References
- Abou-Foul, M., Ruiz-Alba, J. L., & López-Tenorio, P. J. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence capabilities on servitization: The moderating role of absorptive capacity-A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113609. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113609
- Akter, S., Wamba, S. F., Mariani, M., & Hani, U. (2021). How to Build an AI Climate-Driven Service Analytics Capability for Innovation and Performance in Industrial Markets? Industrial Marketing Management, 97, 258-273. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.07.014
- Belhadi, A., Mani, V., Kamble, S. S., Khan, S. A. R., & Verma, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: an empirical investigation. Annals of Operations Research, 333(1). doi: 10.1007/s10479-021-03956-x
- Berghaus, S., & Back, A. (2016). Stages in digital business transformation: results of an empirical maturity study. In Tenth Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS) (pp. 22). Paphos, Cyprus.
- Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471-482.
- Çalli, B. A., & Çalli, L. (2021). Relationships between digital maturity, organizational agility, and firm performance: an empirical investigation on SMEs. Business And Management Studies An International Journal, 9(2), 486-502.
- Chakravarty, A., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2013). Information Technology Competencies, Organizational Agility, and Firm Performance: Enabling and Facilitating Roles. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 883-1167. doi: 10.1287/isre.2013.0500
- Chen, J.-L. (2012). The synergistic effects of IT-enabled resources on organizational capabilities and firm performance. Information & Management, 49(3-4). doi: 10.1016/j.im.2012.01.005
- Chu, Y., Chi, M., Wang, W., & Luo, B. (2019). The impact of information technology capabilities of manufacturing enterprises on innovation performance: evidence from SEM and fsQCA. Sustainability, 11(21), 5946.
- Drydakis, N. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Reduced SMEs’ Business Risks. A Dynamic Capabilities Analysis During the COVID19 Pandemic. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(4), 1223-1247. doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10249-6
- Du, Y., Li, J. X., Liu, Q. C., & Chen, K. W. (2021). Configurational theory and QCA method from a complex dynamic perspective: research progress and future directions. Journal of Management World, 37 (3), 180-197.
- Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. (2005). Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: methodology and empirical application. Strategy Management Journal, 26(3): 277-285.
- Eller, R., Alford, P., Kallmünzer, A., & Peters, M. (2020). Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of small and medium-sized enterprise digitalization. Journal of Business Research, 112, 119-127.
- Enholm, I. M., Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Business Value: a Literature Review. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(5), 1709-1734. doi: 10.1007/s10796-021-10186-w
- Fosso Wamba, S., Queiroz, M. M., Pappas, I. O, & Sullivan, Y. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Capability and Firm Performance: A Sustainable Development Perspective by the Mediating Role of Data-Driven Culture. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-15.
- Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180-1198.
- Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 393-420.
- Fosso Wamba, S., & Queiroz, M. M. (2023). Responsible Artificial Intelligence as a Secret Ingredient for Digital Health: Bibliometric Analysis, Insights, and Research Directions. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(6), 2123-2138. doi: 10.1007/s10796-021-10142-8
- Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Fiss, P. C.& Aguilera, R. V. (2021). Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 46, 778-799.
- Goodwin, P., & Wright, G. (2001) Enhancing strategy evaluation in scenario planning: a role for decision analysis. Journal Management Studies, 38(1), 1-16.
- Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C. & Aguilera, R. V. (2018). Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 16, 482-495.
- Gupta, M. & George, J. F. (2016). Toward the development of a big data analytics capability, Information & Management, 53(8): 1049-1064.
- Heredia, J., Castillo-Vergara, M., Geldes, C., Gamarra, F. M. C., Flores, A. & Heredia, W. (2022). How do digital capabilities affect firm performance? The mediating role of technological capabilities in the “new normal”. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2):100171
- Judge, W. Q., Fainshmidt, S. & Brown, J. L. (2020). Institutional Systems for Equitable Wealth Creation: replication and an Update of Judge et al. Management and Organization Review, 16(1), 5-31. doi: 10.1017/mor.2020.1
- Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D. & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(14), 1-25.
- Kraus, S., Ribeiro-Soriano, D. & Schüssler, M. (2018). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research-the rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 15-33.
- Kumar, S., Sahoo, S., Lim, W. M., Kraus, S. & Bamel, U. (2022) Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: a contemporary overview. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121599.
