Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ageing in European post-communist countries – is it a threat to the welfare system? Cover

Ageing in European post-communist countries – is it a threat to the welfare system?

Environmental & Socio-economic Studies
Volume 9 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)
By: Tomasz Michalski and  Joanna Stępień  
Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. Akturk S. 2016. Post-imperial democracies and new projects of nationhood in Eurasia: transforming the nation through migration in Russia and Turkey. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43, 7: 1101–1120.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Aleksandrova S., Velkova A. 2003. Population ageing in the Balkan countries. Folia Medica (Plovdiv), 45, 4: 5–10.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Angermann A., Eichhorst W. 2012. Eldercare services – lessons from a European comparison. IZA research report, 45. Available online: http://www.iza.org/en/webcontent/publications/reports/report_pdfs/iza_report_45_en.pdf (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Bici R., Thomo L. 2018. Analysis of fertility using different statistical sources. Research Magazine Journal of Statistics and Socio-Economic Analysis, 2: 6–15.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Blažienė I., Žalimienė L. 2020. Between user’s expectations and provider’s quality of work: the future of elderly care in Lithuania. Population Ageing, 13, 1: 5–23.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Botrić V. 2016. Attitudes towards immigrants, immigration policies and labor market outcomes: comparing Croatia with Hungary and Slovenia. Croatian International Relations Review, 76: 5–28.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Brainerd E., Butler D.M. 2004. Autopsy on an empire: understanding mortality in Russia and the former Soviet Union. NBER Working Paper Series, 10868. Available online: http://www.nber.org/papers/w10868 (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).10.3386/w10868
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Broniatowska P. 2019. Population ageing and inflation. Population Ageing, 12, 2: 179–193.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Careja R. 2013. Emigration for development? An exploration of the state’s role in the development-migration nexus: The case of Romania. International Migration, 51, 5: 76–90.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Cutler D.M., Deaton A.S., Lleras-Muney A. 2006. The determinants of mortality. NBER Working Paper Series, 11963. Available online: http://www.nber.org/papers/w11963 (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).10.3386/w11963
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Czarniawska B. 2014. Social science research: From field to desk. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles.10.4135/9781529799613
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Daróczi E. 2007. Ageing and health in the transition countries of Europe – the case of Hungary. Working Papers on Population, Family and Welfare Demographic Research Institute Hungarian Central Statistical Office, 9. Available online: http://demografia.hu/en/publicationsonline/index.php/workingpapers/article/view/325 (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Drbohlav D., Bailey A.J., Čermák Z., Čermáková D., Lozovanu D., Masná E., Paveloková L., Seidlová M., Stojanov R., Valenta O., Vietti F. 2017. Diversification trends in Moldovan international migration: evidence from Czechia and Italy. AUC Geographica, 52, 2: 237–248.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Drbohlav D., Seidlová M. 2016. Current Ukrainian migraton to Czechia – refuge for economic migrants rather than for refugees. [in:] D. Drbohlav, M. Jaroszewicz (eds.) Ukrainian Migraton in Times of Crisis: Forced and Labour Mobility. Charles University Faculty of Science, Prague: 95–127.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Dzúrová D., Jarolímek J. 2020. Šiřeni pandemie COVID-19 napřič geografickymi i socialnimi hranicemi: dokažeme mu čelit? Geografie, 125, 1: 1–20.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Eurydice. 2020. Republic of North Macedonia. Population: demographic situation, languages and religions. Available online: https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/republic-north-macedonia/population-demographic-situation-languages-and-religions_sl (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Fihel A., Janicka A., Kloc-Nowak W. 2018. The direct and indirect impact of international migration on the population ageing process: A formal analysis and its application to Poland. Demographic Research, 38: 1303–1338.10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.43
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Frejka T., Zakharov S. 2013. The apparent failure of Russia’s pronatalist family policies. Population and Development Review, 39, 4: 635–647.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Gerbery D. 2016. Rodinná politika na Slovensku v komparatívnej perspektíve. Slovenská Štatisticka a Demografia, 26, 3: 48–68.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Główny Urząd Statystyczny. 2020. Informacja o rozmiarach i kierunkach czasowej emigracji z Polski w latach 2004–2019. Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/migracje-zagraniczne-ludnosci/informacja-orozmiarach-i-kierunkach-czasowej-emigracji-z-polski-wlatach-2004-2019,2,13.html (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Harper S. 2016. The important role of migration for an ageing nation. Population Ageing, 9, 3: 183–189.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Harvey J. 2006. Return dynamics in Bosnia and Croatia: A Comparative Analysis. International Migration, 44, 3: 89–144.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Havrylyshyn O. 2007. Fifteen Years of Transformation in the Post-Communist World. Rapid Reformers Outperformed Gradualists. CATO Institute, Washington. Available online: https://object.cato.org/pubs/dpa/DPA4.pdf (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).10.2139/ssrn.1066807
