Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Factors influencing behavioural intention to use MOOCs

Engineering Management in Production and Services
Volume 13 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2021

References

  1. Adamopoulos, P. (2013). What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses. ICIS 2013 PROCEEDINGS, 1-21.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Ahadiat, A., & Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z. (2020). Effects of Ethical Leadership and Employee Commitment on Employees’ Work Passion. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 24-35. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.0210.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.02
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Alaeddin, O., Altounjy, R., Zainudin, Z., & Kamarudin, F. (2018). From Physical to Digital: Investigating Consumer Behaviour of Switching to Mobile Wallet. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17(2), 18-30. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2018.17.2.0210.17512/pjms.2018.17.2.02
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Alkhunaizan, A. M., & Love, S. (2012). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised UTAUT model. International Journal of Management and Marketing Academy, 2(1), 82-99.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Almatari, A. Y., Iahad, N. A., & Balaid, A. S. (2013). Factors Influencing Students’ Intention to Use M-learning. Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation, 1-8. Retrieved from https://seminar.utmspace.edu.my/Jisri/download/Vol5/Pub1_Factors_to_Use_Mobile_learning.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Alraja, M. N. (2016). The Effect of Social Influence and Facilitating Conditions on e-Government Acceptance from the Individual Employees’ Perspective. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14(2), 18-27. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2016.14.2.0210.17512/pjms.2016.14.2.02
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Baj-Rogowska, A. (2020). AutoCAD: examination of factors influencing user adoption. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 12(1), 45-56. doi: 10.2478/emj-2020-000410.2478/emj-2020-0004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013, February). Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach (No. 1). Duke University. Retrieved from https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/6216/Duke_Bioelectricity_MOOC_Fall2012.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Blackmon, S. J., & Major, C. H. (2017). Wherefore Art Thou MOOC: Defining Massive Open Online Courses. Online Learning, 21(4), 195-221. doi: 10.24059/olj. v21i4.1272
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258. doi: 10.1177/004912419202100200510.1177/0049124192021002005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Cinque, M. (2017). MOOCS AND SOFT SKILLS: A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT COURSES ON CREATIVITY. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(3), 83-96. doi: 10.20368/1971-8829/1386
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Drake, J. R., O’Hara, M., & Seeman, E. (2015). Five Principles for MOOC Design: With a Case Study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 14, 125-143. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol14/JITEv14IIPp125-143Drake0888.pdf10.28945/2250
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Ejdys, J. (2021). Factors Affecting the Adoption of e-Learning at University Level. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 18, 313-323. Retrieved from https://www.wseas.org/multimedia/journals/economics/2021/a645107-011(2021).pdf10.37394/23207.2021.18.32
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Fianu, E., Blewett, C., Ampong, G., & Ofori, K. (2018). Factors Affecting MOOC Usage by Students in Selected Ghanaian Universities. Education Sciences, 8(2), 70. doi: 10.3390/educsci802007010.3390/educsci8020070
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Flavin, M. (2017). Disruptive Technology Enhanced Learning: The Use and Misuse of Digital Technologies in Higher Education (Digital Education and Learning) (1st ed. 2017 ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Formánek, I. (2015). Knowledge Management as an Important Part of Strategic Management. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 3(3), 45-50. Retrieved from http://ojs.wsb.edu.pl/index.php/fso/article/view/253/197
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Garcia Mendoza, G. A., Jung, I., & Kobayashi, S. (2017). A Review of Empirical Studies on MOOC Adoption: Applying the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 11(1), 15-24. Retrieved from https://jaems.jp/contents/icomej/vol11/02_Mendoza.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Gupta, A., & Dogra, N. (2017). Tourist adoption of mapping apps: a UTAUT2 perspective of smart travellers. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 23(2), 145-161. doi: 10.20867/thm.23.2.610.20867/thm.23.2.6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. doi: 10.2753/mtp1069-667919020210.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.00110.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi: 10.1080/1070551990954011810.1080/10705519909540118
