Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emissions: An analysis for developing, Middle East, OECD and OPEC countries Cover

Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emissions: An analysis for developing, Middle East, OECD and OPEC countries

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Al-Mulali U., Weng-Wai C., Sheau-Ting L., Mohammed A. H. 2015. Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators, 48: 315–323.10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029
  2. Apergis N., Ozturk I. 2015. Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in Asian Countries. Ecological Indicators, 52: 16–22.10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026
  3. Arellano M. 1987. PRACTITIONERS’CORNER: Computing Robust Standard Errors for Within-groups Estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 49, 4: 431–434.10.1111/j.1468-0084.1987.mp49004006.x
  4. Arellano M., Bond S. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 2: 277–297.10.2307/2297968
  5. Arouri M.E.H., Youssef A.B., M’Henni H., Rault C. 2012. Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Middle East and North African countries. Energy Policy, 45: 342–349.10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.042
  6. Arrow K., Bolin B., Costanza R., Dasgupta P., Folke C., Holling C.S., Jansson B., Levin S., Maler K.G., Perrings C., Pimentel D. 1996. Economic growth, carrying capacity and the environment. Environment and Development Economics, 1: 104–110.10.1017/S1355770X00000413
  7. Aslan A., Destek M.A., Okumus I., 2018. Bootstrap rolling window estimation approach to analysis of the Environment Kuznets Curve hypothesis: evidence from the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 3: 2402–2408.10.1007/s11356-017-0548-3
  8. Baltagi B. 2008. Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Bilgili F., Koçak E., Bulut Ü. 2016. The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54: 838–845.10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080
  10. Boden T.A., Marland G., Andres R.J. 2011. Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A.10.3334/CDIAC/00001_V2010
  11. Cole M.A. 2004. Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 48, 1: 71–81.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.09.007
  12. Dehnavi J., Haghnejad A. 2012. Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and pollution in Selected OPEC Countries: Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis. Journal of Academic Research in Economics, 4, 2: 149–166.
  13. Dinda S. 2004. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological Economics, 49, 4: 431–455.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011
  14. Dogan E., Seker F., 2016. Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renewable Energy, 94: 429–439.10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078
  15. Fodha M., Zaghdoud O. 2010. Economic Growth and Pollutant Emissions in Tunisia: An Empirical Analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Energy Policy, 38, 2: 1150–1156.10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.002
  16. Friedl B., Getzner M. 2003. Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecological Economics, 45, 1: 133–148.10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00008-9
  17. Grossman G.M., Krueger A.B. 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 2: 353–377.10.2307/2118443
  18. Hausman J.A. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46, 6: 1251–1271.10.2307/1913827
  19. Holtz-Eakin D., Selden T.M. 1995. Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 57, 1: 85–101.10.1016/0047-2727(94)01449-X
  20. Jebli M.B., Youssef S.B., Ozturk I. 2016. Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecological Indicators, 60: 824–831.10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.031
  21. Keiser N.F. 1964. Macroeconomics, Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth. John Wiley & Sons.
  22. Kuznets S. 1955. Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45, 1: 1–28.
  23. Lacheheb M., Rahim A.S.A., Sirag A., 2015. Economic growth and CO2 emissions: Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Algeria. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5, 4: 1125–1132.
  24. Lantz V., Feng Q. 2006. Assessing income, population, and technology impacts on CO2 emissions in Canada: where’s the EKC? Ecological Economics, 57, 2: 229–238.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.006
  25. Lindmark M. 2002. An EKC-pattern in historical perspective: carbon dioxide emissions, technology, fuel prices and growth in Sweden 1870–1997. Ecological Economics, 42, 1–2: 333–347.10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00108-8
  26. Lorente D.B., Álvarez-Herranz A. 2016. Economic growth and energy regulation in the environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 16: 16478–16494.10.1007/s11356-016-6773-3
  27. Martínez-Zarzoso I., Bengochea-Morancho A. 2004. Pooled mean group estimation of an environmental Kuznets curve for CO2. Economics Letters, 82, 1: 121–126.10.1016/j.econlet.2003.07.008
  28. McConnell K.E. 1997. Income and the demand for environmental quality. Environment and Devolopment Economics, 2, 4: 383–399.10.1017/S1355770X9700020X
  29. Moomaw W.R., Unruh G.C. 1997. Are environmental Kuznets curve misleading us? The case of CO2 emissions. Environment and Development Economics, 2, 4: 451–463.10.1017/S1355770X97000247
  30. Ozatac N., Gokmenoglu K.K., Taspinar N. 2017. Testing the EKC hypothesis by considering trade openness, urbanization, and financial development: the case of Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 20: 16690–16701.10.1007/s11356-017-9317-6
  31. Panayotou T. 1993. Empirical test and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Working Paper WP238, Technology and Employment Program, International Labour Office.
  32. Perman R., Stern D.I. 2003. Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47, 3: 325–347.10.1111/1467-8489.00216
  33. Roodman D. 2006. How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 103.10.2139/ssrn.982943
  34. Sengupta R. 1996. CO2 emission–income relationship: policy approach for climate control. Pacific and Asian Journal of Energy, 7, 2: 207–229.
  35. Shafik N., Bandyopadhyay S. 1992. Economic growth and environmental quality: time series and cross section evidence. World Bank Publications. Policy, research working papers. no. WPS 904, World Development Report, World Bank Washington, DC.
  36. Stern D.I., Common M.S. 2001. Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur? Journals of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, 2: 162–178.10.1006/jeem.2000.1132
  37. Sugiawan Y., Managi S., 2016. The environmental Kuznets curve in Indonesia: Exploring the potential of renewable energy. Energy Policy, 98, C: 187–198.10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.029
  38. Suri V., Chapman D. 1998. Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 25, 2: 195–208.10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00180-8
  39. Torras M., Boyce J.K. 1998. Income, inequality, and pollution: Reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics, 25, 2: 147–160.10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00177-8
  40. Ward F.A. 2006. Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  41. Weil D.N. 2005. Economic Growth. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  42. White H. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48, 4: 817–838.10.2307/1912934
  43. Zhang Y.J. 2011. The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy 39, 4: 2197–2203.10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.026
Language: English
Page range: 48 - 58
Submitted on: Jun 13, 2018
Accepted on: Nov 5, 2018
Published on: Dec 14, 2018
Published by: University of Silesia in Katowice, Institute of Mathematics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Yasin Acar, Temel Gürdal, Şebnem Ekeryılmaz, published by University of Silesia in Katowice, Institute of Mathematics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.