Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Consumer engagement in sustainable consumption: do demographics matter? Cover

Consumer engagement in sustainable consumption: do demographics matter?

Engineering Management in Production and Services
Volume 16 (2024): Issue 2 (June 2024)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2024

References

  1. Abraham, J., Pane, M., &amp; Chairiyani, R. (2015). An investigation on cynicism and environmental self-efficacy as predictors of pro-environmental behavior. <em>Psychology</em>, <em>6</em>, 234-242.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Abrahamse, W., &amp; Steg, L. (2011). Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: The role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. <em>Human Ecology Review</em>, 30-40.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Ajibade, I., &amp; Boateng, G. O. (2021). Predicting why people engage in pro-sustainable behaviors in Portland Oregon: The role of environmental self-identity, personal norm, and socio-demographics. <em>Journal of Environmental Management</em>, <em>289</em>, 112538.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., &amp; Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. <em>Journal of Marketing</em>, <em>69</em>(3), 19-34.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Bălan, C. (2020). How does retail engage consumers in sustainable consumption? A systematic literature review. <em>Sustainability</em>, <em>13</em>(1), 96.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Balderjahn, I., Buerke, A., Kirchgeorg, M., Peyer, M., Seege-barth, B., &amp; Wiedmann, K. P. (2013). Consciousness for sustainable consumption: scale development and new insights in the economic dimension of consumers’ sustainability. <em>Academy of Marketing Science Review</em>, <em>3</em>(4), 181-192.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Banyte, J., Salciuviene, L., Dovaliene, A., Piligrimiene, Z., &amp; Sroka, W. (2020). Sustainable consumption behavior at home and in the workplace: Avenues for innovative solutions. <em>Sustainability</em>, <em>12</em>(16), 6564.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Bulut, Z. A., Kökalan Çımrin, F., &amp; Doğan, O. (2017). Gender, generation and sustainable consumption: Exploring the behaviour of consumers from Izmir, Turkey. <em>International Journal of Consumer Studies</em>, <em>41</em>(6), 597-604.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Camacho-Otero, J., Boks, C., &amp; Pettersen, I. N. (2018). Consumption in the circular economy: A literature review. <em>Sustainability</em>, <em>10</em>(8), 2758.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Camacho-Otero, J., Boks, C., &amp; Pettersen, I. N. (2018). Consumption in the circular economy: A literature review. <em>Sustainability</em>, <em>10</em>(8), 2758.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Capiene, A., Rutelione, A., &amp; Krukowski, K. (2022). Engaging in Sustainable Consumption: Exploring the Influence of Environmental Attitudes, Values, Personal Norms, and Perceived Responsibility. <em>Sustainability</em>, <em>14</em>(16), 10290.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Ciegis, R., &amp; Zeleniute, R. (2008). Ekonomikos plėtra darnaus vystymosi aspektu. <em>Taikomoji ekonomika: sisteminiai tyrimai</em>, <em>2</em>(1), 37-54.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Clench-Aas, J., Nes, R. B., Dalgard, O. S., &amp; Aarø, L. E. (2011). Dimensionality and measurement in- variance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Norway. <em>Quality of Life Research</em>, <em>20</em>(8), 1307-1317.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. D’Souza, C., Taghian, M., Lamb, P., &amp; Peretiatko, R. (2007). Green decisions: demographics and consumer understanding of environmental labels. <em>International Journal of Consumer Studies</em>, <em>31</em>(4), 371-376.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., &amp; Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. <em>Journal of Social Issues</em>, <em>56</em>(3), 425-442.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Europe Sustainable Development Report (2021). Sustainable Development Solutions Network and Institute for European Environmental Policy, December 2021. Retrieved from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustain-abledevelopment.report/2021/Europe+Sustainable+Development+Report+2021.pdf">https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustain-abledevelopment.report/2021/Europe+Sustainable+Development+Report+2021.pdf</ext-link>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. European Commision (2023). Climate change: what the EU is doing. European Council, Council of the European Union. Retrieved from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/climate-change/">https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/climate-change/</ext-link>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Félonneau, M. L., &amp; Becker, M. (2008). Pro-environmental attitudes and behavior: Revealing perceived social desirability. <em>Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale</em>, <em>21</em>(4), 25-53.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Filimonau, V., Matute, J., Kubal-Czerwińska, M., Krzesiwo, K., &amp; Mika, M. (2020). The determinants of consumer engagement in restaurant food waste mitigation in Poland: An exploratory study. <em>Journal of Cleaner Production</em>, <em>247</em>, 119105.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Hirsh, J. B., DeYoung, C. G., &amp; Peterson, J. B. (2009). Meta-traits of the Big Five differentially predict engagement and restraint of behavior. <em>Journal of Personality</em>, <em>77</em>(4), 1085-1102.