Towards organisational simplexity — a simple structure in a complex environment
References
- Ahmos, D. P., Duchon, D., McDaniel, R. R. Jr, & Huonker, J. W. (2002). What a Mess! Participation as a Simple Managerial Rule to ‘Complexify’ Organizations. Journal of Management Studies 39(2), 189-206. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00288
- Ashkenas, R. (2007). Simplicity-Minded Management. Harvard Business Review 85(12), 101-109.
- Bieńkowska, A., & Tworek, K. (2019). Job performance model based on Employees’ Dynamic Capabilities (EDC) Raporty Wydziału Informatyki i Zarządzania Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Ser. PRE nr 7 [Reports of the Faculty of Computer Science and Management of the Wrocław University Science of Technology, Ser. PRE No. 7].
- Bodell, L. (2016). Why Simple Wins: Escape the Complexity Trap and Get to Work That Matters Routledge.
- Brandes, D. (2013). Einfach managen: Komplexität vermeiden, reduzieren und beherrschen Frankfurt, Germany: Redline Verlag.
- Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation London, Great Britain: Tavistock.
- Campos, L. M. S., de Melo Heizen, D. A., Verdinelli, M. A., & Cauchick, M. P. A. (2015). Environmental performance indicators: A study on ISO 14001 certified companies. Journal of Cleaner Production 99, 286-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.019
- Collinson, S., & Jay, M. (2012). From Complexity to Simplicity: Unleash Your Organisation’s Potential Palgrave Macmillan.
- Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J., & Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the value of “creating shared value”. California Management Review 56(2), 130-153. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130
- Croasmun, J. T., & Ostrom, L. (2011). Using Likert-Type Scales in the Social Sciences. Journal of Adult Education 40(1), 19-22.
- Crozier, M. (1993). Przedsiębiorstwo na podsłuchuL’Entreprise à l’écoute Warszawa, Poland: PWE.
- Cunha, M. P., & Rego, A. (2010). Complexity, Simplicity, Simplexity. European Management Journal, 28 85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2009.04.006
- Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations Sage Publications.
- Donaldson, L. (2006). The contingency theory of organizational design: challenges and opportunities. In R. M. Burton, B. Eriksen, D. D. Håkonsson, & C. C. Snow (Eds.), Organization Design. The Evolving State-of-the-Art (pp. 19-40). Boston: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/0-387-34173-0
- Drucker, P. (1993). The Practice of Management New York, United States: Harper Business.
- Eisenhardt, K. H., & Sull, D. N. (2001). Strategy as Simple Rules. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 106-116.
- Fuchs, C., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2009). Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelines. Die Betriebswirtschaft 69(2), 195-210. Retrieved from https://temme.wiwi.uni-wuppertal.de/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/fuchs_diamantopoulos_2009.pdf
- Gribbin J. (2004). Deep Simplicity: Chaos, Complexity and the Emergence of Life London, Great Britain: Allen-Lane.
- Hamann, P. M. (2017). Towards a contingency theory of corporate planning: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly 67(4), 227-289. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11301-017-0132-4
- Hamel, G. (2008). The future of management. Human Resource Management International Digest, 16(6). doi:10.1108/hrmid.2008.04416fae.001
- Hartley, J. (2014). Some thoughts on Likert-type scales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14(1), 83-86. doi: 10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70040-7
- Hase, S. (2002), Simplicity in complexity: Capable people and capable organisations need each other Paper presented at the Australian Vocational Education and Training Association conference, Melbourne, April.
- Hopej, M., Kamiński, R., Tworek, K., Walecka-Jankowska, K., & Zgrzywa-Ziemak, A. (2017). Community-oriented culture and simple organizational structure. Organization and Management, 4A 75-93. Retrieved from http://kolegia.sgh.waw.pl/pl/KZiF/czasopisma/oik/numery/Documents/2017_NR_4A_(179).pdf
- Hopej-Kamińska, M., Zgrzywa-Ziemak, A., Hopej, M., Kamiński, R., & Martan, J. (2015). Simplicity as a Feature of an Organizational Structure. Argumenta Oeconomica, 1(34), 259-276. doi: 10.15611/aoe.2015.1.10
- Leff, S., & Zolkos, R. (2015). Taming organisational complexity – start at the top A report from The Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved from https://eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/EIU_SAP_Taming%20organisational%20complexity_PDF_0.pdf
- Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1995). Simplicity as a Strategy-making Process: The Effects of Stage of Organizational Development and Environment on Performance. Academy of Management Journal 38(5), 1386-1407. doi: 10.5465/256862
- Maeda, J. (2006). The Laws of Simplicity. Design, Technology, Business, Life Cambridge, Great Britain: MIT Press.
- Maletic, M., Maletic, D., Dahlgaard, J., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., & Gomišcek, B. (2015). Do corporate sustainability practices enhance organizational economic performance? International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 7(2), 184-200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2015-0025
- Marion, R. (1999). The edge of organization: Chaos and complexity theories of formal social systems SAGE. doi: 10.4135/9781452234052
- Matić, I. (2012). Measuring the effects of learning on business performances: Proposed performance measurement model. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 18(1), 278-284. Retrieved from http://www.jaabc.com/Jaabc18-1September-2012Matic.html
- McAdam, R., Miller, K., & McSorley, C. (2019). Towards a contingency theory perspective of quality management in enabling strategic alignment. International Journal of Production Economics 207, 195-209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.003
- Miller, D. (1993). The Architecture of Simplicity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 116-138. doi: 10.5465/amr.1993.3997509
- Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research New Jersey, United States: Prentice Hall.
- Morrish, J. (2008). Simplicity: Not as Easy as it Looks. Management Today, April 43-45.
- Osbert-Pociecha, G. (2013). Zmiany upraszczające w organizacji – wyniki badań sondażowych [Simplifying changes in the organization – results of survey research]. Nauki o Zarządzaniu, 4(17), 95-108. Retrieved from http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-78d3caad-72f8-4bb8-a554-d6f40bd961a1?q=bwmeta1.element.desklight-33961a22-3c1e-43be-8f3f-6e62c8de0b32;7&qt=CHILDREN-STATELESS
- Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (2004). In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies New York, United States: Harper Business Essentials.
- Sandlin, J. A., & Walther, C. S. (2009). Complicated Simplicity. Moral Identity Formation and Social Movement Learning in the Voluntary Simplicity Movement. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(4), 298-317. doi: 10.1177/0741713609334137
- Scherer, J., Hartschen, M., Bruegger, C., & Hagmann, P. J. (2013). Simplicity for Business Success! Strategies for Simple Products, Services and Processes Offenbach, Germany: Verlag.
- Segall, K. (2013). Insanely Simple: The Obsession That Drives Apple’s Success New York, United States: Penguin Group.
- Segall, K. (2016). Think simple: how smart leaders defeat complexity New York, United States: Penguin.
- Stephenson, J., & Weil, S. (1992). Four themes in educating for capability. Quality in Learning. A Capability Approach in Higher Education London, Great Britain: Kogan Page.
- Welch, J., & Welch, S. (2005). Winning New York, United States: Harper Business.
Language: English
Page range: 43 - 53
Submitted on: Apr 10, 2019
Accepted on: Nov 15, 2019
Published on: Dec 18, 2019
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2019 Katarzyna Tworek, Katarzyna Walecka-Jankowska, Anna Zgrzywa-Ziemak, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.