Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Estimating the recreational value for the sustainability of Hingol National Park in Pakistan Cover

Estimating the recreational value for the sustainability of Hingol National Park in Pakistan

By: Chakir Ali and  Muhammad Irfan  
Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. Ali S. 2008. Conservation and status of markhor (capra falconeri) in the northen parts of north west frontier province, Pakistan. Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers: 10919.
  2. Amirnejad H., Jahanifar K. 2018. Comparison of contingent valuation and travel cost method in estimating the recreational values of a forest park. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 21, 1: 36–44.
  3. Bakhsh K., Meshaal I., Riaz H. 2019. Evaluating visitors’ travel demand and recreational values in Kallar Kahar Lake, Pakistan. Environment, Development and Sustainability: 0123456789.
  4. Bharali A., Mazumder R. 2012. Application of travel cost method to assess the pricing policy of public parks: the case of Kaziranga National Park. Journal of Regional Development and Planning, 1, 1: 44–52.
  5. Bin O., Landry C.E., Ellis C.L., Vogelsong H. 2005. Some consumer surplus estimates for North Carolina beaches. Marine Resource Economics, 20, 2: 145–161.
  6. Booth J., Gaston K., Armsworth P. 2010. Who benefits from recreational use of protected areas? Ecology and Society, 15, 3: 19.
  7. Borzykowski N., Baranzini A., Maradan D. 2017. A travel cost assessment of the demand for recreation in Swiss forests. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, 98, 3: 149–171.
  8. Clawson M., Knetsch J.L. 1966. Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  9. Czajkowski M., Ahtiainen H., Artell J., Budziński W., Hasler B., Hasselström L., Meyerhoff J., Nõmmann T., Semeniene D., Söderqvist T. 2015. Valuing the commons: An international study on the recreational benefits of the Baltic Sea. Journal of Environmental Management, 156: 209–217.
  10. Dehlavi A., Adil I.H. 2011. Valuing the recreational uses of Pakistan’s wetlands : An application of the travel cost method. South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics (SANDEE) - Economics & the Environment, 3, 58–11: 132–151.
  11. Dudley N., Parrish J.D., Redford K.H., Stolton S. 2010. The revised IUCN protected area management categories: the debate and ways forward. Oryx, 44, 4: 485–490.10.1017/S0030605310000566
  12. Eagles P.F.J. 2014. Research priorities in park tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 22, 4: 528–549.
  13. Fleming C. M., Cook A. 2008. The recreational value of Lake McKenzie, Fraser Island: An application of the travel cost method. Tourism Management, 29, 6: 1197–1205.
  14. Freeman A.M. 1992. The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods. Resources for the Future Press, New York.
  15. Gaston K.J., Charman K., Jackson S.F., Armsworth P.R., Bonn A., Briers R.A., Callaghan C.S.Q., Catchpole R., Hopkins J., Kunin W.E. 2006. The ecological effectiveness of protected areas: the United Kingdom. Biological Conservation, 132, 1: 76–87.
  16. Ghalib S.A., Jabbar A., Wind J., Zehra A., Abbas D. 2008. Avifauna of hingol national park, Balochistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 40, 5: 317–330.
  17. Ghimire K.B. 1994. Parks and people: livelihood issues in national parks management in Thailand and Madagascar. Development and Change, 25, 1: 195–229.
  18. González R.M., Román C., Ortúzar J. de D. 2019. Preferences for sustainable mobility in natural areas: The case of Teide National Park. Journal of Transport Geography, 76: 42–51.
  19. Greene W. 2008. Functional forms for the negative binomial model for count data. Economics Letters, 99, 3: 585–590.
  20. Gürlük S., Rehber E. 2008. A travel cost study to estimate recreational value for a bird refuge at Lake Manyas, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 4: 1350–1360.
  21. Iamtrakul P., Teknomo K., Hokao K. 2005. Public park valuation using travel cost method. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5: 1249–1264.
  22. Job H., Harrer B., Metzler D., Hajizadeh-Alamdary D. 2005. Ökonomische Effekte von Großschutzgebieten. Untersuchung Der Bedeutung von Großschutzgebieten Für Den Tourismus Und Die Wirtschaftliche Entwicklung Der Region. BfNSkripten (135) Selbstverlag. Bonn-Bad Godesberg.
  23. Khan H. 2006. Willingness to pay for Margalla Hills National Park: Evidence from the travel cost method. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 11, 2: 43–70.
