Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Young urban trees as important structures in the cultural heritage of cities – a case study from Prague

Open Access
|Aug 2019

References

  1. Anderson K. 2004. Nature, culture and big trees. University of Texas Press, Austin.10.7560/702127
  2. Blicharska M. Mikusinski G. 2013. Old trees: cultural value. Science, 339: 904.10.1126/science.339.6122.904-b
  3. Blicharska M., Mikusinski G., Godbole A., Sarnaik J. 2013. Safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services of Sacred Groves – experiences from northern western Ghats. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 9, 4: 339–346.10.1080/21513732.2013.835350
  4. Blicharska M., Mikusinski G. 2014. Incorporating social and cultural significance of large trees in conservation policy. Conservation Biology, 28, 6: 1558–1567.10.1111/cobi.12341
  5. Buhyoff G.J., Gauthier L.J., Wellman J.D. 1984. Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements. Forest Science, 30, 1: 71–82.
  6. Carinanos P., Casares-Porcel M., Quesada-Rubio J.M. 2014. Estimating the allergenic potential of urban green spaces: A case-study in Granada, Spain. Landscape and Urban Planning, 123: 134–144.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.009
  7. Churkina G., Grote R., Butler T.M., Lawrence M. 2015. Natural selection? Picking the right trees for urban greening. Environmental Science Policy, 47: 12–17.10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.014
  8. Dafni A. 2006. On the typology and the worship status of sacred trees with a special reference to the Middle East. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2: 26.10.1186/1746-4269-2-26
  9. De la Sota C., Ruffato-Ferreira V.J., Ruiz-García L., Alvarez S. 2019. Urban green infrastructure as a strategy of climate change mitigation. A case study in northern Spain. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40: 145–151.10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.004
  10. Dahlhausen J., Rotzer T., Biber P., Uhl E., Pretzsch H. 2018. Urban climate modifies tree growth in Berlin. International Journal of Biometeorology, 62, 5: 795–808.10.1007/s00484-017-1481-3
  11. Endreny T., Santagata R., Perma A., De Stefano C., Rallo R.F., Ulgiati S. 2017. Implementing and managing urban forests: A much needed conservation strategy to increase ecosystem services and urban wellbeing. Ecological Modelling, 360: 328–335.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.07.016
  12. Grote R., Samson R., Alonso R., Amorim J.H., Carinanos P., Churkina G., Fares S., Thiec D.L., Niinemets U., Mikkelsen T.N., Paoletti E., Tiwary A., Calfapietra C. 2016. Functional traits of urban trees: Air pollution mitigation potential. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 14, 10: 543–550.10.1002/fee.1426
  13. Haase D., Schwartz N., Strohbach M., Kroll F., Seppelt R. 2012. Synergies, Trade-offs, and Loses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions: an Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the Leipzig-Halle region, Germany. Ecology and Society, 17, 3: 22.10.5751/ES-04853-170322
  14. Haider W., Hunt L. 2002. Visual aesthetic quality of Northern Ontario’s forested shorelines. Environmental Management, 29: 324–334.10.1007/s00267-001-0009-Z
  15. Jim C.Y. 2005. Monitoring the performance and decline of heritage trees in urban Hong Kong. Journal of Environmental Management, 74, 2: 161–172.10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.08.014
  16. Jochner-Oette S., Stitz T., Jetschni J., Carinanos P. 2018. The Influence of Individual-Specific Plant Parameters and Species Composition on the Allergenic Potential of Urban Green Spaces. Forests, 9, 6: 284.10.3390/f9060284
  17. Kilianova H., Pechanec V., Svobodova J., Machar, I. 2012. Analysis of the evolution of the floodplain forests in the aluvium of the Morava river. 12th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference, SGEM 2012, Vol. IV; Albena, Bulgaria: 1–8; Accession Number: WOS: 000348535300001.10.5593/sgem2012/s15.v4001
  18. Kilianova H., Pechanec V., Brus J., Kirchner K., Machar I. 2017. Analysis of the development of land use in the Morava River floodplain, with special emphasis on the landscape matrix. Moravian Geographical Records, 25, 1: 46–59.10.1515/mgr-2017-0005
  19. Lindenmayer D.B., Laurance W., Franklin J.F. 2012. Global decline in large old trees. Science, 338: 1305–1306.10.1126/science.1231070
  20. Lindenmayer D.B. 2013. New policies for old trees: averting a global crisis in a keystone ecological structure. Conservation Letters, 7, 1: 61–69.10.1111/conl.12013
  21. Lindenmayer D.B. 2016. The importance of managing and conserving large old trees: a case study from Victorian mountain ash forests. The Royal Society of Victoria, 128: 64–70.10.1071/RS16006
  22. Lindenmann-Matthies P., Marty T. 2013. Does ecological gardening increase species richness and aesthetic quality of a garden? Biological Conservation, 159: 37–44.10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.011
  23. Lutz J.A. et al. 2018. Global importance of large-diameter trees. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 27, 7: 849–864.
