Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Teleworking and sustainable behaviour in the context of COVID-19: the case of Lithuania Cover

Teleworking and sustainable behaviour in the context of COVID-19: the case of Lithuania

Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. Brzustewicz, P., & Singh, A. (2021). Sustainable Consumption in Consumer Behaviour in the Time of COVID-19: Topic Modelling on Twitter Data Using LDA. Energies, 14, 5787. doi: 10.3390/en14185787
  2. Chae, M. J. (2021). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on sustainable consumption. Social Behaviour and Personality: An International Journal, 49(6), 10199.
  3. Chong, S., Huang, Y., & Chang, C. H. (2020). Supporting interdependent telework employees: A moderated-mediation model linking daily COVID-19 task setbacks to next-day work withdrawal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(12), 1408-1422. doi: 10.1037/apl0000843
  4. Christopoulos, K., Eleftheriou, K., & Nijkamp, P. (2021). The role of pre pandemic teleworking and E commerce culture in the COVID 19 dispersion in Europe. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences. doi: 10.1007/s12076-021-00286-1
  5. Czerniawska, M., & Szydło, J. (2021). Do Values Relate to Personality Traits and if so, in What Way? – Analysis of Relationships. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 511-527. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S299720
  6. Czerniawska, M., & Szydło, J. (2022). Traditionalism, Modernism, Postmodernism - Worldview Analysis in the Context of Values. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 19, 701-713. doi: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.62
  7. Čiarnienė, R., Vienažindienė, M., & Adamonienė, R. (2018). Implementation of Flexible Work Arrangements for Sustainable Development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(4), 11-21.
  8. Čiarnienė, R., Vienažindienė, M., & Adamonienė, R. (2020). Sustainable behaviour: evidence from Lithuania. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 12(1), 80-92. doi: 10.2478/emj-2020-0007
  9. Elhoushy, S.; Lanzini, P. (2021). Factors affecting sustainable consumer behaviour in the MENA region: A systematic review. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 33, 256-279.
  10. Freire-González, J., & Vivanco, D. F. (2020). Pandemics and the Environmental Rebound Efect: Reflections from COVID 19. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76, 447-517. doi: 10.1007/s10640-020-00493-2
  11. Gaižauskaitė, I., & Valavičienė, N. (2015). Socialinių tyrimų metodai: kokybinis interviu [Social research methods: a qualitative interview]. Vilnius: Centre of Registers. Retrieved from https://repository.mruni.eu/bitstream/handle/007/16724/9789955302056.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  12. Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 15(5), e0232076. doi: 10.1371/journal
  13. Hatayama, M., Viollaz, M., & Winkler, H. (2020). Jobs’ Amenability to Working from Home: Evidence from Skills Surveys for 53 Countries. Policy Research Working Paper, 9241. Washington: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33753
  14. Hennik, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
  15. Irawanto, D. W., Novianti, K. R., & Roz, K. (2021). Work from Home: Measuring Satisfaction between Work– Life Balance and Work Stress during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Economies, 9, 96. doi: 10.3390/economies9030096
  16. Kallio, H., Pietila, A., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing. doi: 10.1111/jan.13031
  17. Loia, F., & Adinolfi, P. (2021). Teleworking as an Eco-Innovation for Sustainable Development: Assessing Collective Perceptions during COVID-19. Sustainability, 13, 4823. doi: 10.3390/su13094823
  18. Moos, M., Andrey J., & Johnson L. C. (2006) The sustainability of telework: an ecological-footprinting approach. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 2(1), 3-14, doi: 10.1080/15487733.2006.11907973
  19. Mouratidis, K., & Papagiannakis, A. (2021). COVID-19, internet, and mobility: The rise of telework, telehealth, e-learning, and e-shopping. Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103182.
  20. Music, J., Charlebois, S., Toole, V., & Large, Ch. (2022). Telecommuting and food E-commerce: Socially sustainable practices during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 13, 10051.
  21. Nguyen, M. H. (2021). Factors influencing home based telework in Hanoi (Vietnam) during and after the COVID 19 era. Transportation, 48, 3207-3238. doi: 10.1007/s11116-021-10169-5
  22. Olde Kalter, M. J., Geurs, K. T., & Wismans, L. (2021). Post COVID-19 teleworking and car use intentions. Evidence from large scale GPS-tracking and survey data in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 12, 100498.
  23. Raišienė, A. G., Rapuano, V., Varkulevičiūtė, K., & Stachová, K. (2020). Working from Home – Who Is Happy? A Survey of Lithuania’s Employees during the COVID-19 Quarantine Period. Sustainability, 12,5332. doi: 10.3390/su12135332
  24. Schmidt, K., Sieverding, T., Wallis, H., & Matthies, E. (2021). COVID-19 – A window of opportunity for the transition toward sustainable mobility? Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 10, 100374.
  25. Tapia-Fonllem, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., & Fraijo-Sing, B. (2017). Sustainable Behavior and Quality of Life. In G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol, & O. Navarro (Eds.) Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_9
  26. Teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond A Practical Guide. Geneva: International Labour Office, July 2020. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---travail/documents/instructionalmaterial/wcms_751232.pdf
  27. Tokarchuk, O., Gabriele, R., & Neglia, G. (2021). Teleworking during the Covid-19 Crisis in Italy: Evidence and Tentative Interpretations. Sustainability, 13, 2147. doi: 10.3390/su13042147
  28. Villa Castaño, L. E., Perdomo-Ortiz, J., Dueñas Ocampo, S., & Durán León, W. F. (2016). Socially responsible consumption: An application in Colombia. Business Ethics, 25, 460-481.
  29. Qi, X., Yu, H., & Ploeger, A. (2020). Exploring Influential Factors Including COVID-19 on Green Food Purchase Intentions and the Intention–Behaviour Gap: A Qualitative Study among Consumers in a Chinese Context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 7106. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197106
  30. Zambrano-Monserratea, M. A., Ruano, M. A., & Sanchez-Alcalde, L. (2020). Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment. Science of the Total Environment, 728, 138813.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2023-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2543-912X | Journal ISSN: 2543-6597
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 11
Submitted on: May 30, 2022
|
Accepted on: Dec 15, 2022
|
Published on: Mar 29, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Ramunė Čiarnienė, Milita Vienažindienė, Rūta Adamonienė, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.