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Hazans M. 2019. Emigration from Latvia: A brief history and driving forces in the twenty-first century. [in:] R. Kaša, I. Mierna (eds.) The emigrant communities of Latvia. National identity, transnational belonging, and diaspora politics. Springer Open, Cham: 35–68.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Hužvár M., Kaščáková A. 2017. Alternative methods for construction of active ageing composite indicator. Conference Proceedings. RELIK 2017: 165–174. Available online: https://relik.vse.cz/2017/sbornik/en/toc.html (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Janská E., Čermák Z., Wright R. 2014. New immigrant destinations in a new country of immigration: settlement patterns of non-natives in the Czech Republic. Population, Space and Place, 20, 8: 680–693.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Janušauskienė D. 2008. Post-Communist democratization: explaining the differences. [in:] A. Blasko, D. Janušauskienė (eds.) Political transformation and changing identities in Central and Eastern Europe. The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, Washington: 131–154.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Jurčová D., Pilinská V. 2014. Obvyklý pobyt občanov SR a odhad neevidovanej migrácie. INFOSTAT, Bratislava.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Káčerková M., Ondačková J. 2015. The process of population ageing in countries of the Visegrad Group (V4). Erdkunde, 69, 1: 49–68.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Káčerová M., Nováková G. 2016. Vplyv populačných procesov na starnutie obyvateľstva v krajinách V4. Slovenská Štatisticka a Demografia, 26, 2: 47–62.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Kang S-J., Sook I.J. 2020. Age-related morbidity and mortality among patients with COVID-19. Infection & Chemiotherapy, 52, 2: 154–164.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Kettani H. 2020. The world muslim population: spatial and temporal analyses. Jenny Stanford Publishing, Singapore.10.1201/9780429422539
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Klufová R., Poláková Z. 2010. Demografické metody a analýzy – Demografie české a slovenské populacje. Wolters Kluwer, Praha.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Kollmorgen R. 2013. Theories of postcommunist transformation. Approaches, debates, and problems of theory building in the second decade of research. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 5, 2: 88–105.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Kotowska I.E. 2019. Uwagi o urodzeniach i niskiej dzietności w Polsce oraz polityce rodzinnej wspierającej prokreację. Studia Demograficzne, 2, 176: 11–29.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Krimer B.A. 2017. Razvitie semejnoj politiki v Vostočnoj Evrope: Èstonii i Belarusi. Demografìâ ta socìal’na ekonomìka, 2, 30: 47–60.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Lang J. 2017. Central Asia: the crisis of the migration model and its potential impact on the EU. OSW Commentary, 237. Available online: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2017-04-25/central-asia-crisis-migration-model-and-its-potential-impact (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Lankford P.M. 1974. Comparative analysis of clique identification methods. Sociometry, 37, 2: 287–305.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Lesthaeghe R. 2010. The unfolding story of the Second Demographic Transition. Population and Development Review, 36, 2: 211–251.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Levin A.T., Hanage W.P., Owusu-Boaitey N., Cochan K.B., Walsh S.P., Meyerowitz-Katz G. 2020. Assessing the age specificity of infection fatality rates for COVID-19: systematic review, meta-analysis, and public policy implications. European Journal of Epidemiology, 35: 1123–1138.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Martin P., Martin S., Pastore F. 2002. Best practice options: Albania. International Migration, 40, 3: 103–118.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Ministerstwo Rodziny, Pracy i Technologii. 2020. Zezwolenia na pracę cudzoziemców. Available online: https://psz.praca.gov.pl/web/urzad-pracy/-/8180075-zezwoleniana-prace-cudzoziemcow (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Ministerul Afacerilor Interne al. Republici Moldova Biorul Migraţie şi Azil. 2018. Compendiul statistic al. Profilului migrațional extins al Republicii Moldova pentru anii 2014–2016. Available online: http://bma.gov.md/ro/content/compendiul-statistic-al-profilului-migra%C8%9Bional-extins-al-republicii-moldova-pentru-anii-0 (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Moran P.A.P. 1950. Notes on stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37, 1/2: 17–23.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Muszyńska M.M., Rau R. 2012. The old-age healthy dependency ratio in Europe. Population Ageing, 5, 3: 151–162.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Nová K. 2018. Zdravotní a sociální služby v kontextu stárnutí populace. Conference Proceedings. RELIK 2018: 215–225. Available online: https://relik.vse.cz/2018/sbornik/en/toc.html (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Osiewalska B. 2018. Partners’ empowerment and fertility in ten European countries. Demographic Research, 38: 1495–1534.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Píontkívs´ka I., Âblonows´kij D., Ruda Û., Gamanûk O., Prohorov B., Vasil´êva A. 2018. Skíl´ki ukraïncív poïhalo za kordon í ŝo deržaví z cim robili. Available online: https://ces.org.ua/migration/ (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Putkaradze M., Abuselidze G., Putkaradze L. 2020. Political and social-economic aspects of changes in age and gender structure of population of Georgia. Economic and Management, 17, 1: 89–98.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Rašević M. 2006. Fenomen strencja stanovištva Serbije. Demografija, 3: 43–58.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Reid H.M. 2013. Introduction to statistics fundamental concepts and procedures of data analysis. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.10.4135/9781071878927