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Howell, R. A. (2013). It’s not (just)“the environment, stupid!” Values, motivations, and routes to engagement of people adopting lower-carbon lifestyles. <em>Global Environmental Change</em>, <em>23</em>(1), 281-290.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Janmaimool, P., &amp; Denpaiboon, C. (2016). Evaluating determinants of rural Villagers’ engagement in conservation and waste management behaviors based on integrated conceptual framework of Pro-environmental behavior. <em>Life Sciences, Society and Policy</em>, <em>12</em>(1), 1-20.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Kadic-Maglajlic, S., Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, M., Micevski, M., Dlacic, J., &amp; Zabkar, V. (2019). Being engaged is a good thing: Understanding sustainable consumption behavior among young adults. <em>Journal of Business Research</em>, <em>104</em>, 644-654.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Kim, S. H., &amp; Seock, Y. K. (2019). The roles of values and social norm on personal norms and pro-environmentally friendly apparel product purchasing behavior: The mediating role of personal norms. <em>Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services</em>, <em>51</em>, 83-90.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Kollmuss, A., &amp; Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? <em>Environmental Education Research</em>, <em>8</em>(3), 239-260.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Lawrence, M., &amp; Friel, S. (Eds.). (2019). <em>Healthy and sustainable food systems</em>. Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Leary, R. B., Vann, R. J., Mittelstaedt, J. D., Murphy, P. E., &amp; Sherry Jr, J. F. (2014). Changing the marketplace one behavior at a time: Perceived marketplace influence and sustainable consumption. <em>Journal of Business Research</em>, <em>67</em>(9), 1953-1958.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Liu, Y., Liu, R., &amp; Jiang, X. (2019). What drives low-carbon consumption behavior of Chinese college students? The regulation of situational factors. <em>Natural Hazards</em>, <em>95</em>(1), 173-191.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Lubell, M., Zahran, S., &amp; Vedlitz, A. (2007). Collective action and citizen responses to global warming. <em>Political Behavior</em>, <em>29</em>(3), 391-413.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Milfont, T. L., &amp; Schultz, P. W. (2016). Culture and the natural environment. <em>Current Opinion in Psychology</em>, <em>8</em>, 194-199.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Nielsen (2022). <em>The changing climate of sustainability has reached a critical moment</em>. Nielsen Consumer LLC.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Ojala, M. (2012). Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. <em>Environmental Education Research</em>, <em>18</em>(5), 625-642.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Paço, A., &amp; Gouveia Rodrigues, R. (2016). Environmental activism and consumers’ perceived responsibility. <em>International Journal of Consumer Studies</em>, <em>40</em>(4), 466-474.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Pallant, J. (2013). <em>SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using</em>. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Panzone, L., Hilton, D., Sale, L., &amp; Cohen, D. (2016). Sociodemographics, implicit attitudes, explicit attitudes, and sustainable consumption in supermarket shopping. <em>Journal of Economic Psychology</em>, <em>55</em>, 77-95.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Piligrimiene, Z., Zukauskaite, A., Korzilius, H., Banyte, J., &amp; Dovaliene, A. (2020). Internal and external determinants of consumer engagement in sustainable consumption. <em>Sustainability</em>, <em>12</em>(4), 1349.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Pirani, E., &amp; Secondi, L. (2011). <em>Eco-friendly attitudes: what European citizens say and what they do</em>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Polonsky, M. J., Garma, R., &amp; Grau, S. L. (2011). Western consumers’ understanding of carbon offsets and its relationship to behavior. <em>Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics</em>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Pretner, G., Darnall, N., Testa, F., &amp; Iraldo, F. (2021). Are consumers willing to pay for circular products? The role of recycled and second-hand attributes, messaging, and third-party certification. <em>Resources, Conservation and Recycling</em>, <em>175</em>, 105888.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Quoquab, F., &amp; Mohammad, J. (2020). A review of sustainable consumption (2000 to 2020): What we know and what we need to know. <em>Journal of Global Marketing</em>, <em>33</em>(5), 305-334.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Quoquab, F., &amp; Mohammad, J. (2020). Cognitive, affective and conative domains of sustainable consumption: scale development and validation using confirmatory composite analysis. <em>Sustainability</em>, <em>12</em>(18), 7784.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Quoquab, F., Mohammad, J., &amp; Sukari, N. N. (2019). A multiple-item scale for measuring “sustainable consumption behaviour” construct. <em>Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics</em>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Roundtable, O. M. (1994). <em>Oslo roundtable on sustainable production and consumption</em>. Ministry of the Environment: Oslo, Norway.