  24. Krenichyn K. 2006. ‘The only place to go and be in the city’: women talk about exercise, being outdoors, and the meanings of a large urban park. Health & Place, 12, 4: 631–643.10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.08.01516188484
  25. Loomis J., Yorizane S., Larson D. 2000. Testing significance of multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in a travel cost method demand model for whale watching trips. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 29, 2: 183–191.
  26. Mangan T., Brouwer R., Lohano H. Das, Nangraj G.M. 2013. Estimating the recreational value of Pakistan’s largest freshwater lake to support sustainable tourism management using a travel cost model. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21, 3: 473–486.
  27. Mayer M., Woltering M. 2018. Assessing and valuing the recreational ecosystem services of Germany’s national parks using travel cost models. Ecosystem Services, 31: 371–386.
  28. Moghavvemi S., Woosnam K.M., Paramanathan T., Musa G., Hamzah A. 2017. The effect of residents’ personality, emotional solidarity, and community commitment on support for tourism development. Tourism Management, 63: 242–254.
  29. Muhumuza M., Balkwill K. 2013. Factors affecting the success of conserving biodiversity in national parks: A review of case studies from Africa. International Journal of Biodiversity, 2013: 798101.
  30. Ovaskainen V., Neuvonen M., Pouta E. 2012. Modelling recreation demand with respondent-reported driving cost and stated cost of travel time: A Finnish case. Journal of Forest Economics, 18, 4: 303–317.
  31. Pirikiya M., Amirnejad H., Oladi J., Solout K.A. 2016. Determining the recreational value of forest park by travel cost method and defining its effective factors. Journal of Forest Science, 62, 9: 399–406.
  32. Rafiq M., Shafiqullah M., Malik A. 2007. Demand analysis of recreation visits to chitral valley: A natural resource management perspective. Pakistan Development Review, 46, 4: 971–983.
  33. Randall A. 1994. A difficulty with the travel cost method. Land Economics, 70, 1: 88–96.
  34. Shores K.A., Scott D., Floyd M.F. 2007. Constraints to outdoor recreation: A multiple hierarchy stratification perspective. Leisure Sciences, 29, 3: 227–246.
  35. Somuncu M., Khan A.A., Waseem L.I. 2009. Review of Protected Areas System in Pakistan: Present Status and Problems Concerning Future Development: Pakistan’daki Korunan Alanlar Sisteminin Değerlendirilmesi: Mevcut Durum ve Gelecekteki Gelişm.10.1501/Csaum_0000000010
  36. Stemberk J., Dolejs J., Maresova P., Kuca K. 2018. Factors affecting the number of visitors in national parks in the Czech Republic, Germany and Austria. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7, 3: 124.
  37. Stigner M.G., Beyer H.L., Klein C.J., Fuller R.A. 2016. Reconciling recreational use and conservation values in a coastal protected area. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53, 4: 1206–1214.
  38. Suhel S., Bashir A., Yuliana S. 2019. Identifying the determining factors of recreation demand in kongar lake of south sumatera: An individual travel cost approach. Forest and Society, 3, 1: 34–48.10.24259/fs.v3i1.5982
  39. Vicente E., de Frutos P. 2011. Application of the travel cost method to estimate the economic value of cultural goods: Blockbuster art exhibitions. Revista de Economia Pública, 196, 1: 37–63.
  40. Walpole M.J., Goodwin H.J. 2001. Local attitudes towards conservation and tourism around Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Environmental Conservation, 160–166.
  41. Waqas U., Hasnain S.A., Ahmad E., Abbasi M., Pandrani A. 2012. Conservation of green turtle (Chelonia mydas) at Daran beach, Jiwani, Balochistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 43, 1: 85–90.
  42. Watson J.E.M., Dudley N., Segan D.B., Hockings M. 2014. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature, 515, 7525: 67–73.
  43. Witt B. 2019. Tourists’willingness to pay increased entrance fees at Mexican protected areas: A multi-site contingent valuation study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11, 11: 3041.
  44. Zydroń A., Szoszkiewicz K., Chwiałkowski C. 2021. Valuing protected areas: Socioeconomic determinants of the willingness to pay for the National Park. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13, 2: 765.
Language: English
Page range: 52 - 62
Submitted on: Apr 3, 2021
Accepted on: Jun 18, 2021
Published on: Jun 30, 2021
Published by: University of Silesia in Katowice, Institute of Mathematics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Chakir Ali, Muhammad Irfan, published by University of Silesia in Katowice, Institute of Mathematics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.