  24. Machar I. 2009. Conservation and Management of Floodplain Forests in the Protected Landscape Area Litovelske Pomoravi (Czech Republic) Introduction. [in:] I. Machar (ed.) Conservation and Management of Floodplain Forests in the Protected Landscape Area Litovelske Pomoravi (Czech Republic), Palacky University, Olomouc: 7–108.
  25. Machar I. 2010. Attempt to summarize the problems: Is a sustainable management of floodplain forest geobiocenoses possible? [in:] I. Machar (ed.) Biodiversity and target management of floodplain forests in the Morava River basin (Czech Republic), Palacky University, Olomouc: 189–226.
  26. Machar I., Simon J., Rejsek K., Pechanec V., Brus J., Kilianova H. 2016. Assessment of Forest Management in Protected Areas Based on Multidisciplinary Research. Forests, 7, 11: 285.10.3390/f7110285
  27. Maldonado A.D., Aguilera P.A., Salmeron A., Nicholson A.E. 2018. Probabilistic modelling of the relationship between socioeconomy and ecosystem Services in cultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services, 33, B: 146–164.10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.007
  28. Meerow S., Newell J.P. 2017. Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit. Landscape and Urban Planning, 159: 62–75.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
  29. Millard A. 2010. Cultural Aspects of Urban Biodiversity. [in:] Müller N., Werner P., Kelcey J.G. (eds.) Urban Biodiversity and Design, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford: 56–80.10.1002/9781444318654.ch3
  30. Moser A., Rotzer T., Pauleit S., Pretzsch H. 2017. City trees: Growth, functions and services - risks and research prospects. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung, 188, 5/6: 94–111.
  31. Moser-Reischl A., Uhl E., Rotzer T., Biber P., Con T.V., Tan N.T., Pretzsch H. 2018. Effects of the urban heat island and climate change on the growth of Khaya senegalensis in Hanoi, Vietnam. Forest Ecosystems, 5: 37.10.1186/s40663-018-0155-x
  32. Oprsal Z., Harmacek J., Pavlik P., Machar I. 2018. What Factors can Influence the Expansion of Protected Areas around the World in the Context of International Environmental and Development Goals? Problemy Ekorozwoju, 13, 1: 145–157.
