis, E., &Vural, G. (2007). Industry financial ratios—application of factor analysis in Turkish construction industry. Building and environment, 42(1), 385-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.023
  39. Onay, A., Karamaşa, Ç., & Saraç, B. (2016). Application of Fuzzy AHP in Selection of Accounting Elective Courses in Undergraduate and Graduate Level. Journal of Accounting Finance and Auditing Studies, 2(4), 20-42. https://www.acadlore.com/article/JAFAS/2016_2_4/jafas020402
  40. Petrović, N., Živanović, T., & Mihajlović, J. (2023). Evaluating the annual operational efficiency of passenger and freight road transport in Serbia through entropy and TOPSIS methods. Journal of Engoneering Management and Systems Engineering, 2(4), 204-211. https://doi.org/10.56578/jemse020402
  41. Prajapati, D., Daultani, Y., Cheikhrouhou, N., & Pratap, S. (2020). Identification and ranking of key factors impacting efficiency of Indian shipping logistics sector. Opsearch, 57, 765-786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-020-00442-z
  42. Saaty, T. (1980, November). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making. In Kobe, Japan, 1, p. 69. http://www.cashflow88.com/decisiones/saaty1.pdf
  43. Seruffo, M., Frances, C., Santana, A., & Vijaykumar, N. (2012). Heuristic algorithm based on multicriteria analysis for selection of first mile access in standard integrated services digital broadcasting terrestrial. IET Communications, 6(17), 2933-2940. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2012.0237
  44. Sharma, A., Hussain, V. M. S., Kumar, P. A., & Pandit, M. (2023). Prioritization of forging die design criteria based on failure analysis using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). Materials Today: Proceedings, 80, 925-932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.329
  45. Shekar, P. R., & Mathew, A. (2023). Integrated assessment of groundwater potential zones and artificial recharge sites using GIS and Fuzzy-AHP: a case study in Peddavagu watershed, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11474-5
  46. Shiue, W., Li, S. T., & Chen, K. J. (2008). A frame knowledge system for managing financial decision knowledge. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 1068-1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.035
  47. Stevic, Z., N. Mujakovic, A. Goli, and S. Moslem. Selection of logistics distribution channels for final product delivery: FUCOM-MARCOS model. Journal of Intelligent Management Decision 2 (4), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.56578/jimd020402
  48. Sun, J., & Li, H. (2009). Financial distress prediction based on serial combination of multiple classifiers. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8659-8666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.002
  49. Taletović, M. (2023). Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Warehouse: A Brief Review. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 1(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems11202331t
  50. Van Laarhoven, P. J., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 11(1-3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
  51. Wang, Y. J., & Lee, H. S. (2008). A clustering method to identify representative financial ratios. Information Sciences, 178(4), 1087-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.09.016
  52. Xidonas, P., Mavrotas, G., & Psarras, J. (2009). A multicriteria methodology for equity selection using financial analysis. Computers & operations research, 36(12), 3187-3203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2009.02.009
  53. Yang, C. C., & Chen, B. S. (2004). Key quality performance evaluation using fuzzy AHP. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 21(6), 543-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/10170660409509433
  54. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  55. Zangoueinezhad, A., & Moshabaki, A. (2011). Measuring university performance using a knowledge-based balanced scorecard. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(8), 824-843. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401111182215
  56. Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Stević, Ž., & Mardani, A. (2020). Modelling procedure for the selection of steel pipes supplier by applying fuzzy AHP method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(2), 39-53. https://oresta.org/menu-script/index.php/oresta/article/view/53
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2024-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2303-5013 | Journal ISSN: 2303-5005
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 7
Submitted on: Feb 13, 2024
|
Accepted on: Apr 12, 2024
|
Published on: Mar 23, 2024
Published by: Oikos Institut d.o.o.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2024 Subrata Jana, Bibhas Chandra Giri, Anirban Sarkar, Chiranjibe Jana, Željko Stević, Marko Radovanović, published by Oikos Institut d.o.o.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.