Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Assessment of product quality risks by qualimetric methods using functionally dependent statistics

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Arroyo-Montaño, M., Erazo-Álvarez, J. & Zapata-Sánchez, P. (2025). Optimizing operational efficiency in the footwear industry through continuous audit monitoring. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 8(2), 33-44. doi: 10.62452/09xyw841
  2. Aven, T. (2023). On the gap between theory and practice in defining and understanding risk. Safety Science, 168, 106325. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106325
  3. Bubela, T., Michalowska, J., Hots, N., Yatsuk, V., Seheda, O., Ivanyshyn, A., Sus, B. & Kozynets, A. (2025). Risk assessment of the functioning of cyber-physical monitoring systems. In Z. Hu et al. (eds), Artificial Intelligence, Medical Engineering and Education, 65, 290-300. doi: 3233/ATDE250138
  4. Burduk, A. & Pihnastyi, O. (2025). Risk assessment of a production system based on a technological description model. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability, 28(2). doi: 10.17531/ein/204577
  5. Cai, B., Ye, Z., Chen, S. & Liang, X. (2024). Reducing safety risks in construction tower crane operations: A dynamic path planning model. Applied Sciences, 14(22), 10599. doi: 10.3390/app142210599
  6. Canon, J., Broussard, T., Johnson, A., Singletary, W. & Colmenares-Diaz, L. (2022). A knowledge-based artificial intelligence approach to risk management. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, USA. doi: 10.2118/210303-ms
  7. Cheng, M.-Y., Vu, Q.-T., & Teng, R.-K. (2024). Real-time risk assessment of multi-parameter induced fall accidents at construction sites. Automation in Construction, 162, 105409. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105409
  8. Cherniak, O., Trishch, R., Ginevičius, R., Nechuiviter, O. & Burdeina, V. (2024). Methodology for assessing the processes of the occupational safety management system using functional dependencies. In Integrated Computer Technologies in Mechanical Engineering – 2023. Cham, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-60549-9_1
  9. Crawford, J., & Jabbour, M. (2023). The relationship between enterprise risk management and managerial judgement in decision-making: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 26(1), 110-136. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12337
  10. Dyadyura, K., Slyuz, A., Vysotsky, I. Y., Bubela, T. & Cherniak, O. (2024). Decision support algorithm at the life cycle stages of medical devices based on the application of Markov process. In Integrated Computer Technologies in Mechanical Engineering – 2023. Cham, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-60549-9_7
  11. Elmadhoun, B., Alsaidalani, R. & Burczynski, F. (2025). Quality risk management in the final operational stage of sterile pharmaceutical manufacturing: A case study highlighting the management of sustainable related risks in product sterilization, inspection, labeling, packaging, and storage processes. Sustainability, 17(4), 1670. doi: 10.3390/su17041670
  12. Fedorovich, O., Lutai, L., Kompanets, V. & Bahaiev, I. (2024). The creation of an optimisation component-oriented model for the formation of the architecture of science-based products. In Integrated Computer Technologies in Mechanical Engineering – 2023. Cham, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-60549-9_31
  13. Fedorovich, O., Lutai, L., Trishch, R., Zabolotnyi, О., Khomiak, E. & Nikitin, A. (2024). Models for reducing the duration and cost of the aviation equipment diagnostics process using the decomposition of the component architecture of a complex product. In Information Technology for Education, Science, and Technics. ITEST 2024. Cham, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-71801-4_9
  14. Fleurbaey, M., & Zuber, S. (2022). A new puzzle in the social evaluation of risk. Economics and Philosophy, 38, 450-465. doi: 10.1017/S0266267121000225
  15. Fraume, M., Omar-Darío Cardona, A., Fraume, P., Martha-Liliana Carreño, T., & Barbat, A. (2020). Evaluating risk from a holistic perspective to improve resilience: The United Nations evaluation at global level. Safety Science, 127, 104739. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104739