  33. Östlund L., Zackrisson O., Hörnberg G. 2002. Trees on the border between nature and culture, culturally modified trees in boreal Sweden. Environmental History, 7, 1: 48–68.10.2307/3985452
  34. Pace R., Biber P., Pretzsch H., Grote R. 2018. Modeling Ecosystem Services for Park Trees: Sensitivity of i-tree Eco Simulations to Light Exposure and tree Species Classification. Forests, 9, 2: 89.10.3390/f9020089
  35. Peschardt K., Schipperijn J., Stigsdotter J. 2012. Use of small public urban green spaces (SPUGS). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11, 3: 235–244.10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.002
  36. Petritan I.C., Commarmot B., Hobi M.L., Petritan A.M., Bigler C., Abrudan I.V., Rigling A. 2015. Structural patterns of beech and silver fir suggest stability and resilience of the virgin forest Sinca in the Southern Carpathians, Romania. Forest Ecology and Management, 356: 184–195.10.1016/j.foreco.2015.07.015
  37. Pretzsch H., Biber P., Uhl E., Dahlhausen J., Schutze G., Perkins D., Rotzer T., Caldentey J., Koike T., van Con T., Chavanne A., du Toit B., Foster K., Lefer B. 2017. Climate change accelerates growth of urban trees in metropolises worldwide. Scientific Reports, 7: 15403.10.1038/s41598-017-14831-w
  38. Przybyl K. 2007. Fungi and minerals occurring in heartwood discolorations in Quercus robur trees. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 76, 1: 55–60.10.5586/asbp.2007.007
  39. Read H. 1999. Veteran trees: a guide to good management. English Nature, Peterborough.
  40. Ribe R.G. 1989. The aesthetics of forestry: what has empirical preference research taught us? Environmental Management, 13, 1: 55–74.10.1007/BF01867587
  41. Rudl A. 2016. Significant Trees. Agency Koniklec, Prague.
  42. Schroeder H.J., Flannigan J., Coles R. 2006. Residents’ attitudes toward street trees in the U.K. and U.S. communities. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 32, 5: 236–246.10.48044/jauf.2006.030
  43. Simon J., Machar I., Bucek A. 2014. Linking the historical research with the growth simulation model of hardwood floodplain forests. Polish Journal of Ecology, 62, 2: 273–288.10.3161/104.062.0208
  44. Simon J., Machar I., Brus J., Pechanec V. 2015. Combining a growth-simulation model with acoustic-wood tomography as a decision-support tool for adaptive management and conservation of forest ecosystems. Ecological Informatics, 30: 309–312.10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.08.004
  45. Smith M., Bunce R.G.H. 2004. Veteran trees in landscape: a methodology for assessing landscape features with special reference to two ancient landscapes. [in:] R. Smithers (ed.) Landscape ecology of trees and forests, Proceeding of the twelfth annual IALE (UK) conference in Cirencester, UK, London: 168–175.
  46. Teoh S.H.S., Symes W.S., Sun H., Pienkowski T., Carraso L.R. 2018. A global meta-analysis of the economic values of provisioning and cultural ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 649: 1293–1298.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.422
  47. Tribot A.S., Deter J., Mouquet N. 2018. Integrating the aesthetic value of landscapes and biological diversity. Proceedings of Royal Society B, 285: 20180971.10.1098/rspb.2018.0971
  48. Uradnicek L., Sramek M., Dreslerova J. 2017. Checklist of champion trees in the Czech Republic. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 10, 2: 109–120.10.1515/jlecol-2017-0020
  49. Vandekerkhove K., Vanhellemont M., Vrska T., Meyer P., Tabaku V., Thomaes A., Leyman A., De Keersmaeker L., Verheyen K. 2018. Very large trees in a lowland old-growth beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest: Density, size, growth and spatial patterns in comparison to reference sites in Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 417: 1–17.10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.033
  50. Zackrisson O., Ostlund L., Korhonen O., Bergman I. 2000. The ancient use of Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) inner bark by Sami people in northern Sweden, related to cultural and ecological factors. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 9, 2: 99–109.10.1007/BF01300060
Language: English
Page range: 14 - 23
Submitted on: Mar 7, 2019
Accepted on: Jul 24, 2019
Published on: Aug 30, 2019
Published by: University of Silesia in Katowice, Institute of Mathematics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2019 Ales Rudl, Ivo Machar, Lubos Uradnicek, Ludek Praus, Vilem Pechanec, published by University of Silesia in Katowice, Institute of Mathematics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.