Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Quantitative assessment of working conditions in the workplace

Open Access
|Jul 2020

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Indicators of harmful factors, in which the optimal (the best) value is directed to the lower limit of the tolerance field, e. g., local vibration, no more than 0.2 m/s2
Indicators of harmful factors, in which the optimal (the best) value is directed to the lower limit of the tolerance field, e. g., local vibration, no more than 0.2 m/s2

Fig. 2

Optimal (the best) harmful factor indicator goes to the middle of the range of acceptable values (air temperature)
Optimal (the best) harmful factor indicator goes to the middle of the range of acceptable values (air temperature)

Fig. 3

Chart depicting the passage of time and the change in humidity indicators for 31 days
Chart depicting the passage of time and the change in humidity indicators for 31 days

Fig. 4

Graphical model for assessing indicators of harmful factors
Graphical model for assessing indicators of harmful factors

Results of the implementation of the methodology for assessing the safety of working conditions

No.Indicators of harmful factorsqminqmaxqoptqirSq
1air temperature, °C131916170.10.96
2relative humidity, %257550700.90.91
3air velocity, m/s00.500.10.30.62
4intensity of thermal radiation, W/m2014009430.3
5noise, dBA60800650.50.5
6local vibration, m/s200.200.090.70.65
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2020-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2543-912X | Journal ISSN: 2543-6597
Language: English
Page range: 99 - 106
Submitted on: Feb 2, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 15, 2020
Published on: Jul 23, 2020
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2020 Olena Cherniak, Roman Trishch, Nataliia Kim, Sabina Ratajczak, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.