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Sanderson W.C., Scherbov V. 2008. Rethinking Age and Aging. Population Bulletin, 63, 4: 3–16.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Šantić D. 2007. Raseljena lica sa Kosova i Metohije na teritorij grada Beograda. Demografija, 4: 91–102.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Šídlo L., Šprocha B., Ďurček P. 2020a. A retrospective and prospective view of current and future population ageing in the European Union 28 countries. Moravian Geographical Reports, 28, 3: 187–207.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. Šídlo L., Šprocha B., Ďurček P. 2020b. Prospective Dimension of Population Ageing and Potential Use in Pension Security in the V4 Countries. Ekonomický časopis, 68, 6: 601–621.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. Skirbekk V.F., Staudinger U.M., Cohen J.E. 2019. How to measure population aging? The answer is less than obvious: a review. Gerontology, 65: 136–144.10.1159/00049402530544101
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. Smoak N. 2016. Fertility rate. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/topic/fertility-rate (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. Sobotka T., Brzozowska Z., Muttarak R., Zeman K., di Lego V. 2020. Age, gender and COVID-19 infections. medRxiv 2020.05.24.20111765.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. Šprocha B., Majo J. 2016. Storočie populačného vývoja Slovenska I.: demografické procesy. INFOSTAT, Bratislava.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. Šprocha B., Šídlo L., Burcin B. 2015. Úroveň úmrtnosti na Slovensku a v Česku v európskom pohľade. Geografický časopis, 67, 1: 25–43.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. Šprocha B., Tišliar P., Šídlo L. 2018. A cohort perspective on the fertility postponement transition and low fertility in Central Europe. Moravian Geographical Reports, 26, 2: 109–120.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. Tabac T. 2018. Long-term migration from Republic of Moldova and Romania. Anuarul Institutului de Cercetari Economice “Gheorghe Zane”, 27: 79–90.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  63. Thaut L. 2009. EU integration & emigration consequences: the case of Lithuania. International Migration, 47, 1: 191–233.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  64. United Nations Development Programme. 2020. Human development report 2020. Available online: http://hdr.undp.org/en/2020-report (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  65. United Nations. 2019a. Population by age groups – both sexes. Available online: https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/ (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  66. United Nations. 2019b. World population prospects 2019: methodology of the United Nations Population Estimates and Projections. Available online: https://population.un.org/wpp/DefinitionOfProjectionVariants/ (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  67. van de Kaa D.J. 2004. Is the Second Demographic Transition a useful research concept. Questions and answers. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 2: 4–10.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  68. van Nimwegen N., van der Erf R. 2010. Europe at the crossroads: demographic challenges and international migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 9: 1359–1379.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  69. White A., Grabowska I., Kaczmarczyk P., Slany K. 2018. The Impact of migration on Poland: EU mobility and social change. UCL Press, London.10.2307/j.ctv550d7m
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  70. World Bank. 2021. Gender statistics. Available online: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/gender-statistics# (accessed on 11 Jun 2021).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  71. Zaidi B., Morgan S.P. 2017. The Second Demographic Transition theory: a review and appraisal. Annual Review of Sociology, 43: 4.1–4.20.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2021-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2354-0079
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 63 - 71
Submitted on: Apr 26, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jun 14, 2021
|
Published on: Jun 30, 2021
Published by: University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Natural Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
ageing,
old-age dependency ratio,
second demographic transition,
European post-communist countries
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geography,
Atmospheric science and climatology,
Life sciences,
Plant science,
Ecology

© 2021 Tomasz Michalski, Joanna Stępień, published by University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Natural Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 9 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)Next article