Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The value of air purification and carbon storage ecosystem services of park trees in Warsaw, Poland Cover

The value of air purification and carbon storage ecosystem services of park trees in Warsaw, Poland

By: Zbigniew Szkop  
Open Access
|Sep 2022

References

  1. Anderson L.M., Cordell H.K. 1988. Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens. Gerogia (U.S.A.): a survey based on actual sales prices. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15: 153–164.10.1016/0169-2046(88)90023-0
  2. Baldocchi D.D., Hicks B.B., Camara P. 1987. A canopy stomatal resistance model for gaseous deposition to vegetated surfaces. Atmospheric Environment, 21: 91–101.10.1016/0004-6981(87)90274-5
  3. Bauer J., Pérez M.E., Olivero S. 2016. i-Tree urban forest assessment in Santo Domingo’s Colonial City. Technical Report. Santo Domingo.
  4. Bautista D., Peña-Guzmán C. 2019. Simulating the hydrological impact of green roof use and an increase in green areas in an urban catchment with i-tree: A case study with the town of Fontibón in Bogotá. Colombia Resources, 8: 68.10.3390/resources8020068
  5. Berland A., Shiflett S., Shuster W., Garmestani A., Goddard H., Herrmann D., Hopton M. 2017. The role of trees in urban stormwater managemant. Landscape and Urban Planning, 162: 167–177.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.017
  6. Bertram C., Meyerhoff J., Rehdanz K., Wüstemann H. 2017. Differences in the recreational value of urban parks between weekdays and weekends: A discrete choice analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 159: 5–14.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.006
  7. Blair J., Roldan C., Ghosh S., Yung S.H. 2017. Greening Rail Infrastructure for Carbon Benefits. Procedia Engineering, 180: 1716–1724.10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.334
  8. Borkowska M., Rozwadowska M., Śleszyński J., Żylicz T. 2001. Environmental Amenities on Housing Market in Warsaw: Hedonic Price Method Research. Ekonomia 3: 70–82.
  9. Bowler D., Buyung-Ali L., Knight T., Pullin A. 2010. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: a systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97: 147–155.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
  10. Chaparro L., Terradas J. 2009. Ecological services of urban forest in Barcelona. Technical Report. Ballaterra.
  11. Chiesura A. 2004. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68: 129–138.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003
  12. CICES (Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services). 2013. Towards a common classification of ecosystem services.
  13. Costanza R., D’Arge R., Groot R.D., Faber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O’Neill RV., Paruelo J., Raskin RG., Sutton P., Van den Belt M. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253–260.10.1038/387253a0
  14. Costanza R., Groot R.D., Braat L., Kubiszewski I., Fioramonti L., Sutton P., Farber S., Grasso M. 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services, 28: 1–16.10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
  15. Costanza R., Groot R.D., Sutton P., Ploeg S., Anderson S.J., Kubiszewski I., Farber S., Turner R.K. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26: 152–158.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
  16. Czembrowski P., Kronenberg J., Czepkiewicz M. 2016. Integrating non-monetary and monetary valuation methods - SoftGIS and hedonic pricing. Ecological Economics, 130: 166–175.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.004
  17. De la Concha H. 2017. Inventario del Arbolado Urbano de la ciudad de Mérida. Technical Report. Mérida.
  18. Dewalle D., Heisler G. 1988. Use of Windbreaks for Home Energy Conservation. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 22: 243–260.10.1016/B978-0-444-43019-9.50025-0
  19. Dimke K.C., Sydnor T.D., Gardner D.S. 2013. The effect of landscape trees on residential property values of six communities in Cincinnati. Ohio. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 39: 49–55.10.48044/jauf.2013.007
  20. Doick K., Handley P., Ashwood F., Vaz Monteiro M., Frediani K., Rogers K. 2017. Valuing Edinburgh’s Urban Trees. An update to the 2017 i-Tree Eco survey – a report of Edinburgh City Council and Forestry Commission Scotland. Technical Report. Farnham.
  21. Donovan G.H., Butry D.T. 2010. Trees in the city: valuing street trees in Portland. Oregon. Landscape Urban Planning, 94: 77–83.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.019
  22. ExternE (External Costs of Energy). 2005. ExternE - Externalities of Energy Methodology. Available at http://www.externe.info/externe_d7/
  23. Gardner J., McDuie M., Boyle E. 2017. Valuing the Waite Arboretum. South Australia. Technical Report. Adelaide.
  24. Giergiczny M., Kronenberg J. 2012. Jak wycenić wartość przyrody w mieście? Wycena drzew przyulicznych w centrum Łodzi. [in:] T. Bergier. J. Kronenberg (ed.) Przyroda w mieście. Usługi ekosystemów - niewykorzystany potencjał miast. Polish TEEB guide for cities. Sendzimir Foundation. Cracow.
