Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quantitative assessment of working conditions in the workplace Cover

Quantitative assessment of working conditions in the workplace

Open Access
|Jul 2020

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Indicators of harmful factors, in which the optimal (the best) value is directed to the lower limit of the tolerance field, e. g., local vibration, no more than 0.2 m/s2

Fig. 2

Optimal (the best) harmful factor indicator goes to the middle of the range of acceptable values (air temperature)

Fig. 3

Chart depicting the passage of time and the change in humidity indicators for 31 days

Fig. 4

Graphical model for assessing indicators of harmful factors

Results of the implementation of the methodology for assessing the safety of working conditions

No.Indicators of harmful factorsqminqmaxqoptqirSq
1air temperature, °C131916170.10.96
2relative humidity, %257550700.90.91
3air velocity, m/s00.500.10.30.62
4intensity of thermal radiation, W/m2014009430.3
5noise, dBA60800650.50.5
6local vibration, m/s200.200.090.70.65
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2020-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2543-912X | Journal ISSN: 2543-6597
Language: English
Page range: 99 - 106
Submitted on: Feb 2, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 15, 2020
Published on: Jul 23, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Olena Cherniak, Roman Trishch, Nataliia Kim, Sabina Ratajczak, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.