Fig. 1
Collective assessment of the technology of personal care robots for older adults in terms of the innovation criterion, demand, socio-ethical aspects, usability and functionality
Tab. 1
Values of statistics for technology assessment of personal care robots for older adults in terms of demand
| Acronym | Statistics of the Mann‒Whitney U test | Statistics of the ANOVA Kruskal‒Wallis test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| U | p | T | p | |
| D1 | 47108.00 | 0.162578633 | 11.18819 | 0.0108 |
| D2 | 48041.00 | 0.319672595 | 12.73677 | 0.0052 |
| D3 | 49822.50 | 0.818997074 | 4.385920 | 0.2227 |
| D4 | 49117.50 | 0.594667432 | 3.812452 | 0.2824 |
| D5 | 49203.50 | 0.620534872 | 7.994963 | 0.0461 |
| D6 | 44379.50 | 0.0101674892 | 3.775917 | 0.2867 |
| D7 | 44966.00 | 0.0204598559 | 19.69931 | 0.0002 |
Tab. 2
Values of statistics for the technology assessment of personal care robots for older adults in terms of socio-ethical aspects
| Acronym | Statistics of the Mann‒Whitney U test | Statistics of the ANOVA Kruskal‒Wallis test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| U | p | T | p | |
| S1 | 47890.5 | 0.289205106 | 7.925149 | 0.0476 |
| S2 | 45829.5 | 0.051608717 | 9.091852 | 0.0281 |
| S3 | 45462.00 | 0.035338459 | 11.10373 | 0.0112 |
| S4 | 48663.5 | 0.467000255 | 2.767013 | 0.4290 |
| S5 | 50338.5 | 0.994508795 | 2.094907 | 0.5529 |
Fig. 2
Technology assessment of personal care robots for older adults in terms of demand in gender groups — selected answers
Fig. 3
Technology assessment of personal care robots for older adults in terms of demand of in four age groups — selected answers
Fig. 4
Technology assessment of personal care robots for older adults in terms of socio-ethical aspects in gender groups — selected answers
Fig. 5
Technology assessment of personal care robots for older adults in terms of socio-ethical aspects in four age groups — selected answers