  16. Glette-Iversen, I., Flage, R., & Aven, T. (2023). Extending and improving current frameworks for risk management and decision-making: A new approach for incorporating dynamic aspects of risk and uncertainty. Safety Science, 168, 106317. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106317
  17. Gul, M., Yucesan, M. & Karci, C. (2024). A stratified Bayesian decision-making model for occupational risk assessment of production facilities. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 133, 108283. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108283
  18. Guliyeva, A. (2021). Measuring quality of life: A system of indicators. Economic and Political Studies, 10476-491. doi: 10.1080/20954816.2021.1996939
  19. Ha, D., Park, J., & Lee, S. (2022). Risk Assessment of Reported Accident-causing Products Using Rapid Exchange of Information System Risk Assessment Guideline. Journal of Applied Reliability, 22(1), 59-71. doi: 10.33162/jar.2022.3.22.1.059
  20. He, Z., Shen, K., Lan, M. & Weng, W. (2024). An evacuation path planning method for multi-hazard accidents in chemical industries based on risk perception. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 244, 109912. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109912
  21. Hovorov, P., Trishch, R., Ginevičius, R., Petraškevičius, V. & Šuhajda, K. (2025). Assessment of risks of voltage quality decline in load nodes of power systems. Energies, 18, 1579. doi: 10.3390/en18071579
  22. Hrinchenko, H., Trisch, R., Burdeina, V. & Chelysheva, S. (2019). Algorithm of technical diagnostics of the complicated damage to the continued resource of the circulation pipeline of the nuclear power plant. Problems of Atomic Science And Technology (PAST), 2(120), 104-110
  23. Hu, S., Zhang, Y., Lin, Q., Wan, Z., & Liu, Y. (2023). Risk Assessment Method of Project Whole Process Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation. SHS Web of Conferences, 170, 02002. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/202317002002
  24. International Organization for Standardization. (2009). ISO Guide 73:2009 Risk management – Vocabulary - Guidelines for use in standards. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/44651.html
  25. International Organization for Standardization. (2015). ISO 9001:2015 IDT Quality management systems - Requirement. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/62085.html
  26. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 IDT Risk management - Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html
  27. International Organization for Standardization. (2019). ISO 31010:2019 IDT Risk management - Risk assessment techniques. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/72140.html
  28. Irfan, D., Tang, X., Narayan, V., Mall, P. K., Srivastava, S. & Saravanan, V. (2022). Prediction of quality food sale in mart using the AI-based TOR method. Journal of Food Quality, 2022(1), 6877520. doi: 10.1155/2022/6877520
  29. Ismail, M. N., Kallow, S. M., Gati, K. H., Al-Bayati, H. N. A., & Butsenko, Y. (2024). Quantitative Approaches in Decision Theory for Enhancing Risk Assessment Strategies. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(5), 308-321. doi: 10.62754/joe.v3i5.3908
  30. Khomiak, E., Trishch, R., Nazarko, J., Novotný, M. & Petraškevičius, V. (2025). Method of quality control of nuclear reactor element tightness to improve environmental safety. Energies, 18(9), 2172. doi: 10.3390/en18092172
  31. Khomiak, E., Trishch, R., Zabolotnyi, O., Cherniak, O., Lutai, L. & Katrich, O. (2024). Automated mode of improvement of the quality control system for nuclear reactor fuel element shell tightness. In International Scientific-Practical Conference “Information Technology for Education, Science and Technics”. Cham, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-71801-4_7
  32. Kilström, M., & Roth, P. (2024). Risk-sharing and entrepreneurship. Journal of Comparative Economics, 52(1), 341-360. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2023.12.002
  33. Komari, I. E., Fedorenko, M., Kharchenko, V., Yehorova, Y., Bardis, N. & Lutai, L. (2020). The neural modules network with collective relearning for the recognition of diseases: Fault-tolerant structures and reliability assessment. International Journal of Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, 14, 792-800. doi: 10.46300/9106.2020.14.102.o
  34. Lee, H. (2021). The Concept of Risk and Corporate Risk. In: Risk Management. Risk Management: Fundamentals, Theory, and Practice in Asia (pp. 3-12). Singapore, Asia: Springer.