  25. Graça M.S., Gonçalves J.F., Alves P.J.M., Nowak D.J., Hoehn R., Ellis A., Farinha-Marques P., Cunha M. 2017. Assessing mismatches in ecosystem services proficiency across the urban fabric of Porto (Portugal): The influence of structural and socioeconomic variables. Ecosystem Services, 23: 82–93.10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.015
  26. Heisler O.M. 1986. Effects of individual trees on the solar radiation climate of small buildings. Urban Ecology, 9: 337–359.10.1016/0304-4009(86)90008-2
  27. Hutchings T., Lawrence V., Brunt A. 2012. Estimating the Ecosystem Services Value of Edinburgh’s Trees. Technical Report. Farnham
  28. IWG (Interagency Working Group). 2021. Technical Support Document: Social Cost of Carbon. Methane. and Nitrous Oxide Interim Estimates under Executive Order 13990. United States Government. Available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/TechnicalSupportDocument_SocialCostofCarbonMethaneNitrousOxide.pdf
  29. Kiss M., Takács Á., Pogácsás R., Gulyás Á. 2015. The role of ecosystem services in climate and air quality in urban areas: Evaluating carbon sequestration and air pollution removal by street and park trees in Szeged (Hungary). Moravian Geographical Reports, 23: 36–46.10.1515/mgr-2015-0016
  30. Lefrançois C.B. 2015. Designing effective stormwater management policies : The role of the urban forest and impervious cover in Vancouver (B.C. Master Thesis). The UBC School of Community and Regional Planning. Vancouver.
  31. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Synthesis. Island Press.
  32. Medrano O.A. 2019. Measuring the benefits of urban nature-based solutions through quantitative assessment tools (Master Thesis). Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht.
  33. Meléndez-Ackerman E., Trujillo A., Nytch C., Ramse M., Branoff B., Olivero-Lora S. 2018. Ecological vulnerability of urban green infrastructure to Hurricanes Irma and Maria in Puerto Rico. Technical Report. Puerto Rico.
  34. Moffat A.J., Doick K.J., Handley P. 2017. Petersfield’s trees - their importance and value. Results of the i-Tree Eco survey. Technical Report. Report to East Hampshire District Council. South Downs National Park Authority and Petersfield Town Council. The Petersfield Society. Petersfield.
  35. Moulton R., Richards K. 1990. Costs of Sequestering Carbon through Tree Planting and Forest Management in the United States. General Technical Report WO-58. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington. D.C.10.5962/bhl.title.94273
  36. Na H.R., Heisler G.M., Nowak D.J., Grant R.H. 2014. Modeling of urban trees’ effects on reducing human exposure to UV radiation in Seoul. Korea. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 13, 4: 785–792.10.1016/j.ufug.2014.05.009
  37. Nowak D., Hoehn R., Crane D., Stevens J., Walton J. 2007. Philadelphia’s Urban Forest. Assessing Urban Forest Effects and Values. Technical Report. USDA Forest Service. Northern Research Station. Philadelphia.10.2737/NRS-RB-7
  38. Nowak D.J. 1994. Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Chicago’s urban forest. [in:] E.G. McPherson, D.J Nowak; R.A. Rowntree (eds.) Chicago’s urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. General Technical Report. NE-186. Radnor. PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station: 83–94.
  39. Nowak D.J. 1996. Estimating leaf area and leaf biomass of open-grown deciduous urban trees. Forest Science, 42, 4: 504–507.
  40. Nowak D.J. 2018. Améliorer les forêts citadines à travers l’évaluation. la modélisation et le suivi. Unasylva, 69: 30–36.
  41. Nowak D.J., McHale P.J., Ibarra M., Crane D., Stevens J., Luley C. 1998. Modeling the effects of urban vegetation on air pollution. [in:] S.E. Gryning, N. Chaumerliac (ed.) Air pollution modeling and its application. Plenum Press. New York.10.1007/978-1-4757-9128-0_41
  42. Pauleit S., Duhme F. 2000. Assessing the Environmental Performance of Land Cover Types for Urban Planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52, 1: 1–20.10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00109-2
  43. Peper P.J., McPherson E.G., Simpson J.R., Gardner S.L., Vargsas K.E., Xiao Q. 2007. Municipal Forest Resource Analysis. Technical Report. USDA Forest Service. Pacific Southwest Research Station, New York City.
  44. Raum S., Hand K., Hall C., Edwards D., O’Brien L., Doick K. 2019. Achieving impact from ecosystem assessment and valuation of urban greenspace: The case of i-Tree Eco in Great Britain. Landscape and Urban Planning, 190: 1–17.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103590
  45. Rogers K., Sacre K., Goodenough J., Doick K. 2015. Valuing London’s Urban Forest - Results of the London i-Tree Eco Project. Technical Report. Treeconomics, London.
