Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Relationship between organisational silence and employee demographic characteristics: the case of Lithuanian teachers Cover

Relationship between organisational silence and employee demographic characteristics: the case of Lithuanian teachers

Open Access
|Oct 2020

Figures & Tables

Types of organisational silence

General nature of behaviourPrimary employee motiveSpecific type of behaviour
PassiveDisengaged (resignation)Acquiescent silence
Acquiescent voice
ProactiveSelf-protective (fear)Defensive silence
Defensive voice
Other-oriented (cooperation)Prosocial silence
Prosocial voice

Mean values and standard deviations for different types of organisational silence

Types of organisational silence (OS)MeanStd. Deviation
Acquiescent silence3.510.66
Acquiescent voice1.890.76
Defensive silence2.270.73
Defensive voice3.410.75
Prosocial silence1.860.71
Prosocial voice1.990.70

Results of the Mann-Whitney U test for different types of organisational silence

Gender N (%)FemaleMaleMann–Whitney Test
Type of OS88.511.5UWZAsymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Acquiescent silence52.5552.08547.0625.0−0.050.96
Acquiescent voice51.3661.25447.04725.0−1.080.28
Defensive silence51.2462.17436.04714.0−1.180.24
Defensive voice52.5552.08547.0625.0−0.050.96
Prosocial silence51.0563.63418.54696.5−1.370.17
Prosocial voice52.6051.75543.0621.0−0.090.93

Differences in types of organisational silence (OS) by age groups

Age N (%)18–2425–4041–5556–65Chi-SquareAsymp. Sig.
Types of OS5.822.156.715.4
Acquiescent silence47.2551.3752.6855.440.370.95
Acquiescent voice65.5853.4650.3854.031.520.68
Defensive silence74.1751.2249.6256.844.040.26
Defensive voice23.5860.9352.0652.847.400.06
Prosocial silence68.5055.2048.8056.283.080.38
Prosocial voice62.2547.5953.6251.781.340.72

Differences in types of organisation silence (OS) by marital status

Marital status N (%)SingleMarriedDivorcedChi-SquareAsymp. Sig.
Types of OS14.474.011.5
Acquiescent silence44.4751.5768.504.570.10
Acquiescent voice62.4050.7151.631.940.38
Defensive silence62.9050.3253.502.220.33
Defensive voice49.4753.1652.040.190.91
Prosocial silence63.0350.9549.292.210.33
Prosocial voice55.8352.6847.210.560.76

Research-related demographic data

CategoryVariablePart in the research (%)Part in national statistics (%)Difference (%)
GenderWomen88.583.8+4.7
Men11.516.2−4.7
Age18–245.80.52+5.28
25–4022.114.54+7.56
41–5556.748.16+8.54
56–6515.433.84−18.44
Marital statusSingle14.4--
Married74.0--
Divorced11.5--
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2020-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2543-912X | Journal ISSN: 2543-6597
Language: English
Page range: 18 - 27
Submitted on: Mar 15, 2020
|
Accepted on: Aug 30, 2020
|
Published on: Oct 15, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Laima Jesevičiūtė-Ufartienė, Greta Brusokaitė, Urszula Widelska, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.