  35. Li, Y. (2020) A Vulnerability Risk Assessment Method for Industrial Control System. In 2020 International Conference on Computer Communication and Network Security (CCNS). Xi’an, China. doi: 10.1109/CCNS50731.2020.00040
  36. Nateghi, R., & Aven, T. (2021). Risk Analysis in the Age of Big Data: The Promises and Pitfalls. Risk Analysis, 41(10), 1751-1758. doi: 10.1111/risa.13682
  37. Ouyang, L., Zheng, W., Zhu, Y. & Zhou, X. (2020). An interval probability-based FMEA model for risk assessment: A real-world case. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 36, 125-143. doi: 10.1002/qre.2563
  38. Palakurti, N. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in risk assessment and mitigation in the financial sector. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 5(2), 633-641. doi: 10.48175/ijarsct-23392
  39. Panda, A., Dyadyura, K., & Kokhan, O. (2024). Increase of technological indicators used in the energy industry. MM Science Journal, 7724-7730. doi: 10.17973/MMSJ.2024_11_2024025
  40. Pirbalouti, R., Behnam, B., & Dehkordi, M. (2023). A riskbased approach to identify safety-critical equipment in process industries. Results in Engineering, 20, 101448. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101448
  41. Raian, S., Siddiqua, T., Moktadir, M., & Rahman, T. (2023). An empirical model for identifying and controlling operational and environmental risks in spinning industry in an emerging economy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 180, 109244. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2023.109244
  42. Riabchykov, M., Alexandrov, A., Trishch, R., Nikulina, A. & Korolyova, N. (2022). Prospects for the development of smart clothing with the use of textile materials with magnetic properties. Tekstilec, 65(1), 1-8. doi: 10.14502/tekstilec.65.2021050
  43. Riabchykov, M., Nazarchuk, L. & Tkachuk, O. (2022). Basic parameters of medical textile materials for removal and retention of exudate from wounds. Tekstilec, 65(4), 268-277. doi: 10.14502/tekstilec.65.2022064
  44. Riabchykov, M., Tkachuk, O., Nazarchuk, L. & Alexandrov, A. (2023). Conditions for the open pores formation in medical textile materials for the treatment of wounds using iron oxide nanopowders. Materials Research Express, 10(1), 015401. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/acadcf
  45. Riabchykov, M., Tsykhanovska, I. & Alexandrov, A. (2023). Justification of technologies for the synthesis of mineral nanoparticles for the creation of magnetic smart textile. Journal of Materials Science, 58(16), 7244-7256. doi: 10.1007/s10853-023-08463-x
  46. Rudyk, Y., Mykyichuk, M., & Menshykova, O. (2024). Criteria for the Use of Information Technology in Assessing the Quality of Critical Infrastructure by Safety Indexes. In: International Scientific-Practical Conference” Information Technology for Education, Science and Technics”. Cham, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-71801-4_13
  47. Settembre-Blundo, D., González-Sánchez, R., Medina-Salgado, S., & García-Muiña, F. (2021). Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22, 107-132. doi: 10.1007/s40171-021-00277-7
  48. Simpson, A. (2024). Into the unknown: the need to reframe risk analysis. Journal of Cybersecurity, 10(1). doi: 10.1093/cybsec/tyae022
  49. Stødle, K., Flage, R., Guikema, S. & Aven, T. (2024). Artificial intelligence for risk analysis - A risk characterization perspective on advances, opportunities, and limitations. Risk Analysis, 45, 738-751. doi: 10.1111/risa.14307
  50. Sureshkumar, N., Narayanan, P., Ghapar, F., Chew, L., Pandiyan, V., Sundram, K., Naidu, B. M., Zulfakar, M. & Daud, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence-powered risk assessment in supply chain safety. Information Management and Business Review, 16(3), 107-114. doi: 10.22610/imbr.v16i3s(i)a.4124
  51. Tang, K. H. D. (2024). Artificial intelligence in occupational health and safety risk management of construction, mining, and oil and gas sectors: Advances and prospects. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 26(6). 241-253. doi: 10.9734/jerr/2024/v26i61177