  46. Roush W. 1997. Putting a price tag on nature’s bounty. Science, 276(5315): 1029.10.1126/science.276.5315.1029
  47. Scholz T., Hof A., Schmitt T. 2018. Cooling effects and regulating ecosystem services provided by urban trees - Novel analysis approaches using urban tree cadastre data. Sustainability, 10: 712.10.3390/su10030712
  48. Shashua-Bar L., Erell E., Pearlmutter D. 2009. The cooling efficiency of urban landscape strategies in a hot dry climate. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92: 179–186.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.04.005
  49. Summit J., Sommer R. 1999. Further studiem of preferred tree shapes. Environmental Behavior, 31: 550–576.10.1177/00139169921972236
  50. Szkop Z. 2016. An evaluation of the ecosystem services provided by urban trees: The role of Krasiński Gardens in air quality and human health in Warsaw (Poland). Environmental and Socio-economic Studies, 4, 4: 41–50.10.1515/environ-2016-0023
  51. Szkop Z. 2019. Wycena usług ekosystemowych świadczonych przez wybrane drzewa miejskie w Rzeszowie. Technical report prepared for the “EKOSKOP” association for the needs of an educational campaign carried out by the Marshal’s Office of the Podkarpackie Voivodeship, Rzeszów.
  52. Szkop Z. 2020a. Evaluating the sensitivity of the i-Tree Eco pollution model to different pollution data inputs: a case study from Warsaw. Poland. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 55: 126859.10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126859
  53. Szkop Z. 2020b. Wartość ekonomiczna usług świadczonych przez drzewa miejskie. Problem optymalnego zarządzania zielenią miejską (PhD thesis). Faculty of Economic Sciences of the University of Warsaw, Warsaw.
  54. Szkop Z. 2021a. Ocena i wycena usług ekosystemowych w wybranym obszarze miasta stołecznego Warszawy na podstawie danych dostarczonych przez zleceniodawcę. Technical Report prepared by dr. Zbigniew Szkop at the request of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw.
  55. Szkop Z. 2021b. The problem of suboptimal composition of urban trees in Warsaw. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 62: 127127.10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127127
  56. Tamura A. 1997. Effects of landscaping on the feeling of annoyance of a space. [in:] A. Schick, M. Klatte (eds.) Contributions to psychological acoustics: Results of the seventh Oldenburg symposium on psychological acoustics. Universität Oldenbulg, Oldenbulg.
  57. TEEB (Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). 2010. Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach. Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB.
  58. Tsiros I. 2010. Assessment and energy implications of street air temperature cooling by shade trees in Athens (Greece) under extremely hot weather conditions. Renuable Energy, 35, 8: 1866–1869.10.1016/j.renene.2009.12.021
  59. Velazquez-Marti B., Sajdak M., Lopez-Cortes I. 2013. Available residual biomass obtained from pruning Morus alba L. trees cultivated in urban forest. Renuable Energy, 60: 27–33.10.1016/j.renene.2013.04.001
  60. Von Hoffen L.P., Samuel I. 2014. Orchards for edible cities: cadmium and lead content in nuts. berries. pome and stone fruits harvested within the inner city neighbourhoods in Berlin. Germany. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 101: 233–239.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.11.023
  61. Wu. J., Wang Y., Qiu S., Peng J. 2019. Using the modified i-Tree Eco model to quantify air pollution removal by urban vegetation. Science of the Total Environment, 688: 673–683.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.437
  62. Xiao. Q., McPherson E.G., Simpson J.R., Ustin S.L. 1998. Rainfall interception by Sacramento’s urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 24, 4: 235–244.10.48044/jauf.1998.028
  63. Zawojska E., Szkop Z., Czajkowski. M., Żylicz. T. 2016. Economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by the Palace Park in Wilanow. A benefit transfer study. Economics and Environment, 59: 143–153.
  64. Żylicz T. 2017. Wycena drzew miejskich. Aura, 11: 16–17.
  65. Żylicz T. 2018. Czy ekosystemy świadczą usługi. Aura, 1:19–20.10.5604/01.3001.0012.5930
  66. ZZW (Zarząd Zieleni Warszawy). 2021. Data provided by the Warsaw City Hall – Urban Greenery Office. Warsaw.
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 11
Submitted on: May 1, 2022
Accepted on: Aug 19, 2022
Published on: Sep 27, 2022
Published by: University of Silesia in Katowice, Institute of Mathematics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Zbigniew Szkop, published by University of Silesia in Katowice, Institute of Mathematics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.