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Sánchez, M., López-Mosquera, N. ir Lera-López, F. (2016) Improving Pro-environmental Behaviours in Spain. The Role of Attitudes and Sociodemographic and Political Factors. <em>Journal of Environmental Policy &amp; Planning</em>, <em>18</em>(1), 47-66.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? <em>Journal of Social Issues</em>, <em>50</em>(4), 19-45.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Song, Z., &amp; Soopramanien, D. (2019). Types of place attachment and pro-environmental behaviors of urban residents in Beijing. <em>Cities</em>, <em>84</em>, 112-120.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Steg, L., &amp; Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. <em>Journal of Environmental Psychology</em>, <em>29</em>(3), 309-317.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Szpilko, D., de la Torre Gallegos, A., Jimenez Naharro, F., Rzepka, A., &amp; Remiszewska, A. (2023). Waste Management in the Smart City: Current Practices and Future Directions. <em>Resources</em>, <em>12</em>, 115. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12100115" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/resources12100115</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Tabernero, C., Hernández, B., Cuadrado, E., Luque, B., &amp; Pereira, C. R. (2015). A multilevel perspective to explain recycling behaviour in communities. <em>Journal of Environmental Management</em>, <em>159</em>, 192-201.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Unanue, W., Vignoles, V. L., Dittmar, H., &amp; Vansteenkiste, M. (2016). Life goals predict environmental behavior: Cross-cultural and longitudinal evidence. <em>Journal of Environmental Psychology</em>, <em>46</em>, 10-22.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Van Riper, C. J., &amp; Kyle, G. T. (2014). Understanding the internal processes of behavioral engagement in a national park: A latent variable path analysis of the value-belief-norm theory. <em>Journal of Environmental Psychology</em>, <em>38</em>, 288-297.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Vining, J., &amp; Ebreo, A. (1992). Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. <em>Journal of Applied Social Psychology</em>, <em>22</em>(20), 1580-1607.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., &amp; Morgan, R. M. (2012). Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. <em>Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice</em>, <em>20</em>(2), 122-146.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., Dalela, V., &amp; Morgan, R. M. (2014). A generalized multidimensional scale for measuring customer engagement. <em>Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice</em>, <em>22</em>(4), 401-420.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. Wang, P., Liu, Q., &amp; Qi, Y. (2014). Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: a survey of the rural residents in China. <em>Journal of Cleaner Production</em>, <em>63</em>, 152-165.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. Wang, S., Wang, J., Li, J. &amp; Yang, F. (2020) Do motivations contribute to local residents’ engagement in pro-environmental behaviors? Resident-destination relationship and pro-environmental climate perspective. <em>Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28</em>(6), 834-852.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. Wang, Y., Xiang, D., Yang, Z., &amp; Ma, S. S. (2019). Unraveling customer sustainable consumption behaviors in sharing economy: A socio-economic approach based on social exchange theory. <em>Journal of Cleaner Production</em>, <em>208</em>, 869-879.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. Weber, A. (2012). <em>Exploring direct and indirect antecedents of self-reported ecological behaviors</em> (Doctoral dissertation).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. Wei, S., Ang, T., &amp; Jancenelle, V. E. (2018). Willingness to pay more for green products: The interplay of consumer characteristics and customer participation. <em>Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services</em>, <em>45</em>, 230-238.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. Whitmarsh, L., &amp; O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. <em>Journal of Environmental Psychology</em>, <em>30</em>(3), 305-314.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. Zhu, Q., Li, Y., Geng, Y., &amp; Qi, Y. (2013). Green food consumption intention, behaviors and influencing factors among Chinese consumers. <em>Food Quality and Preference</em>, <em>28</em>(1), 279-286.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. Zsóka, Á., Szerényi, Z. M., Széchy, A., &amp; Kocsis, T. (2013). Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. <em>Journal of Cleaner Production</em>, <em>48</em>, 126-138.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2024-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2543-912X | Journal ISSN: 2543-6597
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 90 - 103
Submitted on: Oct 10, 2023
Accepted on: Apr 15, 2024
Published on: Jul 18, 2024
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
engagement in sustainable consumption,
determinants of engagement in sustainable consumption,
sustainable consumption behaviour,
demographics
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Industries,
Transportation, logistics, air traffic, shipping,
Engineering,
Mechanical engineering,
Production technology,
Process engineering and industrial engineering

© 2024 Aistė Čapienė, Aušra Rūtelionė, Rūta Adamonienė, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 16 (2024): Issue 2 (June 2024)Next article