- Kwiotkowska, A. (2024). Creating Organizational Resilience through Digital Transformation and Dynamic Capabilities: Findings from fs/QCA Analysis on the Example of Polish CHP Plants. Sustainability, 16(14), 6266. doi: 10.3390/su16146266
- Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179-228.
- Leidner, D. E., Lo, J., & Preston, D. (2011). An empirical investigation of the relationship of IS strategy with firm performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(4), 419-437.
- Li, L., Ye, F., Zhan, Y., Kumar, A., Schiavone, F. & Li, Y. (2022). Unravelling the performance puzzle of digitalization: evidence from manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Research, 149, 54-64.
- Matalamäki, M. J., Joensuu-Salo, S. (2022). Digitalization and strategic flexibility-a recipe for business growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(3), 380-401.
- Matarazzo, M., Penco, L., Profumo, G., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Digital transformation and customer value creation in Made in Italy SMEs: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research, 123, 642-656.
- Mikalef, P. & Gupta, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information and Management, 58(3), 103434. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2021.103434
- Mikalef, P., Lemmer, K., Schaefer, C., Ylinen, M., Fjørtoft, S. O., Torvatn, H. Y., Gupta, M., & Niehaves, B. (2022). Enabling AI capabilities in government agencies: A study of determinants for European municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4). doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101596
- Mikalef, P., Pappas, I. O., Krogstie, J. & Giannakos, M. (2018). Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 16, 1-32.
- Montealegre, R. (2002). A process model of capability development: lessons from the electronic commerce strategy at Bolsa de Valores de Guayaquil. Organization Science, 13(5), 514-531.
- Omrani, N., Rejeb, N., Maalaoui, A., Dabić, M. & Kraus, S. (2022). Drivers of digital transformation in SMEs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 5030-5043.
- Pappas, I. O., Papavlasopoulou, S., Mikalef, P., & Giannakos, M. N. (2020). Identifying the combinations of motivations and emotions for creating satisfied users in SNSs: An fsQCA approach. International Journal of Information Management, 53, 102128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102128
- Parida, V., Rȍnnberg Sjȍdin, D., Lenka, S. & Wincent, J. (2015) Developing global service innovation capabilities. How global manufacturers address the challenges of market heterogeneity. Research-Technology Management, 58(5), 35-44.
- Press, G. (2017). Top 10 Hot Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technologies. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2017/01/23/top-10-hot-articial-intelligence-ai-technologies/#583fb9451928
- Queiroz, M. M., Fosso Wamba, S., Raut, R. D., & Pappas, I. O. (2023). Does resilience matter for supply chain performance in disruptive crises with scarce resources? British Journal of Management, 35(2), 974-991. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12748
- Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
- Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond, Illustrated edition. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
- Ragin, C. C. & Davey, S. (2016). Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis. California, USA: University of California.
- Schneider, C. Q. & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Schuh, G., Anderl, R., Gausemeier, J., Hompel, M. & Wahl-ster, W. (2017). Industrie 4.0 maturity index. Managing the digital transformation of companies. Munich, Germany: Herbert Utz Verlag.
- Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D. & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Strategic Management Journal, 37(5), 1390-1412.
- Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Palmié, M., & Wincent, J. (2021). How AI capabilities enable business model innovation: Scaling AI through co-evolutionary processes and feedback loops. Journal of Business Research, 134, 574-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.009
- Steininger, D. M., Mikalef, P., Pateli, A. & Ortiz-de-Guinea, A. (2022). Dynamic capabilities in information systems research: A critical review, synthesis of current knowledge, and recommendations for future research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(2), 447-490.
- Stree, C., Gallupe, B. & Baker, J. (2017). Strategic alignment in SMEs: strengthening theoretical foundations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 40(1), 239-266.
- Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40-49.
- Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144.
- Wade, M. & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research, MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107-142.
- Wamba-Taguimdje, S. L., Fosso Wamba, S., Kala Kamdjoug, J. R., & Tchatchouang Wanko, C. E. (2020). Influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on firm performance: the business value of AI-based transformation projects. Business Process Management Journal, 26(7), 1893-1924. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0411
- Wang, X., Gu, Y., Ahmad, M., & Xue, C. (2022). The impact of digital capability on manufacturing company performance. Sustainability, 14(10), 6214.
- Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading Digital: Turning Technology into Business Transformation. Brighton, USA: Harvard Business Review Press.
- Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P., Nielsen, B. B. & Lings. I. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and performance: strategy. Struct Environ. Long Range Planning, 46(1), 72-96.
- Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463-472.
- Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research Commentary-The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724-735.