Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Five user types of autonomous driving in Hungary Cover
Open Access
|Dec 2024

References

  1. Audi. (2019). The pulse of autonomous driving. Audi AG, Berlin.
  2. Bansal, P., Kockelman, K. M., & Singh, A. (2016). Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 1-14.
  3. Berrada, J., Mouhoubi, I., & Christoforou, Z. (2020). Factors of successful implementation and diffusion of services based on autonomous vehicles: Users’ acceptance and operators’ profitability. Research in Transportation Economics, 100902.
  4. Buckley, L., Kaye, S.-A., & Pradhan, A. K. (2018). Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 115, 202-208.
  5. Cohen, T., et al. (2020). A constructive role for social science in the development of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 6, 100133.
  6. Csizmadia, P. (2017). Everett Rogers innovációs elmélete és annak felhasználási lehetőségei az egészségfejlesztésben. Egészségfejlesztés, 58(4), 50-58.
  7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi: 10.2307/249008
  8. Dearing, J. W., & Cox, J. G. (2018). Diffusion of Innovations Theory, Principles, and Practice. Health Affairs, 37(2), 183-190. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1104
  9. Deb, S., Strawderman, L., Carruth, D. W., DuBien, J., Smith, B., & Garrison, T. M. (2017). Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess pedestrian receptivity toward fully autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 84, 178-195.
  10. Gold, C., Körber, M., Hohenberger, C., Lechner, D., & Bengler, K. (2015). Trust in Automation – Before and After the Experience of Take-over Scenarios in a Highly Automated Vehicle. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3025-3032.
  11. Grindsted, T. S., Christensen, T. H., Freudendal-Pedersen, M., Friis, F., & Hartmann-Petersen, K. (2021). The urban governance of autonomous vehicles – In love with AVs or critical sustainability risks to future mobility transitions. Cities, 120, 103504.
  12. Haitovsky, Y. (1969). Multicollinearity in regression analysis: Comment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 51(4), 486-488.
  13. Harman, H. H. (1961). Modern factor analysis. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  14. Hartwich, F., Witzlack, C., Beggiato, M., & Krems, J. F. (2018). The first impression counts – A combined driving simulator and test track study on the development of trust and acceptance of highly automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65, 522-535.
  15. Havlíčková, D., Gabrhel, V., Adamovská, E., & Zámečník, P. (2019). The role of gender and age in autonomous mobility: General attitude, awareness and media preference in the context of Czech Republic. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 10(2), 53-63.
  16. Horn, J. L., & Engstrom, R. (1979). Cattell’s Scree Test In Relation To Bartlett’s Chi-Square Test And Other Observations On The Number Of Factors Problem. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(3), 283-300. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1403_1
  17. Iannelli, L., Giglietto, F., Rossi, L., & Zurovac, E. (2020). Facebook digital traces for survey research: Assessing the efficiency and effectiveness of a Facebook ad– based procedure for recruiting online survey respondents in niche and difficult-to-reach populations. Social Science Computer Review, 38(4), 462-476. doi: 10.1177/0894439318816638
  18. Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., & Flynn, P. J. (1999). Data clustering: A review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 31(3), 264-323. doi: 10.1145/331499.331504
  19. Keszey, T. (2020). Behavioural intention to use autonomous vehicles: Systematic review and empirical extension. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 119, 1-16.
  20. Kim, J. H. (2019). Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 72(6), 558-569. doi: 10.4097/kja.19087
  21. King, D. B., O’Rourke, N., & DeLongis, A. (2014). Social media recruitment and online data collection: A beginner’s guide and best practices for accessing low-prevalence and hard-to-reach populations. Canadian Psychology /Psychologie canadienne, 55(4), 240-249. doi: 10.1037/a0038087
  22. König, M., & Neumayr, L. (2017). Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation Research Part F, 44, 42-52.
  23. Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., & Winter, J. C. F. (2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F, 35, 127-140.
  24. Liljamo, T., Liimatainen, H., & Pöllanen, M. (2018). Attitudes and concerns on automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F, 59, 24-44.
  25. Liu, P., Zhang, Y., & He, Z. (2019). The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 185, 341-347.
  26. Lukovics, M., & Gábor, B. (2021). Az önvezető autók és a magyar nők. Polgári Szemle, 17(1-3), 178-193.
  27. Miller, R. L. (2015). Rogers’ Innovation Diffusion Theory (1962, 1995). In M. Al-Suqri & A. Al-Aufi (Eds.), Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption: Theories and Trends (pp. 261–274). IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8156-9.ch016
  28. Mulaik, S. A. (1972). The Foundations of Factor Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  29. Panagiotopoulos, I., & Dimitrakopoulos, G. (2018). An empirical investigation on consumers’ intentions towards autonomous driving. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95, 773-784.
  30. Páthy, Á. (2019). Az autonóm járművek társadalmi elfogadottságára, illetve a technológiával kapcsolatos várakozásokra irányuló empirikus kutatási előzmények a nemzetközi szakirodalomban. Tér-Gazdaság-Ember, 6(1), 87-110.
  31. Piskóti, I., Nagy, S., & Molnár, L. (2013). Innovation and knowledge-based competitiveness: Corporate practices and economic policy in Hungary. Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific and Practical Conference. Legal and Administrative Problems of the Public and Business: Russian and International Experience, Moscow.
  32. Rahimi, A., Azimi, G., Asgari, H., & Jin, X. (2020). Adoption and willingness to pay for autonomous vehicles: Attitudes and latent classes. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 89, 102611. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102611
  33. Raue, M., D’Ambrosio, L. A., Ward, C., Lee, C., Jacquillat, C., & Coughlin, J. F. (2019). The influence of feelings while self-driving regular cars on the perception and acceptance of self-driving cars. Risk Analysis, 39(2), 358-374.
  34. Rogers, E. M. (1964). Diffusion of innovations. Revue Française de Sociologie, 5(2), 216-218. doi: 10.2307/3319808
  35. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
  36. Rovňák, M., Kalistová, A., Štofejová L., et al. (2022). Management of sustainable mobility and the perception of the concept of electric vehicle deployment. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 25(2), 266-281. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2022.25.2.17
  37. Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014). A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, USA.
  38. Szpilko, D., Budna, K., Drmeyan, H., & Remiszewska, A. (2023). Sustainable and smart mobility – research directions. A systematic literature review. Economics and Environment, 86(3), 31-61. doi: 10.34659/eis.2023.86.3.584
  39. Vágási, M. (2002). Competing through new product development supported by knowledge gained from investigations on success factors. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 10(2), 243-256.
  40. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204.
  41. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
  42. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36, 157-178.
  43. Wang, X., Wong, J. D., Li, K. X., & Yuen, K. F. (2020). This is not me! Technology-identity concerns in consumers’ acceptance of autonomous vehicle technology. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 74, 345-360.
  44. Xu, Z., Zhang, K., Min, H., Wang, Z., Zhao, X., & Liu, P. (2018). What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95, 320-334.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2024-0036 | Journal eISSN: 2543-912X | Journal ISSN: 2543-6597
Language: English
Page range: 116 - 126
Submitted on: Oct 23, 2023
Accepted on: Jul 30, 2024
Published on: Dec 24, 2024
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Miklos Lukovics, Barbara Nagy, Szabolcs Prónay, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.