  52. Tetelepta, J. O. & De Carvalho Belo, G. B. (2025). Analysis of potential hazards of work accidents to workers using the Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Risk Control (HIRARC) method in freight forwarding companies. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, 8(3), 329-340. doi: 10.32493/jjsdm.v8i3.46222
  53. Trishch, R., Cherniak, O., Zdenek, D. & Petraskevicius, V. (2024). Assessment of the occupational health and safety management system by qualimetric methods. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 16(2), 118-127. doi: 10.2478/emj-2024-0017
  54. Trishch, R., Maletska, O., Hrinchenko, H., Artiukh, S., Burdeina, V. & Antonenko, N. (2019). Development and validation of measurement techniques according to ISO/IEC 17025:2017. In 2019 IEEE 8th International Conference on Advanced Optoelectronics and Lasers (CAOL). Sozopol, Bulgaria. doi: 10.1109/CAOL46282.2019.9019539
  55. Tzanakakis, K. (2021). Risk Assessment Techniques. In Managing Risks in the Railway System: A Practice-Oriented Guide (pp. 113-146). Cham, Switzerland: Springer
  56. Urbano, E., Martínez-Viol, V., Kampouropoulos, K., & Romeral, L. (2023). Quantitative and qualitative risk-informed energy investment for industrial companies. Energy Reports, 9, 3290-3304. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.131.
  57. Vasilevskyi, O. (2021). Assessing the level of confidence for expressing extended uncertainty through control errors on the example of a model of a means of measuring ion activity. Acta IMEKO, 10(2), 199-203. doi: 10.21014/acta_imeko.v10i2.810
  58. Vasilevskyi, O., Cullinan, M. & Allison, J. (2024). Theoretical approach for determining an emissivity of solid materials and its comparison with experimental studies on the example of 316l powder steel. Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary W Gospodarce I Ochronie Środowiska, 14(3), 5-8. doi: 10.35784/iapgos.6289
  59. Vasilevskyi, O., Koval, M. & Kravets, S. (2021). Indicators of reproducibility and suitability for assessing the quality of production services. Acta IMEKO, 10(4), 54-61. doi: 10.21014/acta_imeko.v10i4.814
  60. Vasilevskyi, O., Sevastianov, V., Ovchynnykov, K., Didych, V. & Burlaka, S. (2023). Accuracy of potentiometric methods for measuring ion activity in solutions. In Proceedings of Seventh International Congress on Information and Communication Technology: ICICT 2022. London, Unitek Kingdom. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-1607-6_16
  61. Vasilevskyi, O., Voznyak, O., Didych, V., Sevastianov, V., Ruchka, O. & Rykun, V. (2022). Methods for constructing high-precision potentiometric measuring instruments of ion activity. In 2022 IEEE 41st International Conference on Electronics and Nanotechnology (ELNANO). Kyiv, Ukraine. doi: 10.1109/ELNANO54667.2022.9927128
  62. Wang, Q., Zhang, X., Wang, F., Dou, Z., Jiang, Y. & Yang, G. (2022). Human factors risk assessment for highdanger production processes based on SPA. In 12th International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE 2022). Emeishan, China. doi: 10.1049/icp.2022.2901
  63. Wickramaratne, K. A. C. (2023). Risk based quality management: the way forward to improve quality in medical laboratories. The Sri Lanka Journal of Haematology, 15(1), 12-18. doi: 10.4038/tsljh.v15i1.10
  64. Yazdi, M., Zarei, E., Adumene, S. & Beheshti, A. (2024). Navigating the power of artificial intelligence in risk management: A comparative analysis. Safety, 10(2), 42. doi: 10.3390/safety10020042
  65. Zhao, X. (2024). Research on high-rise building risk identification and safety risk factor analysis. Theoretical and Natural Science, 31, 313-319. doi: 10.54254/2753-8818/31/20240997
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2025-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2543-912X | Journal ISSN: 2543-6597
Language: English
Page range: 65 - 82
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2025
Accepted on: Jul 15, 2025
Published on: Oct 8, 2025
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Roman Trishch, Vladislavas Petraškevičius, Agnė Šimelytė, Olena Cherniak, Kostiantyn Lomanov, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.