Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A phytoindicational assessment of the vegetation of afforestation belts in the Middle Dnipro Region, Ukraine Cover

A phytoindicational assessment of the vegetation of afforestation belts in the Middle Dnipro Region, Ukraine

Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Borhidi A. 1995. Social behavior types, the naturalness and relative ecological indicators values of the higher plants in the Hungarian flora. Acta Botanica Hungarica, 39, 1‒2: 97‒181.
  2. Braun-Blanquet J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzuge der Vegetationskunde. Springer-Verlag, Wien, New York.10.1007/978-3-7091-8110-2
  3. Bray J.R., Curtis J.T. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs, 27, 4: 326‒349.10.2307/1942268
  4. Didukh Ya.P. 2011. The ecological scales for the species of Ukrainian flora and their use is synphytoidication. Phytosociocentre, Kyiv.
  5. Didukh Ya.P., Pliuta P.G. 1994. Phytoindication of ecological factors. M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany of NASU, Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  6. Dufrȇne M., Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs, 67, 3: 345‒366.10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:SAAIST]2.0.CO;2
  7. Ecological encyclopedia: in 3 volumes. Vol. I: А‒Е, 2007, Ed: A.V. Tolstoukhov. Center for Ecological Education and Information, Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  8. Frank D., Klotz S. 1990. Biologisch-Ökologische DAten Zur Flora der DDR. Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle.
  9. Goncharenko I.V. 2017. Phytoindication of anthropogenic factor. Serednyak, Dnipro [in Ukrainian].
  10. Hill M.O., Gauch Jr.H.G. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: An improved ordination technique. Vegetatio, 42, 1‒3: 47‒58.10.1007/BF00048870
  11. Lȇ S., Josse J., Husson F. 2008. FactoMineR: A Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25, 1: 1‒18.10.18637/jss.v025.i01
  12. Legendre P., Legendre L. 2012. Numerical ecology: Developments in environmental modeling, 24. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  13. Oksanen J. et al. 2018. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. A package version 2.4-6. – 2018. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html
  14. Ramensky L.G.,. Tsatsenkin I.A, Chizhikov O.N., Antipin N.A. 1956. Ecological assessment of forage lands by vegetation cover. Selkhozgiz, Moscow [in Russian].
  15. Solomakha I.V., Shevchyk V.L. 2020. Syntaxonomy of Middle Dnieper windbreak forest strips. Black Sea Botanical Journal, 16, 1: 40–54 [in Ukrainian].10.32999/ksu1990-553X/2020-16-1-2
  16. Wei T., Wei M.T. 2016. Package «corrplot». Statistician, 25: 316‒324.
  17. Westhoff V., Maarel E. van der. 1978. The Braun-Blanquet approach. [in:] Whittaker R.H. (Ed.) Ordination and Classification of Communities, Dr. W. Junk, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-009-9183-5_9
Language: English
Page range: 30 - 39
Submitted on: Feb 11, 2022
Accepted on: May 17, 2022
Published on: Jun 30, 2022
Published by: University of Silesia in Katowice, Institute of Mathematics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Igor V. Goncharenko, Igor V. Solomakha, Vasyl L. Shevchyk, Tetyana S. Dvirna, Igor Ya. Tymochko, Volodymyr A. Solomakha, published by University of Silesia in Katowice, Institute of Mathematics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.