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Jeng, D. J. F., & Tzeng, G. H. (2012). Social influence on the use of Clinical Decision Support Systems: Revisiting the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology by the fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(3), 819-828. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2011.12.01610.1016/j.cie.2011.12.016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Kay, J., Reimann, P., Diebold, E., & Kummerfeld, B. (2013). MOOCs: So Many Learners, So Much Potential . . . IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(3), 70-77. doi: 10.1109/mis.2013.6610.1109/MIS.2013.66
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Lakhal, S., Khechine, H., & Pascot, D. (2013). Student behavioural intentions to use desktop video conferencing in a distance course: integration of autonomy to the UTAUT model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25(2), 93-121. doi: 10.1007/s12528-013-9069-310.1007/s12528-013-9069-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Liu, L., Miguel Cruz, A., Rios Rincon, A., Buttar, V., Ranson, Q., & Goertzen, D. (2014). What factors determine therapists’ acceptance of new technologies for rehabilitation – a study using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(5), 447-455. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.92352910.3109/09638288.2014.92352924901351
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. McGuire, R. (2014). The best MOOC provider: A review of Coursera, Udacity, and edX. Skilledup. Retrieved from http://www.skilledup.com/blog/the-best-mooc-provider-a-review-of-coursera-udacity-and-edx/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Philbin, S. P., & Kennedy, D. (2020). Exploring the need for a new paradigm in engineering management and the decision-making process in technology-based organ-isations. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 12(4), 7-21. doi: 10.2478/emj-2020-002410.2478/emj-2020-0024
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Sam, M. F. M., & Baharin, S. N. F. (2018). The Factors Which Influencing Users’ Behavioral Intention Towards Using Online Booking System for Car Service at Car Service Centre in Malacca. COJ Electronics & Communications, 1(4), 1-7. doi: 10.31031/COJEC.2018.01.000517
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Seeman, E., Drake, J. R., & Mayasami, R. (2013). The economics of emerging markets: Exploring the transformation of developing economies into developed nation status. Grant proposal for University of North Carolina General Administration’s Emerging Markets MOOC RFP.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Schumacker, R. E., Lomax, R. G., & Schumacker, R. (2015). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling: Fourth Edition (4th ed.). Routledge.10.4324/9781315749105
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Scuotto, V., Del Giudice, M., & Carayannis, E. G. (2016). The effect of social networking sites and absorptive capacity on SMES’ innovation performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 409-424. doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9517-010.1007/s10961-016-9517-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Shah, D. (2020, November 30). By The Numbers: MOOCs in 2019 — Class Central. The Report by Class Central. Retrieved from https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2019/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 57-68. doi: 10.1348/000709908x30439810.1348/000709908X30439818466671
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Stuss, M. M., Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., & Makieła, Z. J. (2019). Competences of Graduates of Higher Education Business Studies in Labor Market I (Results of Pilot Cross-Border Research Project in Poland and Slovakia). Sustainability, 11(18), 4988. doi: 10.3390/su1118498810.3390/su11184988
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. doi: 10.2307/3003654010.2307/30036540
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Wang, H. Y., & Wang, S. H. (2010). User acceptance of mobile internet based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: Investigating the determinants and gender differences. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 38(3), 415-426. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2010.38.3.41510.2224/sbp.2010.38.3.415
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Welsh, D. H. B., & Dragusin, M. (2013). The New Generation of Massive Open Online Course (MOOCS) and Entrepreneurship Education. Small Business Institute® Journal, 9(1), 51-65. Retrieved from https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/D_Welsh_New_2013.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2021-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2543-912X | Journal ISSN: 2543-6597
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 83 - 95
Submitted on: Jan 2, 2021
Accepted on: May 30, 2021
Published on: Jul 5, 2021
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
technology management,
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs),
Multi-Group SEM,
UTAUT,
perceived autonomy,
absorptive capacity
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Industries,
Transportation, logistics, air traffic, shipping,
Engineering,
Mechanical engineering,
Production technology,
Process engineering and industrial engineering

© 2021 Bilal Khalid, Marcin Lis, Wornchanok Chaiyasoonthorn, Singha Chaveesuk, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 13 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)Next article